- tz - lists.iana.org

Re: New zone for DE, split from Europe/Berlin
by Mr tobias conradi Sept. 12, 2011

Sept. 12, 2011

Alois Treindl 2011-09-12 22:25:46 GMT: > It is too early to propose this as a new zone for tzdata. Too early to be included is one thing, but too early to be proposed, is another thing. I think people are free to submit proposals at any time. > The practice for each zone in tzdata is that also the complete history > from the beginning of standard time must be included in the zone file. 1) Alois Treindl 2011-08-30 14:40:48 GMT: "I have compiled a complete timezone history of Germany." http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.time.tz/3951 Buesingen is part of Germany says http://www.buesingen.de/ "Büsingen am Hochrhein ist, wenn auch ringsum von Schweizer Hoheitsgebiet umgeben, deutsches Hoheitsgebiet" 2) I see no proof that it is practice "that complete history from the beginning of standard time must be included in the zone file." 3) I see no statement in the Theory file nor in README that would require such a practice. To the contrary, Theory file says: "As noted in the README file, the tz database is not authoritative (particularly not for pre-1970 time stamps), and it surely has errors. Corrections are welcome and encouraged." README says: "The information in the time zone data files is by no means authoritative; the files currently do not even attempt to cover all time stamps before 1970, and there are undoubtedly errors even for time stamps since 1970. If you know that the rules are different from those in a file, by all means feel free to change file (and please send the changed version to tz(a)elsie.nci.nih.gov for use in the future)." 4) I did not edit the file(s) in question since I don't know how to structure it. I hope someone with more knowledge can help to fix the current error for 1980. Additional pre-1970 imprecisions remain open to be fixed, the fix I propose does not hinder future progress. Little geography fix for my other email: >> The German exclave of Büsingen (http://www.buesingen.de/) surrounded by >> the Swiss canton Schaffhausen, and across the Rhine the cantons of Thurgau and Zurich -- Tobias Conradi Rheinsberger Str. 18 10115 Berlin, Germany http://tobiasconradi.com

1 0

US Mountain/Central border at Fort Pierre SD
by Steve Jones Sept. 12, 2011

Sept. 12, 2011

If I might seek the wisdom of the list on a minor topic: The current Mountain/Central boundary in the most recent official US DOT description (49CFR71.7, http://goo.gl/tqBou) has the border running right through Fort Pierre South Dakota. Here is the relevant text: > From the junction of the North Dakota-South Dakota boundary with > the Missouri River southerly along the main channel of that river > to the crossing of the original Chicago & North Western Railway > near Pierre; thence southwesterly to the northern boundary of Jones > County at the northeast corner of the NE 1, Sec. 6, T. 2 N., R. 30 > E. [note: that's about 44.18635, -100.54646) That makes a straight line from the railroad bridge north of town to 44.18635, -100.54646, this line not making much sense in the context of what's on the ground. A second-hand recent conversation with a Stanley County SD official was relayed to me, including the following: >...The person with whom I spoke said the official dividing line is >the Bad River, which makes more >sense than bisecting Fort Pierre. ... The communities along the >Bad River are so tiny (several houses each) that they don't have >official policies. The person with whom I spoke assumed they would >use Central Time because aside from Fort Pierre, there's no >significant populated place that's even close. There are several common sense border adjustments I could make here and probably be more accurate than the DOT (with regards to what a traveler would encounter in the area). Something like a line from the southern end of the dam at Lake Oahe southward to the Bad River, then following the Bad River soutwesterly to the northern border of Jones County... (and from that point rejoining the DOT description). I would prefer to use some authoritative reference - if possible. Any advice on how to proceed? All I can think of is to try a reference librarian in Pierre. Cheers, Steve Jones

3 4

Theory - zone name, zone creation, zone lifetime
by Mr tobias conradi Sept. 12, 2011

Sept. 12, 2011

Theory reads: To represent this data, the world is partitioned into regions whose clocks all agree about time stamps that occur after the somewhat-arbitrary cutoff point of the POSIX Epoch (1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC). Issue: 1) Where are these regions listed? The only lists of geographical areas I could find are: - the zones in zone.tab - (current) countries in iso3166.tab Theory reads: Use ISO 3166 (see the file iso3166.tab) to help decide whether something is a country. [...] or when locations change countries (e.g. Hong Kong from UK colony to China) Issue: 1) "help to decide" - decision process is undefined. 2) Hong Kong is listed in iso3166.tab as HK.For the purpose of zone creation is it 2a) a country,then it is confusing to say it changed country, or 2b) is it part of China (CN) then it is confusing to mark it with HK 3) In case HK and one of the zones in CN observed the same time since 1970, and that HK is not a country, would there be a merge and would one zone be dropped from zone.tab and any corresponding pre-1970 history be deleted? Theory reads: Within a file name component, use only ASCII letters Issue: 1) It is not defined what the term "file name component" refers to in the context of zone naming. Theory reads: E.g. prefer `Paris' to `France', since France has had multiple time zones. Issue: 1) It does not matter what zones France "had" in the past. 2) It may matter that Europe/Paris might be split in the future. 3) There is no proof in zone.tab that France had multiple time zones at all, there is only one line marked "FR": FR+4852+00220Europe/Paris -- Tobias Conradi Rheinsberger Str. 18 10115 Berlin, Germany http://tobiasconradi.com

3 3

Proclaimed changes to time of Newfoundland Time Zone for Daylight Savings Time
by Pelley, Michael Sept. 12, 2011

Sept. 12, 2011

Hi Folks, We received today, Monday, September 12, 2011, notification that the changes to the Newfoundland Standard Time Act have been proclaimed. The change in the Act stipulates that the change from Daylight Savings Time to Standard Time and from Standard Time to Daylight Savings Time now occurs at 2:00AM. I have included the text of the statute (URL http://www.assembly.nl.ca/legislation/sr/annualstatutes/2011/1106.chp.ht m <http://www.assembly.nl.ca/legislation/sr/annualstatutes/2011/1106.chp.h tm> ) and the official proclamation from THE NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR GAZETTE. Please update the TZ database to reflect this proclaimed change. Thank you. Cheers Mike ----------------------------------------------- MICHAEL PELLEY | Manager of Enterprise Architecture - Solution Delivery Office of the Chief Information Officer Executive Council Government of Newfoundland & Labrador P.O. Box 8700, 40 Higgins Line, St. John's NL A1B 4J6 709 729-7457 (t) | 709 729-6767 (f) | 709 690-2513 (c) | mpelley(a)gov.nl.ca <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@gov.nl.ca> “This email and any attached files are intended for the sole use of the primary and copied addressee(s) and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. Any distribution, use or copying by any means of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender.”

1 0

data2011j
by Arthur David Olson Sept. 12, 2011

Sept. 12, 2011

The file... ftp://elsie.nci.nh.gov/pub/tzdata2011j.tar.gz ...is now available; this reflects the changes circulated recently on the times zone mailing list (contemporary changes for Samoa; past changes for Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania); there are also two spelling corrections to comments in the australasia file (with thanks to Christos Zoulas). I expect another version will appear soon to handle changes in the Middle East (and perhaps in Russia); folks seeking to avoid version churn may want to wait a bit. --ado

3 2

Re: no changes for 3 russian regions at this point
by Ruslan Ermilov Sept. 11, 2011

Sept. 11, 2011

Alexander Krivenyshev wrote: > Olson, Arthur David (NIH/NCI) [E] <olsona <at> > dc37a.nci.nih.gov> writes: > > > > > The latest 2011i tzdata does not have the Russian time > > > > change described by Alexander Krivenyshev: > > > "DRAFT DECISION OF THE GOVERNMENT OF Russian Federation... > > > > Does anyone know the current status of what was a draft > > decision at the time of Alexander's report? > > After some extensive media reports that 3 Russian regions may > change time zones this autumn and FIRST DRAFT DECISION OF THE > GOVERNMENT OF Russian Federation on August 8, 2011 about > upcoming changes on October 30, 2011: see link below: > (http://www.worldtimezone.com/dst_news/dst_news_russia33.html) > > there were some corrections done on August 25, 2011 on DRAFT > DECISION OF THE GOVERNMENT OF Russian Federation "On the > composition of the territories that make up each time zone, and > the procedure of calculation of time within time zones, and the > repeal of certain resolutions of the Government of the Russian > Federation", which shows NO time zones changes at this point > for Vladivostok (Primorsky region), Irkutsk region and Sakha > (Yakutia) will keep its current 3 time zones (MSK +6, +7, +8): > > 1. Vladivostok (Primorsky region) – will keep MSK+7 (UTC+11) > > 2. Sakha (Yakutia) – will keep its current 3 time zones: > MSK+6 (UTC+10), MSK+7 (UTC+11), MSK+8 (UTC+12) and > > 3. Irkutsk region – will keep MSK+5 (UTC+9) > > Original document (in Russian) on: > http://www.minpromtorg.gov.ru/docs/projects/531 > or > > http://www.worldtimezone.com/dst_news/dst_news_russia35.html > > I will keep my eyes open if there is any changes by October 30, > 2011. A final decision was made by Russian government on August 31, 2011, no. 725 (text in Russian): http://www.government.ru/gov/results/16355/ The contents of time zones didn't change since the draft.

3 2

Datasource for IATA timezone files
by Karl Erik Bergaust Sept. 11, 2011

Sept. 11, 2011

Hi. Regarding Sources for Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data http://www.twinsun.com/tz/tz-link.htm International Air Transport Association timezone rules, are obtained from Innovata. http://www.innovata-llc.com/data/data.html ->> IATA Codes Data Files Regards Karl Erik

2 1

Texas timezone history
by Jules Descartes Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

I have reviewed the Texas timezone history before 1970. I attach my result, which proposes two additional Texas zones America/Houston and Amerca/Amarillo. I think there is an error in the current tzdata/northamerica file regarding Texas. It claims that Texas follows America/Chicago. But this is not the case as Texas had no DST in 1936, as Chicago did. Please check my data and my typing, as I am a bad typist.

2 2

A small contribution to California timezone history
by Alois Treindl Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

Calfornia, the US state with the highest population, seems to be one of the most regular timezone history, well represented by zone America/Los_Angeles. One exception has however been brought to my attention, which I report here, as a contribution to the completion of pre-1970 timezone history. # Information published to the Public Domain. # Palm Springs suffered under the shadow of Mt. San Jacinto and # decided to go on DST from 1946 Nov 17 for 120 days, # ending 1947 Mar 17. # Source: Beaver Valley Times, 1946 Nov 8, and other newspapers. # # Palm Springs is at 116w33. # Zone NAME GMTOFF RULES FORMAT [UNTIL] Zone America/Palm_Springs -7:36:12 - LMT 1883 Nov 18 12:23:48 -8:00 US P%sT 1946 Nov 17 02:00 -7:00 - PDT 1947 Mar 17 02:00 -8:00 CA P%sT 1967 -8:00 US P%sT

1 0

re: Texas, typing corrections
by Jules Descartes Sept. 8, 2011

Sept. 8, 2011

Sorry I had several typing errors in the last paragraph of the attached file. I attach a corrected copy.

1 0