April 2021 - tz - lists.iana.org

Re: [tz] Morocco : Ramdan Time Change 2021
by Paul Eggert March 15, 2023

March 15, 2023

On 3/19/21 3:15 AM, Semlali Naoufal wrote: > At the moment, we have no official government announcement to this effect. But, logically, the change to the GMT schedule should be made on the night of April 10-11, 2021 (last weekend before Ramadan). Yes, that's been the tzdb prediction too, ever since tzdb version 2018h (2018-12-23). For the record, here are tzdb's current predictions Morocco transitions during the next five years. Sun Apr 11 01:59:59 2021 UT = Sun Apr 11 02:59:59 2021 +01 Sun Apr 11 02:00:00 2021 UT = Sun Apr 11 02:00:00 2021 +00 Sun May 16 01:59:59 2021 UT = Sun May 16 01:59:59 2021 +00 Sun May 16 02:00:00 2021 UT = Sun May 16 03:00:00 2021 +01 Sun Mar 27 01:59:59 2022 UT = Sun Mar 27 02:59:59 2022 +01 Sun Mar 27 02:00:00 2022 UT = Sun Mar 27 02:00:00 2022 +00 Sun May 8 01:59:59 2022 UT = Sun May 8 01:59:59 2022 +00 Sun May 8 02:00:00 2022 UT = Sun May 8 03:00:00 2022 +01 Sun Mar 19 01:59:59 2023 UT = Sun Mar 19 02:59:59 2023 +01 Sun Mar 19 02:00:00 2023 UT = Sun Mar 19 02:00:00 2023 +00 Sun Apr 30 01:59:59 2023 UT = Sun Apr 30 01:59:59 2023 +00 Sun Apr 30 02:00:00 2023 UT = Sun Apr 30 03:00:00 2023 +01 Sun Mar 10 01:59:59 2024 UT = Sun Mar 10 02:59:59 2024 +01 Sun Mar 10 02:00:00 2024 UT = Sun Mar 10 02:00:00 2024 +00 Sun Apr 14 01:59:59 2024 UT = Sun Apr 14 01:59:59 2024 +00 Sun Apr 14 02:00:00 2024 UT = Sun Apr 14 03:00:00 2024 +01 Sun Feb 23 01:59:59 2025 UT = Sun Feb 23 02:59:59 2025 +01 Sun Feb 23 02:00:00 2025 UT = Sun Feb 23 02:00:00 2025 +00 Sun Apr 6 01:59:59 2025 UT = Sun Apr 6 01:59:59 2025 +00 Sun Apr 6 02:00:00 2025 UT = Sun Apr 6 03:00:00 2025 +01 Sun Feb 15 01:59:59 2026 UT = Sun Feb 15 02:59:59 2026 +01 Sun Feb 15 02:00:00 2026 UT = Sun Feb 15 02:00:00 2026 +00 Sun Mar 22 01:59:59 2026 UT = Sun Mar 22 01:59:59 2026 +00 Sun Mar 22 02:00:00 2026 UT = Sun Mar 22 03:00:00 2026 +01 Sun Feb 7 01:59:59 2027 UT = Sun Feb 7 02:59:59 2027 +01 Sun Feb 7 02:00:00 2027 UT = Sun Feb 7 02:00:00 2027 +00 Sun Mar 14 01:59:59 2027 UT = Sun Mar 14 01:59:59 2027 +00 Sun Mar 14 02:00:00 2027 UT = Sun Mar 14 03:00:00 2027 +01 Sun Jan 23 01:59:59 2028 UT = Sun Jan 23 02:59:59 2028 +01 Sun Jan 23 02:00:00 2028 UT = Sun Jan 23 02:00:00 2028 +00 Sun Mar 5 01:59:59 2028 UT = Sun Mar 5 01:59:59 2028 +00 Sun Mar 5 02:00:00 2028 UT = Sun Mar 5 03:00:00 2028 +01 Sun Jan 14 01:59:59 2029 UT = Sun Jan 14 02:59:59 2029 +01 Sun Jan 14 02:00:00 2029 UT = Sun Jan 14 02:00:00 2029 +00 Sun Feb 18 01:59:59 2029 UT = Sun Feb 18 01:59:59 2029 +00 Sun Feb 18 02:00:00 2029 UT = Sun Feb 18 03:00:00 2029 +01 Sun Dec 30 01:59:59 2029 UT = Sun Dec 30 02:59:59 2029 +01 Sun Dec 30 02:00:00 2029 UT = Sun Dec 30 02:00:00 2029 +00 Sun Feb 10 01:59:59 2030 UT = Sun Feb 10 01:59:59 2030 +00 Sun Feb 10 02:00:00 2030 UT = Sun Feb 10 03:00:00 2030 +01 Sun Dec 22 01:59:59 2030 UT = Sun Dec 22 02:59:59 2030 +01 Sun Dec 22 02:00:00 2030 UT = Sun Dec 22 02:00:00 2030 +00

3 9

United States Senate reintroduced Sunshine Protection Act, enabling Permanent DST
by Phake Nick Nov. 14, 2022

Nov. 14, 2022

I don't quite understand the legal text of the bill itself [2], but according to my reading, it seems like the bill will end DST across the entire US by shifting the standard time forward an hour, except in states/territories/area that currently doesn't enact DST, which they can choose to follow the new standard time or old standard time? 1: https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2021/3/rubio-colleagues-reint… 2: https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/d34c77c0-acea-4074-bc57-14…

18 26

Re: [tz] iana build failures on Windows
by Paul Eggert Nov. 2, 2022

Nov. 2, 2022

On 4/19/21 7:09 AM, Manuela Friedrich wrote: > I had to include signal.h in zic.c to prevent the following error: > > zic.c(610): error C2061: syntax error: identifier 'got_signal' This is a portability bug recently introduced to zic.c. I installed the first attached patch to fix it. > The I needed to resolved error > > zic.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol tz_time referenced in function random_dirent This appears to be another recent portability bug. It's related to a portability problem you reported on MS-Windows in response to which in 2018d I committed a patch that introduced RESERVE_STD_EXT_IDS: https://github.com/eggert/tz/commit/24b45243c5210b4196987fdd06e6c288c358a268 When I recently added the randomish filename code to the development version, I neglected to deal with RESERVE_STD_EXT_IDS. The second attached patch should fix this issue. Please give the two patches a try, as I don't use MS-Windows and can't easily test these patches on that platform. > a test run of zdump -v produced way more output than in the last release, the Linux output seems to have become longer too, but maybe this is still under development. That change is intentional, and was caused by this: https://github.com/eggert/tz/commit/ac07b446a3afaa4cb1ae11a91785a201c91f6351 along with some neighboring commits. Thanks for reporting the problems, and I hope the current development version of tzdb addresses the issues you mentioned.

5 23

Re: [tz] Change Request: Europe/Kiev to Europe/Kyiv
by John Hawkinson March 18, 2022

March 18, 2022

I do not think we have handled this well; we have not given Victor Perov a good answer. Indeed, to some extent we've made it a "runaround." We can do better. We should take the time to write up a good lengthy explanation of the issues ("boilerplate"), because this a really important issue of concern to many people in the world and the project has indeed thought about it pretty carefully. Dismissing the inquiries because they are repetitive makes it seem like we haven't, and that unnecessarily upsets peopl. Victor Perev: I don't have time for a full write-up right now, but please consult the archives of the tz list (http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/ or perhaps https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Amm.icann.org%2Fpipermail%2Ftz%2F+kyiv which returns 203 results). The tz project is very conservative in its judgment for when the predominant English spelling of a city has changed, and so far the project has judged that Kiev is still preferred. We discussed it when major English newspapers and style guides changed from Kiev to Kyiv last year (prompted by the US presidential impeachment, which lead to a lot of discussion about Kyiv in America), and we will probably continue to discuss it as time goes on. But we've thought about it and discussed it a lot. The answers you got don't explain that, and that means we have not done a good a job as we should have. Sorry about that. In particular, I think Brian Inglis's answer was actually incorrect in a way that really matters ("Kiev is the correct English spelling"). There are multiple correct English spellings. It used to be that Kiev was the only one, but Kyiv is gaining popularity more and more. Paul Eggert <eggert(a)cs.ucla.edu> wrote on Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 18:19:08 EDT in <cefc7f01-a3e9-f2a4-9ab9-5288147f994a(a)cs.ucla.edu>: > Thanks for bringing that to the mailing list (if I could shut off GitHub > pull requests I would). Although you cannot do so, we can handle them a little bit better. Please see https://docs.github.com/en/github/building-a-strong-community/creating-a-pu… You can create a template that explains to a would-be pull request submitter than pull requests will be closed and the project uses the mailing list for development discussions. ("I understand that the tz project does not use pull requests on github, and that if I enter a pull request here, it will be closed and I will be directed to send email to tz(a)iana.org.") For the particular case of regular, recurring issues, it may be worth while to keep one of #15, #26, and #27 open and mark the others as a duplicate of it, so that it is easier for newcomers to understand that this issue has been carefully considered and is not a simple oversight. https://github.com/eggert/tz/pulls?q=kiev Also, not to pick on Brian (again), but if the project policy is not to use github pull requests, it's not great to respond to pull requests on their substance, because it bifurcates the discussion and makes it seem like we actually do use pull requests ("except when we don't"). So what seems like a helpful thing may not be. -- jhawk(a)alum.mit.edu John Hawkinson

10 13

Italy April 1944 discrepancy between comment and data
by Alois Treindl Oct. 5, 2021

Oct. 5, 2021

For Italy in 1944 zone Europe/Rome there is a discrepancy between the comment and the data. comment: # From Paul Eggert (2016-10-27): # Go with INRiM for DST rules, except as corrected by Inglis for 1944 # for the Kingdom of Italy. This is consistent with Renzo Baldini. # Model Rome's occupation by using C-Eur rules from 1943-09-10 # to 1944-06-04; although Rome was an open city during this period, it # was effectively controlled by Germany. Data for Italy is Rule Italy 1944 only - Apr 2 2:00s 1:00 S Data for C-Eur is: Rule C-Eur 1944 1945 - Apr Mon>=1 2:00s 1:00 S where Mon>=1 in 1944 is April 3. So Rome is NOT following C-Eur. I think the rule for Itay is right, only the comment is misleading.

4 9

Historical fix for Tonga
by Tim Parenti Sept. 14, 2021

Sept. 14, 2021

First, a quick clerical patch: 0001, attached, fixes the placement of a comment which got shuffled around in the lead-up to publishing the changes for South Sudan in 2021a. Patch 0003 relates to Tonga, and comes from some of the links P Chan shared to 1957–1963 editions of The Air Almanac: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2021-February/029866.html On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 03:43, P Chan <legco(a)outlook.com> wrote: > 1960 Nov (1962.1-4) > https://books.google.com/books?id=bVgtWM6kPZUC&pg=SL1-PA20 > 1961 Mar (1962.5-8) > https://books.google.com/books?id=W2nItAul4g0C&pg=SL1-PA20 When looking around at how this data was presented for other regions, I noticed on the preceding pages (listing "Places Fast on GMT", i.e., east of Greenwich) in some of the earlier editions provided that Tonga was listed at GMT+12:20. The peculiar offset stuck out, and I quickly noticed that some of the later editions of the same tables had it at GMT+13. A quick bisection puts the changeover, as far as The Air Almanac contemporaneously reckoned it, between November 1960 and March 1961. Previously, our data had Tonga transitioning to UT+13 in 1941 based on a quotation from a 1997 news article. Although this differs from what the Almanac suggests by some 20 years, the article does mention a change coincident with the New Year, and that Tāufaʻāhau Tupou IV was Crown Prince at the time. As his predecessor and mother, Queen Sālote Tupou III, reigned from 1918-04-05 to 1965-12-16, a possible transition of 1961-01-01 still jives with the gist of the article, even if the specific year was perhaps wrong or just misprinted. For what it's worth, our commentary already noted that Shanks & Pottenger had put the transition even later, at 1968-10-01. Although of course we don't know how they arrived at that date, given that they did, 1961 seems rather less out-of-place than it otherwise might. The attached patch 0003 makes this adjustment, while more fully documenting and comparing the conflicting sources. Thanks again to P Chan for pointing us to these resources. I wasn't expecting to get a "bonus" correction out of it, but one never knows quite what will catch the eye… -- Tim Parenti

3 3

[PATCH 1/8] * tzfile.5: Fix prefix/suffix typo (thanks to Ian Abbott).
by Paul Eggert Sept. 14, 2021

Sept. 14, 2021

--- tzfile.5 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tzfile.5 b/tzfile.5 index b4952d5..ec78689 100644 --- a/tzfile.5 +++ b/tzfile.5 @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ bytes that represent time zone designations, which are null-terminated byte strings, each indexed by the .B tt_desigidx values mentioned above. -The byte strings can overlap if one is a prefix of the other. +The byte strings can overlap if one is a suffix of the other. The encoding of these strings is not specified. .IP * .B tzh_leapcnt -- 2.27.0

2 8

JavaScript IANA date/time library, now with support for leap seconds, TAI, TDT
by Kerry Shetline April 29, 2021

April 29, 2021

About two months ago I released the first major version of @tubular/time, a JavaScript/TypeScript npm package for date/time handling, with solid support for IANA timezones, including dealing with weird edge cases like 47-hour days and negative DST and such. I’ve just finished up adding a feature I’ve always wanted to have in a date/time package, and that’s the ability to properly handle and represent leap seconds. Along with that comes conversion to and from TAI (International Atomic Time) and astronomical time systems. https://www.npmjs.com/package/@tubular/time One interesting issue was how to handle a broad range of years (thousands of years forward and backward in time) in a way that was nicely integrated with Universal Coordinated Time. The idea for UTC got something of a wobbly start around 1960, and wasn’t implemented in its current form until 1972. Going forward in time, UTC is only strictly defined for up to six months beyond the next announced leap second, or next announced lack of any leap second on the way. I settled on the following scheme for resolving these issues, and I’m curious what others might think about it: * For all dates prior to 1957, estimated UT1 is in effect. This is most accurate back to 1600, for which there is sufficient astronomical data for reasonable approximate conversions from UT1 to TAI and dynamical time. Further back in time less accurate approximations are in effect. * From 1957-1958, using a sliding weighted average, UT1 transitions to proleptic UTC. * From 1958-1972 proleptic UTC, as proposed by Tony Finch (https://fanf.livejournal.com/69586.html) is used, with the first non-official leap second occurring at 1959-06-30 23:59:60. * From 1972 up until the latest updates provided by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, well-defined UTC prevails, with the first official leap second occurring at 1972-06-30 23:59:60. * For a year to 18 months after the current time, or after the last defined leap second (whichever is later), a presumed leap-second-free span of UTC is projected to occur. * A sliding weighted average transition from UTC to estimated UT1 follows for the next 365 days. * Formulaic predicted UT1 is used for all later dates and times thereafter. Another project I’ve been working on (which isn’t quite ready for prime time because it’s utterly without documentation) is a new JavaScript timezone compiler. This has replaced an old Java project I used for generating the timezone data used by @tubular/time: https://github.com/kshetline/tubular_time_tzdb

7 16

Re: [tz] JavaScript IANA date/time library, now with support for leap seconds, TAI, TDT
by Kerry Shetline April 27, 2021

April 27, 2021

On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:03:59 -0400, John_Sauter via tz wrote: > Based on the way the Earth has been rotating recently, the next leap > second will be around the end of this decade, and it will be a negative > leap second. What kind of hopeless nerd does it make me that I find this an exciting prospect? I’ve taken negative leap seconds to be a nearly completely hypothetical idea, even though I have nevertheless coded diligently to account for the possibility.

2 1

Re: [tz] JavaScript IANA date/time library, now with support for leap seconds, TAI, TDT
by Kerry Shetline April 27, 2021

April 27, 2021

On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:06:12 -0600, Paul Gilmartin <PaulGBoulder(a)aim.com> wrote: >> POSIX time is really just UTC without the leap seconds, isn?t it? >> > More precisely, POSIX time counts non-leap seconds since 1972-01-01t00:00:00 UTC. That would be 1970-01-01T00:00:00 UTC. 1972 is, however, the year that the first official leap second (for POSIX not to count) occurred.

1 1