May 1999 - tz - lists.iana.org

FW: Time Zones
by Olson, Arthur David (NCI) July 7, 1999

July 7, 1999

-----Original Message----- From: Daniel C. Sobral [SMTP:dcs@newsguy.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 8:18 AM To: tz(a)elsie.nci.nih.gov Subject: Time Zones I'd like to point out that what you call "Zone America/Sao_Paulo", the brazilian "legal time", is actually known as _Brasilia_ time zone in Brazil. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs(a)gns.com.br To see you is to sympathize.

4 4

US vs. European Date Notation
by Markus Kuhn June 8, 1999

June 8, 1999

May be someone on this list has some insight about this topic: A journalist of the Wall Street Journal has contacted me as part of his research for a feature article about date notations. He noted that more and more Americans now start to use the European day, month, year notation instead of the traditional month, day, year, and he now realizes that thanks to ISO 8601 all this is moving into the wrong direction anyway. He would be very interested into any pointers of the history of these three date notations, and actually I am quite interested as well. Why do Americans write dates as "December 31, 1999" while Europeans write "31 December 1999", etc.? Why are in East Asia Bigendian dates more common? Markus -- Markus G. Kuhn, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK Email: mkuhn at acm.org, WWW: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/>

6 8

DST in the media
by Olson, Arthur David (NCI) May 20, 1999

May 20, 1999

"Good news." "What did they do? Extend Daylight Saving Time year round?" Professional tanner George Hamilton in dialog from a May, 1999 episode of the syndicated television series "Baywatch" --ado

1 0

Time Zones Information
by ZinaFishberg May 19, 1999

May 19, 1999

Dear Sir/Madam: Information systems department of our company (Seabury&Smith) is involved in building a marketing Data Warehouse. We store information on address and phone for all our customers. Part of this information is the Time Zone. We have to be able to uniquely identify the Time Zone based on the area code or address (state, city, or county ). Also, it's important to be able to identify the correct Time Zone for sates and Area Codes that cross Time Zones (for example, North Dakota). Could you, please, provide help to us regarding this matter. Thank you.

1 0

Time Zones Information
by ZinaFishberg May 19, 1999

May 19, 1999

Dear Sir/Madam: Information systems department of our company (Seabury&Smith) is involved in building a marketing Data Warehouse. We store information on address and phone for all our customers. Part of this information is the Time Zone. We have to be able to uniquely identify the Time Zone based on the area code or address (state, city, or county ). Also, it's important to be able to identify the correct Time Zone for sates and Area Codes that cross Time Zones (for example, North Dakota). Could you, please, provide help to us regarding this matter. Thank you.

1 0

FW: Tonga planning DST in year 2000
by Olson, Arthur David (NCI) May 13, 1999

May 13, 1999

Note that Eric Ulevik is not on the time zone mailing list -----Original Message----- From: Eric Ulevik Sent: Monday, May 03, 1999 7:23 AM To: tz(a)elsie.nci.nih.gov Subject: Tonga planning DST in year 2000 Tonga gets serious on millennium bid Monday 3 May, 1999 (1:57pm AEST) Kingdom of Tonga is so determined to be the first country in the world to see 2000 that it might introduce daylight saving this year for the first time ever. Tonga prides itself on being the first country in the world to see the sun each day, although New Zealand catches up with Tonga's time zone each summer. Tonga has great plans to welcome in the year 2000 but its hoped for tourist boom has lost some of its shine because New Zealand is claiming that its Chatham Islands will be the first place in the world to greet the New Year. Tonga's director of tourism, who is also secretary of the National Millenium Committee, has a plan to get Tonga back in front. He has proposed a one-off move to tropical daylight saving for Tonga from October to March, which has won approval in principle from the Tongan Government.

1 0

RE: mktime bug?
by Olson, Arthur David (NCI) May 12, 1999

May 12, 1999

I'm unable to duplicate the problem. --ado Script started on Thu May 13 03:49:04 1999 gertrude$ cat mktimetest.c #include <stdio.h> #include <time.h> #include <errno.h> int main() { struct tm tm; time_t secs; memset(&tm, 0, sizeof tm); tm.tm_year = 99; tm.tm_mon = 4; tm.tm_mday = 13; secs = mktime(&tm); printf("secs: %ld\n", secs); if (secs < 0) printf("strerror(errno): %s\n", strerror(errno)); return 0; } gertrude$ cc mktimetest.c libtz.a -o mktimetest gertrude$ TZ=Europe/Paris ./mktimetest secs: 926550000 gertrude$ TZ=America/New_York ./mktimetest secs: 926571600 gertrude$ TZ=CET-1CEST-2 ./mktimetest secs: 926550000 gertrude$ exit script done on Thu May 13 03:50:23 1999

1 0

FW: mktime bug?
by Olson, Arthur David (NCI) May 12, 1999

May 12, 1999

Be sure to direct replies to Guido, who's not on the time zone mailing list. --ado -----Original Message----- From: Guido Flohr [SMTP:gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 1999 8:43 PM To: tz(a)elsie.nci.nih.gov Subject: mktime bug? Hi, sorry, it's me again. I have problems with this little piece of code: bash$ cat >mktimetest <<EOF #include <stdio.h> #include <time.h> int main () { struct tm tm; time_t secs; memset (&tm, 0, sizeof tm); tm.year = 99; tm.mon = 4; tm.mday = 13; secs = mktime (&tm); printf ("secs: %ld (%s)\n", secs, strerror (errno)); return 0; } EOF # make mktimetest # TZ=CET-1CEST-2 ./mktimetest secs: -1 (OK) On installations where summertime applies during May mktime returns an error here (happens somewhere in the function time2). If I set tm.tm_isdst = -1; before calling mktime() the function returns the correct time. I have fixed that by inserting the line tmp->tm_isdst = -1; in mktime() before time1() gets called but I'm not sure if this is the right place to do that (or if this is correct at all). Can you verify that behavior or have I messed up my sources? If it is a bug, how should it be fixed? Thanks Guido -- http://stud.uni-sb.de/~gufl0000 mailto:gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de

1 0

FW: POSIX-TZ without rules
by Olson, Arthur David (NCI) May 12, 1999

May 12, 1999

Be sure to direct replies to Guido, who's not on the time zone mailing list. --ado -----Original Message----- From: Guido Flohr [SMTP:gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de] Sent: Monday, April 26, 1999 9:46 PM To: arthur_david_olson(a)nih.gov Subject: POSIX-TZ without rules Hello! I'm the current maintainer of the MiNTLib. The MiNTLib is the standard libc for MiNT and MiNT is a free Unix-clone for Atari computers. I've implemented parts of the tzcode and tzdata packages (version 1998c) in the MiNTLib. This went mostly without problems. Two problems arised: First, for testing purposes I set the envariable TZ to "CET-1CEST-2", i. e. a valid POSIX-style string but without explicit rules. I also uninstalled the database for that test. Under these circumstances tzparse() in localtime.c will return an error because it fails to open a default rules file. From what I remember I would say that POSIX demands that the US rules should be applied instead. Anyway, "CET-1CEST-2" is perfectly POSIX-compliant and the library should not return an error then. The GNU libc handles this case by assuming an implicit rule of "M4.1.0,M10.5.0" (commented as "US Federal Law"). My solution is somewhat different: I generated a header "new_york.h" with the disassembled contents of /usr/share/zoneinfo/posix/America/New_York. Now, not giving rules with no time zone database installed has the same effect as linking posixrules to America/New_York (as recommended in the Makefile of tzcode). The second problem: In zic.c, the analysis of the return value of system("yearistype ...") assumes a certain structure of that return value. I think it would be more portable to use the macros from sys/wait.h instead (although this would probably require an additional -D option to cc that determines whether to use POSIX- or BSD-style macros). May sound pedantic, but here's the story: I have happened to introduce a bug in the waitpid() function of the MiNTLib; the upper two bytes of the status pointer weren't zeroed out but contained some garbage. This affected system() because it calls waitpid. The error message from zic was: wild result 27525120 ... australasia line 75, command was "./yearistype 1990 even" Well, I could figure out what happened, but an average user would have had problems, because typing the command literally into the shell simply returned 0. If I understand the sources correctly, the more common error that the yearistype command is not found (e. g. running "zic -y yearistype ..." without "." in $PATH) would also produce quite confusing error messages (but at least the shell would also complain because you don't redirect stderr to /dev/null). Another argument: The specification for system() explicitely demands to use the wait macros to analyse the return value. These macros would have worked in the above described case. From this point of view the garbage in the upper 2 bytes is not even a bug. Apart from that: Thanks for all the work you must have invested into the time zone database! Everything works perfectly fine here. Ciao Guido -- http://stud.uni-sb.de/~gufl0000 mailto:gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de

4 4

Re: FW: UK Timezone info
by peter＠aldie.co.uk May 12, 1999

May 12, 1999

Robert Brady wrote: > You'll like this : the power to set time-zone in the UK might be devolved > to the Scottish Parliamant and Welsh Assembly. > > See : > > http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199899/ldbills/047/1… > 7.htm A check in the Lords Hansard for 13 April confirms my guess that this is a bit of grandstanding by Lord (Jeffrey) Archer as part of his campaign to become the Mayor of London. See: http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199697/ldhansrd/\ pdvn/lds99/text/90413-03.htm#90413-03_head2 (Note for non UK folk: this is nothing to do with the Lord Mayor of London. The Lord Mayor is mayor of the City of London, the famous `square mile' financial bit of London. The Labour government elected in May 1997 had as one of its policies that London as a whole should have an elected mayor. This is a long delayed response to a previous Conservative government having abolished the Greater London Council. The GLC (as it was always known) was controlled by Labour and was led by Ken Livingstone. Neither main party has yet chosen their candidate for Mayor of London but they both find themselves in a mess because the front runners are Ken Livingstone (the very same) and Lord Archer. Both parties seem to be doing everything possible to avoid actually selecting them as candidates. Oh, the Lord Mayor is also elected after a fashion, by all liverymen of at least one year's standing plus some other City officers, from among the Aldermen who have served as sheriff and have not already been elected Mayor. Is that all clear now? :-) As it was only last year that the Government reserved matters relating to time to Westminster in the Scotland Act (the Welsh Assembly is incapable of legislation) I think the chances of this Bill passing are close to zero. I suggest an alternative: the area inside the M25 motorway should have its own timezone and the rest of us can continue as we are. :-) Peter Ilieve peter(a)aldie.co.uk

1 0