- tz - lists.iana.org

buffer overflow in zic
by Evgeniy Gorbanev March 5, 2025

March 5, 2025

Hello! IfoundthatifI runzictocreatea linkonanotherdevice, the bufferoverflowinzip.c:1422inversion2025awill occur. Inthislinei==0. The commandtoreplay: ./zic -l test -d . -t /path/to/link_on_another_device Best regards, Evgeniy Gorbanyov

4 4

DST offsets other than +1
by Doug Ewell March 4, 2025

March 4, 2025

1. Are there any time zones that currently observe DST with an offset other than adding one hour? (For this question, I am treating “negative DST” zones like Europe/Dublin and Africa/Windhoek as if they observed “standard” time in winter and adjusted time in summer. Also, for this question I am only interested in current practice, not historical.) 2. Is there an easy way I could have looked up this information in the tz files? (“Easy” means without exhaustively parsing all the Rule and Zone lines, as a processor would have to do.) Thanks, -- Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org

6 8

North Dakota HB 1259 requiring year-round standard time
by asinglet＠epic.com March 1, 2025

March 1, 2025

https://legiscan.com/ND/text/HB1259/2025 HB 1259 passed the North Dakota House last week. No idea on whether it will pass the ND Senate or be signed into law. The tricky thing about this bill is that it does not have an implementation time frame. Theoretically if it moves through in the next week or two, we could be looking at a repeat of the Lebanon 2023 fiasco. I hope if they are going to pass it, they take their time.

4 4

Maryland HB1290
by Arthur Olson Feb. 21, 2025

Feb. 21, 2025

The hearing on Maryland House Bill 1290, "Full-Year Daylight Saving Time," has been cancelled: https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/hb1290 In past years such bills died in committee, but only having had a hearing; this is the earliest death yet for such a bill. Perhaps the state legislators have more important matters on their minds this year. @dashdashado

2 1

EST5EDT should not resolve to America/New_York because they have different offsets
by Austin Hill Feb. 21, 2025

Feb. 21, 2025

Hello - I recently filed a GitHub issue against the perl DateTime::TimeZone library, which uses your database: https://github.com/houseabsolute/DateTime-TimeZone/issues/58#issue-28644459… I noticed that EST5EDT now resolves to America/New_York. This is problematic because the two do not have the same offset - EST5EDT is -5:00 and America/New_York is -04:56:02. My ticket was closed because the behavior appears to be caused by changes in your database in commit a0b09c0 ( https://github.com/eggert/tz/commit/a0b09c0230089252acf2eb0f1ba922e99f7f4a03 ). Is this something that you would consider changing? Thanks! - Austin Hill

9 16

localized date without time
by Alejandro Colomar Feb. 12, 2025

Feb. 12, 2025

Hi Paul, Link: <https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/issues/1057> Currently, shadow utils' passwd(1) (and several other programs) uses UTC time when printing. That is: $ passwd -S alx alx P 2023-09-20 0 99999 7 -1 the date from above is a UTC representation of $ sudo cat /etc/shadow | grep alx | cut -f3 -d: 19620 However, shadow utils programs, such as chage(1), use local time in input. That timestamp was set by chage(1), interpreting a local date: $ sudo chage -d 2023-09-21 alx $ sudo cat /etc/shadow | grep alx | cut -f3 -d: 19620 $ date Wed Jul 31 07:54:17 CEST 2024 This is rather confusing, and we think that passwd(1) should also print the date in local time, when printing human-readable dates. However, I think it might be better to show the timezone information together with the date, to be clear that what we're printing is local time. Do you think that's reasonable? Or maybe it's understood that when printing a date some timezone information is implicitly local? I didn't find any way to print timezone information in ISO 8601, if you don't print the time together with the date. That is, ISO 8601 says: C.1.3.1 Date A date string represents one of the following: • year, month, and day (e.g. 2001-02-03) • year and month (e.g. 2008-12 ) • year (e.g. 2008) and C.1.3.2 Date and Time A date/time string is composed according to one of three representations as illustrated in the following three examples: • 2001-02-03T09:30:01 • 2004-01-01T10:10:10Z • 2004-01-01T10:10:10+05:00 but I don't see any way to print something like 2023-09-21+02:00 in standardese. Is this a defect in ISO 8691? I see that in C.1.3.2, it says "Zone-offset may be omitted or included", so I guess we can just omit it. What do you think we should do? Thanks! And have a lovely day! Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

5 17

ELIZA Reanimated
by Brooks Harris Jan. 23, 2025

Jan. 23, 2025

ELIZA Reanimated: The world’s first chatbot restored on the world’s first time sharing system https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.06707 Has anyone asked ELIZA what time it is?

3 3

Re: Notice of a problem with the Asia/Tokyo time zone
by Paul Eggert Jan. 22, 2025

Jan. 22, 2025

> From: Patrick BENNY <patrick.benny(a)mixi.co.jp> > Date: Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 6:41 PM > The Asia/Tokyo time zone seems to have been linked with Australia, probably > by mistake. > Please see this related difference from the zone1970.tab file, observed > when comparing 2024b and 2025a. > > 186c186 > < JP +353916+1394441 Asia/Tokyo > --- >> JP,AU +353916+1394441 Asia/Tokyo Eyre Bird Observatory > > The Eyre Bird Observatory should probably be linked with an Australian time > zone instead of Asia/Tokyo. Actually that line should be OK, as the Eyre Bird Observatory region (unlike the rest of Australia) has observed Tokyo time since 1970. The comments at the start of zone1970.tab say this about the "Eyre Bird Observatory" in column 4: # Comments; present if and only if countries have multiple timezones, # and useful only for those countries. For example, the comments # for the row with countries CH,DE,LI and name Europe/Zurich # are useful only for DE, since CH and LI have no other timezones. "Eyre Bird Observatory" is useful only for AU, since JP has no other timezones; so this is another example of that column-4 idea.

4 4

Medovukha factory in Kazakhstan advances its clocks by 1/20 of a day
by Paul Eggert Jan. 21, 2025

Jan. 21, 2025

Last year's move to unify Kazakhstan into a single UTC+05 time zone is seeing some pushback. In "Anger over Kazakh Time Zones" (2024-12-24)[1] RFE/RL's Chris Rickleton and Tasqyn Bolatuly reported that one lawmaker asserted that a majority his party in parliament would support a law to reverse the decision. Although government executive officials still strongly support the move, we'll need to keep an eye on the situation. Rickleton and Bolatuly also reported how one private firm is addressing the problem: > Almas Tangytuli, the owner of a company that produces medovukha, a honey-based alcoholic drink similar to mead, says he is already doing something similar. > > After struggling with the new time, he set the clocks at his factory just east of Oskemen forward by a 1 1/5 hour for the sake of his workers, who keep livestock in villages nearby. > > "After work, there was no time for them to sort out their barns in the steppe, where there is no lighting. In the morning, their cattle make a rush for the fields. You can't tell cattle that the clocks have changed," Tangytuli told RFE/RL. 1 1/5 hour is 72 minutes, or 1/20 of a day. I wonder where Tangytuli got that number? Oskemen is about 5.5 hours ahead of UTC, so he has overcorrected and is about 0.7 hours ahead of local mean time; surely this is not entirely for the sake of the cows. The fractional hour vaguely reminds me of William Willett's 1907 proposal to implement daylight saving time by advancing clocks by 20 minutes each in four successive Sundays.[2] But although Willett wanted his construction workers to get to his worksites earlier during the day, he wrote nothing about his workers' cows. [1]: https://www.rferl.org/a/33249639.html [2]: https://www.webexhibits.org/daylightsaving/willett.html

1 0

Re: [tz-announce] 2025a release of tz code and data available
by Paul Eggert Jan. 21, 2025

Jan. 21, 2025

On 2025-01-16 11:21, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 09:37:50 -0800, Paul Eggert via tz-announce via tz wrote: >> ... Paraguay adopts permanent -03 starting spring 2024. > > starting spring *2025* ? Actually, "spring 2024" is correct. Release 2025a says the legal change occurred in Paraguay on 2024-10-15 at 00:00, which is spring in the southern hemisphere. The clocks didn't change then: only tm_isdst changed, and since tm_isdst is obsolescent that wasn't enough to prompt a new TZDB release right away. The first change to predicted timestamps is this year on March 22 at 00:00, when Paraguay is now predicted to stay at -03 instead of falling back from -03 to -04. This will be autumn in the southern hemisphere.

1 1