- tz - lists.iana.org

[PATCH] Fix "el ds" typo in man pages
by Paul Eggert Dec. 14, 2021

Dec. 14, 2021

This fixes a typo that I introduced in 2014 when fixing glitches with '-' and italics in man pages. The typo is visible only when using traditional troff (as opposed to groff-compatible processors). --- date.1 | 2 +- newctime.3 | 2 +- newstrftime.3 | 2 +- newtzset.3 | 2 +- time2posix.3 | 2 +- tzfile.5 | 2 +- tzselect.8 | 2 +- zdump.8 | 2 +- 8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/date.1 b/date.1 index 432cab1..1ecd63a 100644 --- a/date.1 +++ b/date.1 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ date \- show and set date and time .if n .nh .if n .na .ie \n(.g .ds - \f(CW-\fP -.el ds - \- +.el .ds - \- .B date [ .B \*-u diff --git a/newctime.3 b/newctime.3 index cc56e2c..1b1790f 100644 --- a/newctime.3 +++ b/newctime.3 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ asctime, ctime, difftime, gmtime, localtime, mktime \- convert date and time .SH SYNOPSIS .nf .ie \n(.g .ds - \f(CW-\fP -.el ds - \- +.el .ds - \- .B #include <time.h> .PP .BR "extern char *tzname[];" " /\(** (optional) \(**/" diff --git a/newstrftime.3 b/newstrftime.3 index 887aba5..d68bc33 100644 --- a/newstrftime.3 +++ b/newstrftime.3 @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ strftime \- format date and time .SH SYNOPSIS .nf .ie \n(.g .ds - \f(CW-\fP -.el ds - \- +.el .ds - \- .B #include <time.h> .PP .B "size_t strftime(char *restrict buf, size_t maxsize," diff --git a/newtzset.3 b/newtzset.3 index 05aa350..8aaa0ff 100644 --- a/newtzset.3 +++ b/newtzset.3 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ tzset \- initialize time conversion information .SH SYNOPSIS .nf .ie \n(.g .ds - \f(CW-\fP -.el ds - \- +.el .ds - \- .B #include <time.h> .PP .B timezone_t tzalloc(char const *TZ); diff --git a/time2posix.3 b/time2posix.3 index fbb5766..2ea7edc 100644 --- a/time2posix.3 +++ b/time2posix.3 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ time2posix, posix2time \- convert seconds since the Epoch .SH SYNOPSIS .nf .ie \n(.g .ds - \f(CW-\fP -.el ds - \- +.el .ds - \- .B #include <time.h> .PP .B time_t time2posix(time_t t); diff --git a/tzfile.5 b/tzfile.5 index e2f11b4..550b31d 100644 --- a/tzfile.5 +++ b/tzfile.5 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ tzfile \- timezone information \\$3\*(lq\\$1\*(rq\\$2 .. .ie \n(.g .ds - \f(CW-\fP -.el ds - \- +.el .ds - \- The timezone information files used by .BR tzset (3) are typically found under a directory with a name like diff --git a/tzselect.8 b/tzselect.8 index a1ec8d0..69514e2 100644 --- a/tzselect.8 +++ b/tzselect.8 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ tzselect \- select a timezone .SH SYNOPSIS .ie \n(.g .ds - \f(CW-\fP -.el ds - \- +.el .ds - \- .B tzselect [ .B \*-c diff --git a/zdump.8 b/zdump.8 index a5e2042..131a6cb 100644 --- a/zdump.8 +++ b/zdump.8 @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ zdump \- timezone dumper \\$3\*(lq\\$1\*(rq\\$2 .. .ie \n(.g .ds - \f(CW-\fP -.el ds - \- +.el .ds - \- The .B zdump program prints the current time in each -- 2.32.0

1 0

[PROPOSED] Fix Y2242 bug in tzdb tarball generation
by Paul Eggert Dec. 14, 2021

Dec. 14, 2021

Use pax format so that ‘make tarballs’ will still work after the year 2242. Without this patch, a far-future ‘make tarballs’ would fail for the same reason the following fails now with GNU tar: $ touch -d 2242-03-16T12:56:32Z future $ tar --format=ustar -cf tar future tar: value 8589934592 out of time_t range 0..8589934591 tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors This patch doesn’t change the tarball format for today’s releases since we don’t use any features requiring pax format, which means the tarballs stick to the ustar subset of pax. Although this issue was exposed by the recent switch to ustar format, the Y2242 bug has been present since the tzdb project began, due to historical tar format expiring in 2242 and to POSIX and GNU coming up with incompatible extensions to deal with this expiration. * Makefile (GNUTARFLAGS): Switch from --format=ustar to --format=pax --pax-option='delete=atime,delete=ctime'. * NEWS: Update description of tarball format change. --- Makefile | 3 ++- NEWS | 7 +++++-- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index d30227a..23dcc14 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -466,7 +466,8 @@ OK_LINE= '^'$(OK_CHAR)'*$$' # Flags to give 'tar' when making a distribution. # Try to use flags appropriate for GNU tar. -GNUTARFLAGS= --format=ustar --numeric-owner --owner=0 --group=0 \ +GNUTARFLAGS= --format=pax --pax-option='delete=atime,delete=ctime' \ + --numeric-owner --owner=0 --group=0 \ --mode=go+u,go-w --sort=name TARFLAGS= `if tar $(GNUTARFLAGS) --version >/dev/null 2>&1; \ then echo $(GNUTARFLAGS); \ diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index edb9a1d..1106ef6 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -26,9 +26,12 @@ Unreleased, experimental changes instead of GNU format. Although the formats are almost identical for these tarballs, ustar headers' magic fields contain "ustar" instead of "ustar ", and their version fields contain "00" instead - of " ". For details about ustar format, please see + of " ". The two formats are planned to diverge more significantly + for tzdb releases after 2242-03-16 12:56:31 UTC, when the ustar + format becomes obsolete and the tarballs switch to pax format, an + extension of ustar. For details about these formats, please see "pax - portable archive interchange", IEEE Std 1003.1-2017, - <https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/pax.html#tag_20_…>. + <https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/pax.html#tag_20_…>. Changes affecting documentation and commentary -- 2.33.1

2 1

[PATCH 1/4] Simplify tzselect by omitting old Bash workaround
by Paul Eggert Dec. 13, 2021

Dec. 13, 2021

* tzselect.ksh (doselect): Omit Bash 1.14.7 workaround that I wrote in September 1996, as Bash 1.14.7 hasn’t been supported for years and surely should not be used anyway for security reasons. Bash 2.0 came out in December 1996. --- tzselect.ksh | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/tzselect.ksh b/tzselect.ksh index 18fce27..832cf75 100644 --- a/tzselect.ksh +++ b/tzselect.ksh @@ -101,14 +101,6 @@ then esac done || exit } - - # Work around a bug in bash 1.14.7 and earlier, where $PS3 is sent to stdout. - case $BASH_VERSION in - [01].*) - case `echo 1 | (select x in x; do break; done) 2>/dev/null` in - ?*) PS3= - esac - esac ' else doselect() { -- 2.32.0

1 3

Anniversary
by Arthur David Olson Dec. 13, 2021

Dec. 13, 2021

Discussion at an online meeting today made me realize that, alas, we missed the recent 35th anniversary of the start of the time zone mailing list. Put 2026-11-25 on your calendars now.-) https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/1986-November/008946.html @dashdashado

5 5

[PROPOSED] Distribute tarballs in ustar rather than gnu form
by Paul Eggert Dec. 13, 2021

Dec. 13, 2021

It recently came to my attention that tzdb tarballs are not generated in standard POSIX ustar format, but instead use a trivially different but nonstandard format. Fix this by switching to the standard format. * Makefile (GNUTARFLAGS): Add --format=ustar. * NEWS: Document the change. --- Makefile | 3 ++- NEWS | 10 ++++++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index c89c1be..fd312d9 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -466,7 +466,8 @@ OK_LINE= '^'$(OK_CHAR)'*$$' # Flags to give 'tar' when making a distribution. # Try to use flags appropriate for GNU tar. -GNUTARFLAGS= --numeric-owner --owner=0 --group=0 --mode=go+u,go-w --sort=name +GNUTARFLAGS= --format=ustar --numeric-owner --owner=0 --group=0 \ + --mode=go+u,go-w --sort=name TARFLAGS= `if tar $(GNUTARFLAGS) --version >/dev/null 2>&1; \ then echo $(GNUTARFLAGS); \ else :; \ diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 572a161..edb9a1d 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -20,6 +20,16 @@ Unreleased, experimental changes reader no longer mistakenly attempts to parse a version 1 TZIf file header as a TZ string. + Changes to build procedure + + Distribution tarballs now use standard POSIX.1-1988 ustar format + instead of GNU format. Although the formats are almost identical + for these tarballs, ustar headers' magic fields contain "ustar" + instead of "ustar ", and their version fields contain "00" instead + of " ". For details about ustar format, please see + "pax - portable archive interchange", IEEE Std 1003.1-2017, + <https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/pax.html#tag_20_…>. + Changes affecting documentation and commentary Rename CONTRIBUTING to CONTRIBUTING.md and use Markdown format. -- 2.32.0

1 0

.UA uses both kiev.ua and kyiv.ua, sebastopol.ua, uzhgorod.ua
by Brian Inglis Dec. 11, 2021

Dec. 11, 2021

...and other spellings for backward compatibility and convenience e.g. odessa.ua, sebastopol.ua with sevastopol.ua reserved, uzhgorod.ua (no mention of uzhhorod.ua even as reserved); from: https://hostmaster.ua/2ld/ referenced by the Public Suffix List package. Headings translated: Public domains second level =========================== Thematic domains ---------------- com.ua in.ua org.ua net.ua Specialty domains ----------------- edu.ua gov.ua Geographical domains -------------------- cherkassy.ua cherkasy.ua ck.ua chernigov.ua chernihiv.ua cn.ua chernovtsy.ua chernivtsi.ua cv.ua crimea.ua dnepropetrovsk.ua dnipropetrovsk.ua dp.ua donetsk.ua dn.ua ivano-frankivsk.ua if.ua kharkov.ua kh.ua kharkiv.ua kherson.ua ks.ua khmelnitskiy.ua km.ua kiev.ua kyiv.ua kirovograd.ua kr.ua lugansk.ua lg.ua lutsk.ua lt.ua volyn.ua lviv.ua nikolaev.ua mk.ua odessa.ua od.ua odesa.ua poltava.ua pl.ua rovno.ua rivne.ua rv.ua sebastopol.ua sumy.ua sm.ua ternopil.ua te.ua uzhgorod.ua uz.ua vinnica.ua vn.ua yalta.ua zaporizhzhe.ua zp.ua zhitomir.ua zt.ua Reserved domain names --------------------- cr.ua khmelnytskyi.ua kropyvnytskyi.ua krym.ua kv.ua lv.ua mykolaiv.ua sb.ua sevastopol.ua sicheslav.ua vinnytsia.ua zaporizhzhia.ua zhytomyr.ua Technological domains --------------------- admin.ua ipv6.ua ns.ua ua.ua www.ua xn--mqa.ua dnssec.ua rdap.ua epp1.ua epp2.ua This documents that proposed alternative English spellings may be neither as common nor the issue as settled as the trolls claim. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. [Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]

1 0

Israel DST: Proposed Change of Start of DST
by Ephraim Silverberg Dec. 5, 2021

Dec. 5, 2021

The Minister of Interior, Ayelet Shaked, is proposing to change the Time Law so that DST will start in Israel at 2 a.m. on the *Friday *before the *second *Sunday of March. DST starts, according to the current law, at 2 a.m. on the Friday before the *last* Sunday in March. The proposed change has yet to be brought before the Knesset. I will endeavour to update the list if the proposed change receives Knesset approval.

2 2

America/SaoPaulo TZ still observing DST
by William Renan Santos (DHL Supply Chain) Dec. 4, 2021

Dec. 4, 2021

Hi, In Brazil the DST was revoked few years ago by government, but looks like the systems are still considering the DST change. I ran the tzupdater using latest file of tzdata and the systems are still considering 1 hour ahead in Sao Paulo. Could you please help me to review and point where in the tzdata file the DST for Brazil was removed? Thanks! William Santos LATAM - IT Products Sr Systems Analyst DHL Supply Chain Estrada da Cruz Grande, 1700 Louveira - SP ZipCode: 13290-000 Brazil Telephone: +55 19 3848 9377 william.r.santos(a)dhl.com<mailto:william.r.santos@dhl.com> www.dhl.com/supplychain<http://www.dhl.com/supplychain> DHL Supply Chain - Excellence. Simply delivered. [top_em]

3 2

Proposal: Sections for different kinds of backward links
by Stephen Colebourne Nov. 18, 2021

Nov. 18, 2021

I have taken a stab at splitting the `backward` file into sections. This is based on repeated observations made by multiple people that the file represents different kinds of Link. https://github.com/eggert/tz/pull/33 The sections I'm suggesting are: CROSS-ISO - These link across an ISO-3166 boundary EXCESS - These were added despite the locations having the same timekeeping since 1970 RENAMED - These are simple aliases/renames OBSOLETE - These are the most obsolete form of IDs FIXED - These are alternate names for fixed offsets I don't expect this PR to be merged as is - There will probably need to be some consideration as to the correct split, and as to whether each ID is in the correct section. The approach I've used is commented sections with stable section names. Alternate approaches to this problem are possible. For example, a new file could be created for each section. That seems to be more disruptive than the proposed approach. Note that in order for this change to be useful, the section names need to be considered part of the source file API, and maintained over time. thanks Stephen

5 16

Re: [tz] tz Digest, Vol 122, Issue 22
by nadir altinbas Nov. 14, 2021

Nov. 14, 2021

@ Comment; Time(Winter-summer) setting discussions in Turkey and research about it (Alan Mintz) May I remind to Alan Mintz ;On the "en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_population" list shows that Turkey is in Asia, One of the region where is called as Marmara region is in Europe . Turkey is in both of Asia and Europe. Coordinates for Turkey as follows; ------------------------------------------- Latitude: 38° 57' 26.43" N Longitude: 35° 14' 26.67" E ------------------------------------------ also in GPS DD coordinate; 38.9573415 35.240741 ----------------------------------------- Nadir Altinbas nadiraltinbas(a)yahoo.com n.altinbas On Sunday, November 14, 2021, 05:27:55 PM GMT+3, tz-request(a)iana.org <tz-request(a)iana.org> wrote: Send tz mailing list submissions to tz(a)iana.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/tz or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to tz-request(a)iana.org You can reach the person managing the list at tz-owner(a)iana.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of tz digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Time(Winter-summer) setting discussions in Turkey and research about it (nadir altinbas) 2. Re: Time(Winter-summer) setting discussions in Turkey and research about it (Alan Mintz) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:36:25 +0000 (UTC) From: nadir altinbas <nadiraltinbas(a)yahoo.com> To: Paul Eggert <eggert(a)cs.ucla.edu> Cc: Time Zone Mailing List <tz(a)iana.org> Subject: Re: [tz] Time(Winter-summer) setting discussions in Turkey and research about it Message-ID: <2020539311.1385787.1636817785458(a)mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Ok ! Paul, Thanks,wikipedia correction explanation was better. Nadir Altinbas n.altinbas On Saturday, November 13, 2021, 11:15:33 AM GMT+3, Paul Eggert <eggert(a)cs.ucla.edu> wrote: Thanks for the heads-up. If Turkey actually changes its time zones or daylight-saving rules please let us know. I hope they give us plenty of warning (such as a year or more); otherwise, their cell phones and/or computers will likely be off. One minor point. The text says "Saatlerini de?i?tirmeyen en b?y?k ?lkeler ?in, Hindistan ve Japonya" which Google translates as "The largest countries that do not change their clocks are China, India and Japan." Using the Wikipedia list of countries by population[1], the ten most populous countries that do not observe daylight saving time are China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Brazil, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Russia, Japan, and Ethiopia, in that order. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_populat… ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 10:48:15 -0800 From: Alan Mintz <alan.mintz(a)gmail.com> To: Paul Eggert <eggert(a)cs.ucla.edu> Cc: Time Zone Mailing List <tz(a)iana.org>, nadir altinbas <nadiraltinbas(a)yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [tz] Time(Winter-summer) setting discussions in Turkey and research about it Message-ID: <CAMLM5-Vkqs_k7HkGy+MPwWGcjAUzRXhu4OOkAdFywvy-Ppj5rw(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 12:15 AM Paul Eggert via tz <tz(a)iana.org> wrote: > ... Using the Wikipedia list of countries by population[1], the ten > most populous countries that do not observe daylight saving time are > China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Brazil, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Russia, > Japan, and Ethiopia, in that order. > > [1] > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_populat… > Kind of a misleading statistic, though, since Indonesia straddles the equator and much of Brazil, Nigeria, and Ethiopia are within 15 degrees latitude, making DST unnecessary for them. -- Alan Mintz <Alan.Mintz(a)gMail.com>

1 0

Time(Winter-summer) setting discussions in Turkey and research about it
by nadir altinbas Nov. 13, 2021

Nov. 13, 2021

Thank You Paul! Resending e -mail message as plain Text as follows.Amendment e -mail; GMT+2.30 adviced by Turkeys Electrical Engineers Society (TMMOB-EMO) for eficiently enery usage in the country, on the news dealing with conflict while settings winter and summer time through organization. here is the link about news as Turkish; (www.emo.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=136372&tipi=5&sube=0) There also mentioned a research by ITU (Istanbul technical University research about time arrangement. These are just discussions and advice not officially anouncment. nadiraltinbas(a)yahoo.com Nadir Altinbas n.altinbas

3 3

Tİme zone discussions in Turkey and research about it
by nadir altinbas Nov. 12, 2021

Nov. 12, 2021

For GMT +2.30 adviced from Turkey's Electrical Engineers Society (TMMOB-EMO) reported on Social mediato efficient energy usage in Turkey. news here on the link as follows;EMO - SAATLERE AYAR ARANIYOR (OKSİJEN) | | | | | | | | | | | EMO - SAATLERE AYAR ARANIYOR (OKSİJEN) | | | This research is not official now.It may be considered future plan nadiraltinbas(a)yahoo.com n.altinbas

1 0

Pre-1970 data
by Stephen Colebourne Nov. 12, 2021

Nov. 12, 2021

How can this project successfully handle pre-1970 data? Why have I focussed so much on IDs and their value to tzdb? Intro ------- In previous threads I've focussed on IDs, and laid out different ways to describe the groups of IDs we have. For now, lets focus solely on the two main groups - region IDs, which represent abstract regions where clocks have been the same since 1970 - non-region IDs, which represent locations where tzdb has, at some point, added an ID The key observation is that the segregation between these two groups of IDs *did not exist* until around 2014. It was only in 2018 that the ISO country rule was removed. It has only been since 2014 or so that IDs have been merged. What tzdb previously offered was a set of IDs, based on a simple rule - "ID as needed for post-1970 data, with at least one per ISO country". Full history was available for each of these (whether accurate or not). What has happened since is a split, where no split previously existed. A split which favours some locations over others. The recent mailing list debates merely represent the cumulation of this favouritism. The irony is that the merges are being done in the name of equity and fairness, when the outcome has actually been the exact opposite - picking favourites, and denigrating everywhere else. That the approach to picking favourites is according to a standardised largest city rule isn't really that relevant here - it is the outcome that is unfair, not the process. If region IDs were of different appearance (eg. numeric or textually different) then the issues would not have arisen. The mistake was taking a fully functional and fully integral set of IDs, and bifurcating it into two groups. The split was actually a huge change in the policy of tzdb, which has been added drip by drip, rather than something that was ever fully appreciated up front. FWIW, it is clear to me that there is an aspect of imposing a US-centric timezone system on other parts of the world. The recent tzdb approach of focussing entirely on timezone regions makes perfect sense for the US, where region boundaries do not follow state lines, and ordinary members of the public need to be aware of whether they are in US/Mountain or US/Central. This simply isn't the timezone model in many other parts of the world. In places like Europe and Asia, the timezone is driven primarily by the country you live in - an ordinary member of the public in Iceland is never going to associate with some abstract timezone region stretching down the Atlantic that is not named, not legally defined and is little more than a random outcome based on tzdb's choice of 1970. Even in somewhere like Norway, an ordinary member of the public will understand that although they follow CET, their timezone is actually driven by their Government in Oslo. The brilliance of the original rule - "ID as needed for post-1970 data, with at least one per ISO country" - was that it seamlessly handled *both* models of timezone in one unified set of IDs. Removal of the ISO country part has completely destabilised that balance. As a constraint to this thread, tzdb really needs to offer one standard view of data, not command line flags that allow different views. If downstream projects end up with different views of the data, it makes tzdb a much less reliable source. (tzdb can be packaged in different ways on the same machine, for example it is undesirable for Postgres' internal tzdb and the OS tzdb to diverge for the same version). Given this, what needs to be nailed down is what is the default data set that tzdb publishes - there isn't really much point in talking about compile time flags, or that the contents of backzone could be used by someone. Lets look at seven options for pre-1970 data: Pre-1970 data for regions only ----------------------------------------- 1) Pre-1970 data for regions only - Despite looking identical to other IDs, region IDs are treated as special/favoured - Pre-1970 data for non-region IDs is of no importance whatsoever, thus most get pre-1970 data from another country/continent - The split between region and non-region locations is fully completed - the US-centric timezone model is dominant - An end user in Iceland is supposed to use Africa/Abidjan, Europe/Reykjavik is treated as a historical mistake of tzdb kept around only for backwards compatibility Pre-1970 data for most IDs ------------------------------------ 2) Pre-1970 data for each ID meeting the rule "ID as needed for post-1970 data, with at least one per ISO country" - The split between region and non-region locations is healed - High quality data from places like Iceland and Norway is retained, but low quality data from elsewhere is restored - The pre-1970 data is simply viewed as the best available data for the each location which can be improved over time - Most end-users in Iceland would expect tzdb to provide pre-1970 data from Iceland, not the Ivory Coast 3) Pre-1970 data for for all IDs that currently exist except true aliases - This is very similar to #2, but would include something like Montreal which was effectively mistakenly added to tzdb - This doesn't seem as desirable as #2 4) Pre-1970 data for any ID where the pre-1970 data is high quality - Subjective on quality, which doesn't seem like a great idea - It does avoid bringing bad quality data back into the main tzdb distribution - On balance, #2 has fewer places for debate to arise 5) Pre-1970 data for all IDs that currently exist except true aliases, plus a *new* set of IDs representing regions - As per #2, but adding IDs like "Region/12345" or "Region/Berlin" - Regions should contain post-1970 data only, as the region is by definition only meaningful post-1970 - It is not entirely clear what this solves over just going with #2 - This option is connected to Russ' proposals [1], although he suggests a bigger split between timekeeping data and ID naming - Perhaps it makes sense if the new region IDs were internal and not normally seen by end users? Remove pre-1970 data from general use ------------------------------------------------------- 6) No pre-1970 data whatsoever, all IDs are post-1970 only - Project policy is that tzdb is focussed on post-1970 data only - Paul repeatedly tells us that pre-1970 data is unreliable, and people shouldn't use it - Pre-1970 data would not be deleted, but would not be available in most downstreams - The split between region and non-region locations is effectively healed - End users lose access to pre-1970 data, which is particularly notable in some locations where that data is reliable, eg London - It is unknown at this point what the user impact is of removing pre-1970 data from major financial/business centres (no major location has yet been merged) 7) No existing IDs get pre-1970 data, but a *new* set of IDs are created containing it - As per #5, the existing IDs get no pre-1970 data and the split between region and non-region locations is healed - New IDs, such as "Historic/Europe/London" or "Historic/Africa/Abidjan" get created for each of the main IDs - The historic IDs include pre-1970 data, the standard IDs do not - There is a mechanical transformation between the historic and non-historic IDs - Whether downstreams do or do not include the historic IDs is their choice, potentially based on available space - The data provided by the standard non-historic IDs remains the same whether the downstream includes the historic IDs or not (a Good Thing) - Users have to deliberately opt-in to get pre-1970 data, which might make them think about the accuracy issue Notes -------- - I'm not discussing adding new IDs simply to represent locations whose clocks differ only before 1970. I don't personally think that is a job for tzdb, and even if it is, it is a job for a different thread. - I'm not discussing what value is returned prior to 1970 when pre-1970 data is removed. That would be a job for a different thread. - Link vs Zone is not important for this discussion. Summary ------------- After a few weeks of thinking, these are the options I've come up with. Feel free to suggest another option or variant if you think I've missed anything obvious. I believe that was a disaster that the brilliant "ID as needed for post-1970 data, with at least one per ISO country" rule was removed. It has created needless division, bifurcating a unified set of ID into region and non-region IDs and creating backwards compatibility issues in the data of many locations. IMO, there are two basic models of timezones in the world, and moving tzdb from one that supported both to one that only supports the US-centric model is simply a mistake that needs correcting. As such, my preference would be to adopt option 2. Option 6 or 7 could work, and might be the best choices if we had a clean slate or if there was some hidden pressure that the list is unaware of to remove pre-1970 data, but they are risky options given we do not know the impact on end-users in major financial/business centres. Stephen [1] https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2021-September/030518.html

23 59

The link-name, America/Virgin, is linked to two zones in 'backzone'
by Yan-Jie Wang Nov. 12, 2021

Nov. 12, 2021

A link-name (the second column of the Link line) in a file should be unique. However, 'America/Virgin' is linked to two zones (America/Port_of_Spain and America/St_Thomas) in 'backzone'. The error is in the latest commit as well as in the archive tzdata2021e.tar.gz. The link to the file: https://github.com/eggert/tz/blob/6c15079/backzone Yan-Jie Wang

2 1

Re: [tz] What are the interfaces to the TZDB?
by Brian Park Nov. 10, 2021

Nov. 10, 2021

(Replying back to the list with permission) On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:45 AM Eliot Lear <lear(a)lear.ch> wrote: > On 09.11.21 20:38, Brian Park wrote: > > Is the TZDB project intended to support only POSIX systems? > > It's a fair question. Before we say, “no”, I would like to understand > what sort systems use the database that themselves are *NOT* POSIX > compliant. But also, as Paul pointed out, the binary format itself is > standardized at the IETF, the sponsor of this shindig. > > We could go up the stack, but before we do so, we should be clear on our > reasons as to why we are doing so. And so when you say: > > My downstream usage does not have a file system, or even an operating > system. For me, the API into the TZDB project are the raw files, but I > understand that my usage is unusual. > > Would you mind being a bit more specific? Are you printing a book? ;-) > Not that primitive... My libraries run on bare-metal, embedded microcontrollers, with no operating system. My first version is in C++, supporting all Zones and Links in about 36kB of flash (8-bit controllers) to 44kB of flash (32-bit controllers), without using 64-bit integers. I have another version in Python that I hope to convert to MicroPython soon. I'm hoping to write another version in Go lang, which will be converted into TinyGo. Brian

2 1

Re: [tz] Pre-1970 data
by dpatte Nov. 5, 2021

Nov. 5, 2021

I was be contributing a longer message on this whole subject within a few days, but I want to state upfront that country/city is insufficient in many countries for a fully expandable location database.Off the top of my head, I can think of three different Richmonds in Canada. One in Quebec, one in Ontario, and one in BC. I know there are many Springfields in many USA states, and let's not even talk about the potential USA/Columbus.The key of a database should be unique and recognizable. For many countries, multiple levels of government are the only way to properly differentiate cities.Canada/British_Columbia/Richmond would be more appropriate.This allows the pre-1970 db to be both infinitely expandable, as well as user friendly to the point of being fully obvious to all users.Sent from my Galaxy -------- Original message --------From: Brian Park via tz <tz(a)iana.org> Date: 2021-11-05 11:27 (GMT-05:00) To: Philip Paeps <philip(a)trouble.is> Cc: Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne(a)joda.org>, Time Zone Mailing List <tz(a)iana.org> Subject: Re: [tz] Pre-1970 data On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 10:11 PM Philip Paeps <philip(a)trouble.is> wrote:On 2021-11-05 12:17:34 (+0800), Brian Park via tz wrote: > I get the impression that this debate is caused by the existence of 2 > different schools of thought: [...] > > I want to suggest that it may be possible for these 2 views to > coexist. They de facto coexist right now. The overwhelming majority of the data are descriptive. Only recent efforts have made some of the post-1970 data appear more prescriptive.They coexist in an ad hoc manner right now, and that seems to be one of the causes for the contention. I am suggesting that we formalize the separation, so that both groups are happier. > We > could create a new file, e.g. call it 'countryzone', which contains a > set > of Links organized in a hierarchical tree by country, pointing to the > Core > zones. I strongly believe we should continue to carefully avoid attempting to group data by country. [I would even avoid using the word "country" wherever possible.]Can you explain why? Because it will cause arguments about disputed places? I think only a small minority of places around the world are disputed. By separating these ISO-country timezones into a 'countryzone' file, perhaps we can confine the debate into a smaller section of the TZDB. We could create duplicate entries (i.e. Country1/City, Country2/City), or create a pseudo-country called "Disputed" (i.e. Disputed/City). The point is, we can create policies that govern these disputed regions.Could we move 'countryzone' into a separate project? Probably, but some amount of initial coordination and refactoring would be required to resolve conflicting zone identifiers.Overall, I feel like the TZDB data should lean a bit more towards matching how end-users think about timezones in the real world (Prescriptive), and lean slightly less on treating timezones as a clustering problem (Descriptive). But I can see pros and cons of both approaches. Which is why I am suggesting ways to make the 2 approaches interoperate better. > For the pre-1970 data, it is my understanding that the 'backzone' file > contains Zone records which should replace ONLY the LinkMerged records > found in the other files. I propose that all LinkMerged records be > extracted into a separate file (let's call it 'mergedzone') so that > there > is a clear symmetry between 'backzone' and 'mergedzone', which allows > them > to be substituted for each other. The dependency diagram looks > something > like this: As I've suggested before in another thread, I think we should consider undoing the split into backzone. I really liked Stephen's phrasing earlier in this thread: acceptably accurate, not outrageously wrong. We started moving data to backzone to limit the scope of 'active' maintenance to post-1970 data. That artificial split led us towards a more prescriptive worldview. It seems clear that prescriptive simply does not work for a real world with people on it.I think Paul Eggert has made it clear that he does not want to maintain this data. My proposed refactoring of this info into the 'backzone' / 'mergedzone' pair makes it easy for downstream libraries to add back the 'backzone' data if they want. The 'make PACKRATDATA=backzone' hack does not help downstream libraries which do not use TZif or the Makefile. > If there is any chance that this will result in being able to type > "Canada/Toronto" instead of "America/Toronto", that would resolve an > annoyance that has lasted some 30-35 years. In this context, America refers to the landmass, not to the political entity occupying a large chunk of it. [Canada/Eastern etc moved to backward around 1993, as far as I can tell.]Virtual no one in the world thinks of "America" as referring to all of "North America" and "South America".Brian

2 1

Ref: Tz on social media
by nadir altinbas Nov. 4, 2021

Nov. 4, 2021

is it possible to add 'news' from TZ Coordiation web site share button to social media such as; Linkedin,FaceBook(meta),Instagram,Twitteretc.... There may be occur an anouncment to publicize for sharing via social media? Nadir Altinbas Estanbul /TR, 2021 Nov,2 nadiraltinbas(a)yahoo.com n.altinbas

2 2

event of interest: Future of Europe debates – The end of DST: how can it be placed back to the European agenda?
by BASTIAN Michelle Oct. 28, 2021

Oct. 28, 2021

Hi all, I was just at events for the Barcelona Time Use initiative time use week 2021 and the panel on changing DST in Europe was very interesting and I thought some of you might want to take a look. It is free to sign up and you can access recordings of all the events including the one on time zones/DST. Description and link below. Loved that there was lots of talk about there being no problem having many more time zones in Europe as ‘our computers handle all of that for us now’. https://timeuseweek.beplanet.tv/en/ Future of Europe debates – The end of DST: how can it be placed back to the European agenda? In 2019, the European Parliament agreed to end the biannual clock change. Nevertheless, the Member States have not been able to achieve an agreement on which time zone has to be adopted. This debate explores how can we place back the debate on the European and Member States agenda. Representative of European Parliament Pending to confirm Maria Nikolopoulou European social and economic council Ticia Luengo International Association for Natural Time Till Roenneberg World Federation of Societies for Chronobiology Best, Michelle. --- Dr Michelle Bastian Mid-Career Fellow, Independent Social Research Foundation (Project info<https://www.isrf.org/fellows-projects/michelle-bastian/>) Senior Lecturer in Environmental Humanities ESALA, Edinburgh College of Art, University of Edinburgh The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. Is e buidheann carthannais a th’ ann an Oilthigh Dhùn Èideann, clàraichte an Alba, àireamh clàraidh SC005336.

3 2

Re: [tz] tzcode2021e: uninitialized variable in localtime.c
by Paul Eggert Oct. 27, 2021

Oct. 27, 2021

On 10/22/21 07:49, Christos Zoulas wrote: > My linter reports "prevcorr" is uninitialized in the if statement > below the comment that starts "To avoid other botches". Thanks for mentioning that. This prompted me to find an obscure bug in localtime that would cause it to access an uninitialized local variable (which is undefined behavior) in cases involving 32-bit time_t code reading malformed 64-bit data. I installed the attached patch to fix the bug, and I hope this also pacifies your linter.

2 1

[PROPOSED] Be more generous when dealing with v1 data
by Paul Eggert Oct. 27, 2021

Oct. 27, 2021

* NEWS: Mention this. * localtime.c (tzloadbody): In version 2 and later files, do not attempt to validate the version 1 header and data block; instead, ignore them except for the purpose of skipping over them, as per a recommendation in RFC 8536 section 4. Also, when the TZif file is version 1 and we break out near the end of the loop, do so only after altering nread and memmoving any later data; this avoids having later code attempt to parse the version 1 header as if it were a TZ string. --- NEWS | 6 +++++ localtime.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index d4a9823..0f684f7 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -14,6 +14,12 @@ Unreleased, experimental changes Fix bug when 32-bit time_t code reads malformed 64-bit TZif data. (Problem reported by Christos Zoulas.) + When reading a version 2 or later TZif file, the TZif reader now + validates the version 1 header and data block only enough to skip + over them, as recommended by RFC 8536 section 4. Also, the TZif + reader no longer mistakenly attempts to parse a version 1 TZIf + file header as a TZ string. + Release 2021e - 2021-10-21 18:41:00 -0700 diff --git a/localtime.c b/localtime.c index 6d736b2..39ef6e3 100644 --- a/localtime.c +++ b/localtime.c @@ -434,35 +434,45 @@ tzloadbody(char const *name, struct state *sp, bool doextend, if (close(fid) < 0) return errno; for (stored = 4; stored <= 8; stored *= 2) { - int_fast32_t ttisstdcnt = detzcode(up->tzhead.tzh_ttisstdcnt); - int_fast32_t ttisutcnt = detzcode(up->tzhead.tzh_ttisutcnt); - int_fast64_t prevtr = -1; - int_fast32_t prevcorr; - int_fast32_t leapcnt = detzcode(up->tzhead.tzh_leapcnt); - int_fast32_t timecnt = detzcode(up->tzhead.tzh_timecnt); - int_fast32_t typecnt = detzcode(up->tzhead.tzh_typecnt); - int_fast32_t charcnt = detzcode(up->tzhead.tzh_charcnt); - char const *p = up->buf + tzheadsize; - /* Although tzfile(5) currently requires typecnt to be nonzero, - support future formats that may allow zero typecnt - in files that have a TZ string and no transitions. */ - if (! (0 <= leapcnt && leapcnt < TZ_MAX_LEAPS - && 0 <= typecnt && typecnt < TZ_MAX_TYPES - && 0 <= timecnt && timecnt < TZ_MAX_TIMES - && 0 <= charcnt && charcnt < TZ_MAX_CHARS - && (ttisstdcnt == typecnt || ttisstdcnt == 0) - && (ttisutcnt == typecnt || ttisutcnt == 0))) - return EINVAL; - if (nread - < (tzheadsize /* struct tzhead */ - + timecnt * stored /* ats */ + char version = up->tzhead.tzh_version[0]; + bool skip_datablock = stored == 4 && version; + int_fast32_t datablock_size; + int_fast32_t ttisstdcnt = detzcode(up->tzhead.tzh_ttisstdcnt); + int_fast32_t ttisutcnt = detzcode(up->tzhead.tzh_ttisutcnt); + int_fast64_t prevtr = -1; + int_fast32_t prevcorr; + int_fast32_t leapcnt = detzcode(up->tzhead.tzh_leapcnt); + int_fast32_t timecnt = detzcode(up->tzhead.tzh_timecnt); + int_fast32_t typecnt = detzcode(up->tzhead.tzh_typecnt); + int_fast32_t charcnt = detzcode(up->tzhead.tzh_charcnt); + char const *p = up->buf + tzheadsize; + /* Although tzfile(5) currently requires typecnt to be nonzero, + support future formats that may allow zero typecnt + in files that have a TZ string and no transitions. */ + if (! (0 <= leapcnt && leapcnt < TZ_MAX_LEAPS + && 0 <= typecnt && typecnt < TZ_MAX_TYPES + && 0 <= timecnt && timecnt < TZ_MAX_TIMES + && 0 <= charcnt && charcnt < TZ_MAX_CHARS + && 0 <= ttisstdcnt && ttisstdcnt < TZ_MAX_TYPES + && 0 <= ttisutcnt && ttisutcnt < TZ_MAX_TYPES)) + return EINVAL; + datablock_size + = (timecnt * stored /* ats */ + timecnt /* types */ + typecnt * 6 /* ttinfos */ + charcnt /* chars */ + leapcnt * (stored + 4) /* lsinfos */ + ttisstdcnt /* ttisstds */ - + ttisutcnt)) /* ttisuts */ + + ttisutcnt); /* ttisuts */ + if (nread < tzheadsize + datablock_size) + return EINVAL; + if (skip_datablock) + p += datablock_size; + else { + if (! ((ttisstdcnt == typecnt || ttisstdcnt == 0) + && (ttisutcnt == typecnt || ttisutcnt == 0))) return EINVAL; + sp->leapcnt = leapcnt; sp->timecnt = timecnt; sp->typecnt = typecnt; @@ -578,13 +588,14 @@ tzloadbody(char const *name, struct state *sp, bool doextend, ttisp->tt_ttisut = *p++; } } - /* - ** If this is an old file, we're done. - */ - if (up->tzhead.tzh_version[0] == '\0') - break; - nread -= p - up->buf; - memmove(up->buf, p, nread); + } + + nread -= p - up->buf; + memmove(up->buf, p, nread); + + /* If this is an old file, we're done. */ + if (!version) + break; } if (doextend && nread > 2 && up->buf[0] == '\n' && up->buf[nread - 1] == '\n' && -- 2.31.1

1 0

Extra transition type is generated by zic with -r specified
by Almaz Mingaleev Oct. 26, 2021

Oct. 26, 2021

I’ve tried to generate a TZif file with transitions up to 1 Jan 2100 using zic with -r and “-b fat”. However, an extra transition type is generated for many (all?) time zones. That type’s UTC offset is zero and it is used only for the last transition in the 64-bit section. What I did: mkdir /tmp/zic cd /tmp/zic git clone https://github.com/eggert/tz.git . make -C . zic make -C . NDATA= rearguard.zi mkdir data ./zic -b fat -r /@4102444800 -d ./data rearguard.zi Below is an investigation for Australia/Lord_Howe (I don’t think choice matters here). I couldn’t find a way to force zdump to print transitions for a given TZif file. Instead, please see human-readable dumps from the TZif from our internal tools immediately below and raw byte information at the bottom if you’d prefer to work with that. These are local time transition types for Australia/Lord_Howe: Types gmtOffset (seconds),isDst,ttisgmt,ttisstd,[gmtOffset ISO],[DST?] 38180,0,,,PT10H36M20S,STD 0,0,,,PT0S,STD <- this is odd 36000,0,,,PT10H,STD 41400,1,,,PT11H30M,DST 37800,0,,,PT10H30M,STD 39600,1,,,PT11H,DST Transitions: transition,type,[UTC time],[Type offset],[Type isDST] … 4063275000,5,2098-10-04T15:30:00Z,PT11H,DST 4078998000,4,2099-04-04T15:00:00Z,PT10H30M,STD 4094724600,5,2099-10-03T15:30:00Z,PT11H,DST 4102444800,1,2100-01-01T00:00:00Z,PT0S,STD <- this is odd So, after the upper bound specified in -r, the transitions say that GMT is used. As I’d expect, the 32-bit transitions are not affected when the upper bound in -r is after 2038. However, with -r /@1634833073 the 32-bit section also has 6 transition types and the last transition sets offset to 0. Is that a bug or is there a reason for such behaviour? Thanks, Almaz Byte manipulations: typecnt is 5 in 32-bit section: xxd -seek 36(4+1+15+4*4) -len 4 data/Australia/Lord_Howe 64-bit section starts at offset 674. timecnt is 0xF0(=240) in 64-bit section: xxd -seek 706(674 + 20 + 3 * 4) -len 4 data/Australia/Lord_Howe typecnt is 6 in 64-bit section: xxd -seek 710(706 + 4) -len 4 data/Australia/Lord_Howe So, 64-bit header has one extra transition type. Let’s check how it is used and what that transition is: 2638 = 674 + 44 + 240 * 8 xxd -seek 2638 -len 240 -c 1 data/Australia/Lord_Howe prints transition types: 00000b38: 05 . 00000b39: 04 . 00000b3a: 05 . 00000b3b: 04 . 00000b3c: 05 . 00000b3d: 01 . Transition type is changing from 4 to 5, but the last one is 1. xxd -seek 2878 -len 36 -c 6 data/Australia/Lord_Howe prints local time type records: 00000b3e: 0000 9524 0004 ...$.. 00000b44: 0000 0000 0000 ...... <- the last transition type 00000b4a: 0000 8ca0 0008 ...... 00000b50: 0000 a1b8 010d ...... 00000b56: 0000 93a8 0013 ...... 00000b5c: 0000 9ab0 0119 ...... Which means that 1st type’s offset is 0 and that the last rule for Lord Howe is actually GMT.

2 4

[PROPOSED] Improve Palestine predictions for 2025 and later
by Paul Eggert Oct. 25, 2021

Oct. 25, 2021

* NEWS: Mention this. * asia (Palestine): Guess Fri>=23, not lastFri, for fallback transitions in the future. Fri>=23 is more consistent with past practice than lastFri. The first differing prediction is a fallback on 2025-10-24, not 2025-10-31. --- NEWS | 10 ++++++++++ asia | 2 +- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index a7aa269..d83e01c 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -1,5 +1,15 @@ News for the tz database +Unreleased, experimental changes + + Changes to future timestamps + + Predict Palestine fallbacks to be the first Friday on or after + October 23, not October's last Friday, to be more consistent with + past practice. The first differing prediction is a fallback on + 2025-10-24, not 2025-10-31. + + Release 2021e - 2021-10-21 18:41:00 -0700 Changes to future timestamps diff --git a/asia b/asia index dd228e5..6d6b1de 100644 --- a/asia +++ b/asia @@ -3445,7 +3445,7 @@ Rule Palestine 2019 only - Mar 29 0:00 1:00 S Rule Palestine 2019 only - Oct Sat>=24 0:00 0 - Rule Palestine 2020 max - Mar Sat>=24 0:00 1:00 S Rule Palestine 2020 only - Oct 24 1:00 0 - -Rule Palestine 2021 max - Oct lastFri 1:00 0 - +Rule Palestine 2021 max - Oct Fri>=23 1:00 0 - # Zone NAME STDOFF RULES FORMAT [UNTIL] Zone Asia/Gaza 2:17:52 - LMT 1900 Oct -- 2.31.1

3 3

Wrong name of timezone
by Igor Melnyk Oct. 25, 2021

Oct. 25, 2021

Hello! There is *Europe**/Kiev* timezone related to Ukraine. But Ukraine has the Ukrainian language and *Kiev* is in russian language. The correct name of the capital city of Ukraine is *Kyiv.* It must be changed. I know that it's not easy to do that but you must have some way to do that. For example, rename *Europe/Kiev* to *Europe/Kyiv* and make *Europe/Kiev* to be a temporary alias or link to *Europe/Kyiv.* What do you think about it? Best regards, Igor Melnyk.

1 0

Re: [tz] Palestine winter time
by Paul Eggert Oct. 22, 2021

Oct. 22, 2021

On 10/21/21 01:03, heba.hamad(a)mtit.gov.ps wrote: > Could you please confirm that Palestine winter time has been adopted in IANA time zone database Yes, tzdb release 2021e was published today with the updated Palestine winter time. The announcement is archived here: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz-announce/2021-October/000069.html

2 2

[tz-announce] 2021e release of tz code and data available
by Paul Eggert via tz-announce Oct. 22, 2021

Oct. 22, 2021

The 2021e release of the tz code and data is available. This release reflects the following changes: Changes to future timestamps Palestine will fall back 10-29 (not 10-30) at 01:00. (Thanks to P Chan and Heba Hemad.) Here are links to the release files: https://www.iana.org/time-zones/repository/releases/tzcode2021e.tar.gz https://www.iana.org/time-zones/repository/releases/tzdata2021e.tar.gz https://www.iana.org/time-zones/repository/releases/tzdb-2021e.tar.lz The following convenience links are also available, although they may point to the previous release until the relevant caches are refreshed: https://www.iana.org/time-zones/repository/tzcode-latest.tar.gz https://www.iana.org/time-zones/repository/tzdata-latest.tar.gz https://www.iana.org/time-zones/repository/tzdb-latest.tar.lz Links are also available via plain HTTP, and via FTP from ftp://ftp.iana.org/tz/releases with the same basenames as above. Each release file has a GPG signature, which can be retrieved by appending ".asc" to the above URLs. Copies of these signatures are appended to this message. This release corresponds to commit b102002e5300d94c369796d5b70bae22b5af720d dated 2021-10-21 18:41:00 -0700 and tagged '2021e' in the development GitHub repository at <https://github.com/eggert/tz>. Here are the SHA-512 checksums for the release files: 87b0335129ea41c5f42f687f548712e5da892baa8494cecf5d34851beceecf6ae52f22104696ed187713cf9e502570eb2041e277dfd3c043c11d0253bfde685a tzcode2021e.tar.gz c1e8d04e049157ed5d4af0868855bbd75517e3d7e1db9c41d5283ff260109de46b6fac6be94828201d093e163d868044ac2a9db2bf0aeab800e264d0c73a9119 tzdata2021e.tar.gz 8abd662f07a91eed5b77d03eaa3e9ef59ce08b4e3fc14f9857095c3d4f2039e8ac216fc985b0cf87a823eacad064197c8ecb76ba531a9fc700014d7f0057aba8 tzdb-2021e.tar.lz Here are the GPG digital signatures for the release files: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEfjeSqdis99YzvBWI7ZfpDmKqfjQFAmFyF3cACgkQ7ZfpDmKq fjQKRw//c5HpFCN0vcPUIC/OQKTF/SXFOANCpHWypc/vgTVXFAsVu0zIKWdBuXXI 0zQDpbTcTJ2FfI5Z1JGNzeKa2G4Wy71lwwPu2mGDt0WCCAqh/l15XvgVEAM96YLG WZRK+WLKIVWgZ67NA2xWAt9VLgtA643Cgym1DCpsr9jTDAhGSYq8D0XC5OQHtfw2 oyzv4InTW+0EI14FQcQ3VqImLwGSefeYPfMBRjrAspqrTLez78vW914IWNKcgEoC pKCkq9+14u0L+G5j5E+f27gbRtZ4hZnIn5uNgItomJmGObW6khn0Huf+G6U1BAal 2zLSAYMubr1kq/6dP62QUivi1W2S3YRZDh20YsKxn214HW5qK5LdQKYruBGKOFou 7oAe91W3UW0vSJuboXj0Dbdc3p8Oay97eJ/kRDVKJZ95/UOQtwrkQi2wCbm19eC8 kvHdejbIrOvdl+ZpvkHIggQGSOchyXUASeqnX/9zirOAX0N05insC/ybJLAwepFm FqpvcfwjrJKCotAjFEEex1uIT5kgQwIumvtxLef3bGQgYtF1yfWMD0NSJAR1iAU2 BzXuikOLPNbHWpC41ODgRxBVaQnMpliC0WGJ/HiVT78ukEkx0MpcxyfnxjEDD7fz F3GlJlj/bw5rvsPrFzbSjYyzXfrn0u1y8/vgehUmtSj1K7MmB6I= =CliF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEfjeSqdis99YzvBWI7ZfpDmKqfjQFAmFyF3cACgkQ7ZfpDmKq fjSLPw/9EDTMMp0ySiPkYgXICy+hYq78xDOpF5IU34tcvmL2j3OZiM49X//CQzNF 7kLoEkYenpjJZ9QU8V0w+26UJF3js/R3a9gLU3ybPZ7+o+NOanQK68z5EvggWGfm 0yVCGbPhsKNoP/2Xtpv3gLiT6WoBvJF6k16mRQtiE7ngLJ3OUpaWaQAZ73F+sMTY I5F++cAdTvOTHw6M4ORmvp8OMg2df1KVXf2MINQZkx3OVxw+y6zaMwcKUJHz81eY KCDO6DJyoj48/WNDxfIiYVk2YoOVm9I3HiqgmrojmniJFLCq/PkWGqU61gmNCSRv 5vLjb9qnfWQG8E3E44pdH8aqZt7z7kYdcL89y5UnDBlJMmoh/cPigjfBmAot7Erw 5Mj8pp/a7tcvHKIoGZscIzjRnffYDHTD6rNwStVvTfKyGE7O6Fa63yUnndCudqdu 6nZCQNkELrn9ber4ieJR6d46LOVFvqlMhCzhknZRUBkbtU4ltwBze8RvrGGhdyJ3 s9YQtGpY1uEcNF4JWzqkE9sXtPnevFERUT1hZdQpJ2NM0mrVKAfdLhryvJyi+t30 fbMbyqmYRhPuyk7OUPbduTIXc4IIpSzAaeQRFwZqDGSOuOj+8JSk6EX9Kwel7ahp 2PIzzyffxL7m2kG9+iAKckRHz0nyvoYGHQl1gsah9qUVx2Q/JIo= =kEHz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEfjeSqdis99YzvBWI7ZfpDmKqfjQFAmFyF3cACgkQ7ZfpDmKq fjSLPw/9EDTMMp0ySiPkYgXICy+hYq78xDOpF5IU34tcvmL2j3OZiM49X//CQzNF 7kLoEkYenpjJZ9QU8V0w+26UJF3js/R3a9gLU3ybPZ7+o+NOanQK68z5EvggWGfm 0yVCGbPhsKNoP/2Xtpv3gLiT6WoBvJF6k16mRQtiE7ngLJ3OUpaWaQAZ73F+sMTY I5F++cAdTvOTHw6M4ORmvp8OMg2df1KVXf2MINQZkx3OVxw+y6zaMwcKUJHz81eY KCDO6DJyoj48/WNDxfIiYVk2YoOVm9I3HiqgmrojmniJFLCq/PkWGqU61gmNCSRv 5vLjb9qnfWQG8E3E44pdH8aqZt7z7kYdcL89y5UnDBlJMmoh/cPigjfBmAot7Erw 5Mj8pp/a7tcvHKIoGZscIzjRnffYDHTD6rNwStVvTfKyGE7O6Fa63yUnndCudqdu 6nZCQNkELrn9ber4ieJR6d46LOVFvqlMhCzhknZRUBkbtU4ltwBze8RvrGGhdyJ3 s9YQtGpY1uEcNF4JWzqkE9sXtPnevFERUT1hZdQpJ2NM0mrVKAfdLhryvJyi+t30 fbMbyqmYRhPuyk7OUPbduTIXc4IIpSzAaeQRFwZqDGSOuOj+8JSk6EX9Kwel7ahp 2PIzzyffxL7m2kG9+iAKckRHz0nyvoYGHQl1gsah9qUVx2Q/JIo= =kEHz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- PS. If your tzdata parser does not yet support negative DST offsets or times past 24:00, or if it insists on a 'pacificnew' file that is no longer present, this release's data entries can be turned into a rearguard-format tarball that should work even with these older parsers. This is intended to be a temporary transition aid for these parsers. To generate a rearguard-format tarball, obtain the full distribution as described above, and run the command 'make rearguard_tarballs' on a development host. Or you can run 'make rearguard.zi' to generate a single file that can be fed directly to a parser that works like 'zic'.

1 0