- UA-discuss - lists.iana.org

UA Informational Flyer
by Don Hollander Sept. 24, 2015

Sept. 24, 2015

Dear All: At the last ICANN meeting in Toronto there was a UA Informational Flyer produced. Dennis Tan of he UASG and I have gone through it to bring it up to date. We would welcome your comments between now and end of day Friday (NZ Time) on the attached. This is the deadline to get it ready and printed if we want to have them available for the Dublin Meeting. I will take individual comments received between now and the deadline and produce a final copy. Thanks. Don

4 3

UA ICANN Dublin draft agenda
by Ram Mohan Sept. 23, 2015

Sept. 23, 2015

Folks, Based on our discussions at the UASG Coordination meeting, attached is a draft agenda for the Universal Acceptance workshop session on Sunday and for the public workshop later in the week at the ICANN Dublin meeting. Comments welcome. -Ram

9 8

Materials and funding for new gTLDs event
by Miguel Ignacio Estrada Sept. 23, 2015

Sept. 23, 2015

Hello, I wanted to know if there is any kind of materials and funding available I could use for a new GTLDs series of events in Argentina. I am a Postgraduate teacher at a University in Buenos Aires and I would like to extend a Domains class I am actually giving to make it a half day event for programming and digital marketing careers. Thanks in advance. -- Nacho Estrada | @acmuzic <http://twitter.com/acmuzic>

2 2

UA Coordination Group Meeting Notes
by Don Hollander Sept. 22, 2015

Sept. 22, 2015

Last week the UA Coordination Group met in Horsham, PA USA for a face-to-face meeting to further address UA issues. The meeting was open on Adobe Connect and there were a number of participants during the call. Please find attached the draft notes from that meeting (to be approved at the next meeting of the group). Please also find attached an annotated copy of the budget. (The notes also reference a program for Dublin which has already been circulated). Please let me know if you have any questions are wish to volunteer to participate in any of the efforts. Kind regards, Don Hollander

2 1

Re: [UA-discuss] UA Coordination Group Meeting Notes
by Don Hollander Sept. 22, 2015

Sept. 22, 2015

Thanks Dennis. (Because the format changed from Portrait to Landscape the PDF generator I used created two separate documents) Both are now attached. From: Dennis Tan <dtantanaka(a)verisign.com> Date: Wednesday, 23 September 2015 4:04 am To: Don Hollander <don.hollander(a)icann.org> Subject: RE: UA Coordination Group Meeting Notes Don, the budget documents is missing pages from 2 onwards. Dennis From: ua-discuss-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Don Hollander Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:57 AM To: UA-discuss(a)icann.org Subject: [UA-discuss] UA Coordination Group Meeting Notes Last week the UA Coordination Group met in Horsham, PA USA for a face-to-face meeting to further address UA issues. The meeting was open on Adobe Connect and there were a number of participants during the call. Please find attached the draft notes from that meeting (to be approved at the next meeting of the group). Please also find attached an annotated copy of the budget. (The notes also reference a program for Dublin which has already been circulated). Please let me know if you have any questions are wish to volunteer to participate in any of the efforts. Kind regards, Don Hollander

2 1

FW: [icann-board] ICANN News Alert -- ICANN and UASG Announce Results of Universal Acceptance Study for New gTLDs
by Ram Mohan Sept. 21, 2015

Sept. 21, 2015

From: icann-board-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:icann-board-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of ICANN News Alert Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 6:56 PM To: icann-board(a)icann.org Subject: [icann-board] ICANN News Alert -- ICANN and UASG Announce Results of Universal Acceptance Study for New gTLDs <https://www.icann.org/> News Alert https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-09-14-en _____ ICANN and UASG Announce Results of Universal Acceptance Study for New gTLDs 14 September 2015 ICANN, in conjunction with the Universal Acceptance Steering Group (UASG) <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=47255444> announced the availability of a new report: An Analysis of New gTLD Universal Acceptance. Universal Acceptance (UA) is the concept of removing all technical barriers that might hinder a user from accessing any name in any top-level domain (TLD) from any web browser, email client, or other Internet application on any computer or electronic device. The report, sponsored by ICANN, is available here <http://www.potaroo.net/reports/Universal-Acceptance/UA-Report.pdf> [PDF, 1.63 MB]. APNIC Labs, the research arm of the Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) <https://www.apnic.net/> , conducted the tests and analysis, which included measuring overall and per-country acceptance of certain generic top-level domains (gTLDs) by end-users and the domain name system (DNS) as a whole. The tests show that there were no underlying infrastructure obstacles to the accessibility of any TLDs. "These results were in-line with our expectations," said ICANN's Chief Technology Officer, David Conrad. "However, there will need to be changes to systems and software to fully leverage the global opportunities these new TLDs enable." Conrad went on to note that the results of the APNIC Labs tests identified occasional problems with Adobe's Flash product working in Microsoft's Internet Explorer and Mozilla's Firefox when accessing Internationalized Domain Name (IDN) TLDs. UASG Chair Ram Mohan said "The problems identified in the report resulted in a larger than expected number of IDN TLDs being unresolvable, clearly an issue for Universal Acceptance. The UASG is reaching out to Microsoft, Mozilla and Adobe to further investigate and mitigate this issue identified in the report, and ensure problems are resolved for all TLDs." Mohan also strongly encouraged members of the Internet community to join the UASG and facilitate the proliferation of Universal Acceptance for all TLDs. To learn more about the Universal Acceptance visit the UASG Wiki <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=47255444> or ICANN's UA <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/universal-acceptance-2012-02-25-en#in…> webpage. Interested parties are also invited to join the discuss list: https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ua-discuss. This message was sent to icann-board(a)icann.org <mailto:icann-board@icann.org> from: ICANN News Alert | communications(a)icann.org <mailto:communications@icann.org> | ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Email Marketing by <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=20666176&l=6333&s=RSGT&m=97…> Manage Your Subscription <http://click.icptrack.com/icp/track.php?msgid=972845&act=RSGT&r=20666176&c=…>

4 3

Blue Coat's Web's Shadiest Neighborhoods and implications on TLD acceptance
by Ram Mohan Sept. 18, 2015

Sept. 18, 2015

Folks, BlueCoat <https://www.bluecoat.com/company-overview>, a security vendor used by most of the Fortune 500, released a report on the Web’s shadiest TLDs <https://www.bluecoat.com/company/press-releases/blue-coat-reveals-webs-shad…> on Sep 1, 2015. They recommend to their 15,000+ customers to block all listed TLDs (report attached). Most of these are new gTLDs. There are implications for universal acceptance. This will result in some discussion at the upcoming UA Coordination Summit in Horsham tomorrow and Friday. The summit will have a conference bridge for anyone interesting in participating. Don Hollander will provide details. -Ram Chair, UASG o: +1.215.706.5700 x103; m: +1.215.431.0958; f: +1.215.706.5701 Skype: gliderpilot30 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *The Web’s Top 10 "TLDs with Shady Sites*"* *Rank * *Top-Level Domain Name * *Percentage of Shady Sites* *#1 .zip 100.00%* *#2 .review 100.00% * *#3 .country 99.97%* *#4 .kim 99.74% * *#5 .cricket 99.57% * *#6 .science 99.35% * *#7 .work 98.20%* *#8 .party 98.07% * *#9 .gq (Equatorial Guinea) 97.68%* *#10 .link 96.98%*

10 12

Re: [UA-discuss] Blue Coat's Web's Shadiest Neighborhoods and implications on TLD acceptance
by Kevin Murphy Sept. 18, 2015

Sept. 18, 2015

I would agree with that, David. People who don't think too much about it tend to think that any attempt to sell a domain name is some kind of con. Reporter laziness probably played a role too. This was a prepackaged story from a well-known vendor, the kind of thing that can easily be repurposed into something for publication in 20 minutes or less. Perhaps ICANN should put out a press release ranking security vendors by how many of their research reports are garbage. Borrowing Blue Coat's methodology, it would be quite easy to say with confidence the company has a "100% garbage" rating. Just restrict your sample to research reports you have actually read (ie, only this one). Kevin Murphy Domain Incite > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Blue Coat's Web's Shadiest Neighborhoods and > implications on TLD acceptance > From: David Conrad <david.conrad(a)icann.org> > Date: Thu, September 17, 2015 4:00 pm > To: Kevin Murphy <kevin(a)domainincite.com>, Jordyn Buchanan > <jordyn(a)google.com>, Ram Mohan <rmohan(a)afilias.info> > Cc: "UA-discuss(a)icann.org" <UA-discuss(a)icann.org> > > > Hi, > > From my perspective, the interesting part of the Bluecoat report was how > widely it was picked up in the press. This suggests to me that it played > into a particular mindset/agenda, one that is not particularly supportive > of new TLDs. > > Regards, > -drc > > On 9/16/15, 3:49 PM, "ua-discuss-bounces(a)icann.org on behalf of Kevin > Murphy" <ua-discuss-bounces(a)icann.org on behalf of kevin(a)domainincite.com> > wrote: > > >The Blue Coat report was pure PR. > > > >It had no value. > > > >http://domainincite.com/19211-laughable-security-report-labels-google-regi > >stry-shady > > > >> -------- Original Message -------- > >> Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Blue Coat's Web's Shadiest Neighborhoods and > >> implications on TLD acceptance > >> From: Jordyn Buchanan <jordyn(a)google.com> > >> Date: Wed, September 16, 2015 9:41 pm > >> To: Ram Mohan <rmohan(a)afilias.info> > >> Cc: "UA-discuss(a)icann.org" <UA-discuss(a)icann.org> > >> > >> > >> Relevant follow-up coverage (which doesn't exactly make sense): > >> > >> > >>http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/04/us-internet-security-domains-id > >>USKCN0R41U320150904 > >> > >> Jordyn > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ram Mohan <rmohan(a)afilias.info> wrote: > >> > >> > BlueCoat¹s methodology is discussed in some security group mailing > >>lists. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > My understanding is that in the case of .zip, there were instances of > >> > <file>.pdf.zip which allowed for drive-bys, malware etc. regardless > >>of the > >> > state of name registration. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -ram > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > *From:* Jennifer Gore Standiford [mailto:JStandiford@web.com] > >> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 4:32 PM > >> > *To:* Ram Mohan <rmohan(a)afilias.info> > >> > *Cc:* UA-discuss(a)icann.org > >> > *Subject:* RE: [UA-discuss] Blue Coat's Web's Shadiest Neighborhoods > >>and > >> > implications on TLD acceptance > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Ram and UA Members, > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Have we requested or received any of the underlying data that > >>supports the > >> > stats outlined in the BlueCoat report? I wonder why the .zip > >>extension was > >> > referenced as a shady¹ considering it hasn¹t launched yet. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Jennifer > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > *Jennifer Gore Standiford* > >> > > >> > Policy Director > >> > > >> > Web.com > >> > > >> > 12808 Gran Bay Parkway, West | Jacksonville, FL 32258 > >> > > >> > Office: 904. 680-6919| Cell: 904. 401-4347 > >> > > >> > [image: cid:image003.png@01CFD6B5.902BADC0] > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > *From:* ua-discuss-bounces(a)icann.org > >>[mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org > >> > <ua-discuss-bounces(a)icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Ram Mohan > >> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 1:43 PM > >> > *To:* UA-discuss(a)icann.org > >> > *Subject:* [UA-discuss] Blue Coat's Web's Shadiest Neighborhoods and > >> > implications on TLD acceptance > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Folks, > >> > > >> > BlueCoat <https://www.bluecoat.com/company-overview>, a security > >>vendor > >> > used by most of the Fortune 500, released a report on the Web¹s > >>shadiest > >> > TLDs > >> > > >><https://www.bluecoat.com/company/press-releases/blue-coat-reveals-webs-s > >>hadiest-neighborhoods> > >> > on Sep 1, 2015. They recommend to their 15,000+ customers to block all > >> > listed TLDs (report attached). Most of these are new gTLDs. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > There are implications for universal acceptance. This will result in > >>some > >> > discussion at the upcoming UA Coordination Summit in Horsham tomorrow > >>and > >> > Friday. The summit will have a conference bridge for anyone > >>interesting in > >> > participating. Don Hollander will provide details. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -Ram > >> > > >> > Chair, UASG > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > o: +1.215.706.5700 x103; m: +1.215.431.0958; f: +1.215.706.5701 > >> > > >> > Skype: gliderpilot30 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>---------------------- > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > *The Web¹s Top 10 "TLDs with Shady Sites*"* > >> > > >> > *Rank * *Top-Level Domain Name * *Percentage of Shady Sites* > >> > > >> > *#1 .zip 100.00%* > >> > > >> > *#2 .review 100.00% > >>* > >> > > >> > *#3 .country 99.97%* > >> > > >> > *#4 .kim 99.74% > >> * > >> > > >> > *#5 .cricket 99.57% > >> * > >> > > >> > *#6 .science 99.35% > >>* > >> > > >> > *#7 .work 98.20%* > >> > > >> > *#8 .party 98.07% > >> * > >> > > >> > *#9 .gq (Equatorial Guinea) 97.68%* > >> > > >> > *#10 .link 96.98%* > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >

1 0

A brief taxonomy of web hosting
by Christian Dawson Sept. 17, 2015

Sept. 17, 2015

Dennis et. al: As per our UASG Coordination Group talk about IDNs, and how to engage the other parts of the ecosystem... Attached is a brief taxonomy of the hosting parts of the Internet infrastructure ecosystem - from i2Coalition. It hasn’t been updated in a while but it’s part of a more comprehensive taxonomy of the Internet infrastructure we’re working on. I hope it helps! All the best, Christian Dawson Chairman & Co-founder Internet Infrastructure Coalition (i2C) c: 703 623 2612 http://i2coalition.com <http://i2coalition.com/>

1 0

Fwd: From Toronto (45. ICANN meeting)
by Dusan Stojicevic Sept. 17, 2015

Sept. 17, 2015

-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: From Toronto (45. ICANN meeting) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 21:23:34 +0200 From: Dusan Stojicevic <dusan(a)dukes.in.rs> To: Don Hollander <don.hollander(a)icann.org> Don: Those pictures represent brochure for UA from Toronto meeting. Maybe there is a possibility to print something similar. Dusan --- Ova e-pošta je provjerena na viruse Avast protuvirusnim programom. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

1 0