- lac-discuss-es - lists.iana.org

Re: Proyecto de Acuerdo de Asociaci�n Trans Pac�fico sobre IP
by salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro＠gmail.com Sept. 3, 2012

Sept. 3, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Proyecto de Acuerdo de Asociación Trans Pacífico sobre IP De: salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro(a)gmail.com Sí, Carlton. Él está diciendo que el TPP es un precursor de Libre Comercio Acuerdos. Taiwán es un mercado más grande que Francia en cuanto a las relaciones de EE.UU. go y puedes ver las ventajas y desventajas de apalancamiento, llevando a cabo. Algunos se preguntarán y ¿qué tiene esto que ver con "el precio del pescado en la mercado "[Pacific hablar por .. ¿cómo afecta a la Internet?]. Bueno, no es nuevo que los EE.UU. siempre ha sostenido que la Internet debe ser una zona libre de impuestos como por la Libertad de Impuestos del Congreso de EE.UU. de 1998 (* autor por ** Representante Christopher Cox, y el senador Ron Wyden y firmada ley el 21 de octubre de 1998 por el entonces presidente Clinton *), que después de la expiración reautorización siguió reauthorised y lo más reciente (legal hablar por extensión) fue en octubre de 2007, donde esta se ha extendido hasta 2014. La OCDE y la UE han estado sosteniendo la tesis contraria (Kurbaliha, J.2010) - Ver sus Principios de Ottawa, donde se encuentran con que no hay diferencia entre los impuestos y el correo tradicional que se requieren regulaciones especiales. De ello se desprende que, en 2003, cuando la UE introdujo una regulación solicitando fuera de la UE las empresas de comercio electrónico para pagar impuesto al valor agregado (IVA) si vendían bienes dentro de la UE. El principal motor o motivación fue que empresas de terceros países (Muchos de los cuales son empresas de Estados Unidos) tenía una ventaja sobre las empresas europeas. Ver uno de los informes - http://www.oecd.org/tax/taxadministration/20499630.pdf El punto de controversia es tambiÃ©n la ubicaciÃ³n (EE.UU. estÃ¡ a favor de origen) y destino (UE estÃ¡ a favor de destino) al evaluar tarriffs asÃ que cuando tome por ejemplo, como es con el Comercio. Por ello, las empresas multinacionales (empresas multinacionales) es cuidadoso y selectivo de jurisdicciones en las que Plonk sus servidores u oficinas, ya que tiene que tener sentido para el resultado final. En mi opiniÃ³n nada malo con el lÃnea de fondo, siempre y cuando las personas se comportan de manera responsable y justa para que mundial interÃ©s pÃºblico estÃ© protegido. El Ãºnico problema es que la historia y la corriente tendencias muestran que el yo trabajo de regulaciÃ³n does'nt modelo.[Pregunta para nosotros es encontrar ese lugar de equilibrio en el que todos pueden ganar]. Â¿Por quÃ© es tan importante Corea del Sur en la mezcla? Bueno, aparte de la v Samsung Apple y Samsung v circo, Corea del Sur tambiÃ©n es lÃder mundial en tÃ©rminos de ser el nÃºmero 1 en la clasificaciÃ³n IDI pero si usted pela las capas, el volumen y contenido son desencadenantes masivas en cuanto a la generaciÃ³n de ingresos. Pregunte a cualquier ISP o MNC ... Si los impuestos se introdujeron a nivel mundial, el carro de la manzana estarÃa molesto. Por supuesto, al final del dÃa, la realidad es que la UE se encuentra en crisis financiera y no deberÃa ser una sorpresa en cuanto a lo que su posiciÃ³n serÃ¡ en tÃ©rminos de "reforzar la estabilidad". El hecho de que incluso la FMI estÃ¡ luchando por encontrar soluciones viables reloj de arena indica que se encuentra en movimiento. LecciÃ³n que debemos aprender de esto es que nada es lo que parece, no lo que dicen los medios y las demandas de la sabidurÃa que seamos conscientes de nuestro entorno. @ Carlton, el segmento mÃ¡s grande no viene a nosotros Saludos cordiales, Sala El mar, Sep 4, 2012 a las 6:36 AM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribiÃ³: > Thanks for this Sala. The gentleman is telling Taiwan 'let not your heart > be troubled' or become too alarmed by the 're-balancing' act; moving from > bi-lateral trading relationship to a more multi-lateral profile that is the > TPP. > > The message objective: TPP is intended to create a bigger pie. And if you > wait and be of good cheer, a bigger slice comes to you. > > - Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro < > salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> Whilst on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the US Assistant Secretary Jose >> Fernandez made some remarks which are interesting. Worthwhile noting is the >> inclusion of Mexico, Canada and Japan. >> >> Here you go: >> Strengthening the U.S.-Taiwan Economic Relationship >> >> Remarks >> Jose W. Fernandez >> Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs >> American Chamber of Commerce >> Taipei, Taiwan >> August 5, 2012 >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *I. **Introduction* >> >> Thank you. This is my first trip to Taiwan and I continue to marvel at >> the numerous cultural and economic ties that bind our people. One of our >> ties was illustrated to me as I read the paper this morning. I enjoyed >> seeing that Jeremy Lins visit took top billing in the newspaper, and the >> meeting between President Ma and I drew a little less attention. >> >> Let me give you just one example that is illustrative of the larger U.S. >> Taiwan relationship. It is a great American tradition to start new >> companies in a home garage. In an Irvine, California garage in 1988 Linksys >> was born. The creators of this now ubiquitous line of home computer >> networking devices were Taiwan immigrants Janie and Victor Tsao. At the >> time they founded Linksys, they were also working as consultants >> specializing in pairing U.S. technology vendors with manufacturers in >> Taiwan. That pairing has become emblematic of the U.S. Taiwan economic >> relationship. The latest numbers show that two-way trade between the United >> States and Taiwan in electrical machinery hovers around $23 billion per >> year. >> >> *II. **Strategic Rebalancing Toward Asia* >> >> While Taiwan has been exemplary as one of the so-called Asian Tigers, I >> want to put our economic relationship with Taiwan in the larger Asian >> context before discussing Taiwan specifically. That larger context is our >> work on the Trans Pacific Partnership, and the Select USA initiative. >> >> As you know, the global economic crisis of the past few years has pushed >> us in the United States to pursue our own economic recovery. This is a >> two-sided coin, with an eye toward regional trade liberalization on one >> side, and concerted efforts to attract more foreign investment to the >> United States on the other. At all levels of the U.S. government, we are >> broadening and deepening our economic relationships throughout the Asia >> Pacific region. We are acutely aware that reinvigorating our economy at >> home goes hand in hand with partnering on economic growth abroad. >> >> The United States has long been involved in developments in the Asia >> Pacific region. We are proud that our contributions to regional security >> here helped create the conditions that brought more people out of poverty >> faster than anywhere else in history. That engagement continues today and >> the futures of the United States and the Asia Pacific are inextricably >> linked. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has highlighted, we are not >> just a diplomatic or military power here. We are an economic force as well. >> In 2010 alone, our exports to the Pacific Rim were over $320 billion, >> supporting 850,000 American jobs. >> >> But our work is not finished. One of our countrys great challenges in >> this century will be to establish a stronger network of trade links and >> practices around the Pacific Rim. Our recently enacted Free Trade >> Agreements with South Korea and Colombia, and our commitment to the >> Trans-Pacific Partnership, are clear demonstrations that we are here to >> stay. >> >> I am proud to note that the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) has been a >> very active promoter of these efforts. In fact, they have been so >> successful in working to promote Americas economic relationship with >> Taiwan that I was able to personally congratulate the former Director, Bill >> Stanton, on winning my award for export promotion in 2011. He also received >> the State Departments coveted Cobb award for global trade promotion >> efforts. Thats two awards in the same year to one man, something that >> doesnt happen very often in the State Department. The AIT team in Taipei >> and Kaohsiung (GOW shung) is carrying on that tradition and I expect >> great achievements from the incoming leadership team here in Taipei. >> >> All of these individual efforts fit into our larger work toward regional >> trade liberalization. Also supporting this effort is our commitment to the >> Trans-Pacific Partnership. >> >> Looking ahead to the next generation of trade agreements, we are aiming >> at crafting an agreement that addresses new and emerging trade issues and >> challenges. The Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, includes the United >> States, along with Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Chile, Malaysia, New >> Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam. It is a high-standard, broad-based >> regional agreement. We see the TPP as the most credible pathway to broader >> Asia-Pacific regional economic integration. >> >> The agreement will include core issues traditionally found in trade >> agreements, such as industrial goods, agriculture, and textiles as well as >> rules on intellectual property, technical barriers to trade, labor, and the >> environment. But it will also address cross-cutting issues not previously >> found in trade agreements, such as making the regulatory systems of TPP >> countries more compatible so U.S. companies can operate more seamlessly in >> TPP markets. It will also help innovative, job-creating small- and >> medium-sized enterprises participate more actively in international trade. >> Equally important is addressing new emerging trade issues, such as trade >> and investment in innovative products and services, and ensuring that >> state-owned enterprises compete fairly with private companies and do not >> distort competition in ways that put U.S. companies and workers at a >> disadvantage. >> >> The United States is participating in the TPP as the best vehicle to >> advance our economic interests and to promote economic growth and >> development in the critical Asia-Pacific region. Expanding U.S. exports is >> critical to our economic recovery and to the creation and retention of >> high-quality jobs in the United States. With its rapid growth and large >> markets, there is no region with which expanding our trade is more vital >> than the Asia Pacific. >> >> The TPP countries recently announced the addition of Mexico and Canada to >> the negotiations. Late last year Japan also formally expressed interest in >> beginning consultations with TPP member countries with a view to possibly >> joining the negotiations. Candidate countries for TPP must demonstrate >> through their actions and through bilateral consultations with each TPP >> country their readiness to meet the standards and objectives of the >> agreement. Once those bilateral processes are concluded, the current TPP >> partners must decide by consensus before a new member can participate. In >> short, we are excited by the possibilities created in the Asia-Pacific by >> the TPP, and are working very hard to make it a reality by the end of this >> year. >> >> Lets move on to another program we just started, Select USA. So one side >> of the coin of economic recovery is expanding opportunities for U.S. >> companies to do business effectively abroad. The other side of that coin is >> the work that we do at home to encourage investment in the United States. >> The United States consistently ranks at the top of most major indicators >> for its attractive business and investment climate. In fact, from 2006 >> through 2010, the United States received more FDI than any other country. >> The FDI flow into the United States in 2010 - $228 billion - was more than >> double the flow into any other country in the world, and despite economic >> difficulties of the time, 49 percent greater than the FDI flow into the >> United States in 2009. At the same time, total Taiwan direct investment >> flow in the United States was over $5 billion in 2010, an increase of 14.7% >> from 2009. >> >> Under a program called SelectUSA, the U.S. Departments of Commerce and >> State engage partners around the world, as I am doing here, to promote >> investment into our dynamic economy. SelectUSA showcases how the United >> States is the worlds premier business location and provides easy access to >> federal-level programs and services related to business investment. >> >> Why do I say that the United States is the worlds premier business >> location? Because we are the worlds largest economy; we consistently rank >> at the top of most major indicators for our attractive business and >> investment climate; our own investment in research and development makes us >> the worlds center for innovation; and our leadership in protecting >> intellectual property with a transparent and predictable legal system makes >> doing business in the U.S. both cost-efficient and secure. Also, one of the >> strongest reasons will always be the quality of our higher education, >> particularly in science and engineering. Taiwan people in the United States >> are well aware of this: 80 percent have achieved some level of higher >> education, particularly in these fields and in medicine. I understand that >> the U.S. regulatory environment can be daunting to some investors, but >> through our hardworking representatives at the American Institute in >> Taiwan, and SelectUSA and other U.S. government partners back in >> Washington, we can help connect investors with the business counseling and >> training they may need to comply with applicable regulations. >> >> We can also direct you to the different states economic development >> agencies, making sure you get connected to the right partners for your >> investment selection process. >> >> *III. **U. S. Taiwan Economic Relations* >> >> Where does Taiwan figure into this picture? How can Taiwan partner with >> us and benefit from this wealth creation? Today, Taiwan is our 10th largest >> trading partner and our 15th largest export market. It would surprise >> many people but the United States actually trades more with Taiwan than >> with France; and Taiwan-U.S. trade is at near the same level as India-U.S. >> bilateral trade. The United States is Taiwans largest foreign investor, >> and Taiwan companies have made significant investments in the United >> States. Historically, the United States has been the strongest champion of >> Taiwans participation in global trade bodies such as the World Trade >> Organization and the APEC forum. Our strong economic relationship covers >> more than six decades. Taiwan has been an invaluable partner in influencing >> others to embrace reform and strive for economic growth. >> >> In recent years, however, this immensely valuable relationship has hit >> some bumps in the road that hinder our partnership and progress. We cant >> afford these bumps and need to make sure that they do not detract from >> efforts to make full use of our potential. We were pleased to see that the >> Legislative Yuan recently took action that will clear the path for Taiwan >> to establish a maximum residue limit for ractopamine in beef, eliminating a >> serious impediment to U.S. beef imports. U.S. trade agencies will be >> monitoring implementation of the regulatory measures needed to allow U.S. >> beef imports to resume. These steps will be important in helping to rebuild >> confidence in our bilateral trade relationship. >> >> We know from our own experience that adhering to bilateral and >> multilateral trade commitments is not always easy, but it is essential to >> maintaining the credibility that serves as the foundation of what has long >> been a positive, constructive relationship between trading partners. >> >> Of course our bilateral economic relationship goes well beyond this >> particular issue and we have continued to engage Taiwan at the working >> level and via our capable colleagues at AIT on the full range of important >> bilateral trade and investment issues. For example, the United States >> worked for many years in support of Taiwans candidacy to join the WTO >> Government Procurement Agreement. These joint efforts were rewarded when >> Taiwan acceded to the Agreement in 2009. Taiwan has already made many >> reforms to its procurement practices, and we stand ready to assist as >> Taiwan continues to harmonize its measures with global best practices with >> regard to transparency, contract terms, and licensing. >> >> Taiwan has made tremendous progress over the years in improving >> intellectual property rights protection and enforcement, and the United >> States has carried out significant bilateral cooperation activities on >> intellectual property rightsIPRissues. Still, challenges remain, >> including with regard to online infringement and the theft of trade >> secrets. During my time here in Taiwan I have visited companies that have >> had their technology stolen and heard their stories. For U.S. firms the >> protection of IPR is so vital because so many of our exports derive from >> IPR. A recent study estimated that 75% of U.S. exports involve IPR. Taiwan >> aspires to be an economy based on innovation, and together our unceasing >> efforts will ensure that Taiwans IPR enforcement regime meets the highest >> standards. Improved protection of trade secrets in Taiwan will help both >> foreign and domestic firms be competitive and innovative in todays >> knowledge-based economy. The bottom line: we have made major progress over >> the years on many critical issues when both sides have been prepared to >> work together. The United States sincerely desires a reinvigorated trade >> relationship with Taiwan. Its already generally good, but we can do better. >> >> Like the United States, Taiwan is also pursuing trade liberalization. We >> understand the Ma Administration has indicated a desire to be considered >> for the TPP in eight years. As a gold standard for future trade agreements >> in the region, the TPP requires members to embrace ambitious and >> comprehensive liberalization and open their markets to competition. We >> commend President Ma for recognizing the importance of trade integration, >> and for his expressed determination to push forward liberalization measures >> that would help Taiwan make its case as a possible candidate for future >> trade agreements. >> >> Change will not be easy, but the benefits of liberalization are clear: >> stronger and more competitive firms, better services, wider availability of >> products at lower prices, greater efficiency, and smoother integration into >> the world marketplace. More comprehensive economic liberalization will be >> an essential component for securing Taiwan's economic future. Real >> liberalization will demonstrate Taiwan's commitment to trade integration >> and potential inclusion in various trade arrangements. This includes >> comprehensive, bilateral FTAssuch as Taiwan's ongoing negotiations with >> Singaporewhich is an important first step. As Taiwan's leaders implement >> meaningful market liberalization measures and pursue new trade agreements, >> firm resolve and commitment to free market principles as a responsible WTO >> member are essential attributes to live by. We look forward to deepening >> our trade and economic interaction with Taiwan. We will support Taiwan as >> it embraces these fundamental prerequisites to effective and meaningful >> trade integration. Everyone in this room is an important element of what we >> hope to do. >> >> *IV. **Next Steps & Conclusion* >> >> Just as Janie and Victor Tsao understood when they founded Linksys nearly >> 25 years ago, trade between Taiwan and the United States is vital to the >> prosperity of both. The United States and Taiwan have a long and positive >> history of cooperation and many shared interests in the region. We are >> hopeful that the positive recent steps Taiwan has taken to address the beef >> issue are a demonstration of the sustained commitment that will be needed >> to reenergize our bilateral trade dialogue. To be sure, Taiwan, like any >> democracy, will face tough choices in order to live up to its international >> obligations and to put its long-term economic interests above domestic >> politics. Taiwan is a part of the Asia-Pacific regions economic future. We >> look forward to working with Taiwan as it builds cooperative and credible >> partnerships throughout the region, including with the United States. >> > > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro alias Sala PO Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @ SalanietaT Skype: Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Celular Fiji: +679 998 2851 _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f1c2ef7995.html --]]

1 0

Miembros de los WG o grupos de trabajo
by Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch Sept. 3, 2012

Sept. 3, 2012

Hola, hace ya algunos días que Sylvia Herlein Leite está tratando de movilizar a los miembros de LACRALO que se inscribieron a los grupos de trabajo. Ella pide que al menos digan si van a seguir en los grupos en los que se inscribieron. Sabemos que algunos no pueden hacerlo pero no lo han expresado todos. Quiero proponerles una vía rápida y constructiva para iniciar los trabajos de estos grupos: reconozcamos como miembros de un Equipo Central a quienes ya confirmaron su participación y empecemos el trabajo con ellos. Los otros miembros podrán incorporarse o no más adelante. Aquellos que no participen no serán reconocidos en los documentos que cada grupo de trabajo desarrolle, presente a la comunidad, y publique. Dejemos de sufrir por limitaciones autoimpuestas y hagamos algo. Alejandro Pisanty ! !! !!! !!!! NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUEVO NÚMERO DE TELÉFONO +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2 1

Re: Proyecto de Acuerdo de Asociaci�n Trans Pac�fico sobre IP
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com Sept. 3, 2012

Sept. 3, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Proyecto de Acuerdo de Asociación Trans Pacífico sobre IP De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Gracias por esta Sala. El caballero le dice a Taiwan no permitas que tu corazón ser problemático "o demasiado alarmado por el" acto de reequilibrio "; pasando de bilateral de comercio relación a un perfil más multi-lateral que es la TPP. El objetivo mensaje: TPP tiene por objeto crear un pastel más grande. Y si usted esperar y tener buen ánimo, una rebanada más grande viene a ti. - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= El Viernes, 31 de agosto 2012 a las 2:23 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro < salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro @ gmail.com> escribió: > Dear All, > > Whilst on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the US Assistant Secretary Jose > Fernandez made some remarks which are interesting. Worthwhile noting is the > inclusion of Mexico, Canada and Japan. > > Here you go: > Strengthening the U.S.-Taiwan Economic Relationship > > Remarks > Jose W. Fernandez > Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs > American Chamber of Commerce > Taipei, Taiwan > August 5, 2012 > > ------------------------------ > > *I. **Introduction* > > Thank you. This is my first trip to Taiwan and I continue to marvel at the > numerous cultural and economic ties that bind our people. One of our ties > was illustrated to me as I read the paper this morning. I enjoyed seeing > that Jeremy Lins visit took top billing in the newspaper, and the meeting > between President Ma and I drew a little less attention. > > Let me give you just one example that is illustrative of the larger U.S. > Taiwan relationship. It is a great American tradition to start new > companies in a home garage. In an Irvine, California garage in 1988 Linksys > was born. The creators of this now ubiquitous line of home computer > networking devices were Taiwan immigrants Janie and Victor Tsao. At the > time they founded Linksys, they were also working as consultants > specializing in pairing U.S. technology vendors with manufacturers in > Taiwan. That pairing has become emblematic of the U.S. Taiwan economic > relationship. The latest numbers show that two-way trade between the United > States and Taiwan in electrical machinery hovers around $23 billion per > year. > > *II. **Strategic Rebalancing Toward Asia* > > While Taiwan has been exemplary as one of the so-called Asian Tigers, I > want to put our economic relationship with Taiwan in the larger Asian > context before discussing Taiwan specifically. That larger context is our > work on the Trans Pacific Partnership, and the Select USA initiative. > > As you know, the global economic crisis of the past few years has pushed > us in the United States to pursue our own economic recovery. This is a > two-sided coin, with an eye toward regional trade liberalization on one > side, and concerted efforts to attract more foreign investment to the > United States on the other. At all levels of the U.S. government, we are > broadening and deepening our economic relationships throughout the Asia > Pacific region. We are acutely aware that reinvigorating our economy at > home goes hand in hand with partnering on economic growth abroad. > > The United States has long been involved in developments in the Asia > Pacific region. We are proud that our contributions to regional security > here helped create the conditions that brought more people out of poverty > faster than anywhere else in history. That engagement continues today and > the futures of the United States and the Asia Pacific are inextricably > linked. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has highlighted, we are not > just a diplomatic or military power here. We are an economic force as well. > In 2010 alone, our exports to the Pacific Rim were over $320 billion, > supporting 850,000 American jobs. > > But our work is not finished. One of our countrys great challenges in > this century will be to establish a stronger network of trade links and > practices around the Pacific Rim. Our recently enacted Free Trade > Agreements with South Korea and Colombia, and our commitment to the > Trans-Pacific Partnership, are clear demonstrations that we are here to > stay. > > I am proud to note that the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) has been a > very active promoter of these efforts. In fact, they have been so > successful in working to promote Americas economic relationship with > Taiwan that I was able to personally congratulate the former Director, Bill > Stanton, on winning my award for export promotion in 2011. He also received > the State Departments coveted Cobb award for global trade promotion > efforts. Thats two awards in the same year to one man, something that > doesnt happen very often in the State Department. The AIT team in Taipei > and Kaohsiung (GOW shung) is carrying on that tradition and I expect > great achievements from the incoming leadership team here in Taipei. > > All of these individual efforts fit into our larger work toward regional > trade liberalization. Also supporting this effort is our commitment to the > Trans-Pacific Partnership. > > Looking ahead to the next generation of trade agreements, we are aiming at > crafting an agreement that addresses new and emerging trade issues and > challenges. The Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, includes the United > States, along with Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Chile, Malaysia, New > Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam. It is a high-standard, broad-based > regional agreement. We see the TPP as the most credible pathway to broader > Asia-Pacific regional economic integration. > > The agreement will include core issues traditionally found in trade > agreements, such as industrial goods, agriculture, and textiles as well as > rules on intellectual property, technical barriers to trade, labor, and the > environment. But it will also address cross-cutting issues not previously > found in trade agreements, such as making the regulatory systems of TPP > countries more compatible so U.S. companies can operate more seamlessly in > TPP markets. It will also help innovative, job-creating small- and > medium-sized enterprises participate more actively in international trade. > Equally important is addressing new emerging trade issues, such as trade > and investment in innovative products and services, and ensuring that > state-owned enterprises compete fairly with private companies and do not > distort competition in ways that put U.S. companies and workers at a > disadvantage. > > The United States is participating in the TPP as the best vehicle to > advance our economic interests and to promote economic growth and > development in the critical Asia-Pacific region. Expanding U.S. exports is > critical to our economic recovery and to the creation and retention of > high-quality jobs in the United States. With its rapid growth and large > markets, there is no region with which expanding our trade is more vital > than the Asia Pacific. > > The TPP countries recently announced the addition of Mexico and Canada to > the negotiations. Late last year Japan also formally expressed interest in > beginning consultations with TPP member countries with a view to possibly > joining the negotiations. Candidate countries for TPP must demonstrate > through their actions and through bilateral consultations with each TPP > country their readiness to meet the standards and objectives of the > agreement. Once those bilateral processes are concluded, the current TPP > partners must decide by consensus before a new member can participate. In > short, we are excited by the possibilities created in the Asia-Pacific by > the TPP, and are working very hard to make it a reality by the end of this > year. > > Lets move on to another program we just started, Select USA. So one side > of the coin of economic recovery is expanding opportunities for U.S. > companies to do business effectively abroad. The other side of that coin is > the work that we do at home to encourage investment in the United States. > The United States consistently ranks at the top of most major indicators > for its attractive business and investment climate. In fact, from 2006 > through 2010, the United States received more FDI than any other country. > The FDI flow into the United States in 2010 - $228 billion - was more than > double the flow into any other country in the world, and despite economic > difficulties of the time, 49 percent greater than the FDI flow into the > United States in 2009. At the same time, total Taiwan direct investment > flow in the United States was over $5 billion in 2010, an increase of 14.7% > from 2009. > > Under a program called SelectUSA, the U.S. Departments of Commerce and > State engage partners around the world, as I am doing here, to promote > investment into our dynamic economy. SelectUSA showcases how the United > States is the worlds premier business location and provides easy access to > federal-level programs and services related to business investment. > > Why do I say that the United States is the worlds premier business > location? Because we are the worlds largest economy; we consistently rank > at the top of most major indicators for our attractive business and > investment climate; our own investment in research and development makes us > the worlds center for innovation; and our leadership in protecting > intellectual property with a transparent and predictable legal system makes > doing business in the U.S. both cost-efficient and secure. Also, one of the > strongest reasons will always be the quality of our higher education, > particularly in science and engineering. Taiwan people in the United States > are well aware of this: 80 percent have achieved some level of higher > education, particularly in these fields and in medicine. I understand that > the U.S. regulatory environment can be daunting to some investors, but > through our hardworking representatives at the American Institute in > Taiwan, and SelectUSA and other U.S. government partners back in > Washington, we can help connect investors with the business counseling and > training they may need to comply with applicable regulations. > > We can also direct you to the different states economic development > agencies, making sure you get connected to the right partners for your > investment selection process. > > *III. **U. S. Taiwan Economic Relations* > > Where does Taiwan figure into this picture? How can Taiwan partner with us > and benefit from this wealth creation? Today, Taiwan is our 10th largest > trading partner and our 15th largest export market. It would surprise > many people but the United States actually trades more with Taiwan than > with France; and Taiwan-U.S. trade is at near the same level as India-U.S. > bilateral trade. The United States is Taiwans largest foreign investor, > and Taiwan companies have made significant investments in the United > States. Historically, the United States has been the strongest champion of > Taiwans participation in global trade bodies such as the World Trade > Organization and the APEC forum. Our strong economic relationship covers > more than six decades. Taiwan has been an invaluable partner in influencing > others to embrace reform and strive for economic growth. > > In recent years, however, this immensely valuable relationship has hit > some bumps in the road that hinder our partnership and progress. We cant > afford these bumps and need to make sure that they do not detract from > efforts to make full use of our potential. We were pleased to see that the > Legislative Yuan recently took action that will clear the path for Taiwan > to establish a maximum residue limit for ractopamine in beef, eliminating a > serious impediment to U.S. beef imports. U.S. trade agencies will be > monitoring implementation of the regulatory measures needed to allow U.S. > beef imports to resume. These steps will be important in helping to rebuild > confidence in our bilateral trade relationship. > > We know from our own experience that adhering to bilateral and > multilateral trade commitments is not always easy, but it is essential to > maintaining the credibility that serves as the foundation of what has long > been a positive, constructive relationship between trading partners. > > Of course our bilateral economic relationship goes well beyond this > particular issue and we have continued to engage Taiwan at the working > level and via our capable colleagues at AIT on the full range of important > bilateral trade and investment issues. For example, the United States > worked for many years in support of Taiwans candidacy to join the WTO > Government Procurement Agreement. These joint efforts were rewarded when > Taiwan acceded to the Agreement in 2009. Taiwan has already made many > reforms to its procurement practices, and we stand ready to assist as > Taiwan continues to harmonize its measures with global best practices with > regard to transparency, contract terms, and licensing. > > Taiwan has made tremendous progress over the years in improving > intellectual property rights protection and enforcement, and the United > States has carried out significant bilateral cooperation activities on > intellectual property rightsIPRissues. Still, challenges remain, > including with regard to online infringement and the theft of trade > secrets. During my time here in Taiwan I have visited companies that have > had their technology stolen and heard their stories. For U.S. firms the > protection of IPR is so vital because so many of our exports derive from > IPR. A recent study estimated that 75% of U.S. exports involve IPR. Taiwan > aspires to be an economy based on innovation, and together our unceasing > efforts will ensure that Taiwans IPR enforcement regime meets the highest > standards. Improved protection of trade secrets in Taiwan will help both > foreign and domestic firms be competitive and innovative in todays > knowledge-based economy. The bottom line: we have made major progress over > the years on many critical issues when both sides have been prepared to > work together. The United States sincerely desires a reinvigorated trade > relationship with Taiwan. Its already generally good, but we can do better. > > Like the United States, Taiwan is also pursuing trade liberalization. We > understand the Ma Administration has indicated a desire to be considered > for the TPP in eight years. As a gold standard for future trade agreements > in the region, the TPP requires members to embrace ambitious and > comprehensive liberalization and open their markets to competition. We > commend President Ma for recognizing the importance of trade integration, > and for his expressed determination to push forward liberalization measures > that would help Taiwan make its case as a possible candidate for future > trade agreements. > > Change will not be easy, but the benefits of liberalization are clear: > stronger and more competitive firms, better services, wider availability of > products at lower prices, greater efficiency, and smoother integration into > the world marketplace. More comprehensive economic liberalization will be > an essential component for securing Taiwan's economic future. Real > liberalization will demonstrate Taiwan's commitment to trade integration > and potential inclusion in various trade arrangements. This includes > comprehensive, bilateral FTAssuch as Taiwan's ongoing negotiations with > Singaporewhich is an important first step. As Taiwan's leaders implement > meaningful market liberalization measures and pursue new trade agreements, > firm resolve and commitment to free market principles as a responsible WTO > member are essential attributes to live by. We look forward to deepening > our trade and economic interaction with Taiwan. We will support Taiwan as > it embraces these fundamental prerequisites to effective and meaningful > trade integration. Everyone in this room is an important element of what we > hope to do. > > *IV. **Next Steps & Conclusion* > > Just as Janie and Victor Tsao understood when they founded Linksys nearly > 25 years ago, trade between Taiwan and the United States is vital to the > prosperity of both. The United States and Taiwan have a long and positive > history of cooperation and many shared interests in the region. We are > hopeful that the positive recent steps Taiwan has taken to address the beef > issue are a demonstration of the sustained commitment that will be needed > to reenergize our bilateral trade dialogue. To be sure, Taiwan, like any > democracy, will face tough choices in order to live up to its international > obligations and to put its long-term economic interests above domestic > politics. Taiwan is a part of the Asia-Pacific regions economic future. We > look forward to working with Taiwan as it builds cooperative and credible > partnerships throughout the region, including with the United States. > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f3554121b6.html --]]

1 0

The Verge: Los miembros del Congreso cuestionan Seguridad Nacional sobre dominios incautados " sin suficiente debido proceso y la transparencia"
by devtee＠gmail.com Sept. 3, 2012

Sept. 3, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: The Verge: Los miembros del Congreso cuestionan Seguridad Nacional sobre dominios incautados "sin suficiente debido proceso y la transparencia" De: devtee(a)gmail.com Los miembros del Congreso se han unido indicado se acercó al Departamento de Seguridad Nacional en cuanto a dominios que han sido incautados por la agencia. En una carta dirigida al fiscal general Holder y la secretaria Napolitano, los miembros cuestionan los procedimientos de Seguridad Nacional y jurisdicción cuando se toman medidas para reducir los sitios que pueden violar las leyes de derechos de autor. http://www.theverge.com/2012/9/3/3287392/congress-questions-homeland-securi… La carta: http://lofgren.house.gov/images/Letter_to_AG_Holder_083012.pdf ---- Dev Anand Teelucksingh _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a14527593a.html --]]

2 1

Re: Congratualtions a Trinidad Tobago por sus 50 a�os de la Independencia! 31 de agosto.
by jam＠jacquelinemorris.com Sept. 3, 2012

Sept. 3, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Congratualtions a Trinidad Tobago por sus 50 años de la Independencia! 31 de agosto. De: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com Gracias Vanda! Jacqueline A. Morris La tecnología debería ser como el oxígeno: ubicua, necesaria, Invisible y Gratis. (Después de que Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) On Thu, 30 de agosto 2012 a las 6:31 PM, <vanda(a)uol.com.br> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Congratualtions to Trinidad Tobago for its 50 years of > Independence!! august 31th. > From: vanda(a)uol.com.br > > Congratulations to Trinidad Tobago for its 50 years of independence! > 08/31/62 > > > > > > > > > > > Vanda Scartezini > > > Polo Consultores Associados > > > IT Trend > > > 1004 Avenida Paulista 1159 cj > > > 01311-200 São Paulo, SP, Brazil > > > Tel + 5511 3266.6253 > > > Mob + 55118181.1464 > > > Idia Dissemine this: > > > Enter domain or ao telefone do research. > > > Domain dialing > > > Descrio: Descrio: Siter-16-square.png <http://www.siter.com/> > www.siter.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a7c238c22d.html --]]

2 1

Re: Congratualtions a Trinidad Tobago por sus 50 a�os de la Independencia! 31 de agosto.
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com Sept. 3, 2012

Sept. 3, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Congratualtions a Trinidad Tobago por sus 50 años de la Independencia! 31 de agosto. De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com Gracias Vanda, Este video es tomado desde el nacimiento de nuestra nación y el Dr. Eric Williams muestra el padre de nuestra República. Es un buen recordatorio para todos nosotros http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPMTtiZEyTs&feature=youtube_gdata_player Saludos Cintra On Thu, 30 de agosto 2012 a las 6:31 PM, <vanda(a)uol.com.br> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Congratualtions to Trinidad Tobago for its 50 years of > Independence!! august 31th. > From: vanda(a)uol.com.br > > Congratulations to Trinidad Tobago for its 50 years of independence! > 08/31/62 > > > > > > > > > > > Vanda Scartezini > > > Polo Consultores Associados > > > IT Trend > > > 1004 Avenida Paulista 1159 cj > > > 01311-200 São Paulo, SP, Brazil > > > Tel + 5511 3266.6253 > > > Mob + 55118181.1464 > > > Idia Dissemine this: > > > Enter domain or ao telefone do research. > > > Domain dialing > > > Descrio: Descrio: Siter-16-square.png <http://www.siter.com/> > www.siter.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/290ee3d671.html --]]

3 2

???????? = Iso-8859-1 q = RES 3A_ = 5Blac-discuss-es = 5D_VOTAC == iso-8859-1 I = q D3N_LACRALO_ALAC_MEMBER_2013-2014 =
by vanda＠uol.com.br Sept. 3, 2012

Sept. 3, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto:???????? = Iso-8859-1 q = RES 3A_ = 5Blac-discuss-es = 5D_VOTAC == iso-8859-1 I = q D3N_LACRALO_ALAC_MEMBER_2013-2014 = De: vanda(a)uol.com.br Sí, Fátima, correo electrónico Sylvias habían aclarar el error y le envié un e-mail reconociendo mi error. Con respecto a su decisión, entendido, pero después de la aclaración sobre la diferencia en las versiones en inglés y en español, dejando en claro que fue la residencia principal, no sólo residencia, que para Humberto es Chile, creo que la interpretación correcta es Humberto candidatura es razón válida, por lo que pensé que podría participar de nuevo en la controversia. Todo lo mejor Vanda De: Fátima Cambronero [mailto: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com] Enviada em: sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 13:15 Para: Vanda UOL Cc: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch, lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] VOTACIN LACRALO ALAC MIEMBRO 2013-2014 Estimada Vanda, El 31 de agosto de 2012 12:36, Vanda UOL <vanda(a)uol.com.br> escribi: A mi me parece Que Se Vamos Decidir NuevaMente si es o no Humberto ONU Candidato valido, y debido al Resultado de la votacin previa Fatima él Retirado Su candidatura, no Se Puede Mismo al tempo Votar em el COMO Candidato Efectivo. As necessary HACER Una aclaracin, Adems de La Que correctamente ya Sobre formulSylvia Por quse En Este Momento estvotando en LACRALO. Yo no retirmi candidatura debido al Resultado de la previa votacin pÃ¡rrafo admitir o no a Humberto Como Candidato vlido. Yo retirmi candidatura when sÃ Abria eleccin this situacin, los antes Ã¿ De que estuvieran los Resultados de dicha votacin. Por favor, te Solicito amablemente QUE LEAS correctamente del ya quÃš intereses Cambiando los Hechos histricos Tal y Cual sucedieron.Adems yo retirmi candidatura por mi conviccin respecto a la violacin de las Reglas de LACRALO Que Exigen la residencia de los Representantes de LACRALO ante el ALAC, en Uno de los pases de Nuestra regin, tal y COMO lo expresen mi correo argumentando mi posicin. Te invito a Lo Que Vuelvas un please leer, y especialmente en El Momento Que lo envia la Lista, y en Caso de Ser Alguna necessary aclaracin, Estoy a tu disposicin pÃ¡rrafo brindarla. Saludos cordiales, FÃ¡tima Cambronero El Riesgo es si el pÃ¡rrafo Pierde la votacin servicio sin Candidato valido y gana la votacin pÃ¡rrafo Ser el Representante, Como resulta? El Tiempo es Ahora lo Menos Relevante PORQUE si ocurre el Expuesto arriba, Vamos a necesitar Empezar NuevaMente Para mÃ, si necesitamos nueva votaciÃ³n en una encuesta que se va a definir si puede ser Humberto o no a un candidato, y por el resultado anterior FÃ¡tima ha decidido retirar su candidatura, Â¿cÃ³mo podemos votar en el momento mismo en que sea representante de ALAC?Humberto si gana la segunda encuesta a los candidatos y pierde la encuesta en la que se considerarÃa un candidade, lo que vamos a tener al final? Cualquier comentario. Fecha actual es el tema menos relevante. Si la situaciÃ³n anterior ocurre tendremos que reiniciar todo de nuevo ... Vanda ----- Mensagem original ----- De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch Enviada em: sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 10:18 Para: JosFrancisco Arce Cc: At-Large; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es]???????? = ISO-8859-1 q Voting_announcement_ / / == _Anuncio_de Iso-8859-1 q = F3n = _votaci Jos, te agradezco tu pronta Mucho Respuesta. La eleccin Que estabierta Ahora es Muy Diferente de la eleccin pÃ¡rrafo la Que Se llevaron a Cabo Los debates. La discusin Que propones Ahora, con la votacin iniciada, nos parece Contraria a la lgica ya los procedimientos democrticos ms elementales. Sin embargo seguiremos ma mi Criterio y te felicitamos Por Tomar Una decisin. Alejandro Pisanty ! ! ! !! NÃMERO DE TELÃFONO NUEVO - NUEVO NMERO DE Telfono +52-1-5541444475 DESDE EL EXTRANJERO +525541444475 DESDE Mxico SMS +525541444475 Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 MÃ©xico DF MÃ©xico Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al Grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Unete a ISOC MÃ©xico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________ DESDE: JosFrancisco Arce [josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com] Enviado el: viernes, 31 de agosto de 2012 06:24 Hasta: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch CC: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org, At-Large Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es]???????? = ISO-8859-1 q Voting_announcement_ / / == _Anuncio_de Iso-8859-1 q = F3n = _votaci Estimado Alejandro, Agradezco ma mi gentil e-mail. Como bien sabrs tuvimos Una Llamada especial pÃ¡rrafo CONOCER y preguntarles a los Candidatos Nuestros intereses, sÃ Adems discutien La Lista Mucho about ELLOS y estn los SOI. DESDE Que Yo estoy en LACRALO, 3 aos, no tuvimos Otra situacin Igual a this, Pero tampoco vivdos Llamadas pÃ¡rr evaluar los Posibles mritos. ESTO QUIERE no Decir Que No necessary mar, Claro Que lo es, si lo es la regin pÃ¡rrafo, Pero aqula situacin especial es. Los Plazos establecidos estn vencidos y sÃ about el encuentro de Toronto, sabor Todas las REGIONES TIENE SUS ya Miembros de ALAC y la informacin de los Candidatos de LACRALO estn en los Registros de Todos, CON MUCHOS debates en el historial. Ãsto, tampoco QUIERE Decir Que ISOC Mxico no Florerias expresarse en La Lista o HACER Â¿Tienes dudas? pblicamente a los Candidatos, Claro Que si es Posible y los Candidatos Muy amables respondern. Espero Estimado Alejandro sepa entendre Que la regin sÃ comprometiva Estatutos, a respetar los Plazos de ICANN, Plazos vencidos Hoy Que Hacen necessary avanzar, y solo deberamos Seguir aplazndolos si faltara Por completo el debate con los Candidatos, Pero al Haber ocurrido ya, sin Podemos demorarnos mas. Invito a Todos aquellos Que quieren expresarse o Realizar Consultas a los Candidatos una cola Hagan lo es La Lista pblica. La votacin terminaciÃ³n da el martes. Cordial saludo JosArce. - El 30 de agosto de 2012 20:50, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch <apisan(a)unam.mx<mailto:apisan@unam.mx> > Escribi: Estimado JosÃ©, lamento muchsimo Tomar la Palabra PARA UN Asunto de Procedure, yms considerando Que ya ha expresado ISOC Mxico Reservas Sobre el Mismo. Yo no Creo Que Se Deba En Este Momento PROCEDER a la votacin. Tenamos tres Candidatos y tuvimos ALGUNAS Discusiones Sobre SUS Propuestas ymritos. Ahora tenemos dos y la eleccin es Muy Distinta, es Otra Completamente. Al INICIAR la votacin pecado this debate en la Comunidad y con o Entre los Candidatos, la Presidencia HACE nugatorio Un paso fundamental Tomar pÃ¡rrafo Decisiones, Construir opinin, y Decidir el voto. El Proceso de votacin no debe Empezar de Antes Que tengamos Oportunidad de evaluar los Posibles mritos relativos de los dos Candidatos Que estn en la boleta. En particular, ISOC Mxico TIENE Argumentos Que HEMOS Reservado Por ConSiderar Que El Tiempo procesal de hacerlo no Llegado haba. DESDE LUEGO SI ESTA NO TIENE APOYO propuesta de De la Comunidad La dejaremos expresada pÃ¡rrafo el expediente y dejaremos Que Siga el Proceso electoral de Como Ya lo anunciaste.Como he dicho HEMOS Muchas Veces, y demostrado en los Hechos, pensamos Que el foco de LACRALO debe ESTAR en lo sustantivo y no en los angeles procedimientos debates sobre. HEMOS excepcin Hecho Por La Que Gravedad Falta un atribuimos esta. Cordial saludo. Alejandro Pisanty ! ! ! !! NÃMERO DE TELÃFONO NUEVO - NUEVO NMERO DE Telfono +52-1-5541444475 DESDE EL EXTRANJERO +525541444475 DESDE Mxico SMS +525541444475 Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 MÃ©xico DF MÃ©xico Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al Grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Unete a ISOC MÃ©xico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ Desde: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces @ Atlarge-lists.icann.org> [Lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounce s(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>] en Nombre de josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com <mailto:josefranciscoarce@gmail.com> [Josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com <mailto:josefranciscoarce@gmail.com> ] Enviado el: jueves, 30 de agosto de 2012 18:21 Hasta: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.i cann.org> CC: At-Large Asunto: [lac-discuss-es]???????? = ISO-8859-1 q Voting_announcement_ / / == _Anuncio_de Iso-8859-1 q = F3n = _votaci [[- TraducciÃ³n de texto (en -> es) -]] Asunto:???????? = ISO-8859-1 q Voting_announcement_ / / == _Anuncio_de iso-8859-1 q = F3n = _votaci De: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com <mailto:josefranciscoarce@gmail.com> Estimados Miembros de LACRALO, At-Large personal me ha Informado y de la Secretara Que, debido a la ONU tcnica error del Sistema de votacin BIGPULSE, el voto a favor de la LACRALO ALAC Representante tendrque iniciarse de Nuevo. Se Trata de Una cuestintcnica, Fuera del Control de At-Large personal. Por lo Tanto, hoy, 30 de agosto de 2012, At-Large personal estarenviando votacin Credenciales Para Todos angeles Representantes de LACRALO ALS. Por favor notifique inmediatamente At-Large personal (Staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> ) Si USTED no ha Su recibido Credenciales Para El Ãºltimo de Nuestros das. La nueva votacin comenzarhoy, jueves 30 de agosto de 2012 a las 23:59 UTC y sÃ ejecutarhasta el martes 04 de Septiembre 2012 a las 23:59 UTC. Este es El Mismo Duracin Que el voto original. En Gran personal supervisarlas urnas el daada pÃ¡rrafo asegurarse de Que el estfuncionando Encuesta correctamente. Pedimos disculpas Por las molestias. Sin embargo, Esto era puramente Una Problema tcnica en la instancia de parte de BigPulse Que Ya Se ha Resuelto. Gracias por Su comprensin. JosArce ESPANOL El personal de At-Large personal me ha Informado a mi ya la Secretaria Que debido a las Naciones Unidas error tcnica del Sistema de votacin de BIGPULSE, el voto parrafo el Representante de LACRALO ante el ALAC tendrque Servicio reiniciado. Este Es Un Problema tcnica, Fuera del control del personal de At-Large. Por Esto, HOY DIA, 30 de Agosto del 2012, el personal de At-Large ESTAR personal Enviando Credenciales de las Naciones Unidas voto de los Representantes de Todos de LACRALO ALS.Por favor notifique inmediatamente al personal de At-Large ( staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> ) Si Ud. no ha recibido el parrafo SUS Credenciales Definitiva de Hoy da. El Nuevo voto empezara Hoy da, Jueves 30 de Agosto del 2012 a las 23:59 UTC y estarabierto Hasta El SÃ¡bado 4 de Setiembre del 2012 a las 23:59 UTC. Esta Es La Misma Duracin del voto original. El personal de At Large personal monitoreara los votos diariamente parrafo asegurarse Que el Sistema de votos funcione correctamente. Disculpas Por Cualquier inconveniente. Sin embargo, esto ha Sido pecado Problema puramente tcnica de Instancia de Parte de BigPulse, el Cual ya ha Sido Resuelto. Muchas gracias Por Su comprensin. JosArce. - _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/82dc93ab9d.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] VOTACIÓN LACRALO ALAC MEMBER 2013-2014
by Fatima Cambronero Sept. 3, 2012

Sept. 3, 2012

Estimada Vanda, El 31 de agosto de 2012 12:36, Vanda UOL <vanda(a)uol.com.br> escribió: > A mi me parece que se vamos decidir nuevamente si Humberto es o no un > candidato valido, y debido al resultado de la previa votación Fatima he > retirado su candidatura, no se puede al mismo tempo votar em el como > candidato efectivo. Acá es necesario hacer una aclaración, además de la que correctamente ya formuló Sylvia sobre por qué se está votando en este momento en LACRALO. Yo no retiré mi candidatura debido al resultado de la previa votación para admitir o no a Humberto como candidato válido. Yo retiré mi candidatura cuando se abrió a elección esta situación, y antes de que estuvieran los resultados de dicha votación. Por favor, te solicito amablemente que leas correctamente ya que estás cambiando los hechos históricos tal y cual sucedieron. Además yo retiré mi candidatura por mi convicción respecto a la violación de las reglas de LACRALO que exigen la residencia de los representantes de LACRALO ante ALAC, en uno de los países de nuestra región, tal y como lo expresé en mi mail argumentando mi posición. Te invito a que lo vuelvas a leer por favor, y especialmente el momento en que lo envié a la lista, y en caso de ser necesario alguna aclaración, estoy a tu disposición para brindarla. Saludos cordiales, Fatima Cambronero > El riesgo es si el pierde la votación para ser un > candidato valido y gana la votación para ser el representante, como > resulta? > > > El tiempo ahora es lo menos relevante porque si ocurre el expuesto arriba, > vamos a necesitar empezar nuevamente > > To me, if we need to revote in a poll that is to define if Humberto can be > or not a candidate, and due the previous result Fatima has decided to > withdraw her candidature, how can we vote at the same time on him to be > representative at ALAC? if Humberto wins the second poll for candidates and > loses the poll where he would be considered a candidade, what we will have > in the end? > > Any comments. Time now is the less relevant issue. If the situation above > occurs we will need to restart all over again... > > Vanda > -----Mensagem original----- > De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Dr. > Alejandro Pisanty Baruch > Enviada em: sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 10:18 > Para: José Francisco Arce > Cc: At-Large Staff; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] ???????? = Iso-8859-1 q Voting_announcement_ > / > / == _Anuncio_de iso-8859-1 q = F3n = _votaci > > José, > > te agradezco mucho tu pronta respuesta. > > La elección que está abierta ahora es muy diferente de la elección para la > que se llevaron a cabo los debates. > > La discusión que propones ahora, con la votación iniciada, nos parece > contraria a la lógica y a los procedimientos democráticos más elementales. > > Sin embargo seguiremos tu criterio y te felicitamos por tomar una decisión. > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > ! !! !!! !!!! > NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUEVO NÚMERO DE TELÉFONO > > > > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > > +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO > > SMS +525541444475 > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > ________________________________ > Desde: José Francisco Arce [josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com] Enviado el: > viernes, 31 de agosto de 2012 06:24 > Hasta: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch > CC: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Staff > Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] ???????? = Iso-8859-1 q Voting_announcement_ / > / == _Anuncio_de iso-8859-1 q = F3n = _votaci > > Estimado Alejandro, > > Agradezco tu gentil e-mail. Como bien sabrás tuvimos una llamada especial > para conocer y preguntarles a los candidatos nuestros intereses, además se > discutió en la lista mucho acerca de ellos y están los SoI. Desde que yo > estoy en LACRALO, 3 años, no tuvimos otra situación igual a esta, pero > tampoco viví dos llamadas para evaluar los posibles méritos. Esto no quiere > decir que no sea necesario, claro que lo es, si lo es para la región, pero > aquí la situación es particular. > Los plazos establecidos están vencidos y se acerca el meeting de Toronto, > todas las regiones tiene ya sus miembros de ALAC y la información de los > candidatos de LACRALO están en todos los registros, con muchos debates en > el > historial. Esto, tampoco quiere decir que ISOC México no puede expresarse > en > la lista o hacer preguntas a los candidatos públicamente, claro que si es > posible y los candidatos muy amables responderán. > Espero estimado Alejandro sepa entender que la región se comprometió, vía > estatutos, a respetar los plazos de ICANN, plazos que hoy vencidos hacen > necesario avanzar, y solo deberíamos seguir aplazándolos si faltara por > completo el debate con los candidatos, pero al haber ya ocurrido, no > podemos > demorarnos mas. > > Invito a todos aquellos que quieren expresarse o realizar consultas a los > candidatos a que lo hagan en la lista pública. La votación termina el día > martes. > > Cordial saludo > > José Arce.- > > > El 30 de agosto de 2012 20:50, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch > <apisan(a)unam.mx<mailto:apisan@unam.mx>> escribió: > Estimado José, > > lamento muchísimo tomar la palabra para un asunto de procedimiento, y más > considerando que ya ISOC México ha expresado reservas sobre el mismo. > > Yo no creo que se deba proceder en este momento a la votación. Teníamos > tres > candidatos y tuvimos algunas discusiones sobre sus propuestas y méritos. > Ahora tenemos dos y la elección es muy distinta, es otra completamente. Al > iniciar la votación sin este debate en la comunidad y con o entre los > candidatos, la Presidencia hace nugatorio un paso fundamental para tomar > decisiones, construir opinión, y decidir el voto. > > El proceso de votación no debe empezar antes de que tengamos oportunidad de > evaluar los posibles méritos relativos de los dos candidatos que están en > la > boleta. En particular ISOC México tiene argumentos que hemos reservado por > considerar que el tiempo procesal de hacerlo no había llegado. > > Desde luego si esta propuesta no tiene apoyo de la comunidad la dejaremos > expresada para el expediente y dejaremos que siga el proceso electoral como > ya lo anunciaste. Como lo hemos dicho muchas veces, y demostrado en los > hechos, pensamos que el foco de LACRALO debe estar en lo sustantivo y no en > los debates sobre procedimientos. Hemos hecho excepción por la gravedad que > atribuimos a esta falta. > > Cordial saludo. > > Alejandro Pisanty > > ! !! !!! !!!! > NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUEVO NÚMERO DE TELÉFONO > > > > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > > +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO > > SMS +525541444475 > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > ________________________________________ > Desde: > lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto: > lac-discuss-es-bounces > @atlarge-lists.icann.org> > [lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto: > lac-discuss-es-bounce > s(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>] en nombre de > josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com<mailto:josefranciscoarce@gmail.com> > [josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com<mailto:josefranciscoarce@gmail.com>] > Enviado el: jueves, 30 de agosto de 2012 18:21 > Hasta: > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto: > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.i > cann.org> > CC: At-Large Staff > Asunto: [lac-discuss-es] ???????? = Iso-8859-1 q Voting_announcement_ / / > == _Anuncio_de iso-8859-1 q = F3n = _votaci > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto:???????? = Iso-8859-1 q Voting_announcement_ / / == _Anuncio_de > iso-8859-1 q = F3n = _votaci > De: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com<mailto:josefranciscoarce@gmail.com> > > Estimados miembros de LACRALO, > > > > > > > At-Large personal me ha informado y de la Secretaría que, debido a un > técnico error del sistema de votación BIGPULSE, el voto a favor de la > LACRALO ALAC representante tendrá que iniciarse de nuevo. Se trata de una > cuestión técnica, fuera del control de At-Large personal. > > > > > > > Por lo tanto, hoy, 30 de agosto de 2012, At-Large personal estará enviando > votación credenciales para todos los representantes de LACRALO ALS. Por > favor notifique inmediatamente At-Large personal > (staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>) si usted no ha > recibido su credenciales para el final de nuestros días. > > > > > > > La nueva votación comenzará hoy, jueves 30 de agosto de 2012 a las 23:59 > UTC y se ejecutará hasta el martes 04 de septiembre 2012 a las 23:59 UTC. > Este es el mismo duración que el voto original. > > > > > > > En Gran personal supervisará las urnas el día a día para asegurarse de que > el encuesta está funcionando correctamente. > > > > > > > Pedimos disculpas por las molestias. Sin embargo, esto era puramente una > técnica problema en la parte de BigPulse que ya se ha resuelto. > > > > > > > Gracias por su comprensión. > > > > > JosArce > > > > > > > ESPANOL > > > > > > > El personal de At-Large personal me ha Informado a mi ya la Secretaria Que > debido a las Naciones Unidas error tcnica del Sistema de votacin de > BIGPULSE, el voto pÃ¡rrafo el Representante de LACRALO ante el ALAC > tendrque servicio reiniciado. Este Es Un Problema tcnica, Fuera del > Control > del personal de At-Large. > > > > > > > Por Esto, HOY DIA, 30 de Agosto del 2012, el personal de At-Large ESTAR > personal Enviando las Credenciales de un voto de Todos los Representantes > de LACRALO ALS.Por favor notifique inmediatamente al personal de At-Large > ( > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>) si Ud. no ha > recibido el pÃ¡rrafo SUS Credenciales definitiva de Hoy da. > > > > > > > El Nuevo voto empezara Hoy da, Jueves 30 de Agosto del 2012 a las 23:59 > UTC y estarabierto Hasta El SÃ¡bado 4 de Setiembre del 2012 a las 23:59 > UTC. This es La Misma Duracin del voto original. > > > > > > > El personal de At Large personal monitoreara los votos diariamente > pÃ¡rrafo > asegurarse Que el Sistema de votos funcione correctamente. > > > > > > > Disculpas Por Cualquier inconveniente. Sin embargo, this ha Sido sin > Problema puramente tcnica de instancia de parte de BigPulse, el Cual ya ha > Sido Resuelto. > > > > > Muchas gracias Por Su comprensin. > > > JosArce. - > _______________________________________________ > > > > [[--Original text (en) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/430df05f58.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto: > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.i > cann.org> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > -- > Ab. Arce, Jose Francisco > + 54 9 351 6788920 > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > -- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero *Join the LACRALO/ICANN discussions:* https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es *Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions:* http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/ *Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): *http://www.internetsociety.org/

2 1

Atte - Sr Huesca y miembros de LACRALO - Re: RES:???????? = ISO-8859-1 q Voting_announcement_ / / == _Anuncio_de iso-8859-1 q = F3n = _votaci
by Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado Sept. 3, 2012

Sept. 3, 2012

Estimados miembros de LACRALO: Es lindisimo comenzar la semana con una sonrisa... y la verdad que esta última frase del Sr. Huesca me encantó: "Con respeto" No me van a decir que no es cómico, emitir una serie de consideraciones agraviantes por demás no sólo para el Presidente de LACRALO y cito: "*En este proceso,sin sentido la presidencia,ha perdido el rumbo*" Por ende sostener que un proceso democrático es violento lo que me/nos convierte en violentos automáticos y cito: Para con el resto de los miembros que si decidimos votar y participr como nos indica nuestra obligación y cito: "*un proceso de votación que a todas luces violenta un principio de ICANN: la democracia*." Hasta donde se si se vota y el elegido es el que más votos saca es democracia.- Por otro lado quizás mi debil formación juridica o el echo de ser abogado ya me descalifica para opinar, digo... planteo... sostengo.. razono esto por un desliz del Sr. Huesca y cito: "*A las ALS debemos invitarlas a trabajar más con sus usuarios y a los representantes de ellas que son abogados a litigar menos y actuar más*" Osea, dejemos entonces los que somos abogado, por mala fortuna de la vida y pecados de juventud, opinar a los que no lo son que en apariencia son la palabra del Señor convertida en echos.- En particular debo señalar que el respeto con que habló de uno de los candidatos es un insulto liso y llano y cito: "*La ambición desmedida de un miembro de una de la organizaciones, Humberto Carrasco nos ha metido en esta dinámica. Es evidente que no tiene ningún merito para merecer representar a la región, de la cual se encuentra físicamente ausente" * Que alguien sea ambicioso no me parece malo, indicar que esa ambición es desmedida si es atribuirle un defecto, es calificar descalificandolo y ni hablar cuando hace referencia a que no tiene mérito alguno para representar a la región, como debe interpretarse, ahhh pero es con respeto... perdón ser abogado y mis ganas de pelear por todo hacen que me exprese de esta manera... ahh y no me vengan que hacia referencia a que no está en la región, porque puedo ser limitado en mis razonamientos pero de gramática y sintaxis entiendo, y de la lectura del texto no se desprende nada por el estilo... y si quiso decir eso que aprenda a escribir mi amigo o pidale a alguien que lo haga por Ud..- Debo decior que es maravilloso ver como alguien por fin me dice en términos sencillos y claros para que estamos, y es para representar la opinión de los usurios de internet!! fantástico!, ahora sabemos la opinión de los usuarios mexicanos porque imagino que si se expresa es porque les pregunto que opinan de todo esto, no? o los que emiten opinión deben consultar todo antes o tienen la potestad de hacerlo representando a alguien? Por mi lado opino poco, no porque no imagine que quiere el usuario de internet de la patagonia Argentina, sino porque a veces es mejor quedarse callado y parecer estupido que hablar y demostrarlo...., me explico? Para finalizar, considero que su correo estimado Sr. Huesca es un desproposito cuya única utilidad ha sido hacerme comenzar la semana con una sonrisa... en pocas palabras una pavada... PERO LO DIGO CON RESPETO OJO!! siempre es importante decir cualquier estupidez pero mientras sea con respeto quedamois dispensados de todo, en fin....- Saludos cordiales Guillermo M. Zamora ADIAr El 3 de septiembre de 2012 02:45, Erik Huesca <erik(a)huesca.mx> escribió: > Estimados miembros de LACRALO, > > Estamos en un proceso de votación que a todas luces violenta un principio > de ICANN: la democracia. (tomando texto de tu correo) porque si ya se está > votando ya no se está debatiendo, regla básica de la misma. > > En los últimos días hemos transformado la lista en un tribunal virtual, > mas que en un espacio para discutir lo que nuestros representados tienen > que opinar del rumbo de la Internet, sobretodo cuando se acerca una buena > embestida a la gobernanza de la misma. > La ambición desmedida de un miembro de una de la organizaciones, Humberto > Carrasco nos ha metido en esta dinámica. Es evidente que no tiene ningún > merito para merecer representar a la región, de la cual se encuentra > físicamente ausente. En este proceso,sin sentido la presidencia,ha perdido > el rumbo. > > El proceso de votación desde nuestra perspectiva, no tiene las condiciones > necesarias para darse. Si vamos retrasados, lo mejor es hacer bien las > cosas. Por lo pronto, les comunicamos que no participaremos, ni avalaremos > los resultados de esta votación. > > A las ALS debemos invitarlas a trabajar más con sus usuarios y a los > representantes de ellas que son abogados a litigar menos y actuar más. Es > un ya basta al eterno ciclo de argumentos que no representan más que > opiniones jurídicas y no el sentir de los usuarios de la región. > > Con respeto > > Erik Huesca > ISOC México > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > -- Guillermo M. Zamora Abogado - Estudio jurídico "Lex-Trelew" Twitter: @guillermozam Skype: gmzamora Director Red Iberoamericana ElDerechoInformatico.com<http://www.elderechoinformatico.com> Inmigrantes Nº 320 - 0280-4427490 Trelew - Chubut -- Guillermo M. Zamora Abogado - Estudio jurídico "Lex-Trelew" Twitter: @guillermozam Skype: gmzamora Director Red Iberoamericana ElDerechoInformatico.com<http://www.elderechoinformatico.com> Inmigrantes Nº 320 - 0280-4427490 Trelew - Chubut

1 0

SOCIEDAD CIVIL
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org Sept. 3, 2012

Sept. 3, 2012

Estimados miembros de LACRALO: Quiero consultarlos sobre qué es lo que ustedes consideran como SOCIEDAD CIVIL. Qué tipos de organizaciones / grupos pueden ser considerados como Sociedad Civil??? Les pregunto esto porque, ayer, fue tratado en la reunión de los secretarios de RALOS, preparatoria para Toronto y hubo divergencias. Por ejemplo: pueden ser considerados parte de la Sociedad Civil los SOHO (Small Office Home Office), algo como Pequeñas Oficinas, Oficinas en Casa. Me gustaría contar con vuestra opinión para llevarla a la reunión que se hará en Toronto. Sin más, Sylvia ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Secretaria LACRALO-ICANN/ 2012-2013 - <http://atlarge.icann.org> http://atlarge.icann.org Secretaria FLUI 2009-2012 sylvia_leite=Skype Descrição: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil

5 5