March 2011 - lac-discuss-es

Llamada de la comunidad IPv6 - grabaciones MP3 ahora disponibles
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org March 5, 2011

March 5, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Tema: Llamada de la comunidad IPv6 - grabaciones MP3 ahora disponibles De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Querido Todos, Las grabaciones MP3 de la comunidad En-Grande de hoy invitan IPv6 ahora están disponible en inglés y español en la paginación de la agenda(véase: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Community+Call+on+IPv6+04.03.11) . Respeto, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-Blanco, Marilyn Vernon, Personal En-Grande de ICANN _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9ef179ee1d.html --]]

1 0

Ministerio de los E.E.U.U. de las ENTRADAS DE INFORMACI�N de Fwd:SEEKING de aviso del IANA del Comercio de la pregunta
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com March 4, 2011

March 4, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Tema: Ministerio de los E.E.U.U. de las ENTRADAS DE INFORMACIÓN de Fwd:SEEKING de aviso del IANA del Comercio de la pregunta De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com FYI ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 Estrategia, Hojas de operación (planning), Gobierno, Gravamen Y Vuelta ============================= mensaje remitido De: Cuenta Graham <graham(a)isoc.org> Fecha: Wed, de marcha el 2 de 2011 en P.M. 1:57 Tema: [ ISOC ] [ ENTRADAS DE INFORMACIÓN QUE BUSCAN} Ministerio de los E.E.U.U. de aviso del IANA del Comercio de Pregunta : Delegados Del Capítulo <chapter-delegates(a)elists.isoc.org>, isoc-members-announce(a)elists.isoc.org Delegados y miembros queridos del capítulo, Pues usted está probablemente enterado, el gobierno de los Estados Unidos release/versión su el aviso esperado desde hace mucho tiempo de la pregunta en elIANA funciona el viernes la semana pasada. Estoy asociando una versión del pdf que sea más fácil de leer que el federal Versión del registro en su Web site <See: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/>. el plazo para los comentarios es la 31 de marcha de 2011, asíque necesitamos comenzar convertirse nuestro respuesta ahora. La evolución de la función del IANA es una aplicación inmediato y grande interés para todas las partes de ISOC y de nuestras organizaciones del compañero. Estoy buscando visiónes desde nuestra calidad de miembro en este asunto importante a utilizar como entradas de información cuando desarrollar la respuesta del ISOC al NOI. También trazaré en Suba a las discusiones de la función del IANA que tienen excedente ocurrido el pasado pocos aÃ±os. Y finalmente, coordinarÃ© con el otro I * organizaciones. No creo que debemos intentar desarrollar una respuesta comÃºn el doc., pero nosotros desearÃ¡ asegurarse allÃ no son ninguna sorpresa y, idealmente, Ã©sa hay amplio acuerdo general en a lo que proporcionamos a la toma de decisiÃ³n proceso. Es mi cree que el gobierno de los E.E.U.U. estÃ¡ esperando sinceramente conseguir un amplio rango de respuestas de los E.E.U.U. y a otra parte con las sugerencias concretas para la mejora de la manera la funciÃ³n del IANA se maneja. Por ejemplo, son el esperar oÃr declaraciones claras sobre lo que desea esta comunidad; e.g., si y porquÃ© debe haber cambios a cÃ³mo son el arpa y/o el int tratado en el contrato, quÃ© debe ser los arreglos para el protocolo parÃ¡metros, etc. Si la comunidad tÃ©cnica del Internet quisiera considerar El gobierno de los E.E.U.U. realiza cambios, nosotros necesitaparticipar en este proceso para construir un expediente de esas recomendaciones. AsÃ le animo a que me envÃe su entradas de informaciÃ³n a finales del dÃa viernes, la 18 de marcha de 2011. El NOI es absolutamente detallado, pues usted verÃ¡. Describe la funciÃ³n del IANA, y entonces continÃºa hacer preguntas en seis Ã¡reas. Parafrasear, Ã©sos son: 1 si las funciones tÃ©cnicas interdependientes se realizaron bajo el IANA si continÃºe siendo tratado como interdependiente, o si hay Â¿cambios a actual agrupar? 2 reconociendo que polÃticas de otras organizaciones tÃ©cnicas del Internet (e.g., IETF, IAB, RIRs, impacto de los ccTLDs) en el funcionamiento de las funciones del IANA, si Ã©sos se refieren y se especifican en el contrato de las funciones del IANA y Â¿cÃ³mo? 3 debe haber cambios en la direcciÃ³n de las peticiones de la gerenciade la zona de la raÃz solicita pertenecer a los ccTLDs para tratar las preocupaciones de algunos gobiernos Â¿y operadores del ccTLD? 4 estÃ¡n las mÃ©tricas actuales del funcionamiento y el seÃ±alar por las funciones del IANA Â¿operador adecuado, o debe haber cambios? 5 hay mejoras que se deban llevar a cabo al contrato de las funciones del IANA Â¿para mejorar direccionamiento las necesidades de los utilizadores del IANA funcionan? AquÃ el NOI pregunta especÃficamente si informaciÃ³n adicional sobre el funcionamiento y Â¿la administraciÃ³n de la funciÃ³n del IANA harÃa el proceso mÃ¡s transparente? 6 si las consideraciones o los realces adicionales de la seguridad se incluyen adentro Â¿los requisitos en el IANA funcionan contrato? En cada caso, el NOI solicita * especÃfico * la informaciÃ³n y * especÃfico * sugerencias para las mejoras en el contrato del IANA. Esto puede ser un Ã¡rea donde el ISOC puede contribuir al proceso de una manera muy positiva. especialmente como recibir noticias usted de si usted es de una cierta manera directa un participante o utilizador de las funciones del IANA, y si usted tiene alguna experiencia especÃfica eso indica una necesidad de la mejora o de la alteraciÃ³n del contrato, y si es asÃ cuÃ¡les serÃan sus recomendaciones especÃficas. Esa clase deentrada de informaciÃ³n mejore la profundidad y la credibilidad de la respuesta del ISOC. Por supuesto, como siempre, usted es agradable hacer sus propios comentarios directos al proceso, pero Sin embargo mucho apreciarÃa la audiencia sobre sus experiencias y opiniones. Mientras que no he preparado el texto para la sumisiÃ³n, en general, quisiera para ver el ISOC explicar cÃ³mo es importante debe confiar en el Internet nativo instituciones para desempeÃ±ar los papeles apropiados a donde su maestrÃa contribuye el funcionamiento liso del Internet cabalmente. AsÃ es importante que el papeles del IETF, del IAB, del RIRs, y de los operadores del ccTLD se reconozcan en el sistema, y eso allÃ es una necesidad de construir confianza internacional en cÃ³mo se funciona y se administra la funciÃ³n del IANA. Eso incluye la necesidad sea mÃ¡s abiertos, transparentes y asÃ responsable en la administraciÃ³n del el proceso, corresponder con la franqueza y la transparencia proporcionÃ³ por el operador el seÃ±alar extenso. TambiÃ©n preveo sugerir eso la estabilidad del Las funciones del IANA se podÃan mejorar bajo diverso procesoque la corriente el rediseÃ±ar y la renovaciÃ³n de las funciones relativamente a corto plazo del IANA contrae. Espero que usted lea el NOI completo, y miro adelante a oÃr su opiniÃ³nes sobre las preguntas que hace, sus experiencias, y sus recomendaciones para la mejora. De nuevo, permitir para que yo prepare el ISOC para entrar, satisfacer envÃeme sus entradas de informaciÃ³n antes de finales del dÃa de marcha la 18, 2011 o anterior si posible. Gracias por adelantado Cuenta _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ec6c4f3d3e.html --]]

1 0

Re: un comentario r�pido sobre Bruselas GAC + reuni�n del Consejo
by carlosaguirre62＠hotmail.com March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Tema: Re: un comentario rápido sobre Bruselas GAC + reunión del Consejo De: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com Gracias tanto. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre Consejo de NCA GNSO - ICANN miembro anterior de ALAC de LACRALO En Derecho de los Negocios de Abogado - de Especialista Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Córdoba - La Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org Fecha: Thu, El 3 De Marcha 2011 14:16:06 De -0400 Tema: Re: [ laca-discutir-lac-discuss-en ] un comentario rápido sobre Bruselas GAC + reunión del Consejo De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com : carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com Centímetro cúbico: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Carlos querido y todo, Había emprendido previamente remitir las transcripciones de la reunión de GAC/Board. Vea por favor http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/03/02/transcript-icann-gac-board que sea incluso mejor que las transcripciones y precisó agradable los asuntosdiscutidos tan bien como los miembros que eran los más vocales. Respeto bueno Cintra Sooknanan En Tue, de marcha el 1 de 2011 en 12:47 P.M., aguirre del dionisio de los carlos <carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com> escribió: Las gracias Cintra. serán apreciadas Carlos Dionisio Aguirre Consejo de NCA GNSO - ICANN miembro anterior de ALAC de LACRALO En Derecho de los Negocios de Abogado - de Especialista Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Córdoba - La Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org Fecha: Tue, El 1 De Marcha 2011 10:04:59 De -0400 Tema: Re: [ laca-discutir-lac-discuss-en ] un comentario rÃ¡pido sobre Bruselas GAC + reuniÃ³n del Consejo De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com : carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com CentÃmetro cÃºbico: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Carlos Querido, Estaba presente para ambas sesiones de maÃ±ana (pero faltÃ³ latarde debida trabajar), yo estoy compartiendo mis impresiones iniciales pero quisiera repasar la transcripciÃ³n completa antes de dar un resumen apropiado. Alot fue discutido en el primer dÃa, Ã©l aparecÃa ocasionalmente quealgunos de los miembros de GAC no estaban como preparado como los miembros del Consejo. La impresiÃ³n era que mientras que muy fueron preparados en algunas Ã¡reas, en otras se parecÃa como si deseen instituir restricciones pero no puede sugerir cÃ³mo el proceso debe ser modificado. Â¡Peor todavÃa, en algunos casos (eg. para las palabras genÃ©ricas) era sentido que desean ir mÃ¡s allÃ¡ de cuÃ¡l estÃ¡ presente en la legislaciÃ³n existente! El segundo dÃa (hoy) ha sido un dÃgito binario escalonado, con algunos discursos iniciales significados a grupos del refocus en las Ã¡reas de asunto discutibles y a un boquete grande durante el dÃa donde ambos grupos se reunieron por separado (y ninguna participaciÃ³nde observers/remote fue permitido). Las transcripciones estarÃ¡n disponibles y me placerÃ© remitirlas a lalista (si el personal no hace tan). Respeto bueno Cintra Sooknanan El mon, 28 de febrero de 2011 en 9:36, aguirre del dionisiode los carlos <carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com> escribiÃ³: Querido Todos: I`m referido seriamente, porque no vi cualesquiera de nuestros representantes de ALAC en el cuarto de la charla del adobe esta maÃ±ana. No permanecÃa en la sesiÃ³n de la protecciÃ³n al consumidor, porque tenÃa otros compromisos. Â¿La actual gente en la Bruselas GAC + reuniÃ³n del Consejo (sitio de la charla del adobe), podrÃa resumirme cuÃ¡l estaba en esta sesiÃ³n? Pienso soy muy importante saber sobre esto. Â¿QuizÃ¡ Cynthia o Fatima, por favor? Estaba realmente una compasiÃ³n, didn`t considera cualquier persona nuestros representantes de ALAC allÃ, mÃ¡ximo cuando tienen responsabilities para informarnos. Conjeturo que esta reuniÃ³n serÃ¡ la punta del discusiÃ³n central en San Francisco, para eso que necesitamos un extracto antes de la reuniÃ³n. Â¿QuizÃ¡s podrÃamos elaborado una cierta declaraciÃ³n sobre ese whta usted pensamos de Ã©se? Recuerdos Carlos Dionisio Aguirre Consejo de NCA GNSO - ICANN miembro anterior de ALAC de LACRALO En Derecho de los Negocios de Abogado - de Especialista Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 CÃ³rdoba - La Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c106ec40f6.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letterof ALAC JAS
by carlos dionisio aguirre March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

Dear All: En relacion con la pregunta motivo del voto de ALAC, claramente mi respuesta seria por el YES. En relacion con el otro tema (CC), creo tendremos tiempo en SF para hablar sobre ello. Esta semana es de verdad complicada para mi. Saludos . Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN former ALAC member by LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 18:43:40 +0000 From: apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letterof ALAC JAS [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letterof ALAC JAS From: apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx Sergio, thousand thanks for this note that helps to focus the attention. It seems important to me that Carlos explains the added value to us that saw in the community of consumers; I am open to being convinced, and believe that the information will be valuable for all. I agree with you in which it agrees to read the documents that you indicate. Alexander Pisanty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr Alexander Pisanty UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 * They see ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org * It participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Thu, 3 Sea 2011, presidency Argentina Internaut wrote: > Date: Thu, 03 Sea 2011 15:34:43 -0300 > From: presidency Argentina Internaut <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] [ lac-discuss-in ] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: > Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS > > Thanks Carlos to send the mail in the list in Spanish, many of > this list you is going it to be thankful (between whom I am). > > is very interesting the interchange to Me from opinions withrespect to > the Consumer Constituency and the Not For Profit Constituency, podrian to be > so amiable as much vos Carlos as Alex, power to deepen in this, > mainly in the knowledge that you have of the people who > impels... I believe that this can be very good to clarify usthose > that we have not had possibility of interacting with them onpoints of > Vista and excellent information at the time of making decisions. > > Quiero to clarify that the voting shipment is based on this question with > three possi! ble answers: > > Apoya you it ratification of the Observation of ALAC on "comment on > the Draft for Process Recognition of New GNSO Constituencies"stops > to communicate it in the corresponding Public Commentary that this in process? > * With the possible answers: * > * Yes > No > To abstain * > > Propongo that we also read the following Link and that if wehave things > to say from LACRALO we add it in a commentary: > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Comment+on+the+Draft+Proc… > > warm Greetings > > * Sergio Saline I carry President Inter nauta Argentina Association > Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > Latin American Federation of Users of Internet > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > * > > "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedi! ent, whenever we receivedorders that > humiliates our conscien! ce or vi olates our common sense "- Eduardo > Galeano- > > * > > > the 03/03/2011 11:52 a.m., Carlos dionisio Aguirre wrote: > > Considered All. the answer to my opinion on the creation of new constituencies in the GNSO, is that we cannot deny the importance of the participation and the diversity in the discussion. But that this does not have to be considered in abstract at the time of deciding andvoting. For that reason I propose that Our representatives in ALAC before making their voting see documents in links sent in my previous mail that would daran a better idea to them of like voting and doing it responsibly. > > Today the new presented/displayed constituencies is the Consumer Constituency and the Not For Profit Constituency and some but they estan wanting to make its appearance. My individual vision in the caseof these two mentioned is: support the creation of the Consumer Constituency since being in ALAC I have spoken with its impellers and convinced to me (although thi! s is single my opinion which it is on theother hand not shared by ALEX, segun I see in its mail), and I am not very safe to support the for Not Profit x q I have doubts about the distinction (this can be a lack of particular knowledge) between the CC, NFPC, NCUC, NCSG and until as much that doubt it vanishes..... > > > > my two cents > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > > NCA GNSO Council - ICANN > > to former ALAC to member by LACRALO > > Lawyer - Specialistic in Right of the Businesses > > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - > > * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 > > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 3 Sea 2011 14:30:35 +0000 > > From: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > CC: > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-in ] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS > > > > > > [ [ - - Translated text (is - > in)--]] > > > > ! > > Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply o! f the to letter of ALAC JAS > > From: to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > > > Thanks for Carlos your participation, you would be under amiable to send > > replaced his in the Spanish channel? > > Lamentably the translation to ingles does very difficult to understandthat > > this saying and ace is its position, knows that its opinion is very valuable > > on the subject, but we did not manage to to decipher it from to badone > > translation, tells that in its maternal language we will be able to understand it to better > > those companions of the LACRALO that we spoke fluidly Spanish but that > > the English. > > There am dog clarify if you to U.S. this in agreement with the opinion that maintains > > ALAC with respect to the New GNSO Constituencies? > > Warm greetings > > > > * Sergio Saline I carry President Internaut Argentina Association > > Argentina de Usuarios de Internet<http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > > Latin America! n federation of Users of Internet > > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > > > * > > > > "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedient, to whenever we received orders that > > they humiliate our conscience or sense they violate our common "- Eduardo > > Galeano- > > > > * > > > > > > The 03/03/2011 10:06 a.m., carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com wrote: > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]]> > > Subject: Re: Fw:RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS > Of: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > > > Wanted All: > > electoral With respect to the new districts in GNSO, this one is part of the improvements http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/of GNSO and you invite our representatives in ALAC that read. > to understand the process that I also in! vites to read doccuments - the new process of contituency - in! http:// gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm, to read tolater and to understand those doccuments, safe able I`m you will be todecide to fill your responsabilities. > My certain point of view is that one: I`m in electoral favor to the new districts, but not totallysurely in all the you marry for example I uses to electoral district of the consumers. > I`m not totally surely in marries that of it does not stop the electoral district of the horseradish tree! > > efit, in this marries I have doubts with respect to the differencebetween the cubical to centimeter, NFPC, NCSG, NCUC (I know that it could be an appropriate deficiency of the knowledge of me). And finally I`m almost surely against the to other wichof the electoral districts there are presented/displayed its requests. > > My two cents. > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > Advice of NCA GNSO - ICANN > previous to member of ALAC of LACRALO > In Right of the Businesses of Lawyer - of Specialist &gt! ; Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordova - Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > > Date: Thu, The 3 Of March 2011 11:45:07 Of +0000 > Of: to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar >: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > cubical Centimeter: > Subject: Re: [ lacquer-discuss-lac-discuss-in ] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS > > > [ [ - - translated text (is ->)--]] of in > > > Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THEVOTES: Reviewed supply of the to letter of ALAC JAS! > > > Of: to to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > Ace Ãƒ©l indicates! > > tes it C > > ar them well in its mail was one of which they represented > of the LACRALO that podrÃƒÂa not to votes on the supply of ALAC JAS. > > That representing was. > > razÃƒÂ³n by which I have notbeen able to votes is the breakageof myHD in my PC > invalido cuÃƒ l toemit my votes, I req! uest to you excuse all to him by > this, but without the to! compute r was without to doubt impossible to me to do it. > > I must indicate inside that Ãƒ©l was going to make affirmative, like expressedit > my mail when enviÃƒ© the alert of the consultation in the list in this subject > did the 01/03, lamentably Ãƒ©l was not contribuciÃƒÂ³n nuestrasexes > representing, that of insurance very habÃƒÂa been enriching for all. > > Because to animate the box that I must indicate that, contribuciÃƒÂ³nvaliosa©Ãƒ l was sÃƒÂ the of > to other members of regiÃƒÂ³n that preocupÃƒÂ³ to to answer itself themail and > to contributeto its ends of visiÃƒÂ³n and the knowledge for the decision making, > those end! > > s of visiÃƒÂ³n habÃƒÂan been suitable with ours intenciÃƒÂ³n of the votes. > > mail DeseÃƒÂ³ to take advantage of this to request Carlos to him who offers electoral U.S. to his > point of view in the processes of the recognition of the newGNSO > surpasses to the district, from oft! Ãƒ©rminoof dÃƒÂa 04/03/2011 voting. > > TambiÃƒ©n wantedto lists what the to other members think ours > regiÃƒÂ³n, ace ace theream is of to order in this management serÃƒ taken inside > counts AT theTime of defining our votes in ofvoting of the processes of > the subjects that plows discussed in ALAC, for Ãƒ©l envÃƒÂo one conexiÃƒÂ³n that dog > to be one guÃƒÂa in the subject: > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Comment+on+the+Draft+Proc… > hot Greetings > > * saline Sergio I take asociaciÃƒÂ³n of president Argentina Internaut > Internet of Argentina de Usuarios of<http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI - > Latin American FederaciÃƒÂ³n! > > of users of the Internet > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO -! > > to member f > > acebook:salinasporto of ALAC > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > Skype:internautaargentina Mo! bi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > > the 02/03/2011 12:39 P.! M., carl osaguirre62(a)hotmail.com escribiÃƒÂ³: > [ [ - - text translated (in -> is)--]]>>> subject: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTES: Reviewed OfALAC of the supply of the JAS>de to letter: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > > > DeseÃƒÂ³ All: I`ve finishes seeing of the email down, and my surprise was very great, because: 1 of 2 that our ALAC eligiÃƒÂ³ regionalrepresentatives, the NINGÃƒs(N to decides participates in the survey Ã‚ DeseÃƒÂ³ to know by quÃƒ©? Ã‚ quÃƒ© in you? Ã‚ cuÃƒ l was motivaciÃƒÂ³na to decides? despuÃƒ©s of which Ãƒ©l asksabout that ours maximun of opiniÃƒÂ³nwhen there plows three members of LACRALO in the WG (to Co-chair), and Ãƒ©l watch like I who everything deserves our aid (of even being I one Ãƒ©l). > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > advice of NC! > > To GNSO - ICANN > previous to member of ALAC of LACRALO > in the right of the businesses of the to lawyer - of the specialist > of Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 ! Cordova - Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123 > /423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > dates: Wed, the 2 of march 2011 of 09:55:11 of +0100 > of: Ã‚ staff@atlarg > e.icann.org > a: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > subject: RESULT [ of ALAC-Anuncie ] of the VOTES: The reviewed to letter ProposalofALAC JAS> > deseÃƒÂ³ all, > > with 11 members of outside 15 of ALACen which you vote in the recent you vote > proposed the reviewed to letter of ALACJAS, we dog confirm that quorate is the results >. > > *********>>youuse ratificaciÃƒÂ³n of the supply repasadade the to letter of ALAC JAS > > sÃƒÂ: 11 (100.00%) > Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Carlton Samuels, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Sandra > Hoferichter, Evan Leibovitch, James Seng, Sylvia Leite, Olivier > CrÃƒ©pin-Leblond, the! > > Bashir, Dewandranath Kissoondoyal, Gareth De Mohammed > She! > > arman&g > > t; > not: 0 (0.00%) > > abstains: ! 0 (0.00%) > > ***********>> you dog verify the res! ults ind ependently underneath: Ã‚ >https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=1592gybVUyKuQsbcf9DLza2g>>podemostoconfirm that > did not participate the following members of ALAC > in > votaciÃƒfÃ‚Â³n: Ã‚ > > Edmon Chungking > Orujo Of memory > &g of nberg >t; Ãƒ?rbol bano Jemaa of rÃƒ sharp of saline Tijani > I take accepts Sergio > > you who you dog underneath find the results detodosthe closed you vote of ALAC: Ã‚ > https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097 > > respect to -->,>> Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-Blanco, > Marilyn Vernon, Kristina NordstrÃƒfÃ‚Â¶m > personal En-Grande-Grande of ICANN > > > email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org > site of the Web: www.atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________> ALAC-Anuncie listthatenvÃƒfÃ‚Âa > ALAC-Announc! > > e(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce &! gt; > official En-Grande-Grande of the site: Ã‚ http://atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________>>>>> [ [ - - the original text (inside) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/11ÃƒÂªb0a6f5.html > --]]>>>>>!> _______________________________________________> lacquer-to discuss estÃƒ sending the list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann > org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________> > > > > [ [ - - original text (it is) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/19a716b172.html > --]]> > > > _______________________________________________> > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/db65d40da3.html > --]]> > > > > _______________________________________________> l! > > ac-discuss-i! s mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.ican! > > ! n.org &g t; > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (it is) > > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/462d4cc54b.html > > --]] > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-in mailing list > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-is mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3f362fa1f9.html --]] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Reviewed supply of the letter of ALAC JAS
by carlos dionisio aguirre March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

Estimados Todos. la respuesta a mi opinion sobre la creacion de nuevos constituencies en el GNSO, es que no podemos negar la importancia de la participacion y la diversidad en la discusion. Pero que esto no debe ser considerado en abstracto al momento de decidir y votar. Por ello propongo que Nuestros representantes en ALAC antes de hacer su votacion vean los documentos en los links enviados en mi correo anterior que les daran una idea mejor de como votar y hacerlo responsablemente. Hoy los nuevos constituencies presentados son el Consumer Constituency y el Not For Profit Constituency y algunos mas estan queriendo hacer su aparicion. Mi particular vision en el caso de estos dos mencionados es : apoyo la creacion del Consumer Constituency ya que estando en ALAC he hablado con sus impulsores y me convencieron (aunque esta es solo mi opinion que por otro lado no es compartida por ALEX , segun veo en su correo), y no estoy muy seguro de apoyar el Not for Profit x q tengo dudas acerca de la distincion (esta puede ser una falta de conocimiento particular) entre los CC, NFPC, NCUC, NCSG y hasta tanto esa duda se desvanezca ..... mis dos centavos Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN former ALAC member by LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:30:35 +0000 From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Reviewed supply of the letter of ALAC JAS [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Reviewed supply of the letter of ALAC JAS From: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar Thanks Carlos for your participation, you would be so amiable to send replaced his in the Spanish channel? Lamentably the translation to ingles does very difficult to understandthat this saying and as is its position, knows that its opinion is very valuable on the subject, but we did not manage to decipher it from a badone translation, tells that in its maternal language we will be able to understand it better those companions of the LACRALO that we spoke fluidly Spanish but that the English. He can clarify if you to us this in agreement with the opinion that maintains ALAC with respect to the New GNSO Constituencies? Warm greetings * Sergio Saline I carry President Internauta Argentina Association Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- Latin American federation of Users of Internet <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * * "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedient, whenever we received orders that they humiliate our conscience or they violate our common sense"- Eduardo Galeano- * The 03/03/2011 10:06 a.m., carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com wrote: > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Reviewed supply of the letter of ALAC JAS > Of: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > > > Wanted All: > > With respect to the new electoral districts in GNSO, this one is part of the improvements http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/of GNSO and invites our representatives in ALAC that read. > to understand the process that I also invite to read doccuments - the new process of contituency - in http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm, to read later and to understand those doccuments, safe I`m you will be able todecide to fill your responsabilities. > My certain point of view is that one: I`m in favor to the new electoral districts, but not totally surely in all the cases for example I use to electoral district of the consumers. > I`m not totally surely in case that of it does not stop the electoral district of the ben! efit, in this case I have doubts with respect to the difference between the cubical centimeter, NFPC, NCSG, NCUC (I know that it could be an appropriate deficiency of the knowledge of me). And finally I`m almost surely against the other wichof the electoral districts has presented/displayed its requests. > > My two cents. > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > Advice of NCA GNSO - ICANN > previous member of ALAC of LACRALO > In Right of the Businesses of Lawyer - of Specialist > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordova - Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > > Date: Thu, The 3 Of March 2011 11:45:07 Of +0000 > Of: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar >: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > cubical Centimeter: > Subject: Re: [ lacquer-discuss-lac-discuss-in ] Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Reviewed supply of the letter of ALAC JAS > > > [ [ - - translated text (is ->)--]] of in > > > Subject: Re: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Reviewed supply of the letter of ALAC JAS ! > Of: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > As Ã©l indica! tes it C arlos well in its mail was one of which they represented > of the LACRALO that podrÃa not to vote on the supply of ALAC JAS. > > That representing era. > > razÃ³n by which I have not been able to vote is the breakageof myHD in my PC > invalido cuÃ l to emit my vote, I request to excuses all to him by > this, but without the computer was without a doubt impossible to me to do it. > > I must indicate inside that Ã©l was going to make affirmative, like expressedit > my mail when enviÃ© the alert of the consultation in the list in this subject > did the 01/03, lamentably Ã©l was not contribuciÃ³n nuestrasexes > representing, that of insurance very habÃa been enriching for all. > > Because to animate the box that I must indicate that, Ã©l was sÃ the contribuciÃ³nvaliosa of > other members of regiÃ³n that preocupÃ³ to answer itself themail and > to contribute to its ends of visiÃ³n and the knowledge for the decision making, > those end! s of visiÃ³n habÃan been suitable with ours intenciÃ³n of the vote. > > DeseÃ³ to take advantage of this mail to request Carlos to him who offers us to his > point of view in the processes of the recognition of the newGNSO > surpasses to the electoral district, from of tÃ©rminoof dÃa 04/03/2011 voting. > > TambiÃ©n wanted to listen what the other members think ours > regiÃ³n, as as he is of order in this management serÃ taken inside > counts at the time of defining our vote in ofvoting of the processes of > the subjects that are discussed in ALAC, for Ã©l envÃo one conexiÃ³n that can > to be one guÃa in the subject: > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Comment+on+the+Draft+Proc… > > hot Greetings > > * saline Sergio I take asociaciÃ³n of president Internauta Argentina > Internet of Argentina de Usuarios of<http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > Latin American FederaciÃ³n! of users of the Internet > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ! member f acebook:salinasporto of ALAC > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > > the 02/03/2011 12:39 P.M., carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com escribiÃ³: > [ [ - - text translated (in - > is)--]]>>> subject: Fw: RESULT OF THE VOTE: Reviewed OfALAC of the supply of the JAS>de letter: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > > > DeseÃ³ All: I`ve finishes seeing of the email down, and my surprise was very great, because: 1 of 2 that our ALAC eligiÃ³ regionalrepresentatives, the NINGÃs(N to decide participates in the survey Â DeseÃ³ to know by quÃ©? Â quÃ© in you? Â cuÃ l was motivaciÃ³na to decide? despuÃ©s of which Ã©l asksabout that ours maximun of opiniÃ³nwhen there are three members of LACRALO in the WG (a Co-chair), and Ã©l watch like I who everything deserves our aid (even being I one of Ã©l). > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > advice of NC! A GNSO - ICANN > previous member of ALAC of LACRALO > in the right of the businesses of the lawyer - of the specialist > of Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordova - Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123! > /423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > date: Wed, the 2 of march 2011 of 09:55:11 of +0100 > of: Â staff@atlarg! > e.icann.org > a: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > subject: RESULT [ of ALAC-Anuncie ] of the VOTE: The reviewed letter ProposalofALAC JAS > > deseÃ³ all, > > with 11 members of outside 15 of ALACen which votes in the recent votes > proposed the reviewed letter of ALACJAS, we can confirm that quorate is the results >. > > *********>> youuse ratificaciÃ³n of the supply repasadade the letter of ALAC JAS > > sÃ: 11 (100.00%) > Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Carlton Samuels, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Sandra > Hoferichter, Evan Leibovitch, James Seng, Sylvia Leite, Olivier > CrÃ©pin-Leblond, the ! Bashir, Dewandranath Kissoondoyal, Gareth De Mohammed > She! arman &g t; > not: 0 (0.00%) > > abstains: 0 (0.00%) > > ***********>> you can verify the results independently underneath: Â > https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=1592gybVUyKuQsbcf9DLza2g>>p… confirm that! > did not participate the following members of ALAC! > in > votaciÃfÂ³n: Â > > Edmon Chungking > Orujo Of memory! > &g of nberg > t; Ã?rbol Jemaa of rÃ bano sharp of saline Tijani > I take accepts Sergio > > you who you can underneath find the results detodosthe closed votes of ALAC: Â > https://www.bigpulse.com/m7097 > > respect to -->,>> Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-Blanco, > Marilyn Vernon, Kristina NordstrÃfÂ¶m > personal En-Grande-Grande of ICANN > > > email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org > site of the Web: www.atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________> ALAC-Anuncie listthatenvÃfÂa > ALAC-Announc! e(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > > official En-Grande-Grande of the site: Â http://atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________>>>>> [ [ - - the original text (inside) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/11Ãªb0a6f5.html > --]]>>>>>! > _______________________________________________> lacquer-to discuss estÃ sending the list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann! > org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - original text (it is) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/19a716b172.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/db65d40da3.html > --]] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > l! ac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.ican! n.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > http://www.lacralo.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/462d4cc54b.html --]] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

3 2

Re: un comentario r�pido sobre Bruselas GAC + reuni�n del Consejo
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Tema: Re: un comentario rápido sobre Bruselas GAC + reunión del Consejo De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com Carlos querido y todo, Había emprendido previamente remitir las transcripciones de lareunión de GAC/Board. Vea por favor http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/03/02/transcript-icann-gac-board que es incluso mejores que las transcripciones y precisa agradable los asuntos discutidos así como los miembros que eran los más vocales. Respeto bueno Cintra Sooknanan En Tue, de marcha el 1 de 2011 en 12:47 P.M., aguirre del dionisio de los carlos < carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > escribió: > las gracias Cintra. serán apreciadas > > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > Consejo de NCA GNSO - ICANN > miembro anterior de ALAC de LACRALO > en Derecho de los Negocios de Abogado - de Especialista > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Córdoba - La Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > > > > > fecha: Tue, El 1 De Marcha 2011 10:04:59 De -0400 > tema: Re: [ laca-discutir-lac-discuss-en ] un comentario rápido sobre Bruselas GAC + tarjeta > reunión > de: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com > a: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > CENTÍMETRO CÚBICO: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Carlos Querido, > > estaba presente para ambas sesiones de mañana (pero faltó la tarde debido a > trabajo), estoy compartiendo mis impresiones iniciales pero quisiera repasar > por completo transcripción antes de dar un resumen apropiado. > > Alot fue discutido en el primer dÃa, Ã©l aparecÃa ocasionalmente que algo de > los miembros de GAC no estaban como preparado como los miemb! ros del Consejo. La impresiÃ³n era > que mientras que muy fueron preparados en algunas Ã¡reas, enotras Ã©l se parecÃan como si > desean instituir restricciones pero no pueden sugerir cÃ³mo el proceso > debe ser modificado. Peor todavÃa, en algunos casos (eg. para las palabras genÃ©ricas) Ã©l > era sentido que desean para ir mÃ¡s allÃ¡ de cuÃ¡l estÃ¡ presente en existir Â¡> legislaciÃ³n! > > el segundo dÃa (hoy) ha sido un dÃgito binario escalonado,con algunos inicial > los discursos significaron al refocus a ambos grupos en las Ã¡reas de asunto y la a discutibles > boquete grande durante el dÃa donde ambos grupos se reunieron por separado (y no > la participaciÃ³n de observers/remote fue permitida). > > las transcripciones estarÃ¡n disponibles y me placerÃ© remitirlas a > la lista (si el personal no hace tan). > > respeto bueno > > Cintra Sooknanan > > el mon, 28 de febrero de 2011 en 9:36, aguirre del dionisio de los carlos < > carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com > escribiÃ³: > > > Querido Todos: I`m referido seriamente, porque no vi cualquiera de nuestro ALAC > representantes en el cuarto de la charla del adobe esta maÃ±ana. No permanecÃa en > sesiÃ³n de la protecciÃ³n al consumidor, porque tenÃa otroscompromisos. El presente > la gente en la Bruselas GAC + reuniÃ³n del Consejo (sitio dela charla del adobe), podrÃa Â¿> resÃºmame cuÃ¡l estaba en esta sesiÃ³n? Pienso soy muy importante saber > sobre esto. Â¿QuizÃ¡ Cynthia o Fatima, por favor? Estaba realmente una compasiÃ³n, didn`t considera > cualquier persona nuestros representantes de ALAC allÃ, mÃ¡ximo cuando tienen > responsabilities para informarnos. Conjeturo que esta reuniÃ³n serÃ¡ la punta de > discusiÃ³n central en San Francisco, para eso necesitamos unextracto antes de > reuniÃ³n. QuizÃ¡s podrÃamos elaborar una cierta declaraciÃ³n sobre ese whta le hacemos Â¿> piense de eso? > > Recuerdos > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > Consejo de NCA GNSO - ICANN > miembro anterior de ALAC de LACRALO > en Derecho de los Negocios de Abogado - de Especialista > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 CÃ³rdoba - La Argentina - > * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > lista que envÃa laca-discutir-lac-discuss-en > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > > > _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/fe76d32592.html --]]

1 0

Llamada RECORDATORIO/IPv6 - De la 4 UTC De Marcha De 1500
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Tema: Llamada RECORDATORIO/IPv6 - De la 4 UTC De Marcha De 1500 De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Querido Todos, Éste debe recordarle que se invita participe a la comunidad En-Grande que en un informe de la comunidad en IPv6 el viernes, la 4 de marcha de 2011 en UTC 1500. (0700 PST, 1000 Est, 1200 Buenos Aires, 1500 Londres, 1600 CET, Karachi 2000, 2300 Hong-Kong, 0200 Sydney (05.03)) Habrá interpretación española para esta llamada. La llamada será moderada por Olivier Crépin-Leblond y ofrece a presentación de Leo Vegoda, IANA operacional del oficial de laexcelencia en ICANN. Las instrucciones de la agenda y de la participación están disponibles en: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Community+Call+on+IPv6+04.03.11 Observe por favor el adobe NUEVO conectan: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/ipv6march42011/ Lista de Dialout: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Community+Call+on+IPv6+04.03.11+ Dialouts Por favor contacto staff(a)atlarge.icann.org si usted no está actualmente en la lista y requiera un dialout. Gracias. -- Respeto, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-Blanco, Marilyn Vernon, Kristina Nordström Personal En-Grande de ICANN email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org Web site: www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/576e07a55f.html --]]

1 0

[SEEKING INPUTS} US Departmentof Commerce IANA Notice of Inquiry
by cveraq＠gmail.com March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

Podriamos abrir un hilo de discusion aqui? Para empexar algun miembro con mas conocimiento podria realizar una breve explicacion del tema y la problematica relacionada.. Ojala sea posible Carlos Vera Tema muy importante, en el que opino deberiamos participar todos Saludos Sebastian Bellagamba bellagamba(a)isoc.org ------------------------------- Manager - Oficina Regional para America Latina y el Caribe Regional Bureau Manager for Latin America and the Caribbean =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Internet Society www.isoc.org Begin forwarded message: > From: Bill Graham <graham(a)isoc.org> > Date: 2 March 2011 4:57:59 PM GMT-02:00 > To: Chapter Delegates <chapter-delegates(a)elists.isoc.org>, = isoc-members-announce(a)elists.isoc.org > Cc: ISOC Chapter Support <chapter-support(a)isoc.org> > Subject: [Chapter-delegates] [SEEKING INPUTS} US Department of = Commerce IANA Notice of Inquiry >=20 > Dear Chapter Delegates and Members, >=20 > As you are probably aware, the Government of the United States = released its long-awaited Notice of Inquiry on the IANA functions on = Friday last week. I'm attaching a pdf version that is easier to read = than the Federal Register version on their web site <See: = http://www.ntia.doc.gov/>. The deadline for comments is 31 March 2011, = so we need to begin developing our response now. >=20 > The evolution of the IANA function is an issue of immediate and great = interest to all parts of ISOC and our companion organizations. I am = seeking views from our membership on this important topic to use as = inputs when developing the ISOC response to the NOI. I will also be = drawing on the Board discussions of the IANA function that have taken = place over the past few years. And finally, I will be coordinating with = the other I* organizations. I do not believe we should try to develop a = joint response to DoC, but we will want to ensure there are no surprises = and, ideally, that there is broad general agreement in what we provide = to the decision making process. >=20 > It is my believe that the US government is sincerely hoping to get a = broad range of responses from the US and elsewhere with concrete = suggestions for improvement of the way the IANA function is handled. = For example, they are hoping to hear clear statements about what this = community wants; e.g., whether and why there should be changes to how = the .arpa and/or the .int are treated in the contract, what should be = the arrangements for the protocol parameters, etc. If the Internet = technical community would like to see the US government make changes, we = need to participate in this process to build a record of those = recommendations. Thus I encourage you to send me your inputs by end of = day Friday, 18 March, 2011. >=20 > The NOI is quite detailed, as you will see. It describes the IANA = function, and then goes on to ask questions in six areas. To = paraphrase, those are: >=20 > 1/ Whether the interdependent technical functions performed under the = IANA should continue to be treated as interdependent, or if there should = be changes to the present grouping? >=20 > 2/ Recognizing that other Internet technical organizations' policies = (e.g., IETF, IAB, RIRs, ccTLDs) impact on the performance of the IANA = functions, should those be referred to and specified in the IANA = functions contract and how? >=20 > 3/ Should there be changes in the handling of root zone management = requests requests pertaining to ccTLDs to address the concerns of some = governments and ccTLD operators? >=20 > 4/ Are the current performance metrics and reporting by the IANA = functions operator adequate, or should there be changes? >=20 > 5/ Are there improvements that should be made to the IANA functions = contract to better address the needs of users of the IANA functions? = Here the NOI specifically asks if additional information on the = performance and administration of the IANA function would make the = process more transparent? >=20 > 6/ Should additional security considerations or enhancements be = included in the requirements in the IANA functions contract? >=20 > In every case, the NOI requests *specific* information and *specific* = suggestions for improvements in the IANA contract. This may be an area = where ISOC can contribute to the process in a very positive way. I = would especially like to hear from you if you are in some direct way a = participant or user of the IANA functions, and if you have any specific = experience that indicates a need for improvement or alteration of the = contract, and if so, what your specific recommendations would be. That = kind of input would improve the depth and credibility of the ISOC = response. Of course, as always, you are welcome to make your own direct = comments to the process, but I would still very much appreciate hearing = about your experiences and views. >=20 > While I have not prepared text for the submission, in general, I would = like to see ISOC explain how important it is to rely on the native = Internet institutions to play appropriate roles where their expertise = contributes to the smooth functioning of the Internet overall. Thus it = is important that the roles of the IETF, IAB, RIRs, and ccTLD operators = be recognized in the system, and that there is a need to build = international confidence in how the IANA function is operated and = administered. That includes the need to be more open, transparent and = thus accountable in the administration of the process, to match the = openness and transparency provided by the operator's extensive = reporting. I also foresee suggesting that the stability of the IANA = functions could be improved under different process than the current = redrawing and renewing of relatively short term IANA functions = contracts. =20 >=20 > I hope that you will read the full NOI, and I look forward to hearing = your views on the questions it asks, your experiences, and your = recommendations for improvement. >=20 > Once again, to make it possible for me to prepare the ISOC input, = please send me your inputs before end of day on March 18, 2011 or = earlier if possible. >=20 > Thank you in advance >=20 > Bill=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Chapter-delegates mailing list > Chapter-delegates(a)elists.isoc.org > https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates Mensaje enviado desde mi terminal BlackBerry® de Porta -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Bellagamba <bellagamba(a)isoc.org> Sender: deleg-lac-bounces(a)elists.isoc.org Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:39:41 To: <deleg-lac(a)elists.isoc.org> Reply-To: deleg-lac(a)elists.isoc.org Subject: [Deleg-lac] Fwd: [Chapter-delegates] [SEEKING INPUTS} US Department of Commerce IANA Notice of Inquiry _______________________________________________ Deleg-lac mailing list Deleg-lac(a)elists.isoc.org https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/deleg-lac

1 0

LACRALO ENTRARON el fechas de la reuni�n de ICANN
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Tema: LACRALO ENTRARON el fechas de la reunión de ICANN De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Miembros Queridos de LACRALO, A nombre del ALAC pedimos que usted satisfaga la revisión la reunión propuesta de ICANN fecha el 2014 2016 para asegurarse de que no chocan con regional importante días de fiesta y celebraciones. Usted puede encontrar el documento del pdf con propuesto fechas civiles en: http://meetings.icann.org/calendar/dates-14-16-en.pdf. Se han seleccionado las fechas propuestas basaron en una revisión cuidadosa de importante días de fiesta y acontecimientos de la comunidad alrededor delglobo. Envíe por favor sus comentarios las fechas que satisfacen propuestas a esta lista que envía por domingo, la 6 de marcha. El ALAC compilará la entrada de información regional en a Declaración que será enviada a la consulta pública correspondiente proceso antes de la 8 del plazo de marcha. Usted puede encontrar la información adicional sobre la consulta pública sobre La reunión propuesta de ICANN fecha 2014 - 2016 en http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#meeting-dates -- Respeto, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-Blanco, Marilyn Vernon, Kristina Nordström Personal En-Grande de ICANN email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org Web site: www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ce97fbe8d1.html --]]

1 0

COMENTARIOS DEL LACRALO sobre los propuestos datos de las reuniones de ICANN
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 3, 2011

March 3, 2011

Estimados miembros del LACRALO, De parte del ALAC, le preguntamos de revisar las propuestos datos para las reuniones de ICANN entre 2014 y 2016. Por favor, verifican que los datos no coinciden con importantes fiestas y celebraciones regionales. Pueden descargar el documento PDF con el calendario propuesto en http://meetings.icann.org/calendar/dates-14-16-en.pdf La selección de datos de ICANN se basa en una inspección minuciosa de las celebraciones e eventos de la comunidad de ICANN en todo el mundo. Por favor, envían sus comentarios sobre los datos propuestos a esta lista hasta el domingo, 6 de marzo. El ALAC reunirá los aportes regionales en una declaración que se transmitirá a la consulta pública correspondiente antes de la fecha limite del 8 de marzo. Para revisar la información completa sobre la consulta pública sobre las propuestos datos para las reuniones de ICANN entre 2014 y 2016 siguen el siguiente enlace: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#meeting-dates Cordialmente, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-White, Marilyn Vernon, Kristina Nordström ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org website: www.atlarge.icann.org

1 0