Podriamos abrir un hilo de discusion aqui? Para empexar algun miembro con mas conocimiento podria realizar una breve explicacion del tema y la problematica relacionada.. Ojala sea posible Carlos Vera Tema muy importante, en el que opino deberiamos participar todos Saludos Sebastian Bellagamba bellagamba@isoc.org ------------------------------- Manager - Oficina Regional para America Latina y el Caribe Regional Bureau Manager for Latin America and the Caribbean =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Internet Society www.isoc.org Begin forwarded message:

From: Bill Graham <graham@isoc.org> Date: 2 March 2011 4:57:59 PM GMT-02:00 To: Chapter Delegates <chapter-delegates@elists.isoc.org>, = isoc-members-announce@elists.isoc.org Cc: ISOC Chapter Support <chapter-support@isoc.org> Subject: [Chapter-delegates] [SEEKING INPUTS} US Department of = Commerce IANA Notice of Inquiry =20 Dear Chapter Delegates and Members, =20 As you are probably aware, the Government of the United States = released its long-awaited Notice of Inquiry on the IANA functions on = Friday last week. I'm attaching a pdf version that is easier to read = than the Federal Register version on their web site <See: = http://www.ntia.doc.gov/>. The deadline for comments is 31 March 2011, = so we need to begin developing our response now. =20 The evolution of the IANA function is an issue of immediate and great = interest to all parts of ISOC and our companion organizations. I am = seeking views from our membership on this important topic to use as = inputs when developing the ISOC response to the NOI. I will also be = drawing on the Board discussions of the IANA function that have taken = place over the past few years. And finally, I will be coordinating with = the other I* organizations. I do not believe we should try to develop a = joint response to DoC, but we will want to ensure there are no surprises = and, ideally, that there is broad general agreement in what we provide = to the decision making process. =20 It is my believe that the US government is sincerely hoping to get a = broad range of responses from the US and elsewhere with concrete = suggestions for improvement of the way the IANA function is handled. = For example, they are hoping to hear clear statements about what this = community wants; e.g., whether and why there should be changes to how = the .arpa and/or the .int are treated in the contract, what should be = the arrangements for the protocol parameters, etc. If the Internet = technical community would like to see the US government make changes, we = need to participate in this process to build a record of those = recommendations. Thus I encourage you to send me your inputs by end of = day Friday, 18 March, 2011. =20 The NOI is quite detailed, as you will see. It describes the IANA = function, and then goes on to ask questions in six areas. To = paraphrase, those are: =20 1/ Whether the interdependent technical functions performed under the = IANA should continue to be treated as interdependent, or if there should = be changes to the present grouping? =20 2/ Recognizing that other Internet technical organizations' policies = (e.g., IETF, IAB, RIRs, ccTLDs) impact on the performance of the IANA = functions, should those be referred to and specified in the IANA = functions contract and how? =20 3/ Should there be changes in the handling of root zone management = requests requests pertaining to ccTLDs to address the concerns of some = governments and ccTLD operators? =20 4/ Are the current performance metrics and reporting by the IANA = functions operator adequate, or should there be changes? =20 5/ Are there improvements that should be made to the IANA functions = contract to better address the needs of users of the IANA functions? = Here the NOI specifically asks if additional information on the = performance and administration of the IANA function would make the = process more transparent? =20 6/ Should additional security considerations or enhancements be = included in the requirements in the IANA functions contract? =20 In every case, the NOI requests *specific* information and *specific* = suggestions for improvements in the IANA contract. This may be an area = where ISOC can contribute to the process in a very positive way. I = would especially like to hear from you if you are in some direct way a = participant or user of the IANA functions, and if you have any specific = experience that indicates a need for improvement or alteration of the = contract, and if so, what your specific recommendations would be. That = kind of input would improve the depth and credibility of the ISOC = response. Of course, as always, you are welcome to make your own direct = comments to the process, but I would still very much appreciate hearing = about your experiences and views. =20 While I have not prepared text for the submission, in general, I would = like to see ISOC explain how important it is to rely on the native = Internet institutions to play appropriate roles where their expertise = contributes to the smooth functioning of the Internet overall. Thus it = is important that the roles of the IETF, IAB, RIRs, and ccTLD operators = be recognized in the system, and that there is a need to build = international confidence in how the IANA function is operated and = administered. That includes the need to be more open, transparent and = thus accountable in the administration of the process, to match the = openness and transparency provided by the operator's extensive = reporting. I also foresee suggesting that the stability of the IANA = functions could be improved under different process than the current = redrawing and renewing of relatively short term IANA functions = contracts. =20 =20 I hope that you will read the full NOI, and I look forward to hearing = your views on the questions it asks, your experiences, and your = recommendations for improvement. =20 Once again, to make it possible for me to prepare the ISOC input, = please send me your inputs before end of day on March 18, 2011 or = earlier if possible. =20 Thank you in advance =20 Bill=20 =20 _______________________________________________ Chapter-delegates mailing list Chapter-delegates@elists.isoc.org https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates

Mensaje enviado desde mi terminal BlackBerry® de Porta -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Bellagamba <bellagamba@isoc.org> Sender: deleg-lac-bounces@elists.isoc.org Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:39:41 To: <deleg-lac@elists.isoc.org> Reply-To: deleg-lac@elists.isoc.org Subject: [Deleg-lac] Fwd: [Chapter-delegates] [SEEKING INPUTS} US Department of Commerce IANA Notice of Inquiry _______________________________________________ Deleg-lac mailing list Deleg-lac@elists.isoc.org https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/deleg-lac