- lac-discuss-es - lists.iana.org

Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualizaci�n importante
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com Oct. 13, 2011

Oct. 13, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualización importante A partir de: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Sí señor! En ambas cuestiones de fondo que recibe - y logró ampliar y aclarar - las preocupaciones que tengo. Ojalá me hubiera visto esto antes, así que podría haber salvado mis dedos con un "1 "....... Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega * ============================= El Mar, 11 de octubre 2011 a las 6:39 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evan(a)telly.org> escribió: > > On 11 October 2011 19:04, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> wrote: > > > >> Take imaginary example candidate A, ALAC member, does not attend calls, >> does not attend meetings, or when he travels, uses their time outside of >> the ALAC room. A does not get involved in ALAC & other working groups. A >> is basically using their affiliation to ALAC as something that looks >> good on their CV. Admittedly, this is an extreme, but Carlton, at the >> moment, nothing can be done about that person, and that imaginary person >> is occupying a seat on the ALAC, one of the only 15 seats of people >> supposed to act in the best interests of the 2.1Bn Internet users out >> there. That person is failing those 2.1Bn people. That person is not >> accountable. >> > > I guess the big question -- at least MY big question -- is, accountable to > who? > > If that person was sent by a RALO, the RALO should be able to handle this > issue through a recall or other similar measure. > > If the person was appointed by the NomCom, the procedure is different but a > mechanism is still required. By definition a NomCom ALAC appointee is not > accountable to ALAC or the region, however it reflects badly on the NomCom > and ICANN itself if non-performing ALAC members are chosen and allowed to > under-serve for an entire two-year term. > > What bothers me the most is the prospect of ALAC passing judgment over its > own members. If a RALO elects someone who reflects their viewpoint, and that > viewpoint is that only a small number of issues matter, this is indeed the > RALO's choice to make and ALAC has no right to engage in top-down > second-guessing. Education and persuasion, certainly, but not sanctions. > > I fully agree on requesting that every RALO has some kind of recall > mechanism for their elected officials -- not just ALAC members but also RALO > chairs, secretariats and liaisons as applicable. Indeed I have long > advocated this within my own RALO. I am also greatly in favour of staff's > providing attendance and other performance metrics that allow a RALO to act > appropriately on factual inputs. But I am very much against any scheme that > has ALAC members being accountable to other ALAC members. > > It's bad enough that the ICANN Board has no legal, fiduciary duty to the > public, but only to ICANN itself. Let's not justify, let alone propagate > that mistake within our own bounds. > > But in any case, this debate is premature. We're at an intermediate >> stage, with more than 50 recommendations in this report, some of which >> are completed, some of which need to be taken to the next stage. The >> debate on sanctions/no sanctions will happen later. > > > I don't think there's any problem with that. As I've mentioned, it's simply > that the wording in the report right now could easily be interpreted by a > casual reader to infer that we have already had the discussion, agreed on a > regime of sanctions, and are simply discussing appropriate implementation > going forward. WE know the debate is incomplete, but that is not what the > report indicates. > > - Evan > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3e8dac2b37.html --]]

1 0

Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualizaci�n importante
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com Oct. 13, 2011

Oct. 13, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualización importante A partir de: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Estimado Olivier: En verdad comprendo tu punto de vista y reconoce incluso que el 'Fer-ejemplo "de grabar, sin duda un caso extremo, es posible ..... y preocupante. Pero estoy convencido de que "las sanciones" hablar es la mentalidad equivocada para hacer frente a esto. Las personas que son nombrados por un período. Ese período puede ser ajustado por el diseño y en el contexto del proceso de nombramiento. Que lo de menos sin embargo. Cuando se trata de miembros electos, las elecciones tienen un objetivo en particular en nuestro contexto en general, sino que presagia el proceso de "abajo hacia arriba" para que los nombres y haciendo números de la política se dice que es comprometido. Las personas que son elegidos por un período. La historia me absuelve, todo el mundo sabe que soy consciente de los electores puede, de hecho, el retorno «inadecuadas» las personas.Sin embargo, porque hay que pagar más que buenas palabras para este ideal de "abajo hacia arriba", el ALAC, no pueden adoptar este tipo una actitud arrogante hacia el rechazo de "abajo hacia arriba" que por excelencia acción que la anulación de esa elección mensaje. Luego están las "consecuencias imprevistas" se pueden anticipar. Siempre he advertido en contra de esta charla de "sanciones", incluso cuando respetados colegas han tratado en privado mis opiniones en las circunstancias donde los miembros del ALAC se consideran "levantar objetos livianos en el trabajo de ALAC. Me siento igual de fuerte que a medida que esta mentalidad se mantiene con vida y los tallos marco, es malo para nuestro negocio. AsÃ que de acuerdo con mis propios puntos de vista e intuir, me opondrÃ©. Mejor, Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels MÃ³vil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, PlanificaciÃ³n, Gobierno, EvaluaciÃ³n y plazos de entrega * ============================= El Mar, 11 de octubre 2011 a las 6:04 PM, MJ Olivier Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> escribiÃ³: > Carlton, > > On 11/10/2011 15:49, Carlton Samuels wrote : > > As I have already stated, I cannot vote for any report that recommends > "sanctions" on volunteers, even if they are yet to be determined. The state > of mind that delivers this gem can only be repudiated for cause. > > > Take imaginary example candidate A, ALAC member, does not attend calls, > does not attend meetings, or when he travels, uses their time outside of the > ALAC room. A does not get involved in ALAC & other working groups. A is > basically using their affiliation to ALAC as something that looks good on > their CV. Admittedly, this is an extreme, but Carlton, at the moment, > nothing can be done about that person, and that imaginary person is > occupying a seat on the ALAC, one of the only 15 seats of people supposed to > act in the best interests of the 2.1Bn Internet users out there. That person > is failing those 2.1Bn people. That person is not accountable. > > Yes, that person is a volunteer, but when you volunteer for ALAC, you're > not doing it as a piece of fun. There is a deep responsibility that goes > along with that. There is accountability to users in the rest of the world. > > But in any case, this debate is premature. We're at an intermediate stage, > with more than 50 recommendations in this report, some of which are > completed, some of which need to be taken to the next stage. The debate on > sanctions/no sanctions will happen later. (and in Dakar we have a session on > metric which might touch on that... or we might have to wait until after > Dakar. In any case, there will be plenty of times to debate this) > > Warmest regards, > > Olivier > > -- > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/394dfbab0f.html --]]

1 0

Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualizaci�n importante
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com Oct. 12, 2011

Oct. 12, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualización importante A partir de: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Como ya he dicho, no puedo votar por cualquier informe que recomienda "Sanciones" de los voluntarios, aunque aún no se han determinado. El estado de la mente que ofrece esta joya sólo puede ser repudiado por la causa. Hay un peligroso coqueteo con el principio y aún así, yo estaba dispuesto a tapo la nariz y votar por un informe que compara el apoyo de viaje requeridos para ejecutar una misión voluntaria como un "regalo" que pueden ser retenidas por la ICANN, el empresa! No se requiere ninguna introspección profunda para ver cómo esta postura devalúa el tiempo, esfuerzo, los productos de conocimiento y sí, incluso los fondos voluntarios regalo para esta cosa de la nuestra, este desarrollo de las políticas de nombres y números complejo. Así que aquí está. Dentro del marco que operamos, que a veces puede pasar por alto la gente se mal dirigido. Pero estoy unánime el concepto de "Sanciones" a un voluntario comprometido en un esfuerzo voluntario que realmente es ofensiva a la razón. Yo personalmente no soportan muchos de esos. Éste es rechazado. Yo se vote NO. Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega * ============================= El Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> escribió: > Dear ALAC ExCom members, > > I want to inform you of some changes to the Improvements report based on > information Heidi and Seth received from Samantha Eisner of ICANN Legal. > Legal's view is that the only "final report" appropriate for Board > approval would come once the ALAC can report having implemented *all* > the recommendations of the ALAC Review WG. > > At this stage, however, we could report that the ALAC has completed a > substantial amount of ALAC Improvements work, including developing > specific proposals for the implementation of the ALAC Review WG > recommendations. Consequently, Sam suggests the current status report > which need only be submitted by staff (not by the ALAC) not be called > a final report; we are thinking of calling it the "ALAC/At-Large > Improvements Project Milestone Report." > > Still, an endorsement of this Milestone Report by the ALAC would send a > strong message to the Board. So I have instructed Staff to start a vote > endorsing the report on Sunday. > > The next steps in the At-Large Improvements Project will be for the ALAC > to discuss the implementation of the remaining ALAC Review > recommendations and WT proposals in Dakar, including allocating them to > existing At-Large Working Groups, creating timelines for their > completion, and determining potential resource implications. > > I would like to be able to submit these details to the Board as soon as > practical but hopefully no later than the meeting in Costa Rica (11-16 > March 2012). The ALAC could then aim to submit the actual final Final > Report -- marking the completion of the implementation of all > Improvements recommendations -- to the Board in Prague (24-28 June 2012). > > Would you kindly let me know your thoughts on this as soon as possible? > Seth and others are working to convert the report into a "Milestone" > report as we speak. > > Best regards, > > Olivier Crépin-Leblond > ALAC Chair > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-ExCom mailing list > ALAC-ExCom(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-excom > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8e643fb04f.html --]]

2 1

Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualizaci�n importante
by jam＠jacquelinemorris.com Oct. 12, 2011

Oct. 12, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualización importante A partir de: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com Evan - Estoy de acuerdo con la idea de recordar, y han abogado por lo años, pero tengo un problema con las sanciones de la ALAC. Entiendo los problemas, se han ocupado de ellos yo mismo varias veces, y moral La persuasión no es suficiente para algunos. Pero tener los designados RALO rendir cuentas a la RALO debe ser más que suficiente, y estoy seguro de el Comité de nominaciones y de la Junta sería considerar algún tipo de rendición de cuentas Nombramientos del Comité de nominaciones, así, que iban a ser planteadas. Jacqueline A. Morris La tecnología debe ser como el oxígeno: ubicua, necesaria, Invisible y Libre. (AfterChris Lehmann) El Mar, 11 de octubre 2011 a las 7:39 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evan(a)telly.org> escribió: > On 11 October 2011 19:04, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> wrote: > > > >> Take imaginary example candidate A, ALAC member, does not attend calls, >> does not attend meetings, or when he travels, uses their time outside of >> the ALAC room. A does not get involved in ALAC & other working groups. A >> is basically using their affiliation to ALAC as something that looks >> good on their CV. Admittedly, this is an extreme, but Carlton, at the >> moment, nothing can be done about that person, and that imaginary person >> is occupying a seat on the ALAC, one of the only 15 seats of people >> supposed to act in the best interests of the 2.1Bn Internet users out >> there. That person is failing those 2.1Bn people. That person is not >> accountable. >> > > I guess the big question -- at least MY big question -- is, accountable to > who? > > If that person was sent by a RALO, the RALO should be able to handle this > issue through a recall or other similar measure. > > If the person was appointed by the NomCom, the procedure is different but a > mechanism is still required. By definition a NomCom ALAC appointee is not > accountable to ALAC or the region, however it reflects badly on the NomCom > and ICANN itself if non-performing ALAC members are chosen and allowed to > under-serve for an entire two-year term. > > What bothers me the most is the prospect of ALAC passing judgment over its > own members. If a RALO elects someone who reflects their viewpoint, and that > viewpoint is that only a small number of issues matter, this is indeed the > RALO's choice to make and ALAC has no right to engage in top-down > second-guessing. Education and persuasion, certainly, but not sanctions. > > I fully agree on requesting that every RALO has some kind of recall > mechanism for their elected officials -- not just ALAC members but also RALO > chairs, secretariats and liaisons as applicable. Indeed I have long > advocated this within my own RALO. I am also greatly in favour of staff's > providing attendance and other performance metrics that allow a RALO to act > appropriately on factual inputs. But I am very much against any scheme that > has ALAC members being accountable to other ALAC members. > > It's bad enough that the ICANN Board has no legal, fiduciary duty to the > public, but only to ICANN itself. Let's not justify, let alone propagate > that mistake within our own bounds. > > But in any case, this debate is premature. We're at an intermediate >> stage, with more than 50 recommendations in this report, some of which >> are completed, some of which need to be taken to the next stage. The >> debate on sanctions/no sanctions will happen later. > > > I don't think there's any problem with that. As I've mentioned, it's simply > that the wording in the report right now could easily be interpreted by a > casual reader to infer that we have already had the discussion, agreed on a > regime of sanctions, and are simply discussing appropriate implementation > going forward. WE know the debate is incomplete, but that is not what the > report indicates. > > - Evan > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/bb89ba37de.html --]]

1 0

Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualizaci�n importante
by jam＠jacquelinemorris.com Oct. 11, 2011

Oct. 11, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualización importante A partir de: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com Carlton - Estoy totalmente de acuerdo. La gente está renunciando a sus conocimientos, esfuerzo y el tiempo de trabajo productivo ($ $) y el tiempo personal y familiar a entregar el producto del conocimiento gratis para ICANN. Es ofensivo para considerar "Sanciones" en ellos. Jacqueline A. Morris La tecnología debe ser como el oxígeno: ubicua, necesaria, Invisible y Libre. (AfterChris Lehmann) El Mar, 11 de octubre 2011 a las 9:49 AM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribió: > As I have already stated, I cannot vote for any report that recommends > "sanctions" on volunteers, even if they are yet to be determined. The state > of mind that delivers this gem can only be repudiated for cause. > > There is a dangerous flirting with principle and even so, I was willing to > hold my nose and vote for a report that equates travel support required to > execute a voluntary mission as a "gift" that can be withheld by ICANN, the > corporation! > > It doesn't require any deep introspection to see how this posture devalues > the time, effort, the knowledge products and yes, even funds that volunteers > gift to this thing of ours, this names and numbers policy development > complex. > > So here it is. Within the framework that we operate, I can sometimes > overlook people being wrong headed. But I am unanimous the whole concept of > "sanctions" for a volunteer engaged in a voluntary effort really is > offensive to reason. > > I personally cannot stomach too many of those. This one is rejected. I > shall vote NO. > > Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > > On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>wrote: > >> Dear ALAC ExCom members, >> >> I want to inform you of some changes to the Improvements report based on >> information Heidi and Seth received from Samantha Eisner of ICANN Legal. >> Legal's view is that the only "final report" appropriate for Board >> approval would come once the ALAC can report having implemented *all* >> the recommendations of the ALAC Review WG. >> >> At this stage, however, we could report that the ALAC has completed a >> substantial amount of ALAC Improvements work, including developing >> specific proposals for the implementation of the ALAC Review WG >> recommendations. Consequently, Sam suggests the current status report >> which need only be submitted by staff (not by the ALAC) not be called >> a final report; we are thinking of calling it the "ALAC/At-Large >> Improvements Project Milestone Report." >> >> Still, an endorsement of this Milestone Report by the ALAC would send a >> strong message to the Board. So I have instructed Staff to start a vote >> endorsing the report on Sunday. >> >> The next steps in the At-Large Improvements Project will be for the ALAC >> to discuss the implementation of the remaining ALAC Review >> recommendations and WT proposals in Dakar, including allocating them to >> existing At-Large Working Groups, creating timelines for their >> completion, and determining potential resource implications. >> >> I would like to be able to submit these details to the Board as soon as >> practical but hopefully no later than the meeting in Costa Rica (11-16 >> March 2012). The ALAC could then aim to submit the actual final Final >> Report -- marking the completion of the implementation of all >> Improvements recommendations -- to the Board in Prague (24-28 June 2012). >> >> Would you kindly let me know your thoughts on this as soon as possible? >> Seth and others are working to convert the report into a "Milestone" >> report as we speak. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Olivier Crépin-Leblond >> ALAC Chair >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ALAC-ExCom mailing list >> ALAC-ExCom(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-excom >> > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1354bbc545.html --]]

1 0

Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualizaci�n importante
by carlosaguirre62＠hotmail.com Oct. 11, 2011

Oct. 11, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualización importante A partir de: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com Bueno, dijo Carlton! Estoy totalmente de acuerdo con usted. Pero también reconozco que es un tema difícil en algunos casos y, a veces. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA Consejo de la GNSO - ICANN el ex miembro de ALAC por LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Córdoba - Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org > From: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:49:25 -0500 > To: ocl(a)gih.com > CC: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; alac-excom(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] [ALAC-ExCom] ALAC/At-Large Improvements Project -- important update > > As I have already stated, I cannot vote for any report that recommends > "sanctions" on volunteers, even if they are yet to be determined. The state > of mind that delivers this gem can only be repudiated for cause. > > There is a dangerous flirting with principle and even so, I was willing to > hold my nose and vote for a report that equates travel support required to > execute a voluntary mission as a "gift" that can be withheld by ICANN, the > corporation! > > It doesn't require any deep introspection to see how this posture devalues > the time, effort, the knowledge products and yes, even funds that volunteers > gift to this thing of ours, this names and numbers policy development > complex. > > So here it is. Within the framework that we operate, I can sometimes > overlook people being wrong headed. But I am unanimous the whole concept of > "sanctions" for a volunteer engaged in a voluntary effort really is > offensive to reason. > > I personally cannot stomach too many of those. This one is rejected. I > shall vote NO. > > Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > > On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>wrote: > > > Dear ALAC ExCom members, > > > > I want to inform you of some changes to the Improvements report based on > > information Heidi and Seth received from Samantha Eisner of ICANN Legal. > > Legal's view is that the only "final report" appropriate for Board > > approval would come once the ALAC can report having implemented *all* > > the recommendations of the ALAC Review WG. > > > > At this stage, however, we could report that the ALAC has completed a > > substantial amount of ALAC Improvements work, including developing > > specific proposals for the implementation of the ALAC Review WG > > recommendations. Consequently, Sam suggests the current status report > > which need only be submitted by staff (not by the ALAC) not be called > > a final report; we are thinking of calling it the "ALAC/At-Large > > Improvements Project Milestone Report." > > > > Still, an endorsement of this Milestone Report by the ALAC would send a > > strong message to the Board. So I have instructed Staff to start a vote > > endorsing the report on Sunday. > > > > The next steps in the At-Large Improvements Project will be for the ALAC > > to discuss the implementation of the remaining ALAC Review > > recommendations and WT proposals in Dakar, including allocating them to > > existing At-Large Working Groups, creating timelines for their > > completion, and determining potential resource implications. > > > > I would like to be able to submit these details to the Board as soon as > > practical but hopefully no later than the meeting in Costa Rica (11-16 > > March 2012). The ALAC could then aim to submit the actual final Final > > Report -- marking the completion of the implementation of all > > Improvements recommendations -- to the Board in Prague (24-28 June 2012). > > > > Would you kindly let me know your thoughts on this as soon as possible? > > Seth and others are working to convert the report into a "Milestone" > > report as we speak. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Olivier Crépin-Leblond > > ALAC Chair > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ALAC-ExCom mailing list > > ALAC-ExCom(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-excom > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e89e25478b.html --]]

1 0

RECORDATORIO: Pre-Dakar ICANN Actualizaci�n de Pol�ticas de Invitaci�n Webinar
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org Oct. 10, 2011

Oct. 10, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: RECORDATORIO: Pre-Dakar ICANN Actualización de Políticas de Invitación Webinar A partir de: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-20sep11-en.htm Pre-Dakar ICANN Actualización de Políticas Webinar Invitación Para poder participar, confirmar su asistencia vía correo electrónico a la Secretaría de la GNSO (gnso.secretariat @ gnso.icann.org <mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> ) Para recibir los detalles de la llamada. Si usted planea participar en la próxima reunión de ICANN en Dakar a distancia o en persona, usted está invitado a un rápido recordatorio de los antecedentes y estado actual de cada problema de política actualmente en discusión en ICANN. El personal de políticas de ICANN ofrecerá una conferencia el jueves 13 de octubre a las 12.00 UTC y jueves 13 de octubre a las 19.00 UTC, resumiendo las cuestiones políticas a través de las Organizaciones de Apoyo a la ICANN diferentes, a saber, la Organización de Apoyo para Nombres Genéricos (GNSO), los nombres de países Código de la Organización de Apoyo (ccNSO ) y la Dirección de la Organización de Apoyo (ASO). Entre otros temas, las actualizaciones se referirá a: * Uniforme de Solución de Controversias político n º Informe (GNSO) * Dominio después del vencimiento recuperación de nombres de Dominio (GNSO) * Trabajos recientes WHOIS * Estudio sobre el uso de nombres de países y territorios (ccNSO) * Marco de Interpretación del Grupo de Trabajo para la delegación y volver de los ccTLD (ccNSO) * Conjunto de DNS de Seguridad y el Grupo de Análisis de Estabilidad de Trabajo Las dos sesiones son duplicados, prevista para dar cabida a las diferentes zonas horarias. En cada sesiÃ³n, tendrÃ¡ una duraciÃ³n de 90 minutos, se llevarÃ¡ a cabo sÃ³lo en InglÃ©s. La reuniÃ³n se llevarÃ¡ a cabo en Adobe Connect con una presentaciÃ³n de diapositivas, junto con una marcaciÃ³n de puente de conferencia de audio. Los participantes tendrÃ¡n la oportunidad de hacer preguntas al final de cada sesiÃ³n. Durante el transcurso del seminario, las preguntas pueden ser presentadas mediante la funciÃ³n de chat de Adobe Connect. Si no son capaces de participar en cualquiera de las sesiones en vivo, la grabaciÃ³n de la sesiÃ³n se pondrÃ¡ a disposiciÃ³n poco despuÃ©s de la reuniÃ³n. La polÃtica de personal estÃ¡ siempre disponible para responder a cualquier pregunta que usted correo electrÃ³nico a policy-staff(a)icann.org <mailto:policy-staff@icann.org> . Para poder participar, confirmar su asistencia vÃa correo electrÃ³nico a la SecretarÃa de la GNSO (gnso.secretariat @ gnso.icann.org <mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> ) Para recibir los detalles de la llamada. Por favor, indique que se pide que le gustarÃa participar, el jueves a las 12.00 horas UTC o jueves a las 19.00 UTC (para convertir esos momentos en su hora local, vea: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedform.html) Nosotros le enviaremos un recordatorio por correo electrÃ³nico antes del evento con inicio de sesiÃ³n y de acceso telefÃ³nico en los detalles. Por favor NO confirmar su asistencia a cualquier otro personal de la ICANN miembros de direcciÃ³n de correo electrÃ³nico. Glen de Saint Gry SecretarÃa de la GNSO gnso.secretariat @ gnso.icann.org <mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f3f7996022.html --]]

1 0

Agenda en Español de la Teleconferencia del dia 6 de Octubre próximo !!!
by José Francisco Arce Oct. 6, 2011

Oct. 6, 2011

*Estimados Compañeros*: Les dejo en este mail la agenda en Español de la próxima teleconferencia del 6 de Octubre. Para participar esta el siguiente link ¿Cómo se puede participar en la teleconferencia?<http://www.atlarge.icann.org/teleconference-participation-es>. Pueden agregar temas a la agenda, asi que no sean timidos. Saludos Jose Arce.- LACRALO AGENDA: 06 de Octubre de 2011 1. Lista de participantes – José (2 mins) 2. Revisión de los puntos de acción de la reunión del 18 de Agosto de 2011 Dev (2 min) 3. Foro Público para consultas -José (15 min) . Consultas Publicas <http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/> . Agenda del desarrollo de Políticas Atlarge<https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tKrlhCospxnfewY_9R39SuQ&gid=4> .Wiki del desarrollo de las Políticas de Atlarge<https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Policy+Developme…> 4.- Plan estratégico de ICANN 2012-15 -- Kurt Pritz, Carole Cornell (20 min) . Solicitud de contribuciones de la comunidad sobre la formulación del Plan estratégico 2012-2015<http://www.icann.org/es/public-comment/stratplan-2012-29jul11-es.htm> (cerrado el 29 de Agosto) . Espacio de Trabajo para el plan estratégico de ICANN 2012-15<https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/Strategic+Plan+2012-15> 5. Borrador del reporte final del grupo JAS – Dev, Cintra (10 min) Para ver: At-Large JAS WG Final Report Workspace<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+JAS+WG+Final+Report+Wo…>. Comentarios. Webinar del 19 de Septiembre.- 6. Actualización de representante de LACRALO para ALAC 2011-13 – Dev, Jose (5 min) Ver: “Selección de representante de ALAC” sección de At-Large Elections 2011<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Elections+2011> 7. Actividades de ALAC – Actuales y Futuras – Sergio – Sylvia – Carlton (5 min) 8.- LACRALO: Eventos de Tecnologías (Dev 10 min) Ver: Presupuesto FY12<https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+FY12+Budget+Deve…> Ver: Hoja de Cálculo del presupuesto requerido FY12 de LACRALO<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?authkey=CISn_MwJ&key=0Agb5mu5Ukb2vd…> 9. Modificación de los estatutos de LACRALO José –Dev (10 min) 10.- Recordatorios del ExCom -- Carlton, Olivier (5 min) a) Contribución de ideas de LACRALO, a través de la Wiki, para colaborar con los registradores. 1.- Ideas para futuras reuniones de ALAC y Registradores<https://community.icann.org/login.action?os_destination=%2Fdisplay%2Fatlarg…> 2.- Ideas para el material de contenido educativo para ser desarrollado por Atlarge y los registradores<https://community.icann.org/login.action?os_destination=%2Fpages%2Fviewpage…> b) Necesidades de Comunicación de LACRALO c) Todas las llamadas Atlarge (ALAC, ExCom, At-Large WGs, etc.), a menos que se indique lo contrario, están abiertas a todos los miembros de At-Large, como observadores o participantes (basadas en el cumplimiento de la discreción del Presidente).

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-es] CR_Asociaci ????-?? = ISO-8859-1 q = ALS_Application 3A_ = = = = 29_ISOC 28156 iso-8859-1 q = = = F3n_Costarricense_Para_el_Desarrollo_de_la_In iso-8859-1 q = ternet
by carlosaguirre62＠hotmail.com Oct. 6, 2011

Oct. 6, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: CR_Asociaci ????-?? = ISO-8859-1 q = ALS_Application 3A_ = = = = 29_ISOC 28156 iso-8859-1 q = = = F3n_Costarricense_Para_el_Desarrollo_de_la_In iso-8859-1 q = ternet A partir de: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com Buen comentario de Alberto. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA Consejo de la GNSO - ICANN el ex miembro de ALAC por LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Córdoba - Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org > Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:52:24 +0000 > From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com; lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; presidente(a)internauta.org.ar > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] CR_Asociaci ????-?? = Iso-8859-1 q = ALS_Application 3A_ = = = = 29_ISOC 28156 iso-8859-1 q = = = F3n_Costarricense_Para_el_Desarrollo_de_la_In iso-8859-1 q = ternet > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re: CR_Asociaci ????-?? = Iso-8859-1 q = ALS_Application 3A_ = = = = 29_ISOC 28156 iso-8859-1 q = = = F3n_Costarricense_Para_el_Desarrollo_de_la_In iso-8859-1 q = ternet > From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org > > Hello. I guess they make the mistake deslizun application > because by placing "NO" in step 3. In overview, ICANN depends > be financed. > Best Regards > > > Alberto Soto > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > Posted on: Thursday, October 6, 2011 12:17 am > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: Carlton Samuels, lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > presidente(a)internauta.org.ar, ICANN At-Large Staff > Subject: [lac-discuss-en] ????- CR_Asociaci?? = Iso-8859-1 q = > ALS_Application 3A_ = = = = 29_ISOC 28156 iso-8859-1 q = = > F3n_Costarricense_Para_el_Desarrollo_de_la_In iso-8859-1 q = ternet > > > > > [[- Translated text (in -> is )--]] > > > Subject :????- CR_Asociaci?? = Iso-8859-1 q = ALS_Application 3A_ = 28156 = = > 29_ISOC = iso-8859-1 q = = = F3n_Costarricense_Para_el_Desarrollo_de_la_In > iso-8859-1 q = ternet From: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > This is to inform you that we received a request for ALS ISOC-CR > Costa Rican Association for Development of the Internet. Headquartered in > Heredia, Costa Rica and will be a member of LACRALO if accepted. > > > > > Please find the application form, In addition to the statutes of > the applicant for ALS. The regional focal points for LACRALO reported and > proporcionarel us Due Diligence form for this aplicacina their > time. > > > > > - > Regards, > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Seth Green, Gisella Gruber, Matt Ashtiani, Peregrine > Nathalie, Marilyn Vernon > ICANN At-Large Staff > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d7b5182eeb.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] ????- CR_Asociaci?? = ISO-8859-1 q = ALS_Application 3A_ = 28156 = = = 29_ISOC iso-8859-1 q = = = F3n_Costarricense_Para_el_Desarrollo_de_la_In iso-8859-1 q = ternet
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org Oct. 6, 2011

Oct. 6, 2011

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: ????- CR_Asociaci?? = ISO-8859-1 q = ALS_Application 3A_ = 28156 = = = 29_ISOC iso-8859-1 q = = = F3n_Costarricense_Para_el_Desarrollo_de_la_In iso-8859-1 q = ternet A partir de: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Hola. Imagino Que se les deslizun error al confeccionar la Solicitud, PORQUE al colocar "NO" En el punto 3. De Descripcin, DEPENDE de ICANN párrafo financiarse. Saludos cordiales Alberto Soto ----- Mensaje original ----- De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] En Nombre de staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Enviado el: jueves, 06 de octubre de 2011 12:17a.m. Para: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: Carlton Samuels, lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; presidente(a)internauta.org.ar; ICANN At-Large Staff Asunto: [lac-discuss-es] ????- CR_Asociaci?? = ISO-8859-1 q = ALS_Application 3A_ = 28156 = = = 29_ISOC iso-8859-1 q = = = F3n_Costarricense_Para_el_Desarrollo_de_la_In iso-8859-1 q = ternet [[- Translated text (en -> es )--]] Asunto :????- CR_Asociaci?? = ISO-8859-1 q = ALS_Application 3A_ = 28156 = = = 29_ISOC iso-8859-1 q = = = F3n_Costarricense_Para_el_Desarrollo_de_la_In iso-8859-1 q = ternet A partir de: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Hola a todos, ESTO ES párrafo informarle Que hemos Recibido Una Solicitud de ALS de ISOC-CR Asociacin Costarricense Para El Desarrollo de la Internet. TIENE Su Sede en Heredia, Costa Rica y los sueros de las Naciones Unidas Miembro de LACRALO si es Aceptado. Por favor, encontrar El Formulario de Solicitud, adems de los Estatutos de la solicitante de la ELA. El enlace regional pÃ¡rrafo LACRALO sÃ ha Informado y nn proporcionarel Formulario de Due Diligence pÃ¡rrafo this aplicacina Su debido tiempo. - Saludos, Heidi Ullrich, Seth Green, Gisela Gruber, Ashtiani Matt, Peregrine Nathalie, Marilyn Vernon ICANN At-Large Personal E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3fe280b254.html --]]

1 0