[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Proyecto de mejoras de ALAC / At-Large - actualización importante A partir de: carlton.samuels@gmail.com Como ya he dicho, no puedo votar por cualquier informe que recomienda "Sanciones" de los voluntarios, aunque aún no se han determinado. El estado de la mente que ofrece esta joya sólo puede ser repudiado por la causa. Hay un peligroso coqueteo con el principio y aún así, yo estaba dispuesto a tapo la nariz y votar por un informe que compara el apoyo de viaje requeridos para ejecutar una misión voluntaria como un "regalo" que pueden ser retenidas por la ICANN, el empresa! No se requiere ninguna introspección profunda para ver cómo esta postura devalúa el tiempo, esfuerzo, los productos de conocimiento y sí, incluso los fondos voluntarios regalo para esta cosa de la nuestra, este desarrollo de las políticas de nombres y números complejo. Así que aquí está. Dentro del marco que operamos, que a veces puede pasar por alto la gente se mal dirigido. Pero estoy unánime el concepto de "Sanciones" a un voluntario comprometido en un esfuerzo voluntario que realmente es ofensiva a la razón. Yo personalmente no soportan muchos de esos. Éste es rechazado. Yo se vote NO. Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega * ============================= El Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> escribió:

Dear ALAC ExCom members,

I want to inform you of some changes to the Improvements report based on information Heidi and Seth received from Samantha Eisner of ICANN Legal. Legal's view is that the only "final report" appropriate for Board approval would come once the ALAC can report having implemented *all* the recommendations of the ALAC Review WG.

At this stage, however, we could report that the ALAC has completed a substantial amount of ALAC Improvements work, including developing specific proposals for the implementation of the ALAC Review WG recommendations. Consequently, Sam suggests the current status report – which need only be submitted by staff (not by the ALAC) – not be called a “final report”’; we are thinking of calling it the "ALAC/At-Large Improvements Project Milestone Report."

Still, an endorsement of this Milestone Report by the ALAC would send a strong message to the Board. So I have instructed Staff to start a vote endorsing the report on Sunday.

The next steps in the At-Large Improvements Project will be for the ALAC to discuss the implementation of the remaining ALAC Review recommendations and WT proposals in Dakar, including allocating them to existing At-Large Working Groups, creating timelines for their completion, and determining potential resource implications.

I would like to be able to submit these details to the Board as soon as practical but hopefully no later than the meeting in Costa Rica (11-16 March 2012). The ALAC could then aim to submit the actual final Final Report -- marking the completion of the implementation of all Improvements recommendations -- to the Board in Prague (24-28 June 2012).

Would you kindly let me know your thoughts on this as soon as possible? Seth and others are working to convert the report into a "Milestone" report as we speak.

Best regards,

Olivier Crépin-Leblond ALAC Chair

_______________________________________________ ALAC-ExCom mailing list ALAC-ExCom@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-excom

[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8e643fb04f.html --]]