Oct. 24, 2011
8:49 a.m.
On 24/10/2011, at 16:53 , Russ Allbery wrote:
Random832 <random832@fastmail.us> writes:
Why doesn't the "reply-to" header get set on these messages?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html
http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html It's silly non-discussion, not worth its time and should just be put to reply-to-list :-P Edwin, trolling.