I see we have a lot of discussion about this. Present and in the past https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2019-February/thread.html#27530 https://github.com/moment/moment-timezone/issues/653 https://unicode-org.atlassian.net/browse/CLDR-11977 ... Whether we have a standard or will create a standard to create tz list? And Paul Eggert told me why this particular list was made: https://data.iana.org/time-zones/theory.html#naming ("the naming conventions attempt to strike a balance among the following goals") but through the discussions I found, I feel that they are very confusing because they think Asia/Hanoi still exists, and I don't know why Hanoi is in the backzone. I will learn more about this because the tz list is really confusing. On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:45 PM Michael H Deckers via tz <tz@iana.org> wrote:
On 2020-06-30 09:20, Alois Treindl wrote:
That problem would easily be fixed if Asia/Hanoi were moved from backzone to file asia.
...or if Asia/Hanoi were made a link to Asia/Bangkok (as Asia/Vientiane and Asia/Phnom_Penh already are).
Michael Deckers.