I see we have a lot of discussion about this. Present and in the past

https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2019-February/thread.html#27530
https://github.com/moment/moment-timezone/issues/653
https://unicode-org.atlassian.net/browse/CLDR-11977
...

Whether we have a standard or will create a standard to create tz list?
And Paul Eggert told me why this particular list was made: https://data.iana.org/time-zones/theory.html#naming ("the naming conventions attempt to strike a balance among the following goals") but through the discussions I found, I feel that they are very confusing because they think Asia/Hanoi still exists, and I don't know why Hanoi is in the backzone. I will learn more about this because the tz list is really confusing.


On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:45 PM Michael H Deckers via tz <tz@iana.org> wrote:

    On 2020-06-30 09:20, Alois Treindl wrote:

> That problem would easily be fixed if Asia/Hanoi were moved from
> backzone to file asia.


    ...or if Asia/Hanoi were made a link to Asia/Bangkok (as
    Asia/Vientiane and Asia/Phnom_Penh already are).

    Michael Deckers.