I think the approach is reasonable, but I'm unsure about the questions that are being asked here. After a bit of thought (it's right after a long weekend for me <=) ), I realized that the question that concerns me the most is "describe hos the content is organized using these tools". Perhaps the question should be something along the lines of: "what sorts of content does each tool (tend to) produce?". This is along the lines of the observations that Lance and I have made over the last couple of sessions (please correct me if I'm wrong here, Lance). This is a first, very quick, swing at this. I hope it helps. My bigger hope, though, is that it generates some discussion here. Gordon On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 09:59 -0400, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote:
I've uploaded the PDF that was shown on the TTF call last week.
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Ideas+for+improving+the+organisa...
This is what I have in mind on how to implement the TTF project on improving the organisation of At-Large content
* list the tools used by At-Large to generate/organise/distribute content
* for At-Large Working Groups - What tools are used for At-Large Working Groups - describe how the content is organised using these tools - note issues regarding At-Large Working Group Content - develop recommendations to alleviate issues noted
And then repeat for RALO content and ALAC content.
Any thoughts on this approach? If there is agreement on this approach, then we can continue to edit the document in this style. Perhaps persons can be penholders for the different sections
The document is in a Google Document and I can share an editable link with persons willing to work on this.
Dev Anand _______________________________________________ ttf mailing list ttf@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ttf