Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? De: jam@jacquelinemorris.com Como usted insiste, por supuesto, esto se transmitirá como relevantes. Por desgracia, que es un grupo de trabajo de TODOS RALOs y no sólo LACRALO, no puedo decir que el resto del grupo estará de acuerdo con la Mirador LACRALO. Esto es, después de todo, un grupo de trabajo para crear criterios para ser aplicado a nivel mundial. Y, por supuesto, estoy encantado de que otros miembros de LACRALO serán participar y seguir el trabajo. Jacqueline El 02 de agosto 2015 23:15, <jumaropi@yahoo.com> escribió:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? From: jumaropi@yahoo.com
Alejandro thanks for that reminder. We will be watching. We insist on it. Cordially
Sent from my Huawei Mobile
Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:
Juan Manuel, answered with a copy to the list, because your question is relevant to the community:
June 24 I expressed what I reproduce below. In the course of 24 hours (25 June) we met the consensus of Carlton Samuels, Jacqueline Morris, Sergio Salinas, and several others. Goes:
"Today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion on metrics.
Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, I think it worthwhile to make clear what the objective metrics.This is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not self-interest to distort the discussion.
What we need is accountability and transparency among ourselves. Individuals and organizations working activametne must be identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute or participate must decide whether they will participate or no longer counted. And there's a middle ground and representatives of organizations who find it difficult to participate but have the will to do so. Among these there are many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to spend time with family or work that sustains; a policy change or mandate; and many more circumstances.
A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and difficult to counterfeit.Would make a "triage", ie, would quite clear what organizations 5-10 regularly participate and contribute, the 20 that are practically abandoned, and an intermediate strip of 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or by way of the decertification. This assumes cycles of renewal of certificates, which must institute.
There is a classification of units that can help us further in this process:
1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities and contribution to substantive policy issues. Their proposals are incorporated in resolutions of LACRALO and impact on policies and ICANN ALAC.
2. sporadic participation and / or dedicated to issues Reglaments procedure formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
3.sporadic, little focus, and fundamentally conducive to "make presence" for elections and selection processes for equity participation in events, especially if they involve support for travel.
Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations should encourage the Type 1, Type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who make equity type 2 pass to level 1.
If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and achievable. "
Best regards,
Alejandro Pisanty
08.02.2015 20:28 GMT-05: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi@yahoo.com> :
Thank you Alexander. We take those concerns before. TF. It considered helpful to have clarity on the points that you mean specifically.
Sent from my Huawei Mobile
Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:
Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, all,
The regional point of view has been expressed in the consensus that we out of the meeting in Buenos Aires, with general criteria for ALS reached consensus and are of great strength and general validity.
I hope these guidelines define what they will do our representatives.
Alejandro Pisanty
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
[[- Translated text (en -> en) -]]
Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? From: jam@jacquelinemorris.com
Thank you. I will do my best to represent the region in the WG. Jacqueline
Jacqueline A. Morris Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, necessary, invisible, Free.(After Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
The Sun, August 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote:
[[Translated text (es -> en) -]]
??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - =
=
Utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? From: asoto@ibero-americano.org
Dear, on This issue we Have had four nominations. ACCORDING to the above Opportunely criteria, They Have Been selected:
Jacqueline Morris
- Juan Manuel Rojas
We Know That esta WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting will be Tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and schedule the Meeting.
Best regards
Alberto Soto
--- Avast antivirus software >> esta email scanned for viruses. Http://www.avast.com
[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3fe46e10f6.html --]]
Estimada Jacqueline, lo que quiere significar Alejandro, es que los representantes de LACRALO deben defender la opinión de nuestra Region. No imponerla, explicarla. Se sabe que puede haber diferencias de opiniones en algún tema en particular, allí habrá una votación, entonces se podrá obrar en consecuencia. Tal como manifestaron todos los postulantes en su presentación, son representantes de nuestra Región. Saludos cordiales Alberto Soto El 3 de agosto de 2015 10:01:31 GMT-03:00, jam@jacquelinemorris.com escribió: > >[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > >Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = >UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? > De: jam@jacquelinemorris.com > >Como usted insiste, por supuesto, esto se transmitir� como relevantes. > Por desgracia, que es un grupo de trabajo de TODOS RALOs y no s�lo >LACRALO, no puedo decir que el resto del grupo estar� de acuerdo con la > >Mirador LACRALO. Esto es, despu�s de todo, un grupo de trabajo para >crear criterios para ser > aplicado a nivel mundial. >Y, por supuesto, estoy encantado de que otros miembros de LACRALO ser�n > > participar y seguir el trabajo. > Jacqueline > El 02 de agosto 2015 23:15, <jumaropi@yahoo.com> escribi�: > > >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >> >> Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - >= = >> UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? >> From: jumaropi@yahoo.com >> >> Alejandro thanks for that reminder. We will be watching. >> We insist on it. >> Cordially >> >> >> Sent from my Huawei Mobile >> >> >> Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Juan Manuel, answered with a copy to the list, because your >question is >> relevant to the community: >> > >> > >> > June 24 I expressed what I reproduce below. In the course of 24 >hours >> (25 June) we met the consensus of Carlton Samuels, Jacqueline Morris, >> Sergio Salinas, and several others. Goes: >> > >> > >> > "Today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion >on >> metrics. >> > >> > >> > Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, I >> think it worthwhile to make clear what the objective metrics.This is >well >> understood in the community, and those who say they do not >self-interest to >> distort the discussion. >> > >> > >> > What we need is accountability and transparency among ourselves. >> Individuals and organizations working activametne must be identified. >> Organizations and individuals that do not contribute or participate >must >> decide whether they will participate or no longer counted. And >there's a >> middle ground and representatives of organizations who find it >difficult to >> participate but have the will to do so. Among these there are many >types of >> situations: a representative who is sick or has to spend time with >family >> or work that sustains; a policy change or mandate; and many more >> circumstances. >> > >> > >> > A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, >and >> difficult to counterfeit.Would make a "triage", ie, would quite clear >what >> organizations 5-10 regularly participate and contribute, the 20 that >are >> practically abandoned, and an intermediate strip of 10 or 15 with >which we >> must work in hopes that recover their participation or leave the >> organization voluntarily or by way of the decertification. This >assumes >> cycles of renewal of certificates, which must institute. >> > >> > >> > There is a classification of units that can help us further in >this >> process: >> > >> > >> > 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities and >> contribution to substantive policy issues. Their proposals are >incorporated >> in resolutions of LACRALO and impact on policies and ICANN ALAC. >> > >> > >> > 2. sporadic participation and / or dedicated to issues Reglaments >> procedure formats agreements but not their contents, etc. >> > >> > >> > 3.sporadic, little focus, and fundamentally conducive to "make >> presence" for elections and selection processes for equity >participation in >> events, especially if they involve support for travel. >> > >> > >> > Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations >should >> encourage the Type 1, Type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who >make >> equity type 2 pass to level 1. >> > >> > >> > If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working >Group >> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good implementation and >their >> work will be more reliable, predictable and achievable. " >> > >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > >> > Alejandro Pisanty >> > >> > >> > 08.02.2015 20:28 GMT-05: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi@yahoo.com> >: >> > >> > Thank you Alexander. We take those concerns before. TF. It >considered >> helpful to have clarity on the points that you mean specifically. >> > >> > Sent from my Huawei Mobile >> > >> > Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, all, >> > >> > >> > The regional point of view has been expressed in the consensus >that we >> out of the meeting in Buenos Aires, with general criteria for ALS >reached >> consensus and are of great strength and general validity. >> > >> > >> > I hope these guidelines define what they will do our >representatives. >> > >> > >> > Alejandro Pisanty >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]] >> > >> > Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = >- = >> = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? >> > From: jam@jacquelinemorris.com >> > >> > Thank you. I will do my best to represent the region in the >> > WG. >> > Jacqueline >> > >> > >> > Jacqueline A. Morris >> > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, necessary, >invisible, >> > Free.(After Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) >> > >> > >> > The Sun, August 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM <asoto@ibero-americano.org> >wrote: >> >> >> >> [[Translated text (es -> en) -]] >> >> >> >> ??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N >= - = >> = >> >> Utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? >> >> From: asoto@ibero-americano.org >> >> >> >> Dear, on This issue we Have had four nominations. ACCORDING to >the >> above >> >> Opportunely criteria, They Have Been selected: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Jacqueline Morris >> >> >> >> >> >> - Juan Manuel Rojas >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We Know That esta WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting >will >> be >> >> Tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and >schedule >> the >> >> Meeting. >> >> >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Alberto Soto >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --- >> Avast antivirus software >> esta email scanned for viruses. >> >> Http://www.avast.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> > > > >[[--Original text (en) >http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3fe46e10f6.html >--]] > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >lac-discuss-es mailing list >lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > >http://www.lacralo.org -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Jacqueline, confiamos en que lleves adelante el acuerdo que tú misma aprobaste, y nos informes de manera transparente acerca de las otras posiciones que existan. ¿Cuáles conoces? ¿en qué difieren de las nuestras? Alejandro Pisanty On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:01 AM, <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? De: jam@jacquelinemorris.com
Como usted insiste, por supuesto, esto se transmitirá como relevantes. Por desgracia, que es un grupo de trabajo de TODOS RALOs y no sólo LACRALO, no puedo decir que el resto del grupo estará de acuerdo con la Mirador LACRALO. Esto es, después de todo, un grupo de trabajo para crear criterios para ser aplicado a nivel mundial. Y, por supuesto, estoy encantado de que otros miembros de LACRALO serán participar y seguir el trabajo. Jacqueline El 02 de agosto 2015 23:15, <jumaropi@yahoo.com> escribió:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? From: jumaropi@yahoo.com
Alejandro thanks for that reminder. We will be watching. We insist on it. Cordially
Sent from my Huawei Mobile
Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:
Juan Manuel, answered with a copy to the list, because your question
is
relevant to the community:
June 24 I expressed what I reproduce below. In the course of 24 hours
(25 June) we met the consensus of Carlton Samuels, Jacqueline Morris, Sergio Salinas, and several others. Goes:
"Today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion on
metrics.
Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, I
think it worthwhile to make clear what the objective metrics.This is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not self-interest to distort the discussion.
What we need is accountability and transparency among ourselves.
Individuals and organizations working activametne must be identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute or participate must decide whether they will participate or no longer counted. And there's a middle ground and representatives of organizations who find it difficult to participate but have the will to do so. Among these there are many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to spend time with family or work that sustains; a policy change or mandate; and many more circumstances.
A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and
difficult to counterfeit.Would make a "triage", ie, would quite clear what organizations 5-10 regularly participate and contribute, the 20 that are practically abandoned, and an intermediate strip of 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or by way of the decertification. This assumes cycles of renewal of certificates, which must institute.
There is a classification of units that can help us further in this
process:
1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities and
contribution to substantive policy issues. Their proposals are incorporated in resolutions of LACRALO and impact on policies and ICANN ALAC.
2. sporadic participation and / or dedicated to issues Reglaments
procedure formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
3.sporadic, little focus, and fundamentally conducive to "make
presence" for elections and selection processes for equity participation in events, especially if they involve support for travel.
Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations
should encourage the Type 1, Type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who make equity type 2 pass to level 1.
If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group
Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and achievable. "
Best regards,
Alejandro Pisanty
08.02.2015 20:28 GMT-05: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi@yahoo.com> :
Thank you Alexander. We take those concerns before. TF. It considered
helpful to have clarity on the points that you mean specifically.
Sent from my Huawei Mobile
Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:
Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, all,
The regional point of view has been expressed in the consensus that we
out of the meeting in Buenos Aires, with general criteria for ALS reached consensus and are of great strength and general validity.
I hope these guidelines define what they will do our representatives.
Alejandro Pisanty
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
[[- Translated text (en -> en) -]]
Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - =
= UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
From: jam@jacquelinemorris.com
Thank you. I will do my best to represent the region in the WG. Jacqueline
Jacqueline A. Morris Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, necessary, invisible, Free.(After Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
The Sun, August 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote:
[[Translated text (es -> en) -]]
??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = -
= =
Utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? From: asoto@ibero-americano.org
Dear, on This issue we Have had four nominations. ACCORDING to the above Opportunely criteria, They Have Been selected:
Jacqueline Morris
- Juan Manuel Rojas
We Know That esta WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting will be Tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and schedule the Meeting.
Best regards
Alberto Soto
--- Avast antivirus software >> esta email scanned for viruses. Http://www.avast.com
[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3fe46e10f6.html --]]
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jackie I will be in this group as ALAC member, and will be good to work with you. kisses Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: "lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org" on behalf of Alejandro Pisanty Date: Monday, August 3, 2015 at 11:07 To: "lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org" Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? Jacqueline, confiamos en que lleves adelante el acuerdo que tú misma aprobaste, y nos informes de manera transparente acerca de las otras posiciones que existan. ¿Cuáles conoces? ¿en qué difieren de las nuestras? Alejandro Pisanty On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:01 AM, <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> wrote: [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? De: jam@jacquelinemorris.com Como usted insiste, por supuesto, esto se transmitirá como relevantes. Por desgracia, que es un grupo de trabajo de TODOS RALOs y no sólo LACRALO, no puedo decir que el resto del grupo estará de acuerdo con la Mirador LACRALO. Esto es, después de todo, un grupo de trabajo para crear criterios para ser aplicado a nivel mundial. Y, por supuesto, estoy encantado de que otros miembros de LACRALO serán participar y seguir el trabajo. Jacqueline El 02 de agosto 2015 23:15, <jumaropi@yahoo.com> escribió:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? From: jumaropi@yahoo.com
Alejandro thanks for that reminder. We will be watching. We insist on it. Cordially
Sent from my Huawei Mobile
Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:
Juan Manuel, answered with a copy to the list, because your question is relevant to the community:
June 24 I expressed what I reproduce below. In the course of 24 hours (25 June) we met the consensus of Carlton Samuels, Jacqueline Morris, Sergio Salinas, and several others. Goes:
"Today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion on metrics.
Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, I think it worthwhile to make clear what the objective metrics.This is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not self-interest to distort the discussion.
What we need is accountability and transparency among ourselves. Individuals and organizations working activametne must be identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute or participate must decide whether they will participate or no longer counted. And there's a middle ground and representatives of organizations who find it difficult to participate but have the will to do so. Among these there are many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to spend time with family or work that sustains; a policy change or mandate; and many more circumstances.
A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and difficult to counterfeit.Would make a "triage", ie, would quite clear what organizations 5-10 regularly participate and contribute, the 20 that are practically abandoned, and an intermediate strip of 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or by way of the decertification. This assumes cycles of renewal of certificates, which must institute.
There is a classification of units that can help us further in this process:
1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities and contribution to substantive policy issues. Their proposals are incorporated in resolutions of LACRALO and impact on policies and ICANN ALAC.
2. sporadic participation and / or dedicated to issues Reglaments procedure formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
3.sporadic, little focus, and fundamentally conducive to "make presence" for elections and selection processes for equity participation in events, especially if they involve support for travel.
Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations should encourage the Type 1, Type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who make equity type 2 pass to level 1.
If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and achievable. "
Best regards,
Alejandro Pisanty
08.02.2015 20:28 GMT-05: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi@yahoo.com> :
Thank you Alexander. We take those concerns before. TF. It considered helpful to have clarity on the points that you mean specifically.
Sent from my Huawei Mobile
Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:
Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, all,
The regional point of view has been expressed in the consensus that we out of the meeting in Buenos Aires, with general criteria for ALS reached consensus and are of great strength and general validity.
I hope these guidelines define what they will do our representatives.
Alejandro Pisanty
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
[[- Translated text (en -> en) -]]
Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? From: jam@jacquelinemorris.com
Thank you. I will do my best to represent the region in the WG. Jacqueline
Jacqueline A. Morris Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, necessary, invisible, Free.(After Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
The Sun, August 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote:
[[Translated text (es -> en) -]]
??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - =
=
Utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? From: asoto@ibero-americano.org
Dear, on This issue we Have had four nominations. ACCORDING to the above Opportunely criteria, They Have Been selected:
Jacqueline Morris
- Juan Manuel Rojas
We Know That esta WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting will be Tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and schedule the Meeting.
Best regards
Alberto Soto
--- Avast antivirus software >> esta email scanned for viruses. Http://www.avast.com
[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3fe46e10f6.html --]] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org
participants (4)
-
Alberto Soto -
Alejandro Pisanty -
jam＠jacquelinemorris.com -
Vanda Scartezini