[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? 
 De: jam@jacquelinemorris.com

 Como usted insiste, por supuesto, esto se transmitir� como relevantes. 
 Por desgracia, que es un grupo de trabajo de TODOS RALOs y no s�lo 
 LACRALO, no puedo decir que el resto del grupo estar� de acuerdo con la 
 Mirador LACRALO. Esto es, despu�s de todo, un grupo de trabajo para crear criterios para ser 
 aplicado a nivel mundial. 
 Y, por supuesto, estoy encantado de que otros miembros de LACRALO ser�n 
 participar y seguir el trabajo. 
 Jacqueline 
 El 02 de agosto 2015 23:15, <jumaropi@yahoo.com> escribi�: 

 [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

  Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = =
 UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
  From: jumaropi@yahoo.com

  Alejandro thanks for that reminder. We will be watching.
  We insist on it.
  Cordially

  Sent from my Huawei Mobile

  Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:
 Juan Manuel, answered with a copy to the list, because your question is
 relevant to the community:

 June 24 I expressed what I reproduce below. In the course of 24 hours
 (25 June) we met the consensus of Carlton Samuels, Jacqueline Morris,
 Sergio Salinas, and several others. Goes:

 "Today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion on
 metrics.

 Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, I
 think it worthwhile to make clear what the objective metrics.This is well
 understood in the community, and those who say they do not self-interest to
 distort the discussion.

 What we need is accountability and transparency among ourselves.
 Individuals and organizations working activametne must be identified.
 Organizations and individuals that do not contribute or participate must
 decide whether they will participate or no longer counted. And there's a
 middle ground and representatives of organizations who find it difficult to
 participate but have the will to do so. Among these there are many types of
 situations: a representative who is sick or has to spend time with family
 or work that sustains; a policy change or mandate; and many more
 circumstances.

 A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and
 difficult to counterfeit.Would make a "triage", ie, would quite clear what
 organizations 5-10 regularly participate and contribute, the 20 that are
 practically abandoned, and an intermediate strip of 10 or 15 with which we
 must work in hopes that recover their participation or leave the
 organization voluntarily or by way of the decertification. This assumes
 cycles of renewal of certificates, which must institute.

 There is a classification of units that can help us further in this
 process:

 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities and
 contribution to substantive policy issues. Their proposals are incorporated
 in resolutions of LACRALO and impact on policies and ICANN ALAC.

 2. sporadic participation and / or dedicated to issues Reglaments
 procedure formats agreements but not their contents, etc.

 3.sporadic, little focus, and fundamentally conducive to "make
 presence" for elections and selection processes for equity participation in
 events, especially if they involve support for travel.

 Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations should
 encourage the Type 1, Type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who make
 equity type 2 pass to level 1.

 If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group
 Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good implementation and their
 work will be more reliable, predictable and achievable. "

 Best regards,

 Alejandro Pisanty

 08.02.2015 20:28 GMT-05: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi@yahoo.com> :

 Thank you Alexander. We take those concerns before. TF. It considered
 helpful to have clarity on the points that you mean specifically.

 Sent from my Huawei Mobile

 Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:

 Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, all,

 The regional point of view has been expressed in the consensus that we
 out of the meeting in Buenos Aires, with general criteria for ALS reached
 consensus and are of great strength and general validity.

 I hope these guidelines define what they will do our representatives.

 Alejandro Pisanty

 On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:

 [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]]

 Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - =
 = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
 From: jam@jacquelinemorris.com

 Thank you. I will do my best to represent the region in the
 WG.
 Jacqueline

 Jacqueline A. Morris
 Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, necessary, invisible,
 Free.(After Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )

 The Sun, August 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote:

 [[Translated text (es -> en) -]]

 ??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - =
 =
 Utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
 From: asoto@ibero-americano.org

 Dear, on This issue we Have had four nominations. ACCORDING to the
 above
 Opportunely criteria, They Have Been selected:

 Jacqueline Morris

 - Juan Manuel Rojas

 We Know That esta WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting will
 be
 Tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and schedule
 the
 Meeting.

 Best regards

 Alberto Soto

 ---
  Avast antivirus software >> esta email scanned for viruses.
 Http://www.avast.com

[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3fe46e10f6.html
--]]