- lac-discuss-es - lists.iana.org

Rv: [ALAC-Announce] Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings - Initial Report
by Juan Manuel Rojas March 19, 2013

March 19, 2013

Estimada región Envío la información sobre la apertura de comentarios de UDRP. JUAN MANUEL ROJAS Comunicador Social Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia Twitter: @JmanuRojas Unete a LACRALO: https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es ----- Mensaje reenviado ----- De: At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Para: ALAC Announce <alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Enviado: Lunes, 18 de marzo, 2013 11:40 A.M. Asunto: [ALAC-Announce] Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings - Initial Report https://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-15mar13-en.htm <https://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-15mar13-en.htm> Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings Initial Report Comment / Reply Periods (*) Comment Open Date: 15 March 2013 Comment Close Date: 26 April 2013 - 23:59 UTC Reply Open Date: 27 April 2013 Reply Close Date: 17 May 2013 - 23:59 UTC Important Information Links Public Comment Announcement <https://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-15mar13-en.htm> To Submit Your Comments (Forum) <mailto:comments-locking-domain-name-15mar13@icann.org> View Comments Submitted <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-locking-domain-name-15mar13/> Brief Overview Originating Organization: GNSO Categories/Tags: * Policy Processes Purpose (Brief): The Generic Names Supporting Organization Working Group tasked with addressing the issue of locking of a domain name subject to Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) Proceedings has published its Initial Report for public comment. Current Status: The Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group has published its Initial Report and is soliciting community input on the preliminary recommendations contained in the report. Next Steps: Following review of the public comments received, the Working Group will continue its deliberations and finalize its report for submission to the GNSO Council. Staff Contact: Marika Konings Email Staff Contact <mailto:Policy-staff@icann.org?subject=More%20information%20on%20the%20Locki ng%20of%20a%20Domain%20Name%20Subject%20to%20UDRP%20Proceedings%20%E2%80%93% 20Initial%20Report%20public%20comment%20period> Detailed Information Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose: In its Initial Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/locking/domain-name-initial-15mar13-en.pdf> [PDF, 883 KB], the PDP Working Group presents eleven preliminary recommendations, which are expected to usefully clarify and standardize how a domain name is locked and unlocked during the course of a UDRP Proceeding for all parties involved. Amongst others, these recommendations include: * A definition of 'locking' in the context of a UDRP Proceeding - the term "lock" means preventing any changes of registrar and registrant [without impairing the resolution of the domain name]1 <https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/locking-domain-name-15mar13-en .htm#foot1> (Preliminary recommendation #1) * Proposed modification of the UDRP rules to no longer require that the complainant sends a copy of the complaint to the respondent to avoid cyberflight2 <https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/locking-domain-name-15mar13-en .htm#foot2> (Preliminary recommendation #2) * Requirement for the registrar to 'lock' the domain name registration within 2 business days following a request for verification from the UDRP Provider (Preliminary recommendation #3) * Clarifying how to deal with changes to contact information and/or lifting of proxy / privacy services (Preliminary recommendation #7 and #8) * Clarifying the process for the unlocking of a domain name registration following the conclusion of a UDRP proceeding (Preliminary recommendation #9) In addition to these recommendations, the WG has put forward two possible options in its report to clarify the process in case a settlement is reached and is requesting community input on these two options or possible alternatives. It is important to emphasize that most of these preliminary recommendations codify existing practices in line with the UDRP and are not expected to require any changes to the existing policy. However, should these recommendations be adopted in their current form, minor changes may need to be made to the UDRP rules and/or UDRP Provider supplemental rules. Those interested in providing input are strongly encouraged to especially review section 5 and 6 of the Initial Report in order to obtain a further understanding concerning the WG's thinking and rationale with regards to these recommendations as well as further details with respect to the preliminary recommendations. In addition to input on the preliminary recommendations, the WG is also interested to receive further feedback on the expected impact should these recommendations be adopted. The WG would like to encourage all interested parties to submit their comments and suggestions so these can be considered as the WG continues its deliberations in view of finalizing its report and recommendations in the next phase of the policy development process. 1 <https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/locking-domain-name-15mar13-en .htm#text1> The WG is considering adding the bracketed language and would welcome community input on the proposed addition. 2 <https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/locking-domain-name-15mar13-en .htm#text2> Cyberflight in this context means changing the registrant information with the intent to escape from the dispute. Section II: Background: The "locking" of a domain name registration associated with UDRP proceedings is not something that is literally required by the UDRP as written, but is a practice that has developed around it. As a result, there is no uniform approach, which has resulted in confusion and misunderstandings. To address this issue, the GNSO Council decided to initiate a Policy Development Process on 15 December 2011. As part of its deliberations, the WG was required to consider the following questions: 1. Whether the creation of an outline of a proposed procedure, which a complainant must follow in order for a registrar to place a domain name on registrar lock, would be desirable. 2. Whether the creation of an outline of the steps of the process that a registrar can reasonably expect to take place during a UDRP dispute would be desirable. 3. Whether the time frame by which a registrar must lock a domain after a UDRP has been filed should be standardized. 4a. Whether what constitutes a "locked" domain name should be defined. 4b. Whether, once a domain name is 'locked' pursuant to a UDRP proceeding, the registrant information for that domain name may be changed or modified. 5. Whether additional safeguards should be created for the protection of registrants in cases where the domain name is locked subject to a UDRP proceeding. Section III: Document and Resource Links: * Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings Initial Report - http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/locking/domain-name-initial-15mar13-en.pdf <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/locking/domain-name-initial-15mar13-en.pdf> [PDF, 883 KB] * Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy - http://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp/policy <https://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp/policy> * Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy - http://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp/rules <https://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp/rules> * Working Group Workspace - https://community.icann.org/x/xq3bAQ <https://community.icann.org/x/xq3bAQ> Section IV: Additional Information: N/A (*) Comments submitted after the posted Close Date/Time are not guaranteed to be considered in any final summary, analysis, reporting, or decision-making that takes place once this period lapses. ********** Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org One World, One Internet _______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org

2 1

Re: Recordatorio / Reuni�n Invitaci�n y convocatoria de Comentarios - ALAC llame para discutir la propuesta de versi�n de sus nuevas Reglas de Procedimiento (ROPs) - Martes, 19 de marzo 2013 a las 21:00 UTC
by h.raiche＠internode.on.net March 19, 2013

March 19, 2013

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Recordatorio / Reunión Invitación y convocatoria de Comentarios - ALAC llame para discutir la propuesta de versión de sus nuevas Reglas de Procedimiento (ROPs) - Martes, 19 de marzo 2013 a las 21:00 UTC De: h.raiche(a)internode.on.net ¡Hola Sólo un recordatorio de que no voy a poder asistir, así que mis disculpas para esta convocatoria Acebo El 17/03/2013, a las 11:51 AM, Heidi Ullrich escribió: > When: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:00 PM-10:30 PM. GMT Standard Time > Where: 2100 UTC - Adigo EN 1638, ES 1738, FR 1838 /(for the time in various > time-zones click here > <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=ALAC+meeting+for+f > inal+review+of+the+revised+ROPs&iso=20130319T21> ) > > Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/alac > > > > ** > > > > On behalf of Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, and Cheryl > Langdon-Orr, Chair of the At-Large Rules of Procedure Working Group, please > see the important note below regarding an upcoming ALAC Meeting to review > the revised ALAC Rules of Procedure (RoPs): > > ** > > Dear All, > > As per a previous discussion and agreement of the ALAC on 22 January 2013, > the ALAC will be holding a single purpose teleconference call to discuss the > proposed version of their NEW Rules of Procedure (RoPs) before a Call to > Vote to Ratify and Adopt these (or not) which is to be conducted online and > prior to the 46th ICANN Meeting to be held in Beijing 7-11 April 2013. > > This special meeting of the ALAC, which is open to all members of the > At-Large Community, especially RALO Leadership and ALS members, is now > announced. This call will be held on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 at 2100 UTC > (2100 UTC =1400 PDT, 1700 EDT, 2200 CET, 5am Hong Kong (+1 Day) and 8am > Sydney (+1 Day). The Wiki page for this meeting is found at > <https://community.icann.org/x/WpVwAg> https://community.icann.org/x/WpVwAg. > > FR and ES interpretation has been confirmed for this meeting. > > All Members of the ALAC and members of the At-Large Community are requested > to RSVP their attendance at this call to At-Large Staff ( > <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org) indicating if they > will be joining one of the interpreted channels. > > IMPORTANT: The 15 Members of the ALAC are encouraged to place any comments > they have in the COMMENTS section of the meeting page (see: > <https://community.icann.org/x/WpVwAg> https://community.icann.org/x/WpVwAg) > or e-mail to the ALAC Working List ( <mailto:alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org) particularly if they will not be able to > attend this meeting. > > Members of the At-Large Community who wish to have any input or comments on > these proposed new RoPs considered at this meeting should send these > contributions to one of the ALAC Members from their Region or via email to > the Chair of the Rules of Procedure Working Group, Cheryl Langdon-Orr ( > <mailto:langdonorr@gmail.com> langdonorr(a)gmail.com) > > Background on these proposed new ALAC RoPs and opportunity for final ALAC > review: > > This final version of the new ALAC RoP (see: > <https://community.icann.org/x/VoYi> https://community.icann.org/x/VoYi and > attached) is the product of an extensive process carried out by some 33 > members of the At-Large Community (ALAC Members, formal Regional > representatives as well as individual ALS and RALO members of the At-Large > Community who volunteered to the ALAC Metrics and RoP Review WG(s). > > These volunteers have, in face-to-face and teleconference meetings of the > Working Group (WG) as a whole and of the new Rules section Drafting Teams > (DTs), committed well over 500 person-hours in review of the current RoPs > and support material including previous versions, discussion of all rules > merits, and in drafting of and editing this new Rules proposed text. A > summary of who participated in the various RoP meetings can be found at: > <https://community.icann.org/x/SgoQAg> https://community.icann.org/x/SgoQAg. > > In addition, and unfortunately difficult to measure and capture, is an > extraordinary amount of time spent by the WG's Drafting Teams (DTs) > leadership and section pen-holders (noting each DT was in itself, like the > RoP Review WG as a whole, a deliberately regionally balanced group) and even > more hours and effort again contributed by several current and previously > serving ALAC Members during the final stages of integration and editing of > the version you are presented with here. > > The majority of the ALAC has been directly involved with the Rules of > Procedure WG and DTs activities and in several cases served as Leads and/or > Pen-Holders for the discussion and drafting, and therefore it is unexpected > and doubtful that any significant or substantial omissions or edits will be > proposed for discussion either at or before the conference call. Also it is > recognised that the ALAC has at its regular meetings been continually > appraised of the progress of this Rules Review and also that all business of > the Review WG/DTs has been done in an open and transparent manner with > archives and records being held and publicly available on the relevant ALAC > wiki pages. > > It must also be noted by the ALAC as a whole and by the wider At-Large > Community in general, that virtually every concept and issue relating to > these proposed new ALAC RoPs was discussed extensively, prior to any > drafting, and often reviewed line by line, mostly over several visits / > revisits at several meetings. Anything that was even slightly controversial > or where people had differing views was debated and in virtually all cases, > what has ended up in these Rules has a strong consensus of those working on > the original drafting team and the final reviewers. > > It is also important to note that several of the 'Adjunct Documents' > referred to in these new Rules are not as yet completely finalised nor have > they been reviewed (as such) by the ALAC. However, they are all to be drawn > from existing ALAC policy and practices and will be shortly available. The > vote for the adoption of these new ALAC RoPs does not need to be delayed > until they are prepared and circulated, but rather the new RoPs will not > come into effect until those Adjunct Documents are all approved by the ALAC. > > > Specific details on the ALAC vote plans and procedures relating to these new > ALAC Rules will be discussed during this special ALAC meeting on 19 March > 2013, but it is our hope that the vote can commence shortly after the ALAC > monthly call on 26 March 2013. > > Regards, > Cheryl Langdon-Orr and Olivier Crepin-Leblond > 11 March 2013 > > ** > > Kind regards, > > Heidi > > > > Heidi Ullrich > > Director for At-Large > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Telephone: + 1 (310) 578 - 8647 > > Fax: +1 (310) 823 - 8649 > > Cell/Mobile: +1 (310) 437 - 3956 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > APAC-Discuss mailing list > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/927bb52210.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO
by rok＠bango.org.bb March 19, 2013

March 19, 2013

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO De: rok(a)bango.org.bb Estoy totalmente de acuerdo en que la conversación es contraproducente. Los trabajadores en huelga son contraproducentes demasiado y están destinados a ser, por el bien de impresionar del capital, la difícil situación de los trabajadores. Hemos determinado la calidad durante demasiado tiempo, con capacidad para la clase de segundo demasiado largo y todavía tratan como si fuéramos basada en una definición arcaica o de ficción, incluso de la democracia. Es como, la democracia es la regla de la mayoría, que son la mayoría y que Realmente no quiero saber de los restos. En estas condiciones, siempre habrá charla de dos regiones porque uno conjunto de las personas no se sentarán a ser dominado por otro. A menos que el Caribe totalmente cede a LA, siempre habrá charla de dos regiones y no será siempre que la distancia entre los dos. Mi experiencia con la OEA y ahora esto me convence de que ALC no debe ser nunca. Estoy viendo cómo el Caribe está dando en forma lenta pero segura. Elecciones No tiene sentido para el Caribe como hemos sido totalmente privados de sus derechos y Todos los intentos de hacer el sistema más justo y equitativo se oponen por LA. Alguien desde el Caribe se ejecuta como Presidente? ¿Crees que Lance ganar esta elección para Secretario? Una pérdida de tiempo. ¿Cómo se puede pretender representar a LA el Caribe cuando están suprimiendo el Caribe? No tiene ningún sentido para mí y si la OEA es cualquier cosa ir cerca, la participación de la región del Caribe disminuyen en LACRALO y que se adapte a LA bien. Corea del Sur ----- Original Message ----- De: Lanza Hinds Enviado el: Lunes, 18 de marzo 2013 23:11 Para: Jacqueline Morris Cc: lista de LACRALO discusiÃ³n Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECCIONES Es francamente contraproducente para continuar esta conversaciÃ³n sobre "2 subregiones". Como Jacqueline dice que no es nada mÃ¡s una distracciÃ³n. Nosotros van a tener que trabajar con los demÃ¡s y respetar cada uno de otros intereses. Vamos a aprovechar la diversidad que tenemos y las habilidades que cada uno de nosotros trae a la mesa. Alguien hablÃ³ durante la conferencia sobre AFRALO. No tengo ninguna duda de que tienen problemas internos tambiÃ©n, pero sin duda en primera vista parecen funcionar a pesar de muchos de los idiomas y culturales las diferencias que puedan tener en ese RALO. Podemos y debemos hacer mucho mejor. Creo que a veces nos olvidamos de quiÃ©nes son y lo que estamos haciendo aquÃ. Mis prÃ³ximos dos centavos El lunes, 18 de marzo 2013 a las 9:14 PM, Jacqueline Morris <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > wrote: > it is clear that the region is LAC. I believe the issue is one of the > balance of majority and minority interests in a democratic institution. To > me, the focus on 2 regions is a distraction from the real issue as > identified here. > On Mar 18, 2013 12:18 PM, <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> wrote: > > > > Lanza Hinds Director de TecnologÃa BrainStreet Grupo 287 'C' Albert St. Georgetown Guyana Este mensaje contiene informaciÃ³n que puede ser privilegiada y / o confidencial y es propiedad de las TecnologÃas de BrainStreet o BrainStreet Aprendizaje. La informaciÃ³n contenida en este documento estÃ¡ destinado Ãºnicamente a la persona o entidad a quien va dirigida y otros autorizados para recibirlo.Si usted no es el destinatario indicado, no estÃ¡ autorizado para leer, imprimir, guardar, copiar, difundir, distribuir o tomar cualquier acciÃ³n en consecuencia y en el contenido de esta informaciÃ³n o parte de ella, y puede ser ilegal hacerlo. Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por favor notifique inmediatamente al remitente y borrar todas las copias de este mensaje su sistema. TecnologÃas de Aprendizaje BrainStreet o BrainStreet no son ni responsable de la transmisiÃ³n apropiada y completa de la informaciÃ³n contenida en esta comunicaciÃ³n ni cualquier retraso en su recepciÃ³n. _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/24dcc68cb0.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO
by brainstreetceo＠gmail.com March 19, 2013

March 19, 2013

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO De: brainstreetceo(a)gmail.com Es francamente contraproducente para continuar esta conversación sobre "2 subregiones". Como Jacqueline dice que no es nada más una distracción. Nosotros van a tener que trabajar con los demás y respetar cada uno de otros intereses. Vamos a aprovechar la diversidad que tenemos y las habilidades que cada uno de nosotros trae a la mesa. Alguien habló durante la conferencia sobre AFRALO. No tengo ninguna duda de que tienen problemas internos también, pero sin duda en primera vista parecen funcionar a pesar de muchos de los idiomas y culturales las diferencias que puedan tener en ese RALO. Podemos y debemos hacer mucho mejor. Creo que a veces nos olvidamos de quiénes son y lo que estamos haciendo aquí. Mis próximos dos centavos El lunes, 18 de marzo 2013 a las 9:14 PM, Jacqueline Morris <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > wrote: > it is clear that the region is LAC. I believe the issue is one of the > balance of majority and minority interests in a democratic institution. To > me, the focus on 2 regions is a distraction from the real issue as > identified here. > On Mar 18, 2013 12:18 PM, <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> wrote: > > > > Lanza Hinds Director de Tecnología BrainStreet Grupo 287 'C' Albert St. Georgetown Guyana Este mensaje contiene información que puede ser privilegiada y / o confidencial y es propiedad de las Tecnologías de BrainStreet o BrainStreet Aprendizaje. La información contenida en este documento está destinado únicamente a la persona o entidad a quien va dirigida y otros autorizados para recibirlo. Si usted no es el destinatario indicado, no está autorizado para leer, imprimir, guardar, copiar, difundir, distribuir o tomar cualquier acción en consecuencia y en el contenido de esta información o parte de ella, y puede ser ilegal hacerlo. Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por favor notifique inmediatamente al remitente y borrar todas las copias de este mensaje su sistema. TecnologÃas de Aprendizaje BrainStreet o BrainStreet no son ni responsable de la transmisiÃ³n apropiada y completa de la informaciÃ³n contenida en esta comunicaciÃ³n ni cualquier retraso en su recepciÃ³n. _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9cb9c47a0d.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com March 19, 2013

March 19, 2013

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com +1. Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= El lunes, 18 de marzo 2013 a las 8:14 PM, Jacqueline Morris <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > wrote: > it is clear that the region is LAC. I believe the issue is one of the > balance of majority and minority interests in a democratic institution. To > me, the focus on 2 regions is a distraction from the real issue as > identified here. > On Mar 18, 2013 12:18 PM, <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> wrote: > > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > Subject: RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS > > From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > > > Dear companions: > > We have long engaged in discusin whether we are two (2) or (1) > > region in the meeting in Costa Rica to discuss this again. > > Estclaro we are one (1) reginy confess I spent much of my > > time to take this discussion to ward doubts on the subject and to > advance > > one direction: the discussion of the great issues of the Internet and > > commitment to defending the rights of users > > this multicultural region from Latin America and the Caribbean. > > It seems inappropriate to be discussing this when already buried habamos > > never to return msa be discussing this that gets us nothing. > > This topic leads undoubtedly to wear us in matters > > surface. At times it seems that he had not been to Costa Rica and > > not remember these debates ... > > Propose to overcome this bad idea and go for one of profundizacin > > relations in our region, we integrate more in our culture and > > our need to build positions that serve users > > internet of our reginy not pro-establishment within ICANN or its > > default the business lobby, as was what happened to him. patagonia, the > > . Amazon and. Cba. with a result that gives shame by the group > > trateste topic work. > > Best Regards > > > > > > * Sergio Salinas Porto > > Argentina President Internauta > > Argentina Association of Internet Users > > <http://www.internauta.org.ar> / CTA <http://www.ctamdq.org.ar> > > Fluid Latin American Federation of Internet Users > > <http://www.fuilain.org/> > > facebook: salinasporto > > twitter: sergiosalinas > > MSN / YAHOO MSN / Talk: salinasporto ... > > Skype: internautaargentina > > > > > > Mobi: +54 215 819 9223 5 * > > > > > > * "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, every time we receive orders that > > humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "Eduardo > > Galeano * > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/211c2fe783.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO
by brainstreetceo＠gmail.com March 19, 2013

March 19, 2013

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO De: brainstreetceo(a)gmail.com Convenido Lanza Hinds Director El Grupo BrainStreet www.brainstreetgroup.com Enviado desde iPad meh eh .... 18 de Mar de 2013, a las 9:14 PM, Jacqueline Morris <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> escribió: > it is clear that the region is LAC. I believe the issue is one of the > balance of majority and minority interests in a democratic institution. To > me, the focus on 2 regions is a distraction from the real issue as > identified here. > On Mar 18, 2013 12:18 PM, <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> wrote: > >> >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >> >> Subject: RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS >> From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar >> >> Dear companions: >> We have long engaged in discusin whether we are two (2) or (1) >> region in the meeting in Costa Rica to discuss this again. >> Estclaro we are one (1) reginy confess I spent much of my >> time to take this discussion to ward doubts on the subject and to advance >> one direction: the discussion of the great issues of the Internet and >> commitment to defending the rights of users >> this multicultural region from Latin America and the Caribbean. >> It seems inappropriate to be discussing this when already buried habamos >> never to return msa be discussing this that gets us nothing. >> This topic leads undoubtedly to wear us in matters >> surface. At times it seems that he had not been to Costa Rica and >> not remember these debates ... >> Propose to overcome this bad idea and go for one of profundizacin >> relations in our region, we integrate more in our culture and >> our need to build positions that serve users >> internet of our reginy not pro-establishment within ICANN or its >> default the business lobby, as was what happened to him. patagonia, the >> . Amazon and. Cba. with a result that gives shame by the group >> trateste topic work. >> Best Regards >> >> >> * Sergio Salinas Porto >> Argentina President Internauta >> Argentina Association of Internet Users >> <http://www.internauta.org.ar> / CTA <http://www.ctamdq.org.ar> >> Fluid Latin American Federation of Internet Users >> <http://www.fuilain.org/> >> facebook: salinasporto >> twitter: sergiosalinas >> MSN / YAHOO MSN / Talk: salinasporto ... >> Skype: internautaargentina >> >> >> Mobi: +54 215 819 9223 5 * >> >> >> * "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, every time we receive orders that >> humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "Eduardo >> Galeano * >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7276cf54d5.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO
by jam＠jacquelinemorris.com March 19, 2013

March 19, 2013

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO De: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com es evidente que la región es de ALC. Creo que el tema es uno de los equilibrio de los intereses de la mayoría y la minoría en una institución democrática. A me, el enfoque en dos regiones es una distracción del verdadero problema como identificado aquí. El 18 de marzo 2013 12:18 PM, <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS > From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > Dear companions: > We have long engaged in discusin whether we are two (2) or (1) > region in the meeting in Costa Rica to discuss this again. > Estclaro we are one (1) reginy confess I spent much of my > time to take this discussion to ward doubts on the subject and to advance > one direction: the discussion of the great issues of the Internet and > commitment to defending the rights of users > this multicultural region from Latin America and the Caribbean. > It seems inappropriate to be discussing this when already buried habamos > never to return msa be discussing this that gets us nothing. > This topic leads undoubtedly to wear us in matters > surface. At times it seems that he had not been to Costa Rica and > not remember these debates ... > Propose to overcome this bad idea and go for one of profundizacin > relations in our region, we integrate more in our culture and > our need to build positions that serve users > internet of our reginy not pro-establishment within ICANN or its > default the business lobby, as was what happened to him. patagonia, the > . Amazon and. Cba. with a result that gives shame by the group > trateste topic work. > Best Regards > > > * Sergio Salinas Porto > Argentina President Internauta > Argentina Association of Internet Users > <http://www.internauta.org.ar> / CTA <http://www.ctamdq.org.ar> > Fluid Latin American Federation of Internet Users > <http://www.fuilain.org/> > facebook: salinasporto > twitter: sergiosalinas > MSN / YAHOO MSN / Talk: salinasporto ... > Skype: internautaargentina > > > Mobi: +54 215 819 9223 5 * > > > * "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, every time we receive orders that > humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "Eduardo > Galeano * > _______________________________________________ > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/52276a9d58.html --]]

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO
by carlosaguirre62＠hotmail.com March 19, 2013

March 19, 2013

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO De: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com Querida Jacqueline: Totalmente de acuerdo. Carlos Dionisio AguirreAbogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Córdoba - Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 > Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:14:44 -0400 > From: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS > > it is clear that the region is LAC. I believe the issue is one of the > balance of majority and minority interests in a democratic institution. To > me, the focus on 2 regions is a distraction from the real issue as > identified here. > On Mar 18, 2013 12:18 PM, <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> wrote: > > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > Subject: RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS > > From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > > > Dear companions: > > We have long engaged in discusin whether we are two (2) or (1) > > region in the meeting in Costa Rica to discuss this again. > > Estclaro we are one (1) reginy confess I spent much of my > > time to take this discussion to ward doubts on the subject and to advance > > one direction: the discussion of the great issues of the Internet and > > commitment to defending the rights of users > > this multicultural region from Latin America and the Caribbean. > > It seems inappropriate to be discussing this when already buried habamos > > never to return msa be discussing this that gets us nothing. > > This topic leads undoubtedly to wear us in matters > > surface. At times it seems that he had not been to Costa Rica and > > not remember these debates ... > > Propose to overcome this bad idea and go for one of profundizacin > > relations in our region, we integrate more in our culture and > > our need to build positions that serve users > > internet of our reginy not pro-establishment within ICANN or its > > default the business lobby, as was what happened to him. patagonia, the > > . Amazon and. Cba. with a result that gives shame by the group > > trateste topic work. > > Best Regards > > > > > > * Sergio Salinas Porto > > Argentina President Internauta > > Argentina Association of Internet Users > > <http://www.internauta.org.ar> / CTA <http://www.ctamdq.org.ar> > > Fluid Latin American Federation of Internet Users > > <http://www.fuilain.org/> > > facebook: salinasporto > > twitter: sergiosalinas > > MSN / YAHOO MSN / Talk: salinasporto ... > > Skype: internautaargentina > > > > > > Mobi: +54 215 819 9223 5 * > > > > > > * "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, every time we receive orders that > > humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "Eduardo > > Galeano * > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a784e86230.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO
by Diego Acosta March 19, 2013

March 19, 2013

Estimados compañeros de vocación Pregunta para José Arce: cual debería ser la hoja de ruta para diversificar y ampliar la participación de las organizaciones de ususarios de internet en el región y que papel podrían cumplir ene ste propósito los Centros de Estudios Superiores ? Estoy desconectado por favor retomar la comunicación a mi celular. Atte Diego Acosta Bastidas, Dr. ECUADOR 2013/3/18 <cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com> > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Re: RES: ELECCIONES LACRALO > De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com > > Querida Silvia, > > > Gracias por esto, por favor tenga en cuenta que la lista de personas que > apoyan Lanza > Hinds es incompleta e irreflexiva de la rosca lista de correo. > > > Saludos > > > Cintra Sooknanan > > > El Viernes, 08 de marzo 2013 a las 3:10 PM, <silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org> > escribió: > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > Subject: Re: RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS > > From: silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org > > > > Hello Dear Alexander, > > > > > > Published the WIKI estn Aquen candidates who applied to participate in > > these elections. > > > > > > https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40928090 > > > > > > > > > > Personally I have included the candidates according to what is > manifesten > > lists, both EN and ES. > > I have also sent reminders to the lists so you do not miss the closing > > date within which pruned presented. > > > > > > In other words, the lists have been monitored by staff at all times to > > any request for participation asincluir. > > > > > > Much agradecercontacten preocupacin Staff if they had any particular > > regard to this election process. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > Silvia > > > > > > > > > > Silvia Vivanco > > Manager, At-Large Regional Affairs > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > Telephone: + 1 (202) 570-7119 > > Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 > > Cell / Mobile: +1 (202) 735-7011 > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch [mailto: apisan(a)unam.mx] > > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 24:42 > > To: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff > > Subject: RE: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS > > > > > > Sylvia, > > > > > > it is urgent that you enven to list the names of the candidates who > > applied for registration. > > > > > > In particular it seems that there are only a candidate for President, > and > > is the same as estorganizando elections. > > > > > > Make an attempt to simulate transparency, at least, since they could not > > move it. > > > > > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------- > > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > > UNAM Faculty of Chemistry > > AvUniversity 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > > > > > > SMS FROM +525541444475 +525541444475 Mexico > > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > > Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, > > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > > ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ > > lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of > > sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org [sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org] Sent on: > > Friday, March 8, 2013 9:18 > > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > CC: 'ICANN At-Large Staff' > > Subject: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS > > > > > > S course, Jackeline. > > Estbamos already working on it by the Staff and publish everything on > > page WIKI elections. > > Regards > > Sylvia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________ > > Sylvia Herlein > > sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org > > Secretary LACRALO-ICANN / 2012-2013 - Secretary FLUI 2009-2012 > > http://atlarge.icann.org sylvia_leite = Skype > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Mensagem Original ----- > > From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome em > > jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 12:57 > > To lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff > > Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] LACRALO ELECTIONS > > > > > > > > > > [[- Translated text (in -> s) -]] > > > > > > Subject: Re: ELECTIONS LACRALO > > From: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > > > > > > Hi Sylvia > > You can get a list of all the nominees and if possible, a link or a > > description of the positions? For example, what are the functions, roles, > > responsibilities and mandate are the President and secrete? > > I think a reminder or, for some, a first point of view, what are the > > positions that voting for decisions harmucho msfcil. > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > Jacqueline A. Morris > > The technology should be like oxygen: ubiquitous, necessary, Invisible > > and free. (After I Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, March 8, 2013 at 6:48 AM, <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > > > Subject: ELECTIONS LACRALO > > > From: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org > > > > > > Dear Members of LACRALO > > > > > > > > > Yesterday at 23:59 UTC terminel nomination period for President / ae > > > Secretary / a LACRALO 2013-2014. > > > > > > > > > https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40928090 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And as announced, the next scheduled week we have a conference call > > > with nominees (the Staff estorganizando it). > > > > > > > > > Please enven your questions to the list or the Wiki in the section > > > comments. > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > Sylvia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > Sylvia Herlein > > > > > > > > > <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org > > > > > > > > > Secretary LACRALO-ICANN / 2012-2013 - <http://atlarge.icann.org> > > > http://atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > > > 2009-2012 Secretary FLUI > > > > > > > > > sylvia_leite = Skype > > > > > > > > > Descrio: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9ea3ea0bba.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org >

2 1

Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Manifestaci�n = F3n_antes_de_la_reuni? == Iso-8859-1? Q? On_de_Lacralo_ = 28Elecciones = 29? =
by rok＠bango.org.bb March 18, 2013

March 18, 2013

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Manifestación = F3n_antes_de_la_reuni? == Iso-8859-1? Q? On_de_Lacralo_ = 28Elecciones = 29? = De: rok(a)bango.org.bb Todo esto gimiendo y gruñendo cuando alguien tiene que decir lo que piensan es construir un caso para que me vaya? No tengas miedo, pero esto es evidencia de una alto nivel de intolerancia. No me mueve. Lo que me mueve son las motivos para ello y yo digo que es una lástima que esa intolerancia existe aquí. Corea del Sur ----- Original Message ----- De: amedinagomez(a)gmail.com Enviado el: Lunes, 18 de marzo 2013 15:13 A: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Asunto: [lac-discuss-es] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Manifestación = F3n_antes_de_la_reuni? == Iso-8859-1? Q? On_de_Lacralo_ = 28Elecciones = 29? = [[- Traducción de texto (es -> en) -]] Asunto: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Manifestación = F3n_antes_de_la_reuni? == Iso-8859-1? Q?On_de_Lacralo_ = 28Elecciones = 29? = De: amedinagomez(a)gmail.com Buenas tardes queridos amigos LACRALO. Quiero expresar mi insatisfacción con las situaciones que se presentan precisamente en las elecciones pequeños. Falta de respeto constante de generar malestar y la incomodidad y observe que no se les permite expresar opiniones diferentes u oportunidad inquietud que tenga. En pocos días manifesthace curiosamente, la falta de participación, es uno de los factores que deben ser resueltos, que no es ni más ni menos de falta de responsabilidad y de compromiso de algunos miembros de LACRALO. Hay personas, profesionales en reginy valioso es el tiempo abrir el debate y escuchar las diferentes propuestas, informes y planes entender que guiarÃ¡ los esfuerzos y el trabajo prximo nuestra regiÃ³n en el perÃodo. Esto no es una queja o una denuncia, es simplemente la manifestaciÃ³n de mi punto de vista favorecido especialmente cuando, en gran medida, el trabajo Icann se desarrolla en carÃ¡cter voluntario. Espero propuestas reunin buenas para esta tarde y lo mejor de mi los deseos de los candidatos. Si tengo una pregunta, y creo que Ã©l y Johnny Laureano. Si el cargo de Presidente sale como ganador llevarÃ¡ a cabo una abstenciÃ³n nuevo llamado a la oficina?. La abstenciÃ³n puede entenderse como obligaraa democrtica una opciÃ³n para tomar esas decisiones? Los expertos tienen la palabra ... Antonio Medina GÃ³mez Presidente AsociaciÃ³n Colombiana de Usuarios de Internet _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/30659580ac.html --]]

1 0