April 2014 - lac-discuss-es

Fwd: Correction: LACRALO Election March 2014
by Humberto Carrasco April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

Estimados: Para su conocimiento. Saludos -------- Mensaje original -------- Delivered-To: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com Received: by 10.50.182.227 with SMTP id eh3csp237695igc; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:06:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.102.39 with SMTP id fl7mr9314001pab.43.1396552002208; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 12:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org. [64.78.22.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id se7si3495208pbb.225.2014.04.03.12.06.41 for <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Apr 2014 12:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of ariel.liang(a)icann.org designates 64.78.22.237 as permitted sender) client-ip=64.78.22.237; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of ariel.liang(a)icann.org designates 64.78.22.237 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ariel.liang(a)icann.org Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:06:40 -0700 From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> To: Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org>, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> CC: Silvia Vivanco <silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:07:36 -0700 Subject: Correction: LACRALO Election March 2014 Thread-Topic: Correction: LACRALO Election March 2014 Thread-Index: Ac9Pb9gGfxP7mRiOQp+jlzyDF/TS3Q== Message-ID: <CF63D278.11E70%ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="B_3479425656_13940123" MIME-Version: 1.0 Hello Alberto and Humberto, I hope your day has been going well. My name is Ariel Liang, the At-Large Policy Coordinator. It is nice to virtually meet you. I was informed that there is a country coefficient-related calculation error in the past LACRALO Election. I have checked the vote results several times and confirm that the country coefficients of all ALS representatives are correct expect for that of Carlos Alberto Watson Carazo. The weight of his vote should be 3.13 instead of 6.25. I have created PDF documents (attached) showing where the error occurs, as well as correcting the error. I have also drafted an addendum to the Vote Result (below) that you may consider publicizing via the LACRALO mailing list. Sincerely apologize for the error and the inconvenience may cause you. Thank you, Ariel ** Dear All, In the interests of transparency, the LACRALO Chair and Secretariat are obliged to report an error in calculating the weighted vote for the preferred candidates to serve as LACRALO Chair and Secretariat for the period 2014-2015. Alberto Soto is still the preferred candidate for LACRALO Chair with 43.49 weighted vote instead of 46.61 while Sergio Salinas Porto is unchanged at 28.65 weighted vote. Humberto Carrasco is still the preferred candidate for LACRALO Secretariat with the unchanged 44.80 weighted vote while Juan Manuel Rojas has 32.54 weighted vote instead of 35.66. The reason for the error was due to an incorrect country coefficient assigned to the following ALS: * ISOC-CR Costa Rica Society for Internet Development -- was 6.25 (incorrect) instead of 3.13 (correct) Here is a PDF showing the incorrect calculations: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B10rrZn6kIB0OGhPRjBPQzVEeDg/edit?usp=shari… Here is a PDF showing the corrected results: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B10rrZn6kIB0N1JyUjcyV0FjbmM/edit?usp=shari… Apologies for the error. Kind Regards, Alberto Soto LACRALO Chair Humberto Carrasco LACRALO Secretariat

1 0

Re: R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by apisanty＠gmail.com April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: apisanty(a)gmail.com Adam, esta respuesta mía sólo irá a algunas listas (que es demasiado -publicado cruz.) Su admisión en la última frase es la clave de la simplificación discusión del Comité de nominaciones de ICANN y darle un poco de enfoque realista. Usted dice que a menudo sentía inadecuado para juzgar los méritos de los candidatos que estaban muy por encima de su capacidad. Usted debería haber dimitido en ese mismo momento, pero vamos a saltar esa parte e ir en una declaración más general. El diseño del NomCom preveía una aplicación en la que todas las comunidades que designa los miembros del Comité de Nominaciones enviaría un "estadista senior", alguien que ejercería la administración sobre el bien común, sin sin tener en cuenta que las comunidades 'propios intereses y principios rectores. En practican esta no sucedió.En cambio con frecuencia las comunidades las personas designadas no independientes, junior que tuvieron que demostrar sus méritos a la comunidad en el Comité de Nominaciones y podía esperar alguna recompensa en el futuro. Esta ruptura de la confianza y la renuncia de la administración ha sido tóxica. No hay nada que se puede escribir en las reglas que pueden causar el cambio hacia un modelo de gestión y la ganancia-confianza. Tiene que ser la acción de los la propia comunidad que comienza a pensar menos en cómo conseguir un tamaño más grande del pastel y más de cómo hacer el pastel mejor. Por lo tanto creo que este es el peor de los tiempos para un replanteamiento de el Comité de Nominaciones y otros procesos que se interponen a la Junta de Directores. El cambio puede ser necesario, a pesar de lo que el cambio que se necesita es un debate muy abierto. Pero el cosa para centrarse en estos momentos es la sustitución de la función de la NTIA, nada más. Si eso implica otros cambios estos deben ser muy convincente. Tuya es, Alejandro Pisanty El Jueves, 03 de abril 2014 a las 10:54 AM, Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> escribió: > I've been involved in NomCom far too many times :-) And each year the > community was asked for input on the criteria. > > ICANN is a large and complex organization: having experience of complex > organizations, budgets, strategic planning, it part of the job. Doesn't > mean it has to be a person's only skill, but in a broad aggregate it needs > to be present. And smart people will learn, but you don't want too many > learning on the job when they are voting on issues that affect millions and > $millions. Look at the people NomCom has appointed. There's only one that > fits the pure "large corporate board" category. > > Selection of NomCom members does need more thought. I often felt a fraud > judging people on criteria I myself had little or no experience of. > > Adam > > > On Apr 4, 2014, at 12:31 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote: > > > Carlton, > > > > I completely agree with you, the criteria given to NomCom have to be > > thoroughly revised. > > > > Experience on "large corporate boards" has been an indication given to > > NomCom in the past, but I believe that one of the key words in the ideal > > Director profile is "in aggregate". > > > > This means that while ideally a Director has to have an incredible > knowledge > > and experience, this is meant in the sense that the Board, as a whole, > needs > > to have this wealth of knowledge and experience, not necessarily each and > > every Director. So, it might well be that at certain moments there is not > > enough large corporate boards experience on the Board, and it will be > > legitimate to look for reinforcing this aspect, but this does not mean > that > > all candidates that do not have such item in the profile should be > > discarded. To make an example, if "large corporate boards" is a need, > > "non-profit boards" is well another one. > > > > So the two big questions are: > > > > - How to cefine the requirements for NomCom > > > > - How to select the NomCom members (i.e. is the current > mechanism > > the best one?) > > > > Cheers, > > > > Roberto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com] > > Inviato: mercoledì 2 aprile 2014 02:56 > > A: Roberto Gaetano > > Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of lac-discuss; > > Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuss > > Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] > > VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > > > > > Roberto: > > > > I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic > and > > in the overarching At-Large interest. > > > > > > > > Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot > accept > > that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and with > > respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to 'take > > the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This is > my > > position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly > elected > > or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged as > truly > > reflecting the wishes of the constituency. > > > > > > > > Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly > > configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the At-Large > than > > the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have one > > quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that set of > > criteria utilised for selection of directors. > > > > > > > > In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that > space > > for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria between > > persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those without. > > And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of > > 'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely > > participants from my side of the world will enter the process already > > disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at that > level > > for those of us at the edge of empire. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > -Carlton > > > > > > > > > > > > ============================== > > Carlton A Samuels > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround > > ============================= > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano > > <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the Board > > with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. > > So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, years > > later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle of > > the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the > > organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. > > The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the > > stakeholder will get representation based on their relative "strength". > The > > parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where > the > > constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic laws > > and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by > > constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of the > > different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the > elders > > that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common good. > > This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, > albeit > > with only partial, although significant, results. > > It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get > rid as > > much as possible of the system by which we have representative of > "parties" > > that often have conflicting interests. > > I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed Directors, > and > > have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by > NomCom. > > The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set that is > > missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names > > accordingly. > > Cheers, > > Roberto > > > > > > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- > >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- > >> bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M > >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 > >> A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang > >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- > >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > afri-discuss@atlarge- > >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; > na- > >> discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > > > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > >> > > > >> Dear Wolfgang, > >> > >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to > > ensure an > >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in > the > >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared > >> responsibility in the selection process. > >> > >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would > > positively > >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- > >> stakeholder model of Governance. > >> > >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and > >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large > has > >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you > > have > >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, > >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even > > more. > >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which > > would > >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other > Stakeholders > >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the > > Board, > >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. > >> > >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by > two > >> different processes: > >> > >> 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate > > and > >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could > >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist > within > >> this AC at the moment. > >> > >> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an > internal > >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a > >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) > >> > >> Thank you. > >> > >> Sivasubramanian M > >> India > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < > >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to > >>> Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing > >>> more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > >>> > >>> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA > >>> transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are > >>> remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine > >>> voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, > >>> 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > >>> (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be > >>> established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the > >> Initial Board". > >>> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- > >> en.htm# > >>> V > >>> > >>> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for > >>> two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, > >> chaired > >>> by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting > >>> Organisation > >>> (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > >>> > >>> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h > >>> tm#_toc523422641 > >>> > >>> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an > >>> At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional > >>> councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory > >> Committee" > >>> (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > >>> establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the > >>> board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC > >>> was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to > >>> the chair of the GAC). > >>> > >>> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for > >>> two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the > >>> horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the > >>> multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has > >>> to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong > >>> civil society role in policy development and decision making. > >>> > >>> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > >>> both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and > >>> NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and > >> collaboration with > >>> private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. > >>> > >>> Wolfgang > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> wolfgang > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> > >>> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > >>> Veronica Cretu > >>> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > >>> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > >>> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > >>> na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large > >>> Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo > >>> and build up on it, I would also like to: > >>> > >>> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of > >>> the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and > >>> initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so > >>> this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can > >>> learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share > >>> the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and > >>> continue serve the community in the best possible ways. > >>> > >>> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her > >>> much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are > >>> important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, > >>> and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the > >>> world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on > > the > >> community-at-large. > >>> > >>> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has > >>> been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience > >>> there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input > > from > >> members. > >>> > >>> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > >>> safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > >>> > >>> With very best, > >>> Veronica > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > >>> <ocl(a)gih.com > >>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Dear All, > >>>> > >>>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what > >>>> was a very balanced election that required many rounds to > >>>> differentiate the candidates. > >>>> > >>>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > >>>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for > >>>> ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual > >>>> General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take > >>>> place in Los Angeles. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > >>>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > >>>> options for the future of our community. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation > >> Committee. > >>>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > >>>> candidates. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > >>>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been > >>>> challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. > >>>> > >>>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > >>>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > >>>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > >>>> > >>>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, > >>>> the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and > >>>> would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the > >>>> challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on > >>>> the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community > >>>> selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to > >>>> share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues > >>>> and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of > > ICANN. > >>>> > >>>> Kindest regards, > >>>> > >>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > >>>> ALAC Chair > >>>> > >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > >>>>> Dear All, > >>>>> > >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process > >>>>> Committee > >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote > >>>> results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the > >>>> ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be > >> published. > >>>>> > >>>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat > >>>>> #15) > >>>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > >>>>> > >>>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of > >>>>> the > >>>> family name) who ran for the position: > >>>>> > >>>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > >>>>> * Sébastien Bachollet > >>>>> * Alan Greenberg > >>>>> * Evan Leibovitch > >>>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > >>>>> > >>>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > >>>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is > >>>> selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for > >>>> 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. > >>>>> > >>>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information > >>>>> about > >>>> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, > >>>>> Nathalie > >>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew > >>>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >>>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > >>> 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org> > > >>>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > >>>> > >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- > >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% > >>> > >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G > >>> isella%20Gruber,% > >>>> > >>> > >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy > >> %20St > >>> aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > <mailto: > aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff(a)atlarge.icann.o > > rg> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> At-Large mailing list > >>>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >>>>> > >>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > >>> http://atlarge.icann.org/> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >>>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >>>> > >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > >>>> <http://www.euralo.org/> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> *Veronica Cretu * > >>> > >>> > >>> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > >>> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > >>> > >>> *Member of the Steering Committee, * > >>> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > >>> * > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > >> and-cu > >>> rrent-membership > >>> < > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > >> and-cu > >>> rrent-membership > >>>> * > >>> > >>> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet > >>> Governance Forum (IGF)* > >>> > >>> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > >>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > >>> > >>> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation > >>> for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > >>> > >>> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members > >>> <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > >>> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: > >> 373 > >>> 067435000* > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >>> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > >>> <http://www.euralo.org/> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> APAC-Discuss mailing list > >>> APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > >>> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > --------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Qumica UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF México +52-1-5541444475 DESDE EL EXTRANJERO +525541444475 DESDE Mxico SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al Grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Unete a ISOC México, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6ebcfbd03b.html --]]

1 0

Re: R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by ajp＠glocom.ac.jp April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp He estado involucrado en el Comité de nominaciones demasiadas veces :-) Y cada año la comunidad pidieron para la entrada en los criterios. ICANN es una organización grande y compleja: tener experiencia de las organizaciones complejas, presupuestos, planificación estratégica, es parte del trabajo. Eso no significa que tiene que ser única habilidad de una persona, pero en un agregado amplio que tiene que estar presente. Y las personas inteligentes aprenden, pero no quieren demasiadas aprendizaje en el trabajo cuando están votando en las cuestiones que afectan a millones y millones de dólares. Miren a la gente NomCom ha nombrado. Sólo hay una que se adapte a la categoría de puro "gran tablero de las empresas". Selección de los miembros del NomCom sí necesita más pensamiento. A menudo me sentía un fraude juzgar a la gente sobre los criterios que yo mismo había poca o ninguna experiencia de. Adán El 04 de abril 2014, a las 12:31 de la mañana, Roberto Gaetano escribió: > Carlton, > > I completely agree with you, the criteria given to NomCom have to be > thoroughly revised. > > Experience on large corporate boards has been an indication given to > NomCom in the past, but I believe that one of the key words in the ideal > Director profile is in aggregate. > > This means that while ideally a Director has to have an incredible knowledge > and experience, this is meant in the sense that the Board, as a whole, needs > to have this wealth of knowledge and experience, not necessarily each and > every Director. So, it might well be that at certain moments there is not > enough large corporate boards experience on the Board, and it will be > legitimate to look for reinforcing this aspect, but this does not mean that > all candidates that do not have such item in the profile should be > discarded. To make an example, if large corporate boards is a need, > non-profit boards is well another one. > > So the two big questions are: > > - How to cefine the requirements for NomCom > > - How to select the NomCom members (i.e. is the current mechanism > the best one?) > > Cheers, > > Roberto > > > > > > > > Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com] > Inviato: mercoledì 2 aprile 2014 02:56 > A: Roberto Gaetano > Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of lac-discuss; > Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuss > Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] > VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > Roberto: > > I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic and > in the overarching At-Large interest. > > > > Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot accept > that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and with > respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to 'take > the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This is my > position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly elected > or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged as truly > reflecting the wishes of the constituency. > > > > Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly > configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the At-Large than > the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have one > quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that set of > criteria utilised for selection of directors. > > > > In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that space > for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria between > persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those without. > And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of > 'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely > participants from my side of the world will enter the process already > disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at that level > for those of us at the edge of empire. > > > > Best, > > -Carlton > > > > > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround > ============================= > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano > <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the Board > with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. > So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, years > later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle of > the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the > organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. > The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the > stakeholder will get representation based on their relative "strength". The > parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where the > constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic laws > and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by > constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of the > different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the elders > that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common good. > This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, albeit > with only partial, although significant, results. > It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get rid as > much as possible of the system by which we have representative of "parties" > that often have conflicting interests. > I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed Directors, and > have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by NomCom. > The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set that is > missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names > accordingly. > Cheers, > Roberto > > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- >> bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 >> A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > afri-discuss@atlarge- >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na- >> discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >> Dear Wolfgang, >> >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to > ensure an >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in the >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared >> responsibility in the selection process. >> >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would > positively >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- >> stakeholder model of Governance. >> >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large has >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you > have >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even > more. >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which > would >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other Stakeholders >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the > Board, >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. >> >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by two >> different processes: >> >> 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate > and >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist within >> this AC at the moment. >> >> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an internal >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) >> >> Thank you. >> >> Sivasubramanian M >> India >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to >>> Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing >>> more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >>> >>> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA >>> transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are >>> remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine >>> voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, >>> 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine >>> (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be >>> established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the >> Initial Board". >>> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- >> en.htm# >>> V >>> >>> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for >>> two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, >> chaired >>> by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting >>> Organisation >>> (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. >>> >>> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h >>> tm#_toc523422641 >>> >>> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an >>> At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional >>> councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory >> Committee" >>> (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the >>> establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the >>> board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC >>> was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to >>> the chair of the GAC). >>> >>> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for >>> two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the >>> horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the >>> multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has >>> to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong >>> civil society role in policy development and decision making. >>> >>> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos >>> both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and >>> NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and >> collaboration with >>> private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. >>> >>> Wolfgang >>> >>> >>> >>> wolfgang >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von >>> Veronica Cretu >>> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >>> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >>> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; >>> na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large >>> Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo >>> and build up on it, I would also like to: >>> >>> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of >>> the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and >>> initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so >>> this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can >>> learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share >>> the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and >>> continue serve the community in the best possible ways. >>> >>> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her >>> much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are >>> important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, >>> and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the >>> world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on > the >> community-at-large. >>> >>> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has >>> been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience >>> there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input > from >> members. >>> >>> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home >>> safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >>> >>> With very best, >>> Veronica >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >>> <ocl(a)gih.com >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what >>>> was a very balanced election that required many rounds to >>>> differentiate the candidates. >>>> >>>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >>>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for >>>> ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual >>>> General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take >>>> place in Los Angeles. >>>> >>>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is >>>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >>>> options for the future of our community. >>>> >>>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation >> Committee. >>>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of >>>> candidates. >>>> >>>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >>>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been >>>> challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. >>>> >>>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >>>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >>>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >>>> >>>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, >>>> the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and >>>> would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the >>>> challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on >>>> the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community >>>> selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to >>>> share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues >>>> and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of > ICANN. >>>> >>>> Kindest regards, >>>> >>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >>>> ALAC Chair >>>> >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >>>>> Dear All, >>>>> >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process >>>>> Committee >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote >>>> results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the >>>> ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be >> published. >>>>> >>>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat >>>>> #15) >>>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >>>>> >>>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of >>>>> the >>>> family name) who ran for the position: >>>>> >>>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >>>>> * Sébastien Bachollet >>>>> * Alan Greenberg >>>>> * Evan Leibovitch >>>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >>>>> >>>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >>>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is >>>> selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for >>>> 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. >>>>> >>>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information >>>>> about >>>> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, >>>>> Nathalie >>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >>>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >>>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% >>> 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org> > >>>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >>>> >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% >>> >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G >>> isella%20Gruber,% >>>> >>> >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy >> %20St >>> aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > <mailto:aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.o > rg> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> At-Large mailing list >>>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >>>>> >>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < >>> http://atlarge.icann.org/> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >>>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >>>> >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >>>> <http://www.euralo.org/> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Veronica Cretu * >>> >>> >>> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >>> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >>> >>> *Member of the Steering Committee, * >>> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >>> * >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> and-cu >>> rrent-membership >>> < >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> and-cu >>> rrent-membership >>>> * >>> >>> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet >>> Governance Forum (IGF)* >>> >>> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >>> >>> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation >>> for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >>> >>> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members >>> <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* >>> >>> >>> >>> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >>> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: >> 373 >>> 067435000* >>> _______________________________________________ >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >>> >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >>> <http://www.euralo.org/> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> APAC-Discuss mailing list >>> APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss >>> >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b88bc734e9.html --]]

1 0

Re: R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by vanda＠uol.com.br April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: vanda(a)uol.com.br Hola a todos, Normalmente la comprensión de la NOMCOM es proporcionar el mejor candidato que cumplen con la falta de conocimiento específico de la junta directiva, teniendo en cuenta principalmente todo el perfil del candidato y su capacidad para llevar a cabo en tal junta. Cada año Nomcom tiene una opinión de la Junta sobre qué tipo de conocimiento ahora que falta en el estribo. NOMCOM también considera el perfil de que abandona el tablero de cada año y, si ya se ha definido, el nuevo llegados desde Sos + AC. Por ejemplo, ya sabemos que Rinalia sustituirá por Sebastien 15a del asiento, por lo que su perfil es considerado entre todas las demandas de la Junta. Hoy en día estamos teniendo bastante apoyo profesional para el cazador principal externo organización y capacitación de funcionamiento de la entrevista que se propicie una mucho nuestra capacidad de elegir siempre los mejores candidatos. Reseñas, por otro lado, como se revisa todos los cuerpos dentro de la ICANN, son uno de la mejores mecanismos de gestión de la ICANN tiene que presentar a la comunidad. Siempre hay espacio para mejorar y las revisiones llevar esta oportunidad de cada grupo dentro de ICANN. Todo lo mejor, Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, CJ 1004 01311-200 - Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil Línea del terreno: +55 11 3266.6253 Móvil: + 55 11 98181.1464 El 03/04/14, 12:31, "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> escribió: > Carlton, > > Estoy totalmente de acuerdo con usted, los criterios que figuran a NomCom tienen que ser > Minuciosamente revisado. > > Experiencia en "grandes consejos de administración" ha sido una indicación dada a > Comité de nominaciones en el pasado, pero creo que una de las palabras clave en el ideal > Perfil del director es "en su conjunto". > > Esto significa que, si bien lo ideal sería un director tiene que tener una increíble > Conocimiento > Y la experiencia, esto se entiende en el sentido de que el Consejo, en su conjunto, > necesidades > Tener esta riqueza de conocimientos y experiencia, no necesariamente todos y > Cada director. Por lo tanto, bien podría ser que en ciertos momentos no hay > Suficientemente grande experiencia directorios de las empresas en el Consejo, y será > Legítima para buscar reforzar este aspecto, pero esto no significa > Que > Todos los candidatos que no cuentan con dichos puntos en el perfil deben ser > Desechado. Para dar un ejemplo, si "los grandes consejos de administración" es una necesidad, > "Juntas sin fines de lucro" es bien otra. > > Así que las dos grandes preguntas son: > > - ¿Cómo cefine los requisitos para NomCom > > - ¿Cómo seleccionar los miembros de NomCom (es decir, es el mecanismo actual > El mejor?) > > Saludos, > > Roberto > > > > > > > >Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com] >Inviato: mercoledÃ¬ 2 aprile 2014 02:56 >A: Roberto Gaetano >Cc: Sivasubramanian M; KleinwÃ€chter, Wolfgang; >lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of lac-discuss; >Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuss >Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] >VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > >Roberto: > >I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic and >in the overarching At-Large interest. > > > >Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot accept >that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and with >respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to 'take >the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This is >my >position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly >elected >or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged as >truly >reflecting the wishes of the constituency. > > > >Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly >configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the At-Large >than >the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have one >quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that set of >criteria utilised for selection of directors. > > > >In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that space >for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria between >persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those without. >And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of >'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely >participants from my side of the world will enter the process already >disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at that >level >for those of us at the edge of empire. > > > >Best, > >-Carlton > > > > > >============================== >Carlton A Samuels >Mobile: 876-818-1799 >Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround >============================= > > > >On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano ><roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the Board >with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. >So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, years >later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle of >the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the >organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. >The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the >stakeholder will get representation based on their relative "strength". >The >parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where the >constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic laws >and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by >constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of the >different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the elders >that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common good. >This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, >albeit >with only partial, although significant, results. >It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get rid >as >much as possible of the system by which we have representative of >"parties" >that often have conflicting interests. >I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed Directors, >and >have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by >NomCom. >The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set that is >missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names >accordingly. >Cheers, >Roberto > > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- >> bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 >> A: KleinwÃ€chter, Wolfgang >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >afri-discuss@atlarge- >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na- >> discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >> Dear Wolfgang, >> >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to >ensure an >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in >>the >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared >> responsibility in the selection process. >> >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would >positively >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- >> stakeholder model of Governance. >> >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large >>has >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you >have >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even >more. >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which >would >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other >>Stakeholders >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the >Board, >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. >> >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by >>two >> different processes: >> >> 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate >and >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist >>within >> this AC at the moment. >> >> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an >>internal >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) >> >> Thank you. >> >> Sivasubramanian M >> India >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "KleinwÃ€chter, Wolfgang" < >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to >> > Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing >> > more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >> > >> > I this context: DonÂŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA >> > transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are >> > remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine >> > voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, >> > 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine >> > (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be >> > established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of >>the >> Initial Board". >> > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- >> en.htm# >> > V >> > >> > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for >> > two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, >> chaired >> > by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting >> > Organisation >> > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. >> > >> > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h >> > tm#_toc523422641 >> > >> > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an >> > At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional >> > councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory >> Committee" >> > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the >> > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the >> > board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC >> > was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to >> > the chair of the GAC). >> > >> > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for >> > two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the >> > horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the >> > multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has >> > to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong >> > civil society role in policy development and decision making. >> > >> > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos >> > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and >> > NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and >> collaboration with >> > private sector, technical community and governments. A big >>challenge. >> > >> > Wolfgang >> > >> > >> > >> > wolfgang >> > >> > >> > >> > ________________________________ >> > >> > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von >> > Veronica Cretu >> > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >> > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; >> > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large >> > Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >> > >> > >> > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo >> > and build up on it, I would also like to: >> > >> > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of >> > the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and >> > initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so >> > this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can >> > learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share >> > the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and >> > continue serve the community in the best possible ways. >> > >> > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her >> > much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are >> > important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, >> > and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the >> > world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on >the >> community-at-large. >> > >> > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has >> > been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience >> > there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input >from >> members. >> > >> > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home >> > safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >> > >> > With very best, >> > Veronica >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> > <ocl(a)gih.com >> > >wrote: >> > >> > > Dear All, >> > > >> > > I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what >> > > was a very balanced election that required many rounds to >> > > differentiate the candidates. >> > > >> > > Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >> > > moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for >> > > ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual >> > > General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take >> > > place in Los Angeles. >> > > >> > > Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is >> > > through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >> > > options for the future of our community. >> > > >> > > Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation >> Committee. >> > > Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of >> > > candidates. >> > > >> > > Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >> > > Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been >> > > challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. >> > > >> > > The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >> > > learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >> > > recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >> > > >> > > Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, >> > > the Board Member selected by At-Large is SÃ©bastien Bachollet and >> > > would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the >> > > challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on >> > > the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community >> > > selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to >> > > share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues >> > > and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of >ICANN. >> > > >> > > Kindest regards, >> > > >> > > Olivier MJ CrÃ©pin-Leblond >> > > ALAC Chair >> > > >> > > On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >> > > > Dear All, >> > > > >> > > > Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process >> > > > Committee >> > > (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote >> > > results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the >> > > ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be >> published. >> > > > >> > > > This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat >> > > > #15) >> > > Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >> > > > >> > > > Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of >> > > > the >> > > family name) who ran for the position: >> > > > >> > > > * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >> > > > * SÃ©bastien Bachollet >> > > > * Alan Greenberg >> > > > * Evan Leibovitch >> > > > * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >> > > > >> > > > After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >> > > breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is >> > > selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for >> > > 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. >> > > > >> > > > You may review the results, as well as the detailed information >> > > > about >> > > the selection procedure, under: >>https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > >> > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, >> > > > Nathalie >> > > Peregrine and Terri Agnew >> > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% >> > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org ><mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org> > >> > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> > > >> > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% >> > >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G >> > isella%20Gruber,% >> > > >> > >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy >> %20St >> > aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org ><mailto:aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann >.o >rg> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > At-Large mailing list >> > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >> > > > >> > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < >> > http://atlarge.icann.org/> >> > > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > > >> > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > > <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > *Veronica Cretu * >> > >> > >> > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >> > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >> > >> > *Member of the Steering Committee, * >> > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >> > * >> > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> and-cu >> > rrent-membership >> > < >> > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> and-cu >> > rrent-membership >> > >* >> > >> > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet >> > Governance Forum (IGF)* >> > >> > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >> > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >> > >> > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation >> > for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >> > >> > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members >> > <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* >> > >> > >> > >> > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >> > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: >> 373 >> > 067435000* >> > _______________________________________________ >> > EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > >> > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > APAC-Discuss mailing list >> > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss >> > >> > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > >_______________________________________________ >lac-discuss-es mailing list >lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > >http://www.lacralo.org > > > >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6be709beae.html --]]

1 0

R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2014 Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selecci�n de At-Large
by roberto_gaetano＠hotmail.com April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2014 Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selección de At-Large De: roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com Carlton, Estoy totalmente de acuerdo con usted, los criterios que figuran a NomCom tienen que ser revisado a fondo. La experiencia en los grandes consejos de administración ha sido una indicación dada a Comité de nominaciones en el pasado, pero creo que una de las palabras clave en el ideal Perfil del Director es en conjunto. Esto significa que, si bien lo ideal sería un director tiene que tener un conocimiento increíble y la experiencia, esto se entiende en el sentido de que el Consejo de Administración, en su conjunto, las necesidades tener esta riqueza de conocimientos y experiencia, no necesariamente todos y cada director. Por lo tanto, bien podría ser que en ciertos momentos no hay experiencia suficiente grandes consejos de administración en el Consejo, y será legítimo para buscar reforzar este aspecto, pero esto no significa que todos los candidatos que no cuentan con dichos puntos en el perfil deben ser desechado.Para dar un ejemplo, si los grandes consejos de administración es una necesidad, juntas sin fines de lucro es bien otra. Así que las dos grandes preguntas son: - ¿Cómo cefine los requisitos para NomCom - ¿Cómo seleccionar los miembros de NomCom (es decir, es el mecanismo actual el mejor?) Saludos, Roberto Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto: carlton.samuels @ gmail.com] Inviato: aprile mercoled2 2014 02:56 A: Roberto Gaetano Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwchter, Wolfgang; lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Versión en español de lac-discuss; Discusión de At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Discuta; At-Large Anuncios; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuta Oggetto: Re: R: [lac-discuss-es]: [EURO-Opinar] [APAC-Opinar] [At-Large] Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección Roberto: Yo también creo lo que está proponiendo no es sólo sensata sino estratégico y en el global de At-Large interés. Tal vez sea debido a mi posición de que, por principio, simplemente no puedo aceptar que en materia de gobernabilidad y cuando forma parte de un grupo distante y con respecto a la toma de decisiones, el representante debería estar obligada a "tomar el látigo "- lo que significa seguir las instrucciones - de su grupo /. Este es mi posición sin importar el tamaño del electorado; si popularmente electo o no, no tengo dudas de magníficos que uno puede confinarse y juzgados como verdaderamente que refleja los deseos del electorado. De hecho en el inicio, a algunos de nosotros pensamos que el papel de enlace correctamente configurado probablemente puede tener un interés más sostenible para el At-Large de el director de votación única. Así que, aunque estamos de acuerdo en gran parte, tengo una objetar con su caracterización de la función del Comité de nominaciones; ese conjunto de criterios utilizados para la selección de directores. En su estimación de este nuevo papel de la Junta, espero que el espacio se calcula para una mayor orientación por lo que hay un equilibrio en los criterios entre las personas que tengan experiencia en 'grandes consejos de administración "que los que no. Y lo digo en el contexto de la interpretación probable del significado de "Grande". Para dependiendo de quién la define "grande", todo un conjunto de probabilidades participantes de mi lado del mundo entrarán en el proceso ya desfavorecidos. Y eso no augura nada bueno para la participación en ese nivel para aquellos de nosotros en el borde del imperio. Best, -Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround ============================= El mar, 01 de abril 2014 a las 24:19, Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> escribió: He sido uno de los campeones de la representación de ALAC a la Junta con los directores con derecho a voto, a la par con las otras organizaciones de apoyo. Así que creo que no puedo ser sospechoso de anti-ALAC-ismo si yo ahora, años después, argumentan que para luchar por más Consejeros en el Consejo es una batalla de el pasado, que tiene poco significado mirando a la evolución de la organizazion ya una plena realización del modelo de múltiples partes interesadas. El modelo de múltiples partes interesadas no es un modelo parlamentario en el que el los interesados \u200b\u200bobtendrá representación en función de su "fuerza" relativa. La régimen parlamentario está bien para una organización en su infancia, en el que el constitución tiene que ser redactado. En una organización madura, con las leyes básicas y comportamientos ya definidos, la designación de representantes por circunscripciones trae inevitablemente a la Junta de los mezquinos intereses de la diferentes grupos en lugar de tener una especie de consejo de los ancianos que hace abstracción de los intereses contingentes que buscan el bien común. Esta ha sido la pauta que se intentó con la revisión de la GNSO, aunque con sólo parcial, aunque significativas, resultados. Es el momento de proponer un modelo diferente para la Junta, así, deshacerse como tanto como sea posible del sistema por el cual tenemos representante de "partes" que a menudo tienen intereses en conflicto. Creo que debemos ir hacia la reducción de los Consejeros así nombrados, y tendrá lugar una parte mayor, posiblemente un súper-mayoría, designado por Comité de nominaciones. El Comité de Nominaciones también debe obtener una descripción precisa del conjunto de habilidades que es que falta para ese año en particular, para que puedan elegir los nombres en consecuencia. Saludos, Roberto > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- > bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M > Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 > A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- > lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na- > discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > Dear Wolfgang, > > The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to > independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in the > process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared > responsibility in the selection process. > > A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would > demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- > stakeholder model of Governance. > > In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and > four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large has > matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you > mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, > which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even > In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which > reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other Stakeholders > might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the > because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. > > More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by two > different processes: > > 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate > the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could > sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist within > this AC at the moment. > > 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an internal > NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a > process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) > > Thank you. > > Sivasubramanian M > India > > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < > wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to > > Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing > > more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > > > > I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA > > transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are > > remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine > > voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, > > 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > > (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be > > established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the > Initial Board". > > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- > en.htm# > > V > > > > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for > > two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, > chaired > > by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting > > Organisation > > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > > > > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h > > tm#_toc523422641 > > > > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an > > At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional > > councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory > Committee" > > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the > > board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC > > was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to > > the chair of the GAC). > > > > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for > > two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the > > horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the > > multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has > > to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong > > civil society role in policy development and decision making. > > > > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and > > NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and > collaboration with > > private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. > > > > Wolfgang > > > > > > > > wolfgang > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > > Veronica Cretu > > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large > > Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > > > > > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo > > and build up on it, I would also like to: > > > > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of > > the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and > > initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so > > this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can > > learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share > > the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and > > continue serve the community in the best possible ways. > > > > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her > > much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are > > important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, > > and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the > > world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on > community-at-large. > > > > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has > > been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience > > there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input > members. > > > > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > > safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > > > With very best, > > Veronica > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > <ocl(a)gih.com > > >wrote: > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what > > > was a very balanced election that required many rounds to > > > differentiate the candidates. > > > > > > Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > > > moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for > > > ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual > > > General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take > > > place in Los Angeles. > > > > > > Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > > > through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > > > options for the future of our community. > > > > > > Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation > Committee. > > > Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > > > candidates. > > > > > > Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > > > Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been > > > challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. > > > > > > The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > > > learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > > > recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > > > > > > Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, > > > the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and > > > would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the > > > challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on > > > the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community > > > selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to > > > share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues > > > and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of > > > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > > ALAC Chair > > > > > > On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process > > > > Committee > > > (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote > > > results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the > > > ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be > published. > > > > > > > > This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat > > > > #15) > > > Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > > > > > > > > Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of > > > > the > > > family name) who ran for the position: > > > > > > > > * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > > > > * Sébastien Bachollet > > > > * Alan Greenberg > > > > * Evan Leibovitch > > > > * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > > > > > > > > After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > > > breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is > > > selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for > > > 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. > > > > > > > > You may review the results, as well as the detailed information > > > > about > > > the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, > > > > Nathalie > > > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- > B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% > > > 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G > > isella%20Gruber,% > > > > > > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy > %20St > > aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org rg> > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > At-Large mailing list > > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > > > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > > http://atlarge.icann.org/> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Veronica Cretu * > > > > > > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > > > *Member of the Steering Committee, * > > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > > * > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > and-cu > > rrent-membership > > < > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > and-cu > > rrent-membership > > >* > > > > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet > > Governance Forum (IGF)* > > > > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > > > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation > > for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > > > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members > > <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* > > > > > > > > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: > 373 > > 067435000* > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > APAC-Discuss mailing list > > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org > > > > > > -- > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/698787e3e0.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: �C�mo hacerse socio? | IndividualUsers
by josefranciscoarce＠gmail.com April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Fwd: ¿Cómo hacerse socio? | IndividualUsers De: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com FYI ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- De: "Tracy F. Hackshaw @ Google" <tracyhackshaw(a)gmail.com> Fecha: abr 2, 2014 22:08 Asunto: [becas-alumnos] ¿Cómo hacerse socio? | IndividualUsers Para: "Fellowships-alumni(a)icann.org" <fellowships-alumni(a)icann.org> Cc: En caso de que usted estaba viviendo bajo una roca ... ;) http://individualusers.org/?page_id=8 ------ Rgds, Tracy _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b3a7c97006.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Terremoto en Chile
by geek.iskander＠gmail.com April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Terremoto en Chile De: geek.iskander(a)gmail.com Sergio Gracias a Dios todo bien, El Terremoto FUE en el Norte de Nuestro pas, Pero temamos Por El tsunami, Que afortunadamente no llegcon mucha Fuerza una regin our. Gracias por la preocupacin. Saludos Javier Chanda 02/04/2014 08:23 GMT-04: 00 <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> : > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Earthquake in Chile > From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > Dear Humberto and Javier. Are you and your family well? > _______________________________________________ > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e30ce74f84.html --]]

1 0

Terremoto en Chile
by Sergio Salinas Porto April 2, 2014

April 2, 2014

Estimados Humberto y Javier. Estan bien ustedes y su familia?

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Terremoto en Chile
by dacostabastidas＠dtech.ec April 2, 2014

April 2, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Terremoto en Chile De: dacostabastidas(a)dtech.ec Estimado Humberto Saludo solidario desde Ecuador Con La hermana Nacin de Chile Que es porción NuevaMente asolada el estremecimiento brutal de la tierra. Como en la anterior OPORTUNIDAD, EL DESASTRE dejarvisible el temperamento chileno párr Superar la adversidad. Atte Diego Acosta Bastidas, el Dr. DTECH ECUADOR 02/04/2014 07:42 GMT-05: 00 <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> : > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re: Earthquake in Chile > From: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com > > Sergio, > > > Thank you very much for this email. > > > I do not live in that part of Chile, but I have family who live if > there. They are thankfully uneventful. > > > Regards > The 02/04 / > On 02/04/2014 1:22 pm, Sergio Salinas Porto wrote: > > Estimados Humberto y Javier. Estan bien ustedes y su familia? > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2af9394862.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Transferencia de las Funciones de IANA a la Comunidad Global
by josefranciscoarce＠gmail.com April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Transferencia de las Funciones de IANA a la Comunidad Global De: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com Estimado Rodrigo, Muchas gracias Por tu correo gentil. Como siempre estaremos Apoyando el Proceso Que Lidera ICANN y Dando imput en La Medida Que se nos permita. Saludos José Arce El 19 de marzo 2014 15:05, "Rodrigo de la Parra" <rodrigo.delaparra(a)icann.org> escribi: > Estimados Amigos de LACRALO: > > Espero que este correo los encuentre muy bien. > > Como es de su conocimiento el Gobierno de los Estados Unidos de América > recientemente anunció su intención de transferir su rol técnico respecto > de las funciones de IANA a la comunidad multipartita o multisectorial > global de Internet. > > En 1998, el año en que se forma ICANN, el gobierno de los Estados Unidos > determinó que conforme el Internet se expandiera globalmente, su > responsabilidad se trasladaría a todos los actores de Internet. Actores > que representaran no solo a gobiernos, sino también al sector privado, la > sociedad civil, las comunidades técnicas y académicas, así como los > usuarios independientes de Internet alrededor del mundo. > > Desde su formación, ICANN ha cumplido sus obligaciones contractuales al > ejecutar estas funciones técnicas y ha alcanzado tanto la excelencia > operacional como la madurez organizacional. Ahora, el Gobierno de los > Estados Unidos le ha solicitado a ICANN implementar, bajo un enfoque > multipartita o multisectorial, la transición de su rol de supervisión > iniciando un proceso que permita a la comunidad diseñar un marco > incluyente y "de abajo hacia arriba" para tales efectos. Este proceso > incluirá oportunidades para la incorporación de insumos, incluyendo tanto > aquellos de las organizaciones de soporte y comités asesores activos en > ICANN, como aquellos de otros actores interesados. > > También quisiera aprovechar esta oportunidad para recordarles sobre la > resolución que emitió el Directorio de ICANN el 17 de febrero de 2014 > para acelerar el proceso de globalización de ICANN. Nuestro equipo se > encuentra comprometido para ejecutar este ambicioso plan para implementar > este proceso de globalización tan rápido como sea posible para asegurar la > inclusion de todos los actores relevantes en todo el mundo. > > Esta resolución pueden cosultarla aquí: > > https://www.icann.org/es/groups/board/documents/resolutions-17feb14-es.pdf > > Su participación es muy importante en este proceso. A continuación te > describo una serie de eventos y fechas clave que deben tomar en cuenta: > > EURO 17 de Marzo de 2014: Publicación del anuncio de ICANN describiendo > los > principios de relacionamiento con la comunidad y los objetivos de la > consulta pública en Singapur. > EURO 21 -27 de Marzo de 2014: Durante nuestra reunión 49 en Singapur- > Diálogo > público y consulta con la comunidad sobre cómo deben ocurrir los > mecanismos de la transición. > EURO 7 de abril de 2014: Publicación de los resultados de la discusión > en > Singapur y una propuesta de pasos a seguir y su calendarización. > EURO 22 - 26 de Junio de 2014: Durante nuestra reunión 50 en Londres- > reunión > de la comunidad global multisectorial para avanzar respecto de lo > construido en la reunión previa. > EURO 12-16 de Octubre de 2014: Durante nuestra reunión 51 en Los > Ángeles- > reunión de la comunidad global multisectorial para avanzar respecto de lo > construido en las reuniones previas. > EURO Marzo de 2015: Durante nuestra reunión 52, lugar por definir- > reunión de > la comunidad global multisectorial para avanzar respecto de lo construido > en las reuniones previas. > EURO Junio de 2015: Durante nuestra reunión 53, lugar por definir- > reunión de > la comunidad global multisectorial para avanzar respecto de lo construido > en las reuniones previas. > EURO 30 de Septiembre de 2015: Fecha de Vencimiento del Contrato de > IANA. > > Espero contar con su activa participación y apoyo durante este proceso > histórico en el desarrollo de Internet. Mucho les agradeceré compartir > esta información con sus organizaciones. > > Para referencia estoy adjuntando un documento sobre Preguntas Frecuentes y > otro sobre la Historia y Desarrollo de la Globalización de ICANN. Los > documentos en Inglés, Español, Francés y Portugués se encuentran > disponibles en nuestra página de Internet. > > Reciban un afectuoso saludo. > > > -------------------------- > Rodrigo de la Parra > > rodrigo.delaparra(a)icann.org > @rdelapar > Vicepresidente para América Latina y el Caribe > La Casa de Internet de Latinoamérica y el Caribe > Rambla República de México 6125 > Montevideo, 11400 > Uruguay > ICANN > One World, One Internet > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/18a7afc2b9.html --]]

1 0