R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2014 Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selecci�n de At-Large

April 3, 2014

      [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2014 Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selección de At-Large 
 De: roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com

 Carlton, 

 Estoy totalmente de acuerdo con usted, los criterios que figuran a NomCom tienen que ser 
 revisado a fondo. 

 La experiencia en los grandes consejos de administración ha sido una indicación dada a 
 Comité de nominaciones en el pasado, pero creo que una de las palabras clave en el ideal 
 Perfil del Director es en conjunto. 

 Esto significa que, si bien lo ideal sería un director tiene que tener un conocimiento increíble 
 y la experiencia, esto se entiende en el sentido de que el Consejo de Administración, en su conjunto, las necesidades 
 tener esta riqueza de conocimientos y experiencia, no necesariamente todos y 
 cada director. Por lo tanto, bien podría ser que en ciertos momentos no hay 
 experiencia suficiente grandes consejos de administración en el Consejo, y será 
 legítimo para buscar reforzar este aspecto, pero esto no significa que 
 todos los candidatos que no cuentan con dichos puntos en el perfil deben ser 
 desechado.Para dar un ejemplo, si los grandes consejos de administración es una necesidad, 
 juntas sin fines de lucro es bien otra. 

 Así que las dos grandes preguntas son: 

 - ¿Cómo cefine los requisitos para NomCom 

 - ¿Cómo seleccionar los miembros de NomCom (es decir, es el mecanismo actual 
 el mejor?) 

 Saludos, 

 Roberto 

 Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto: carlton.samuels @ gmail.com] 
 Inviato: aprile mercoled2 2014 02:56 
 A: Roberto Gaetano 
 Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwchter, Wolfgang; 
 lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org; Versión en español de lac-discuss; 
 Discusión de At-Large Europe; afri-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Discuta; At-Large Anuncios; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuta 
 Oggetto: Re: R: [lac-discuss-es]: [EURO-Opinar] [APAC-Opinar] [At-Large] 
 Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección 

 Roberto:

 Yo también creo lo que está proponiendo no es sólo sensata sino estratégico y 
 en el global de At-Large interés. 

 Tal vez sea debido a mi posición de que, por principio, simplemente no puedo aceptar 
 que en materia de gobernabilidad y cuando forma parte de un grupo distante y con 
 respecto a la toma de decisiones, el representante debería estar obligada a "tomar 
 el látigo "- lo que significa seguir las instrucciones - de su grupo /. Este es mi 
 posición sin importar el tamaño del electorado; si popularmente electo 
 o no, no tengo dudas de magníficos que uno puede confinarse y juzgados como verdaderamente 
 que refleja los deseos del electorado. 

 De hecho en el inicio, a algunos de nosotros pensamos que el papel de enlace correctamente 
 configurado probablemente puede tener un interés más sostenible para el At-Large de 
 el director de votación única. Así que, aunque estamos de acuerdo en gran parte, tengo una 
 objetar con su caracterización de la función del Comité de nominaciones; ese conjunto de 
 criterios utilizados para la selección de directores. 

 En su estimación de este nuevo papel de la Junta, espero que el espacio 
 se calcula para una mayor orientación por lo que hay un equilibrio en los criterios entre 
 las personas que tengan experiencia en 'grandes consejos de administración "que los que no. 
 Y lo digo en el contexto de la interpretación probable del significado de 
 "Grande". Para dependiendo de quién la define "grande", todo un conjunto de probabilidades 
 participantes de mi lado del mundo entrarán en el proceso ya 
 desfavorecidos. Y eso no augura nada bueno para la participación en ese nivel 
 para aquellos de nosotros en el borde del imperio. 

 Best, 

 -Carlton 

 ============================== 
 Carlton Un Samuels 
 Móvil: 876-818-1799 
 Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround 
 ============================= 

 El mar, 01 de abril 2014 a las 24:19, Roberto Gaetano 
<roberto_gaetano@hotmail.com> escribió:

 He sido uno de los campeones de la representación de ALAC a la Junta 
 con los directores con derecho a voto, a la par con las otras organizaciones de apoyo. 
 Así que creo que no puedo ser sospechoso de anti-ALAC-ismo si yo ahora, años 
 después, argumentan que para luchar por más Consejeros en el Consejo es una batalla de 
 el pasado, que tiene poco significado mirando a la evolución de la 
 organizazion ya una plena realización del modelo de múltiples partes interesadas. 
 El modelo de múltiples partes interesadas no es un modelo parlamentario en el que el 
 los interesados \u200b\u200bobtendrá representación en función de su "fuerza" relativa. La 
 régimen parlamentario está bien para una organización en su infancia, en el que el 
 constitución tiene que ser redactado. En una organización madura, con las leyes básicas 
 y comportamientos ya definidos, la designación de representantes por 
 circunscripciones trae inevitablemente a la Junta de los mezquinos intereses de la 
 diferentes grupos en lugar de tener una especie de consejo de los ancianos 
 que hace abstracción de los intereses contingentes que buscan el bien común. 
 Esta ha sido la pauta que se intentó con la revisión de la GNSO, aunque 
 con sólo parcial, aunque significativas, resultados.
 Es el momento de proponer un modelo diferente para la Junta, así, deshacerse como 
 tanto como sea posible del sistema por el cual tenemos representante de "partes" 
 que a menudo tienen intereses en conflicto. 
 Creo que debemos ir hacia la reducción de los Consejeros así nombrados, y 
 tendrá lugar una parte mayor, posiblemente un súper-mayoría, designado por Comité de nominaciones. 
 El Comité de Nominaciones también debe obtener una descripción precisa del conjunto de habilidades que es 
 que falta para ese año en particular, para que puedan elegir los nombres 
 en consecuencia. 
 Saludos, 
 Roberto
...
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: euro-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss-
bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M
Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27
A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang
Cc: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-
lists.icann.org; euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org;
lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na-
discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014
At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process
Dear Wolfgang,
The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to
...
independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in the
process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared
responsibility in the selection process.
A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would
demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi-
stakeholder model of Governance.
In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and
four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large has
matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you
mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people,
which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even
In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which
reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other Stakeholders
might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the
because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process.
More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by two
different processes:
1)  By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate
the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could
sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist within
this AC at the moment.
2)  By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an internal
NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a
process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered)
Thank you.
Sivasubramanian M
India
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <
wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:
...
Hi,
I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to
Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing
more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured.
I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA
transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are
remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine
voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6,
1998) said in para. iv: "Nine
(9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be
established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the
Initial Board".
http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-
en.htm#
V
We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for
two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee,
chaired
by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting
Organisation
(ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board.
http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h
tm#_toc523422641
In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an
At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional
councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory
Committee"
(ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the
establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the
board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC
was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to
the chair of the GAC).
In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for
two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the
horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the
multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has
to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong
civil society role in policy development and decision making.
Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos
both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and
NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and
collaboration with
 private sector, technical community and governments.   A big challenge.
Wolfgang
wolfgang
________________________________
Von: euro-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von
Veronica Cretu
Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55
An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
Cc: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org;
lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org;
euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org;
afri-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org;
ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org;
apac-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide;
na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large
Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process
Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo
and build up on it, I would also like to:
- Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of
the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and
initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so
this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can
learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share
the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and
continue serve the community in the best possible ways.
- Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her
much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are
important times for ICANN which will require several key competences,
and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the
world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on
community-at-large.
- Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has
been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience
there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input
members.
On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home
safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home!
With very best,
Veronica
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
<ocl@gih.com
...
wrote:
...
Dear All,
I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what
was a very balanced election that required many rounds to
differentiate the candidates.
Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a
moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for
ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual
General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take
place in Los Angeles.
Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is
through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of
options for the future of our community.
Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation
Committee.
Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of
candidates.
Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process
Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been
challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties.
The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons
learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of
recommendations to improve the selection process next time around.
Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM,
the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and
would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the
challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on
the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community
selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to
share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues
and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of
Kindest regards,
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
ALAC Chair
On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote:
...
Dear All,
Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process
Committee
(BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote
results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the
ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be
published.
This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat
#15)
Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014.
Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of
the
family name) who ran for the position:
*   Rinalia Abdul Rahim
 *   Sébastien Bachollet
 *   Alan Greenberg
 *   Evan Leibovitch
 *   Jean-Jacques Subrenat
After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie
breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is
selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for
2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim.
You may review the results, as well as the detailed information
about
the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber,
Nathalie
Peregrine and Terri Agnew
ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%
3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org
staff@atlarge.icann.org
<applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-
B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%
20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G
...
isella%20Gruber,%
...
20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy
%20St
...
aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org
 rg>
...
...
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org <
http://atlarge.icann.org/>
...
_______________________________________________
EURO-Discuss mailing list
EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
<http://www.euralo.org/>
--
*Veronica Cretu *
*President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova
- http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>*
*Member of the Steering Committee, *
*Open Government Partnership (OGP);*
*
http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-
and-cu
rrent-membership
<
http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-
and-cu
rrent-membership
...
*
*Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet
Governance Forum (IGF)*
*http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549
<http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>*
*Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation
for Assigned Names and Numbering)*
*http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members
<http://www.icann.org<; http://www.icann.org/> >*
*Email: veronicacretu@gmail.com <veronicacretu@gmail.com> and/or
veronica@cretu.md <veronica@cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone:
373
067435000*
_______________________________________________
EURO-Discuss mailing list
EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
<http://www.euralo.org/>
_______________________________________________
APAC-Discuss mailing list
APAC-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org
--
Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> 
_______________________________________________
EURO-Discuss mailing list
EURO-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/698787e3e0.html
--]]

roberto_gaetano＠hotmail.com

tags

participants (1)