April 2014 - lac-discuss-es

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Hotel en Londres
by ocl＠gih.com April 14, 2014

April 14, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Hotel en Londres De: ocl(a)gih.com Estimado Carlos, viajes circunscripción está ocupado con NetMundial en el momento. Ellos tienen la lista de viajeros y tan pronto como haya terminado NetMundial, enviarán invitaciones. Usted ya puede solicitar una carta de invitación para solicitar un visado en: http://www.icann.org/en/contact/invite/london50 Saludos cordiales, Olivier El 12/04/2014 21:55, carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com escribió: > Humberto, flight tickets were delivered for ALS s representatives ? Or we are waiting for ? I have any notice yet. What information have you about this ? > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > ADIAR Vice Pte. > Enviado desde mi dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry® > > -----Original Message----- > From: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com > Sender: lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 19:35:34 > To: <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Reply-To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Hotel in London > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Hotel in London > From: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com > > Dear Friends: > > > For those who have been wondering inform you that the hotel where we will stay at the Hilton London Metropole is. > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b906285fd9.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] La materia del calendario de reuniones de la ICANN
by josefranciscoarce＠gmail.com April 14, 2014

April 14, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: La materia del calendario de reuniones de la ICANN De: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com Querido Carlton, Estoy de acuerdo con usted. De todos modos hay que aprovechar el tiempo si ya están establecida. Y creo que la participación tardía también es valida, aunque no tan eficaz, pero sirve como entrenamiento para los voluntarios que no son todavía involucrarse. Best, Jos - 04/12/2014 13:02 GMT-03: 00 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> : > I share Sylvia's concern and discomfort. > > She represented LACRALO. To my certain knowledge she's given reports > several times in our meetings, an interim report was published and comments > solicited. For well over 18 months Sylvia made it very clear she was a > channel for the region's concerns to the WG. We did not make use of her. > And absent feedback, she contributed her best judgment in a collective > decision of the WG. > > While I think the issue regarding impact on volunteer's time this new > schedule raised is worthy, I do not believe it is so significantly > impactful to raise at this point. That horse is already thru the gate. > > -Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > Arce, JosF. http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/28db78fc1a.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Hotel en Londres
by carlosaguirre62＠hotmail.com April 12, 2014

April 12, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Hotel en Londres De: carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com Humberto, billetes de avión fueron entregados a los representantes de ELA s? O estamos esperando? Tengo previo aviso todavía. ¿Qué información tienes sobre esto? Carlos Dionisio Aguirre ADIAR Vice Pte.. Enviado desde mi BlackBerry Dispositivo inalmbrico ----- Mensaje original ----- De: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com Remitente: lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Fecha: Sab, 12 de abril 2014 19:35:34 A: <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Reply-To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Asunto: [lac-discuss-es] Hotel en Londres [- Texto traducido [(es ->) -]] Asunto: Hotel en Londres De: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com Queridos Amigos: Para aquellos que han estado preguntando en su conocimiento que el hotel donde nos alojaremos en el Hilton London Metropole es. Saludos _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9057abf28f.html --]]

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-es] RV: Entrevista ATLAS II
by DIEGO ALFONSO ACOSTA BASTIDAS April 12, 2014

April 12, 2014

Estimado Alberto Soto Estimad@s colegas y amig@s LACRALO , Celebramos que este espacio de pronunciamiento fortalezca los esfuerzos por construir una comunidad de usuarios de la región más inclusiva, más participativa y con mayor soberanìa de conocimiento y determinación. *1. ¿Desde la perspectiva de su región cuál es la importancia de participar en espacios como ATLAS II? * Decisiva para retomar los valores fundacionales de la creación del Internet y restaurar la influencia decisiva de la sociedad civil por sobre la del poder en la sociedad del conocimiento, esfuerzo que debe tener presente siempre los derechos civiles de libertad, privacidad y democracia del conocimiento. * 2. ¿Cuál es la meta u objetivo que pretende alcanzar su región con la participación dentro del ATLAS II?* Sobre la base de nuestra diversidad y colorido social; aportar a la gestión técnica de la Gobernanza del Internet con una lectura màs generosa con nuestros rostros, comunidades, entornos y espacios ciudadanos de nuestra región; para que aquellos incorporen eficazmente a su gestión cotidiana la informaciòn y el conocimiento generada en la interconexiòn mundial del Internet. *3. ¿Cuáles espera que sean los resultados regionales o globales de ATLAS II?* - Menos enredos y formalidades tecno-burocráticas en el Icann, para desarrollar un mayor protagonismo de los actores que representan a los usuarios del internet de la región. - Mayor intercambio de experiencias con otras regiones - RALOS - - Incorporar herramientas y procesos tecnològicos desarrollados con estàndares abiertos, como opción vàlida para dar a conocer nuestro talento y superar esa deslucida conformidad: " necesitamos que nos den haciendo ". *4. ¿Cuáles considera que son los siguientes pasos que debe realizar la región después de ATLAS II?* - REUNIONES REGIONALES: Aprobar y poner en funcionamiento el apoyo y financiamiento para organizar y realizar reuniones regionales que fortalezcan la dinámica colaborativa de las ALS en sus espacios; como preparación de las reuniones mundiales màs trascendentes. - ESTANDARES ABIERTOS: incorporar herramientas de sistemas con estàndares abiertos que potencien la construcción de una inteligencia colectiva que permita tambièn la expresión de una soberanìa del conocimiento integrada a los planes isntitucionales del Icann. - PROYECTOS TECNOLOGICOS INCLUSIVOS: desarrollo de un fondo concursable para proyectos tecnològicos por Región; de esta forma el Icann tendría mayor visibilidad para su mandato. Siempre bienvenidos al nuestro rincón and ino megadiverso del centro del mundo. Diego Acosta Bastidas CULTURA LIBRE Y SOFTWARE LIBRE DEL ECUADOR El 12 de abril de 2014, 11:59, Adrian Carballo <ainfodata(a)gmail.com>escribió: > Estimados, Estimadas, > Estuve trabajando en proyectos de conectividad en el interior del país y > con muy poco acceso a internet. > > De todos modos me resulta de interés responder las consultas enviadas desde > la Fundación Incluirme, espero que lo puedan incluir en próximos > documentos. > > 1. ¿Desde la perspectiva de su región cuál es la importancia de participar > en espacios como ATLAS II? > > ATLAS II tendrá lugar en un momento histórico único de la Gobernanza de > Internet. > > Luego del anuncio del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos del inicio del proceso > de transferencia de las funciones de IANA a un esquema de control > multistakehoder y el inicio de este proceso formal en la reunión de ICANN > 49 en Singapur, ATLAS II se convierte en un espacio de intercambio de ideas > y de experiencias de gran relevancia para este proceso que culminará a > mediados de 2015. > > En especial, el intercambio de ideas y perspectivas generará un > enriquecimiento de gran valor para las ALS de nuestra región América Latina > y el Caribe. Los países de nuestra región enfrentan desafíos similares > frente al acceso a Internet, a la elaboración de políticas relacionadas con > la gobernanza de Internet y por sobre todas las cosas el desafío de una > participación en pie de igualdad con otras regiones del mundo más > desarrolladas. > > Es por esto que Fundación Incluirme está convencida que la participación en > ATLAS II es un espacio único de gran valor para fortalecer nuestra región > en este proceso de cambio profundo. > > > 2. ¿Cuál es la meta u objetivo que pretende alcanzar su región con la > participación dentro del ATLAS II? > > América Latina y el Caribe es una región de gran diversidad cultural, > geográfica y social, a su vez es una región con grandes asimetrías > económicas, tecnológicas y sociales. > > La meta de nuestra región en la participación en ATLAS II es lograr que el > conocimiento mutuo entre distintas ALS del mundo y de nuestra propia región > sirva de herramienta para el cambio y el logro de los objetivos de > inclusión social, mayor acceso, participación en pie de igualdad y mayor > capacitación para todos los ciudadanos y ciudadanas de América Latina y el > Caribe. > > Aprender de otras ALS, intercambiar experiencias, potenciar los proyectos > de cada una de las ALS de los distintos RALOS, y por sobre todas las cosas > transmitir la convicción que una participación relevante en los procesos de > creación de políticas puede cambiar los resultados esperados. > > > 3. ¿Cuáles espera que sean los resultados regionales o globales de ATLAS > II? > > - Intercambio de experiencias entre ALS de la región y con otras de otras > regiones > - Aprendizaje colectivo de herramientas de uso común > - Mayor fluidez en las comunicaciones futuras entre ALS de la región y > otras del mundo > - Mayor participación relevante de miembros de las comunidades de América > Latina y el Caribe en ICANN y otros espacios de debate de la Gobernanza de > Internet > > > 4. ¿Cuáles considera que son los siguientes pasos que debe realizar la > región después de ATLAS II? > > - Elaborar un plan de trabajo que cubra todo el proceso de transición de > las funciones de IANA a fin de evaluar cuál será la posición los usuarios > de Internet de América y el Caribe en este proceso. > > - Consolidar una visión regional de interés común para ser presentada en > todas las reuniones, reforzando lo que se espera de organizaciones de > responsabilidad global como ICANN. > > - Apoyar proyectos de capacitación que permitan a más ciudadanos y > ciudadanas de nuestros países una activa participación en estos procesos. > > - Fundación Incluirme ofrece sus actividades de capacitación a través de la > Escuela del Sur de Gobernanza de Internet para lograr este objetivo. > > Saludos cordiales, > Adrián Carballo > Presidente > Fundación Incluirme > > > > > El 8 de abril de 2014, 0:29, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org > >escribió: > > > Estimados, por favor, necesito vuestra colaboración para contestar lo > más > > rápidamente posible. > > > > Podrían colaborar con una rápida respuesta y lograr una respuesta > > consensuada? Caso contrario deberé contestar en forma personal, y > > realmente > > no me gustaría. Lo haré el miércoles 10, luego de las 24:00UTC > > > > Recuerden lo poco que falta para Atlas II y que los que están trabajando > > para nosotros (varios miembros e LACRALO), lo están haciendo > > representándonos. > > > > Es una responsabilidad de todos.. > > > > Saludos cordiales > > > > Alberto Soto > > > > De: Juan Manuel Rojas [mailto:jumaropi@yahoo.com] > > Enviado el: lunes, 07 de abril de 2014 09:00 p.m. > > Para: Alberto Soto > > Asunto: Entrevista ATLAS II > > > > > > > > Estimado Alberto, > > > > Como líder actual de LACRALO, y en vista de que se acerca ATLAS II, es > > necesario solicitar tu colaboración para responder las preguntas que > > encontrarás más abajo. Las necesitamos para construir el material del > > Newsletter de ATLAS II y llenar de contenidos el Sitio Web, por lo que > > agradezco tu pronta respuesta. > > > > > > > > Las preguntas son: > > > > > > > > 1. ¿Desde la perspectiva de su región cuál es la importancia de > participar > > en espacios como ATLAS II? > > > > 2. ¿Cuál es la meta u objetivo que pretende alcanzar su región con la > > participación dentro del ATLAS II? > > > > 3. ¿Cuáles espera que sean los resultados regionales o globales de ATLAS > > II? > > > > > > 4. ¿Cuáles considera que son los siguientes pasos que debe realizar la > > región después de ATLAS II? > > > > Cordialmente, > > > > > > > > JUAN MANUEL ROJAS > > Comunicador Social > > Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia > > > > Twitter: @JmanuRojas <http://www.twitter.com/jmanurojas> > > > > Unete a LACRALO: > > > > <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org >

1 0

RV: Entrevista ATLAS II
by Alberto Soto April 12, 2014

April 12, 2014

Estimados, por favor, necesito vuestra colaboración para contestar lo más rápidamente posible. Podrían colaborar con una rápida respuesta y lograr una respuesta consensuada? Caso contrario deberé contestar en forma personal, y realmente no me gustaría. Lo haré el miércoles 10, luego de las 24:00UTC Recuerden lo poco que falta para Atlas II y que los que están trabajando para nosotros (varios miembros e LACRALO), lo están haciendo representándonos. Es una responsabilidad de todos.. Saludos cordiales Alberto Soto De: Juan Manuel Rojas [mailto:jumaropi@yahoo.com] Enviado el: lunes, 07 de abril de 2014 09:00 p.m. Para: Alberto Soto Asunto: Entrevista ATLAS II Estimado Alberto, Como líder actual de LACRALO, y en vista de que se acerca ATLAS II, es necesario solicitar tu colaboración para responder las preguntas que encontrarás más abajo. Las necesitamos para construir el material del Newsletter de ATLAS II y llenar de contenidos el Sitio Web, por lo que agradezco tu pronta respuesta. Las preguntas son: 1. ¿Desde la perspectiva de su región cuál es la importancia de participar en espacios como ATLAS II? 2. ¿Cuál es la meta u objetivo que pretende alcanzar su región con la participación dentro del ATLAS II? 3. ¿Cuáles espera que sean los resultados regionales o globales de ATLAS II? 4. ¿Cuáles considera que son los siguientes pasos que debe realizar la región después de ATLAS II? Cordialmente, JUAN MANUEL ROJAS Comunicador Social Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia Twitter: @JmanuRojas <http://www.twitter.com/jmanurojas> Unete a LACRALO: <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

9 10

El asunto de la Lista reuni�n de ICANN
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com April 12, 2014

April 12, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: El asunto de la Lista reunión de ICANN De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Comparto la preocupación y el malestar de Sylvia. Ella representó LACRALO. Para mi conocimiento cierto que ha dado informes varias veces en nuestras reuniones, un informe provisional fue publicada y comentarios solicitado. Durante más de 18 meses Sylvia dejó muy claro que era una canal para las preocupaciones de la región a la WG. No hicimos uso de ella. Y retroalimentación ausente, ella contribuyó con su mejor juicio en un colectivo la decisión del Grupo de Trabajo. Aunque creo que el impacto problema con respecto a tiempo de los voluntarios de esta nueva cronograma planteado es digno, no creo que es tan significativa impactante para levantar en este punto. Ese caballo ya es a través de la puerta. -Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2ff53d73e8.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Felicidades
by hcarrascob＠gmail.com April 12, 2014

April 12, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Felicidades De: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com Muchas gracias Adrián ... Un abrazo Enviado desde mi iPhone > El 12-04-2014, a las 14:48, Adrian Carballo <ainfodata(a)gmail.com> escribiÃ³: > > Estimados,â > He tenido algunos inconvenientes con mi correo. > > Pero no quiero dejar pasar mas tempo sin Felicitar a Alberto y a Humberto > esperando desde ya tengan un a gestiÃ³n muy exitosa. > > Quedamos a disposiciÃ³n para lo que necesiten. > > Saludos cordiales, > AdriÃ¡n Carballo > FundaciÃ³n Incluirme > > > > > El 25 de marzo de 2014, 5:49, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> escribiÃ³: > >> Felicitaciones a Alberto y Humberto, les deseo mucho Ã©xito en su nueva >> tarea y esperamos cooperar con su mandato y con la comunidad para bien de >> todos. >> >> Agradecemos a Sergio y Juan Manuel por haber participado en este proceso. >> >> A JosÃ© y Sylvia nuestro agradecimiento por la labor cumplida y la >> dedicaciÃ³n demostrada durante el ejercicio de sus cargos. >> >> Saludos a todos >> >> >> 2014-03-25 4:19 GMT-03:00 <tracyhackshaw(a)gmail.com>: >> >>> >>> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] >>> >>> Asunto: Re: Felicidades >>> De: tracyhackshaw(a)gmail.com >>> >>> 1 >>> >>> >>> ------ >>> Rgds, >>> >>> >>> Tracy >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> El 25 de marzo 2014 15:01, "Carlton Samuels" < >>> carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> >>> escribiÃ³: >>> >>> >>>> My congratulations to the new LACRALO leadership and best wishes for a >>>> fruitful term of office. >>>> >>>> And a vote of thanks to the outgoing leadership for a job well done >> under >>>> very trying circumstances. >>>> >>>> -Carlton >>>> >>>> ============================== >>>> Carlton A Samuels >>>> Mobile: 876-818-1799 >>>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* >>>> ============================= >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> lac-discuss-en mailing list >>>> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en >>> >>> >>> [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/20ffd2b528.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Felicidades
by tracyhackshaw＠gmail.com April 12, 2014

April 12, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Felicidades De: tracyhackshaw(a)gmail.com 1 ------ Rgds, Tracy El 25 de marzo 2014 15:01, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribió: > My congratulations to the new LACRALO leadership and best wishes for a > fruitful term of office. > > And a vote of thanks to the outgoing leadership for a job well done under > very trying circumstances. > > -Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5237f30dd1.html --]]

5 4

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Felicidades
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org April 12, 2014

April 12, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Felicidades De: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Muchas gracias Adrian! Saludos cordiales Alberto soto Enviado desde mi smartphone BlackBerry 10. Mensaje original, De: Adrian Carballo Enviado: sábado, 12 de abril de 2014 10:48 Para: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; lac-discuss-es CC: Adrian Carballo Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-es] Felicidades Estimados, Él Teñido algunos inconvenientes estafa mi correo. Pero no quiero del DEJAR Pasar mas pecado tempo Felicitar a Alberto ya Humberto from Esperando ya Tengan sin Exitosa un muy Gestión. Quedamos un necesiten Que lo Disposición párr. Saludos cordiales, Adrián Carballo Fundación Incluirme El 25 de marzo de 2014, 05:49, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> escribio: > Felicitaciones a Alberto y Humberto, les deseo mucho Ã©xito en su nueva > tarea y esperamos cooperar con su mandato y con la comunidad para bien de > todos. > > Agradecemos a Sergio y Juan Manuel por haber participado en este proceso. > > A JosÃ© y Sylvia nuestro agradecimiento por la labor cumplida y la > dedicaciÃ³n demostrada durante el ejercicio de sus cargos. > > Saludos a todos > > > 2014-03-25 4:19 GMT-03:00 <tracyhackshaw(a)gmail.com>: > > > > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > > > Asunto: Re: Felicidades > > De: tracyhackshaw(a)gmail.com > > > > 1 > > > > > > ------ > > Rgds, > > > > > > Tracy > > > > > > > > > > El 25 de marzo 2014 15:01, "Carlton Samuels" < > > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > > escribiÃ³: > > > > > > > My congratulations to the new LACRALO leadership and best wishes for a > > > fruitful term of office. > > > > > > And a vote of thanks to the outgoing leadership for a job well done > under > > > very trying circumstances. > > > > > > -Carlton > > > > > > ============================== > > > Carlton A Samuels > > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > > > ============================= > > > _______________________________________________ > > > lac-discuss-en mailing list > > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c7ed536847.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Felicidades
by ainfodata＠gmail.com April 12, 2014

April 12, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Felicidades De: ainfodata(a)gmail.com Estimados, Él Teñido algunos inconvenientes estafa mi correo. Pero no quiero del DEJAR Pasar mas pecado tempo Felicitar a Alberto ya Humberto from Esperando ya Tengan sin Exitosa un muy Gestión. Quedamos un necesiten Que lo Disposición párr. Saludos cordiales, Adrián Carballo Fundación Incluirme El 25 de marzo de 2014, 05:49, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> escribio: > Felicitaciones a Alberto y Humberto, les deseo mucho Ã©xito en su nueva > tarea y esperamos cooperar con su mandato y con la comunidad para bien de > todos. > > Agradecemos a Sergio y Juan Manuel por haber participado en este proceso. > > A JosÃ© y Sylvia nuestro agradecimiento por la labor cumplida y la > dedicaciÃ³n demostrada durante el ejercicio de sus cargos. > > Saludos a todos > > > 2014-03-25 4:19 GMT-03:00 <tracyhackshaw(a)gmail.com>: > > > > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > > > Asunto: Re: Felicidades > > De: tracyhackshaw(a)gmail.com > > > > 1 > > > > > > ------ > > Rgds, > > > > > > Tracy > > > > > > > > > > El 25 de marzo 2014 15:01, "Carlton Samuels" < > > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > > escribiÃ³: > > > > > > > My congratulations to the new LACRALO leadership and best wishes for a > > > fruitful term of office. > > > > > > And a vote of thanks to the outgoing leadership for a job well done > under > > > very trying circumstances. > > > > > > -Carlton > > > > > > ============================== > > > Carlton A Samuels > > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > > > ============================= > > > _______________________________________________ > > > lac-discuss-en mailing list > > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d759050ddf.html --]]

1 0

Programa de Fortalecimiento de Capacidades de la invitaci�n de reuniones / Primera PRE-ATLAS II sobre las comunicaciones Tema
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org April 11, 2014

April 11, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Programa de Fortalecimiento de Capacidades de la invitación de reuniones / Primera PRE-ATLAS II sobre las comunicaciones Tema De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Espaol despus de la versin Ingls ********************* Queridos todos, Esta es una invitación para asistir a la primera creación de capacidad PRE-ATLAS II Programa sobre el tema de las comunicaciones. Los instructores serán Dev Anand Teelucksign y Nathalie Peregrine. Este seminario está programado para el jueves 17 abril 2014, desde 13:00-14:30 UTC. Para otras veces: http://tinyurl.com/qdqtkjn El proyecto de orden del día y call detalles se pueden encontrar en: https://community.icann.org/x/fjjRAg Se proporcionará francés ad interpretación española. Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/preatlas2cb/ ID de la conferencia: ES: 1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 http://adigo.com/icann/ Si necesita una llamada de salida, por favor póngase en contacto con At-Large personal staff(a)atlarge.icann.org con su número preferido. Gracias. Saludos, ******************* Estimados de tareas, De Esta es Una invitacin párrafo Asistir al imprimación Webinar del Programa de Desarrollo de Capacidades PRE-ATLAS II. El tema de imprimación sueros Comunicaciones. Los Instructores sern Dev Anand Teelucksign y Nathalie Peregrine. Este Webinar estprogramado párr El Jueves 17 de abril de 2014, una las 13:00-14:30 UTC. Para ver las horas en sus Información respectivos paises Vea: http://tinyurl.com/qdqtkjn El Orden del día Detalles de La Llamada SE Puede ENCONTRAR en: https://community.icann.org/x/fjjRAg Se proporcionarinterpretacion en francsy espaol. Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/preatlas2cb/ Identificación de la Conferencia: ES: 1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 http://adigo.com/icann/ Llamada Si NECESITA Una un su telefono, please PNGasa en contacto Con El de personal de At-Large en staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> COn Preferido do nmero. Gracias. Saludos cordiales, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine y Terri Agnew El personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Un mundo, una Internet [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/111d6c6771.html --]]

2 1

Re: ATLAS II Eventos-Breakout Informaci�n y solicitudes de sesi�n
by nursesacrosstheborders＠yahoo.com April 11, 2014

April 11, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: ATLAS II Eventos-Breakout Información y solicitudes de sesión De: nursesacrosstheborders(a)yahoo.com Estoy interesado en contribuir con el punto 3, y también me encantaría ser voluntario como moderador de la sesión y el reportaje. Por favor reconozca. Heidi en la última teleconferencia AFRALO existía una relación que iba a ser enviado o publicado en los miembros a aplicar para participar en una conferencia en las regiones que Tijani comprometió una ayuda de. Por favor, no me he metido en el vínculo todavía. Gracias ----- Mensaje original ----- De: "Baudouin Schombe" <baudouin.schombe(a)gmail.com> Enviado el: 04/10/2014 14:02 Para: "ICANN At-Large" <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> CC: "lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; "Euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; "Atlas-ii-participants(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <atlas-ii-participants(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; "Afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; "Alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; "Apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; "Atlas-ii-events(a)atlarge.icann.org" <atlas-ii-events(a)atlarge.icann.org> ; "Na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: Re: [Atlas-ii-participantes] [AFRI-Opinar] ATLAS II Eventos-Breakout Información y solicitudes de sesión El futuro de multistakeholderism Baudouin 07/04/2014 22:35 GMT +02:00 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> : Queridos todos, A continuación encontrará una nota con las solicitudes enviadas en nombre de Evan Leibovitch y Wolf Ludwig, Eventos ATLAS II Coordinadores del Programa. ** Queridos todos, Como se señaló anteriormente, At-Large participantes en la reunión de Singapur se reunieron en cinco ocasiones para discutir At-Large II Cumbre (ATLAS II) preguntas preparatorias, tales como las cuestiones de logística y las prioridades temáticas y preguntas para la próxima cumbre de At-Large en Londres. Entre los temas abordados, el grupo examinó los insumos del Grupo de Trabajo II Evento ATLAS en detalle mediante la comparación con los resultados del estudio ATLAS II. Después de una discusión muy dinámica sobre el terreno, se modificaron los temas de las prioridades temáticas. Esta selección tiene en cuenta el tema general ATLAS II, los recientes anuncios clave dentro del ecosistema de Internet, y los resultados de encuestas anteriores. A continuación encontrará la lista modificada de 5 ejes temáticos, que serán discutidos en una serie de sesiones de trabajo durante la cumbre. Como próximos pasos en nuestro proceso nos pusimos de acuerdo para enviar esta carta de solicitud al GT de eventos y otros miembros interesados \u200b\u200bque estuvieron presentes en Singapur. Expertos en la materia se dirigirá y coordinará contenido de la sesión y de salida. En las discusiones en Singapur, se propusieron varios miembros de At-Large de la comunidad: . 1 El futuro de multistakeholderism - Adam Peake . 2 La globalización de ICANN - Rinaliah Abdul Rahim / Roberto Gaetano . 3 Internet Global: La Perspectiva del usuario - Jean-Jacques Subrenat . 4 ICANN Transparencia y Rendición de Cuentas - Avri Doria / Hong Xue 5 At-Large de compromiso comunitario en ICANN -. Olivier Crépin-Leblond / Mike O'Connor Cualquier miembro de la comunidad que esté interesado en contribuir a uno de los temas estallan por encima y por ser miembro del grupo de organización de sesiones respectivo es bienvenida. Por favor, háganos saber su interés y el grupo tópico favorecido hasta Domingo, 13 de abril 2014. O por favor deja tu interés en el área de trabajo de la Coordinación ATLAS II Grupo Temático de Domingo, 13 de abril 2014 a las https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ATLAS+II+Thematic+Group+Coordin…. También tenemos que identificar a los miembros de la comunidad con experiencia para la sesión de moderación y presentación de informes. Ambas son funciones adicionales cruciales para asegurar la calidad de la conducta sesión así como los resultados.Por favor, háganos saber su interés por una de estas funciones o fijemos su nombre en el espacio de trabajo de Coordinación ATLAS II Grupo Temático hasta Lunes, 21 de abril 2014. Su colaboración en este importante proceso de programación ATLAS II es muy apreciada. Estamos a sólo 74 días desde el inicio de ATLAS II! Un Doodle para una próxima convocatoria del II Evento ATLAS WG se enviará en breve. Saludos cordiales, Evan Leibovitch y Wolf Ludwig, ATLAS II Eventos Coordinadores de Programas ** Saludos, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine y Terri Agnew El personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,%20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> _______________________________________________ AFRI-Comenta lista de correo AFRI-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss Página de inicio de la región: http://www.afralo.org Directrices de publicaciones para asegurar traducciones automáticas de los email enviados a esta lista son más precisos: http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html # anexo1 - SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN REPRESENTANTE OFFICIEL TICAFRICA ET CYBERVILLAGE @ FRICA / RDC COORDINACIÓN NACIONAL CAFEC COORDINACIÓN NACIONAL REPRONTIC Teléfono Móvil: +243998983491 / +243813684512 email: b.schombe @ gmail.com skype: b.schombe blog: http://akimambo.unblog.fr _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2d01a0da96.html --]]

1 0

Captación nuevas ALS
by Alberto Soto April 11, 2014

April 11, 2014

Estimados, adjunto una borrador de presentación con la idea de que se modifique, complete, y sirva para ser utilizada en (de aprobarse el proyecto) Haití y República Dominicana. El concepto vertido es el siguiente: muy básico, pero subiendo en los contenidos sin profundizar técnicamente en ellos, que lleve de la computadora que utiliza un usuario final e Internet, a que entienda las complejidad de la gobernanza. Apenas termine con el archivo en español, lo envío. Insisto, esta es una primera aproximación, sin estética, sin efectos especiales, sin apariciones de párrafos en secuencia, etc. Desde allí, sigue el resto el temario, es decir, todo ICANN-LACRALO-ATLARGE. Esta primera parte puede ser ampliada en cuanto se quiera. Por ejemplo, toda una explicación en direcciones IP y una completa explicación sobre dominios, pero podría hacerla muy larga y muy compleja técnicamente. Pero esto es lo básico, creo que esto es más o menos adecuado para las charlas de captación de nuevas ALS. Como ya se había comentado, el título es: Titulo: El rol de los usuarios en la Gobernanza de Internet El Temario a desarrollar: -Sistemas de Información -Gobernanza de Internet -ICANN: Misión, visión, Ecosistema de Internet -Organizaciones At-Large: Su participación en las distintas regiones geográficas de ICANN. Región Latinoamérica y Caribe (LACRALO) -Como involucrase como organización At-Large Lo que estoy enviando, es solo el primer ítem: Sistemas e Información. Hay que desarrollar el resto del Temario, para lo cual, sugiero conformar un grupo de trabajo para tal fin. Espero vuestros comentarios y como siempre, amplísima colaboración. Saludos cordiales Alberto Soto

4 10

Re: Eventos ATLAS II - Breakout Informaci�n y solicitudes de sesi�n
by otieno.barrack＠gmail.com April 10, 2014

April 10, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Eventos ATLAS II - Breakout Información y solicitudes de sesión De: otieno.barrack(a)gmail.com También me gustaría participar en el futuro de múltiples stakeholderism sesión. Saludos cordiales El Jueves, 10 de abril 2014 a las 13:11, Baudouin Schombe < baudouin.schombe @ gmail.com> escribió: > The future of multistakeholderism > > > Baudouin > > > 2014-04-07 22:35 GMT+02:00 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org>: > > > Dear All, > > > > Please find below a note with requests sent on behalf of Evan Leibovitch > > and Wolf Ludwig, ATLAS II Events Program Coordinators. > > > > ** > > > > Dear All, > > > > As noted earlier, At-Large participants at the Singapore meeting met five > > times to discuss At-Large Summit II (ATLAS II) preparatory questions such > > as logistical issues and thematic priorities and questions for the > > forthcoming At-Large summit in London. > > > > Among the items discussed, the group reviewed the inputs of the ATLAS II > > Event Working Group in detail by comparing it with the ATLAS II Survey > > results. > > > > After a very dynamic on-spot discussion, the topics of the thematic > > priorities were amended. This selection takes into account the > overarching > > ATLAS II theme, recent key announcements within the Internet eco-system, > > and earlier survey results. > > > > Please find below the modified list of 5 thematic topics, which will be > > discussed within a series of breakout sessions during the summit. As next > > steps in our proceeding we agreed to send this Solicitation Letter to the > > Event WG and other interested members who were present in Singapore. > > > > Subject Matter Experts will lead and coordinate session content and > > output. In discussions in Singapore, several At-Large community members > > were proposed: > > > > 1. The future of multistakeholderism - Adam Peake > > 2. The globalization of ICANN - Rinaliah Abdul Rahim / Roberto Gaetano > > 3. Global Internet: The User Perspective - Jean-Jacques Subrenat > > 4. ICANN Transparency and Accountability - Avri Doria / Hong Xue > > 5. At-Large Community Engagement in ICANN - Olivier Crépin-Leblond / Mike > > O'Connor > > > > Any community member who is interested to contribute to one of the break > > out subjects above and being a member of the respective session > > organization group is welcome. Please let us know your interest and > > favoured topical group until Sunday, 13 April 2014. Or please post your > > interest on the ATLAS II Thematic Group Coordination Workspace by Sunday, > > 13 April 2014 at > > > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ATLAS+II+Thematic+Group+Coordin… > > . > > > > We also need to identify experienced community members for session > > moderation and reporting. Both are crucial additional functions to ensure > > quality of session conduct as well as outcomes. Please either let us know > > your interest for one of these functions or post your name on the ATLAS > II > > Thematic Group Coordination Workspace until Monday, 21 April 2014. > > > > Your collaboration in this important ATLAS II programming process is > much > > appreciated. We are only 74 days from the start of ATLAS II! > > > > A Doodle for a next call of the ATLAS II Event WG will be sent shortly. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Evan Leibovitch and Wolf Ludwig, > > ATLAS II Events Program Coordinators > > > > ** > > > > Regards, > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% > > > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > AFRI-Discuss mailing list > > AFRI-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org > > > > Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to this > > list are more accurate: > > > http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#… > > > > > > -- > *SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN* > *REPRESENTANT OFFICIEL TICAFRICA ET CYBERVILLAGE@FRICA/RDC* > > *COORDINATION NATIONALE CAFECCOORDINATION NATIONALE REPRONTIC* > > Téléphone mobile:+243998983491/+243813684512 > email : b.schombe(a)gmail.com > skype : b.schombe > blog : http://akimambo.unblog.fr > _______________________________________________ > AFRI-Discuss mailing list > AFRI-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org > > Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to this > list are more accurate: > http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#… > Barack O. Otieno +254721325277 +254-20-2498789 Skype: barrack.otieno http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c58023cb92.html --]]

1 0

Re: Eventos ATLAS II - Breakout Informaci�n y solicitudes de sesi�n
by baudouin.schombe＠gmail.com April 10, 2014

April 10, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Eventos ATLAS II - Breakout Información y solicitudes de sesión De: baudouin.schombe(a)gmail.com El futuro de multistakeholderism Baudouin 07/04/2014 22:35 GMT +02:00 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> : > Dear All, > > Please find below a note with requests sent on behalf of Evan Leibovitch > and Wolf Ludwig, ATLAS II Events Program Coordinators. > > ** > > Dear All, > > As noted earlier, At-Large participants at the Singapore meeting met five > times to discuss At-Large Summit II (ATLAS II) preparatory questions such > as logistical issues and thematic priorities and questions for the > forthcoming At-Large summit in London. > > Among the items discussed, the group reviewed the inputs of the ATLAS II > Event Working Group in detail by comparing it with the ATLAS II Survey > results. > > After a very dynamic on-spot discussion, the topics of the thematic > priorities were amended. This selection takes into account the overarching > ATLAS II theme, recent key announcements within the Internet eco-system, > and earlier survey results. > > Please find below the modified list of 5 thematic topics, which will be > discussed within a series of breakout sessions during the summit. As next > steps in our proceeding we agreed to send this Solicitation Letter to the > Event WG and other interested members who were present in Singapore. > > Subject Matter Experts will lead and coordinate session content and > output. In discussions in Singapore, several At-Large community members > were proposed: > > 1. The future of multistakeholderism - Adam Peake > 2. The globalization of ICANN - Rinaliah Abdul Rahim / Roberto Gaetano > 3. Global Internet: The User Perspective - Jean-Jacques Subrenat > 4. ICANN Transparency and Accountability - Avri Doria / Hong Xue > 5. At-Large Community Engagement in ICANN - Olivier CrÃ©pin-Leblond / Mike > O'Connor > > Any community member who is interested to contribute to one of the break > out subjects above and being a member of the respective session > organization group is welcome. Please let us know your interest and > favoured topical group until Sunday, 13 April 2014. Or please post your > interest on the ATLAS II Thematic Group Coordination Workspace by Sunday, > 13 April 2014 at > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ATLAS+II+Thematic+Group+Coordin… > . > > We also need to identify experienced community members for session > moderation and reporting. Both are crucial additional functions to ensure > quality of session conduct as well as outcomes. Please either let us know > your interest for one of these functions or post your name on the ATLAS II > Thematic Group Coordination Workspace until Monday, 21 April 2014. > > Your collaboration in this important ATLAS II programming process is much > appreciated. We are only 74 days from the start of ATLAS II! > > A Doodle for a next call of the ATLAS II Event WG will be sent shortly. > > Kind regards, > > Evan Leibovitch and Wolf Ludwig, > ATLAS II Events Program Coordinators > > ** > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > AFRI-Discuss mailing list > AFRI-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org > > Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to this > list are more accurate: > http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#… > * SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN * * REPRESENTANTE OFFICIEL TICAFRICA ET CYBERVILLAGE @ FRICA / RDC * * COORDINACIÓN NACIONAL CAFECCOORDINATION NATIONALE REPRONTIC * Teléfono Móvil: +243998983491 / +243813684512 email: b.schombe @ gmail.com skype: b.schombe blog: http://akimambo.unblog.fr _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8914c7ef35.html --]]

1 0

Re: Eventos ATLAS II - Breakout Informaci�n y solicitudes de sesi�n
by news.tkeb＠gmail.com April 10, 2014

April 10, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Eventos ATLAS II - Breakout Información y solicitudes de sesión De: news.tkeb(a)gmail.com Hola a todos, Este grupo me interesa: - GRUPO Global Internet: la perspectiva del usuario ¡Gracias! 07/04/2014 21:35 GMT +01:00 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> : > Dear All, > > Please find below a note with requests sent on behalf of Evan Leibovitch > and Wolf Ludwig, ATLAS II Events Program Coordinators. > > ** > > Dear All, > > As noted earlier, At-Large participants at the Singapore meeting met five > times to discuss At-Large Summit II (ATLAS II) preparatory questions such > as logistical issues and thematic priorities and questions for the > forthcoming At-Large summit in London. > > Among the items discussed, the group reviewed the inputs of the ATLAS II > Event Working Group in detail by comparing it with the ATLAS II Survey > results. > > After a very dynamic on-spot discussion, the topics of the thematic > priorities were amended. This selection takes into account the overarching > ATLAS II theme, recent key announcements within the Internet eco-system, > and earlier survey results. > > Please find below the modified list of 5 thematic topics, which will be > discussed within a series of breakout sessions during the summit. As next > steps in our proceeding we agreed to send this Solicitation Letter to the > Event WG and other interested members who were present in Singapore. > > Subject Matter Experts will lead and coordinate session content and > output. In discussions in Singapore, several At-Large community members > were proposed: > > 1. The future of multistakeholderism - Adam Peake > 2. The globalization of ICANN - Rinaliah Abdul Rahim / Roberto Gaetano > 3. Global Internet: The User Perspective - Jean-Jacques Subrenat > 4. ICANN Transparency and Accountability - Avri Doria / Hong Xue > 5. At-Large Community Engagement in ICANN - Olivier Crépin-Leblond / Mike > O'Connor > > Any community member who is interested to contribute to one of the break > out subjects above and being a member of the respective session > organization group is welcome. Please let us know your interest and > favoured topical group until Sunday, 13 April 2014. Or please post your > interest on the ATLAS II Thematic Group Coordination Workspace by Sunday, > 13 April 2014 at > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ATLAS+II+Thematic+Group+Coordin… > . > > We also need to identify experienced community members for session > moderation and reporting. Both are crucial additional functions to ensure > quality of session conduct as well as outcomes. Please either let us know > your interest for one of these functions or post your name on the ATLAS II > Thematic Group Coordination Workspace until Monday, 21 April 2014. > > Your collaboration in this important ATLAS II programming process is much > appreciated. We are only 74 days from the start of ATLAS II! > > A Doodle for a next call of the ATLAS II Event WG will be sent shortly. > > Kind regards, > > Evan Leibovitch and Wolf Ludwig, > ATLAS II Events Program Coordinators > > ** > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > AFRI-Discuss mailing list > AFRI-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org > > Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to this > list are more accurate: > http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#… > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/751f32770a.html --]]

1 0

Comentarios Públicos - Estrategia de las Reuniones de ICANN
by José Francisco Arce April 9, 2014

April 9, 2014

Estimados Miembros Como sabrán está abierto el periodo de comentarios públicos sobre el grupo de trabajo estratégico de las reuniones de la ICANN https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/meetings-strategy-25feb14-en.h… A su vez el documento a ser considerado esta en varios idiomas entre ellos Español: https://www.icann.org/es/groups/board/participation/mswg/recommendations-25… Un miembro de la región, Sylvia Leite, es actualmente miembro del grupo, quien ha trabajado muy duramente en este borrador, junto a los demás miembros. Personalmente he elaborado un borrador de declaración para que pueda salir como de la región, en caso de no haber consenso, estaré subiéndolo a los comentarios públicos personalmente. El último día es el 25 de Abril. Mi borrador: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=47264806 Saludos -- Arce, José F. http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz

6 12

Comentario Público - Transición de las funciones de la IANA
by José Francisco Arce April 9, 2014

April 9, 2014

Estimados, Esta abierto para comentarios el borrador, basado en la retroalimentación inicial de la Comunidad, respecto de los principios, mecanismos y el proceso para desarrollar una propuesta de Transición de la administración las funciones de IANA http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/iana/transition/draft-proposal-08a… Hay tiempo hasta el 8 de Mayo de 2014, 23:59 UTC Durante la reunión de Singapur (hace 15 días atrás) realice una declaración inicial sobre este tema: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=47261889 Alcance de la tarea: http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/iana/iana-transition-scoping-08apr… Así mismo pronto se estarán recibiendo aplicaciones para formar un grupo de trabajo especifico para esta temática. Aquellos que estén interesados estaré trabajando este tema. Saludos -- Arce, José F. http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz

5 8

Fwd: [At-Large] European Union Court of Justice ruling on data retention.
by Humberto Carrasco April 9, 2014

April 9, 2014

Hola, A los interesados en el tema de protección de datos. Saludos Enviado desde mi iPhone Inicio del mensaje reenviado: > De: "Subrenat, Jean-Jacques" <jjs(a)dyalog.net> > Fecha: 9 de abril de 2014 9:32:48 GMT+1 > Para: At-Large Worldwide <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Asunto: [At-Large] European Union Court of Justice ruling on data retention. > Responder a: At-Large Worldwide <at-large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > On 9 april, the European Union Court of Justice (EUCJ) ruled that > > "Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC is invalid". > > This ruling follows requests by associations representing civil society in Ireland (Digital Rights Ireland, Ltd.) and Austria (Verfassungsgerichtshof). It > - requires the European Union to provide enhanced protection for Internet and telecommunications users; > - while recognizing the legitimate concerns posed by criminal and terrorist activities, imposes improved protection of personal data and privacy. > > For those not familiar with the legal system of the European Union, when the new Directive will have been adopted as a result of this ruling, it will be transposed into the national legislation of each Member State. > > To my knowledge, this ruling represents one of the most (if not the most) advanced legislation in the world regarding the protection of Internet user rights and privacy. > > The full ruling can be read > - in English, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/celex.jsf?celex=62012CJ0293&lang1=fr&type=TXT&… > - in French, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/celex.jsf?celex=62012CJ0293&lang1=fr&type=TXT&… > - in German, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/celex.jsf?celex=62012CJ0293&lang1=fr&type=TXT&… > > > Jean-Jacques. > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

2 1

ICANN initial proposal for NTIA stewardship transition
by León Felipe Sánchez Ambía April 9, 2014

April 9, 2014

Dear all, This has just been published. http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/iana/transition/draft-proposal-08a… All the best, León

1 0

Asunto
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org April 7, 2014

April 7, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Eventos ATLAS II - Breakout información y las peticiones de la sesión: Asunto De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Queridos todos, A continuación encontrará una nota con las solicitudes enviadas en nombre de Evan Leibovitch y Wolf Ludwig, Eventos ATLAS II Coordinadores del Programa. ** Queridos todos, Como se señaló anteriormente, At-Large participantes en la reunión de Singapur se reunieron en cinco ocasiones para discutir At-Large II Cumbre (ATLAS II) preguntas preparatorias, tales como las cuestiones de logística y las prioridades temáticas y preguntas para la próxima cumbre de At-Large en Londres. Entre los temas abordados, el grupo examinó los insumos del Grupo de Trabajo II Evento ATLAS en detalle mediante la comparación con los resultados del estudio ATLAS II. Después de una discusión muy dinámica sobre el terreno, se modificaron los temas de las prioridades temáticas. Esta selección tiene en cuenta el tema general ATLAS II, los recientes anuncios clave dentro del ecosistema de Internet, y los resultados de encuestas anteriores. A continuación encontrará la lista modificada de 5 ejes temáticos, que serán discutidos en una serie de sesiones de trabajo durante la cumbre. Como próximos pasos en nuestro proceso nos pusimos de acuerdo para enviar esta carta de solicitud al GT de eventos y otros miembros interesados \u200b\u200bque estuvieron presentes en Singapur. Expertos en la materia se dirigirá y coordinará contenido de la sesión y de salida. En las discusiones en Singapur, se propusieron varios miembros de At-Large de la comunidad: 1. El futuro de multistakeholderism - Adam Peake 2. La globalización de ICANN - Rinaliah Abdul Rahim / Roberto Gaetano 3. Internet Global: La Perspectiva del usuario - Jean-Jacques Subrenat 4. ICANN Transparencia y Rendición de Cuentas - Avri Doria / Hong Xue 5. At-Large de compromiso comunitario en ICANN - Olivier Crepin-Leblond / Mike O'Connor Cualquier miembro de la comunidad que esté interesado en contribuir a uno de los temas estallan por encima y por ser miembro del grupo de organización de sesiones respectivo es bienvenida. Por favor, háganos saber su interés y el grupo tópico favorito hasta Domingo, 13 de abril 2014. O por favor enviar su interés en el área de trabajo de la Coordinación ATLAS II Grupo Temático de Domingo, 13 de abril 2014 a las https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ATLAS+II+Thematic+Group+Coordin…. También tenemos que identificar a los miembros de la comunidad con experiencia para la sesión de moderación y presentación de informes. Ambas son funciones adicionales cruciales para asegurar la calidad de la conducta sesión así como los resultados. Por favor, háganos saber su interés por una de estas funciones o fijemos su nombre en el espacio de trabajo de Coordinación ATLAS II Grupo Temático hasta Lunes, 21 de abril 2014. Su colaboración en este importante proceso de programación ATLAS II es muy apreciada. Estamos a sólo 74 días desde el inicio de ATLAS II! Un Doodle para una próxima convocatoria del II Evento ATLAS WG se enviará en breve. Saludos cordiales, Evan Leibovitch y Wolf Ludwig, ATLAS II Eventos Coordinadores de Programas ** Saludos, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine y Terri Agnew El personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,%20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/44d939eb05.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] ???????? Q = iso-8859-1 Invitaciones_a_reuniones_ / _Pr = F3X == iso-8859-1 q = F3n = ima_llamada_del_Grupo_de_Nivelaci
by presidencia＠internauta.org.ar April 7, 2014

April 7, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re:???????? Q = iso-8859-1 Invitaciones_a_reuniones_ / _Pr = F3X == iso-8859-1 q = F3n = ima_llamada_del_Grupo_de_Nivelaci De: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar Estimos miebros del personal, del necesito queme llamen al +54 223 4715948 Muchas Gracias! * Sergio Salinas Porto Presidente Internauta Argentina Asociacin Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar> / CTA <http://ctamdq.org.ar> FLUI-Federacin Latinoamericana de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.fuilatin.org> facebook: salinasporto <http://www.facebook.com/salinasporto> Y sergiosalinasII <http://www.facebook.com/sergiosalinasII> Twitter: sergiosalinas <http://twitter.com/sergiosalinas> Google+: Sergio Salinas Porto < https://plus.google.com/104639152443153592254/posts> Hangout: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar <Hangout%3Apresidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> / Pixelhub: salinasporto <http://pixelhub.me/salinasporto> Youtube: salinasporto <http://www.youtube.com/salinasporto> Skype: internautaargentina Mobi: +54 9 223 5 215 819 * * "Desobedientes servi Ojalpodamos, Cada Vez Que recibimos rdenes Que humillan Nuestra Conciencia o Violan our SENTIDO comn "Eduardo Galeano * El 7 de abril de 2014, 12:17, <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> escribi: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto:???????? = Q iso-8859-1 Invitaciones_a_reuniones_ / _Pr = F3X == > iso-8859-1 q = F3n = ima_llamada_del_Grupo_de_Nivelaci > De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > Si NECESITA Una Llamada de salidapor favorecen PNGasa en contacto conel > de personal de At-Large en: > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > ************ > > > Estimados Todos, > > > En relacin Con La Encuesta Doodle, la prxima Llamada del Grupo de > Nivelacin estprevista párrafo el Lunes 7 Abril 2014 a las 2200 UTC > > > Horarios Otros Pará: > http://tinyurl.com/pgrkxco > > > El Proyecto de Programa (Actualizar POR) estdisponible en: > https://community.icann.org/x/-TDRAg > > > Adobe Connect: > http://icann.adobeconnect.com/lacralo > > > Si NECESITA Una Llamada de salidapor favorecen PNGasa en contacto conel > de personal de At-Large en: > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > Gracias. > Saludos, > ******************* > > > Queridos todos, > > > En relación con la encuesta de Doodle, la siguiente llamada del Grupo de > nivelación está programada > el lunes 07 de abril 2014 a las 2200 UTC > > > Para otras veces: > http://tinyurl.com/pgrkxco > > > El proyecto de orden del día (por actualizar) está disponible en: > https://community.icann.org/x/-TDRAg > > > Adobe Connect Sala: > > > http://icann.adobeconnect.com/lacralo > > > > > Si necesita una llamada de salida, por favor póngase en contacto con el > personal de At-Large en: > > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > Gracias. > > > Saludos, > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine y Terri Agnew > El personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC > > > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > Un mundo, una Internet > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4af83bac27.html --]]

1 0

???????? = Q iso-8859-1 Invitaciones_a_reuniones_ / _Pr = F3X == iso-8859-1 q = F3n = ima_llamada_del_Grupo_de_Nivelaci
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org April 7, 2014

April 7, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto:???????? = Q iso-8859-1 Invitaciones_a_reuniones_ / _Pr = F3X == iso-8859-1 q = F3n = ima_llamada_del_Grupo_de_Nivelaci De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Si NECESITA Una Llamada de salidapor favorecen PNGasa en contacto conel de personal de At-Large en: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org ************ Estimados Todos, En relacin Con La Encuesta Doodle, la prxima Llamada del Grupo de Nivelacin estprevista párrafo el Lunes 7 Abril 2014 a las 2200 UTC Horarios Otros Pará: http://tinyurl.com/pgrkxco El Proyecto de Programa (Actualizar POR) estdisponible en: https://community.icann.org/x/-TDRAg Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/lacralo Si NECESITA Una Llamada de salidapor favorecen PNGasa en contacto conel de personal de At-Large en: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Gracias. Saludos, ******************* Queridos todos, En relación con la encuesta de Doodle, la siguiente llamada del Grupo de nivelación está programada el lunes 07 de abril 2014 a las 2200 UTC Para otras veces: http://tinyurl.com/pgrkxco El proyecto de orden del día (por actualizar) está disponible en: https://community.icann.org/x/-TDRAg Adobe Connect Sala: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/lacralo Si necesita una llamada de salida, por favor póngase en contacto con el personal de At-Large en: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Gracias. Saludos, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine y Terri Agnew El personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Un mundo, una Internet _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e07a7e5255.html --]]

2 1

RV: [ALAC-Announce] ICANN News Alert -- ICANN Seeks Public Comment on 2013 RAA Data Retention Specification Data Elements and Legitimate Purposes for Collection and Retention
by Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch April 6, 2014

April 6, 2014

Colegas, el llamado anexo puede tener implicaciones legales apreciables en nuestra región. Convoquemos a los expertos en protección de datos personales y otros temas relacionados con la retención de datos (cómputo forense, leyes de telecomunicaciones, Marco Civil en el caso particular de Brasil) para conformar una opinión sólida, si hay el interés suficiente. Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ Desde: alac-announce-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [alac-announce-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de ICANN At-Large Staff [staff(a)atlarge.icann.org] Enviado el: viernes, 21 de marzo de 2014 20:00 Hasta: ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Asunto: [ALAC-Announce] ICANN News Alert -- ICANN Seeks Public Comment on 2013 RAA Data Retention Specification Data Elements and Legitimate Purposes for Collection and Retention [http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-21mar14-en.htm ________________________________ ICANN Seeks Public Comment on 2013 RAA Data Retention Specification Data Elements and Legitimate Purposes for Collection and Retention 21 March 2014 ICANN has been in discussions with a number of Registrars regarding data retention waiver requests ("Waiver Requests") submitted under the 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement (the "2013 RAA"). Some Registrars are seeking an exemption from certain collection and/or retention requirements under the Data Retention Specification (the "Specification") of the 2013 RAA. Section 2 of the Data Retention Specification sets forth requirements regarding the written materials a Registrar must submit in support of its good faith determination that the collection and/or retention of any data element specified in the Specification violates applicable law, and provides that following notice to ICANN of the Waiver Request, ICANN and the applicable Registrar shall discuss the matter in good faith in an effort to reach a mutually acceptable resolution of the matter. An update on the 2013 RAA and the data retention waiver process can be found here: http://blog.icann.org/2014/02/update-on-2013-raa-and-data-retention-waiver-… ICANN understands that personal data should be treated in accordance with applicable data protection laws, which generally permit gathering and retention of personal data for legitimate purpose(s). ICANN also understands that the law may vary from country to country as to (i) what is considered a legitimate purpose, (ii) whether the personal data is adequate, relevant and not excessive in relation to the legitimate purpose for which they are collected and (iii) for how long certain data elements may be retained. In other words, what is considered a legitimate purpose for collection of certain data in one country may not be considered a legitimate purpose in another country. During ICANN's discussions in an effort to reach a mutually acceptable resolution of the matter, some Registrars have requested that ICANN (a) clarify and better define certain data elements described in the Data Retention Specification that the Registrars maintain are not clearly defined; and (b) describe potentially legitimate purposes for collection and retention of each data element that would help provide guidance for Registrars both as to whether such elements may be lawfully collected, and, if so, for how long such elements might lawfully be retained. In response to these requests from some Registrars, ICANN is posting for public comment a document seeking to clarify what is meant by certain data elements described in the Data Retention Specification and describing potentially legitimate purposes for collection and retention of those data elements. That document can be found here<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/draft-data-retention-spec-…> [PDF, 116 KB]. The document will be posted for a period of thirty (30) days to seek feedback and input from the community on (i) whether the data elements are appropriately described, (ii) whether the cited purposes for collection and retention are appropriate and legitimate, and (iii) whether there are other potentially legitimate purposes for collection and retention of such data elements. After the thirty (30) day period following this posting has expired, ICANN will consider all feedback and input received in connection with ICANN’s ongoing discussions to reach a mutually acceptable resolution of Waiver Requests. In the interim, ICANN will continue its ongoing discussions to reach a mutually acceptable resolution of Waiver Requests with individual Registrars with the goal of granting additional Waiver Requests as and when appropriate. A public comment period will remain open until 23:59 p.m. PDT/California, 21 April 2014. Public comments will be available for consideration by ICANN staff and the ICANN Board. * Comments can be posted to: comments-retention-21mar14(a)icann.org<mailto:comments-retention-21mar14@icann.org> * Comments can be viewed at: http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-retention-21mar14/ _______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org

5 11

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2014 Director de At-Large Board (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com April 6, 2014

April 6, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2014 Director de At-Large Board (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com .... Cuando veo a este hilo no sé por qué Robin Crawford viene la parte superior de mente ...... En mi opinión la cuestión es moreso de cultura que de cualquiera miembro votante. ICANN es una corporación estadounidense; abreviada de decir que es aculturados de una manera específica. Sus prácticas visión del mundo, modelo de decisión y de gestión surge de una cierta base filosófica. En este marco determinado intereses son inherentemente limitadas. Algunas de las más sensibles comprenden esto y por lo que ahora, algunos movimientos están en juego para hacer frente a esto. El tiempo dirá si son aptos para el propósito o no. En el balance de la realidad, la comprensión de la dinámica de la Junta y cultural stasis, no estoy tan seguro de otra "At-Large Miembro de la Junta" entregará lo la mayoría de nosotros creemos que es bueno y necesario, en ausencia de un cambio cultural. -Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= El viernes, 04 de abril 2014 a las 18:29, <ocl(a)gih.com> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re: VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) > Selection Process > From: ocl(a)gih.com > > Dear Wolfgang, > > > thank you for this reminder of the history. > > > I'd like to hear more from our Community on Whether They Should we think > be pushing for a second manager position now that we've had another > successful round of selection of a Board director. > > > Fadi Chehadmentioned today in the At-Large Election When speaking > about the multi-stakeholder model at the Hudson Institute > > http://www.hudson.org/events/1144-the-future-of-internet-governance-a-discu… > > > Kind regards, > > > Olivier > > > On 30/03/2014 11:32, "Kleinwchter, Wolfgang" wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to Rinalia > (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing more to add > what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > > > > I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA transition > discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are remembered. One orginal > idea was to give the At Large Membership nine voting seats. Article V, > Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be established by > a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the Initial Board". > > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-en.htm#V > > > > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for two > years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, chaired by Carl > Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting Organisation > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > > > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_t… > > > > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an At > Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional councils > were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory Committee" > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the board. The > NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC was invited to > serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to the chair of the > GAC). > > > > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for two > voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the horizon. We > need a strong message from ATLAS II that the multistakeholder model - which > is now under tough discussion and has to face its "moment of truth" - will > work only, if you have a strong civil society role in policy development > and decision making. > > > > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and NPOC) as > well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and collaboration > with private sector, technical community and governments. A big > challenge. > > > > Wolfgang > > > > > > > > wolfgang > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > Veronica Cretu > > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board > Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > > > > > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and > > build up on it, I would also like to: > > > > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the > > Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We > > all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process should > > be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, I > am > > sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise > gained > > in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the > best > > possible ways. > > > > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her much > > luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important > > times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and awareness > > of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust > Rinalia > > will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. > > > > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been > > for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are > > always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. > > > > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > safe > > & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > > > With very best, > > Veronica > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com > >wrote: > > > >> Dear All, > >> > >> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what was > >> a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the > >> candidates. > >> > >> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > >> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN > >> as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General > >> Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los > >> Angeles. > >> > >> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > >> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > >> options for the future of our community. > >> > >> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. > >> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > >> candidates. > >> > >> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > >> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging > >> due to the multiple instances of Ties. > >> > >> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > >> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > >> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > >> > >> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the > >> Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and would like > >> to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months > >> ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to "represent > >> us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our > >> community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet End > >> Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued > >> involvement in all matters of ICANN. > >> > >> Kindest regards, > >> > >> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > >> ALAC Chair > >> > >> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > >>> Dear All, > >>> > >>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process Committee > >> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results > of > >> the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for > 2015-2017 > >> (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. > >>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) > >> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > >>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the > >> family name) who ran for the position: > >>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > >>> * Sébastien Bachollet > >>> * Alan Greenberg > >>> * Evan Leibovitch > >>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > >>> > >>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > >> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected as > >> the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: Rinalia > >> Abdul Rahim. > >>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about > >> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > >> Peregrine and Terri Agnew > >>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > >> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > >> > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% > >> > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> At-Large mailing list > >>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >>> > >>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > http://atlarge.icann.org/> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> > >> > > > > > > -- > > *Veronica Cretu * > > > > > > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > > > *Member of the Steering Committee, * > > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > > * > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… > > < > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… > >* > > > > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* > > *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* > > > > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > > > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* > > *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > > > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members < > http://www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> >* > > > > > > > > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 > > 067435000* > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8a3fe7f2ab.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) Selection Process
by Carlton Samuels April 6, 2014

April 6, 2014

....when I see this thread I don't know why Robin Crawford comes top of mind...... To my mind the issue is moreso about culture than any one voting member. ICANN is an American corporation; shorthand for saying it is acculturated in a specific way. Its world view, decision model and management practices springs from a certain philosophical base. In this framework certain interests are inherently constrained. Some sentient ones understand this and so now, some moves are in play to address this. Time will tell whether they are fit to purpose or not. On the balance of fact, understanding of Board dynamics and cultural stasis, I'm not so sure another "At-Large Board Member" will deliver what most of us believe to be good and necessary, absent a cultural shift. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:29 PM, <ocl(a)gih.com> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re: VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) > Selection Process > From: ocl(a)gih.com > > Dear Wolfgang, > > > thank you for this reminder of the history. > > > I'd like to hear more from our Community on Whether They Should we think > be pushing for a second manager position now that we've had another > successful round of selection of a Board director. > > > Fadi Chehadmentioned today in the At-Large Election When speaking > about the multi-stakeholder model at the Hudson Institute > > http://www.hudson.org/events/1144-the-future-of-internet-governance-a-discu… > > > Kind regards, > > > Olivier > > > On 30/03/2014 11:32, "Kleinwchter, Wolfgang" wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to Rinalia > (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing more to add > what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > > > > I this context: Don´t forget the History. In the present NTIA transition > discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are remembered. One orginal > idea was to give the At Large Membership nine voting seats. Article V, > Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be established by > a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the Initial Board". > > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-en.htm#V > > > > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for two > years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, chaired by Carl > Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting Organisation > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > > > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_t… > > > > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an At > Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional councils > were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory Committee" > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the board. The > NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC was invited to > serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to the chair of the > GAC). > > > > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for two > voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the horizon. We > need a strong message from ATLAS II that the multistakeholder model - which > is now under tough discussion and has to face its "moment of truth" - will > work only, if you have a strong civil society role in policy development > and decision making. > > > > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and NPOC) as > well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and collaboration > with private sector, technical community and governments. A big > challenge. > > > > Wolfgang > > > > > > > > wolfgang > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > Veronica Cretu > > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board > Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > > > > > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and > > build up on it, I would also like to: > > > > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the > > Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We > > all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process should > > be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, I > am > > sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise > gained > > in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the > best > > possible ways. > > > > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her much > > luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important > > times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and awareness > > of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust > Rinalia > > will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. > > > > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been > > for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are > > always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. > > > > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > safe > > & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > > > With very best, > > Veronica > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com > >wrote: > > > >> Dear All, > >> > >> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what was > >> a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the > >> candidates. > >> > >> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > >> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN > >> as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General > >> Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los > >> Angeles. > >> > >> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > >> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > >> options for the future of our community. > >> > >> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. > >> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > >> candidates. > >> > >> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > >> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging > >> due to the multiple instances of Ties. > >> > >> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > >> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > >> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > >> > >> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the > >> Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and would like > >> to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months > >> ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to "represent > >> us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our > >> community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet End > >> Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued > >> involvement in all matters of ICANN. > >> > >> Kindest regards, > >> > >> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > >> ALAC Chair > >> > >> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > >>> Dear All, > >>> > >>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process Committee > >> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results > of > >> the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for > 2015-2017 > >> (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. > >>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) > >> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > >>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the > >> family name) who ran for the position: > >>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > >>> * Sébastien Bachollet > >>> * Alan Greenberg > >>> * Evan Leibovitch > >>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > >>> > >>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > >> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected as > >> the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: Rinalia > >> Abdul Rahim. > >>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about > >> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > >> Peregrine and Terri Agnew > >>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > >> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > >> > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% > >> > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> At-Large mailing list > >>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >>> > >>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > http://atlarge.icann.org/> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> > >> > > > > > > -- > > *Veronica Cretu * > > > > > > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > > > *Member of the Steering Committee, * > > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > > * > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… > > < > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… > >* > > > > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* > > *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* > > > > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > > > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* > > *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > > > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members < > http://www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> >* > > > > > > > > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 > > 067435000* > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3d86269c0c.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >

1 0

Re: Ampliaci�n de Sufragio
by toml＠communisphere.com April 6, 2014

April 6, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Ampliación de Sufragio De: toml(a)communisphere.com Ariel, Estoy volviendo a enviar este mensaje a los seis RALO discutir listas según su petición. Tom -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Hola Thomas, espero que el día ha ido bien. ¿Podría usted por favor vuelva a su mensaje titulado La extensión del sufragio a los seis RALO discutir correo listas? Me accentually el mensaje y voy a permitir que el mensaje para ir a través de este tiempo. Pedir disculpas por las molestias. Gracias, Ariel -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Olivier, Aprecio Wolfgang de plantear la cuestión de la posición del At-Large dentro de la estructura de gobierno de la ICANN (ver abajo), y el que se extiende una invitación a comentar. En un documento presentado a NETmundial <http://www.coactivate.org/projects/campaign-for.nyc/blog/2014/03/08/260/> abordamos la cuestión del sufragio en los procesos de gobernanza de ICANN. Nos fijamos en el derecho a votar en la ICANN hoy y trazamos una paralela a América en 1787, cuando el 3% de la población era elegible para votar: básicamente grandes propietarios agrícolas (hay negros, las mujeres, o la mala). Nuestro documento se proponía que nos tomamos un primer paso para extender el sufragio a ICANN por volver a la selección de los 5 miembros de la junta por las Estructuras At-Large, un miembro de cada región. Permítanme reiterar, esto es "un paso" con más extensiones sufragio requeridos. En el documento se <http://www.coactivate.org/projects/campaign-for.nyc/blog/2014/03/08/260/> También se propone un papel formal para las ciudades en el proceso de gobernanza de ICANN. Best, Tom Lowenhaupt ----------------------------------------------- Thomas Lowenhaupt, Fundador y Presidente Connecting.nyc Inc. tom(a)connectingnyc.org <mailto:tom@connectingnyc.org> Hts Jackson., NYC 11372 718 639 4222 Blog <http://blog.connectingnyc.org/> - Wiki <http://wiki.connectingnyc.org/> - Web <http://www.connectingnyc.org/> El 04/04/2014 19:28, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond escribió: > Dear Wolfgang, > > thank you for this reminder of the history. > > I'd like to hear more from our Community on whether they think we should > be pushing for a second director position now that we've had another > successful round of selection of a Board Director. > > Fadi Chehadé mentioned today the Election in At-Large when speaking > about the multi-stakeholder model at the Hudson Institute > http://www.hudson.org/events/1144-the-future-of-internet-governance-a-discu… > > Kind regards, > > Olivier > > On 30/03/2014 11:32, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >> >> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the Initial Board". >> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-en.htm#V >> >> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, chaired by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting Organisation (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. >> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_t… >> >> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory Committee" (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to the chair of the GAC). >> >> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong civil society role in policy development and decision making. >> >> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and collaboration with private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. >> >> Wolfgang >> >> >> >> wolfgang >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Von:euro-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von Veronica Cretu >> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> Cc:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org;lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org;euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org;afri-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org;ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org;apac-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide;na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> >> >> >> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and >> build up on it, I would also like to: >> >> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the >> Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We >> all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process should >> be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, I am >> sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise gained >> in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the best >> possible ways. >> >> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her much >> luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important >> times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and awareness >> of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust Rinalia >> will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. >> >> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been >> for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are >> always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. >> >> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home safe >> & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >> >> With very best, >> Veronica >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond<ocl(a)gih.com>wrote: >> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what was >>> a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the >>> candidates. >>> >>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN >>> as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General >>> Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los >>> Angeles. >>> >>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is >>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >>> options for the future of our community. >>> >>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. >>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of >>> candidates. >>> >>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging >>> due to the multiple instances of Ties. >>> >>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >>> >>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the >>> Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and would like >>> to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months >>> ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to "represent >>> us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our >>> community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet End >>> Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued >>> involvement in all matters of ICANN. >>> >>> Kindest regards, >>> >>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >>> ALAC Chair >>> >>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process Committee >>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results of >>> the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 >>> (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. >>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) >>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the >>> family name) who ran for the position: >>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >>>> * Sébastien Bachollet >>>> * Alan Greenberg >>>> * Evan Leibovitch >>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >>>> >>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected as >>> the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: Rinalia >>> Abdul Rahim. >>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about >>> the selection procedure, under:https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie >>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >>>> E-mail:<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% >>> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> At-Large mailing list >>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >>>> >>>> At-Large Official Site:http://atlarge.icann.org <http://atlarge.icann.org/> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >>> >>> Homepage for the region:http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> >>> >> -- >> *Veronica Cretu * >> >> >> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >> -http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >> >> *Member of the Steering Committee, * >> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >> *http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current-membership >> <http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current…>* >> >> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* >> *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* >> >> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >> >> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* >> *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >> >> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members <http://www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> >* >> >> >> >> *Email:veronicacretu@gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 >> 067435000* >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Homepage for the region:http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> >> >> >> > ------ > NA-Discuss mailing list > NA-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss > > Visit the NARALO online athttp://www.naralo.org > ------ > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/30e9da164e.html --]]

2 1

Re: R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by apisanty＠gmail.com April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: apisanty(a)gmail.com Verónica, esto sólo trae más burocracia con poco valor añadido, esp. si el grupos que se evaluarán son defensivas. Los incentivos equivocados están en su lugar. Alejandro Pisanty El sábado, 05 de abril 2014 a las 1:40 AM, Veronica Cretu <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> escribió: > Dear colleagues, greetings! > > I find this exchange of ideas, views and reflections extremely valuable! I > can only imagine what a wonderful face-to-face activity this might be with > at-large members brainstorming and 'designing' the future through the prism > of the history and current developments:)! > > Few reflections on some of the aspects, based on my experience of being on > this years' NomCom (and part of 2013 NomCom): > > - When it comes to the competency level of NomCom members (as this aspect > has been touched upon by Adam and Alejandro), I think it might be worth for > the NomCom to have a capacity/competency assessment tool that would allow > for a 'scanning' of what competencies are there within the committee > itself, and what competencies are needed. Before any 'new' NomCom is > appointed/selected, this evaluation has to be made, and appointments of the > new members would be in line with some of the missing > elements/competencies, etc. > > Each and every single member of NomCom brings in certain knowledge, > skills/expertise and experiences per different sectors (not only ICANN/IG > related). The degree to which NomCom manages to create or build synergy > between these valuable 'attributes' of the members, determines the quality > of the selection process indeed. > > - The same kind of assessment/approach should take place at the level of > the Board - without a clear picture of the key areas and competencies > needed, it is difficult to bring in the 'right fit' for the given context, > given realities and the type of future one aims at building/creating > for/within ICANN's ecosystem. > > So, having a Board Capacity Assessment Tool and a NomCom Capacity > Assessment Tool would indeed ensure the continuity of the structures, and > would continue on bringing in the 'right fits' whenever necessary. > Institutionalizing the approach could take 2-3 years, after some pilot > phase results would be available. > > A great weekend ahead everyone! > > With very best, > Veronica > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> wrote: > >> Hi Alejandro, >> >> On Apr 4, 2014, at 2:30 AM, Alejandro Pisanty wrote: >> >> > Adam, >> > >> > this reply of mine will only go to some lists (it is too much >> cross-posted.) >> > >> >> And there still is. It's quite a collection of addresses. >> >> >> > Your admission in the last sentence is the key to simplifying this >> discussion of the ICANN NomCom and giving it some realistic focus. >> > >> > You say that you often felt inadequate in judging the merits of >> candidates who were way above your capacity. You should have resigned at >> that very moment but let's skip that part and go into a more general >> statement. >> > >> >> >> I didn't quite say what you have interpreted me as saying. But it was a >> throw-away comment, and you got my meaning below: >> >> >> > The design of the NomCom foresaw an implementation in which every >> community that designates members of the NomCom would send a "senior >> statesperson", someone who would exert stewardship over the greater good, >> without disregarding that communities' own interests and driving >> principles. In practice this failed to happen. Instead frequently the >> communities designated non-independent, junior people who had to prove >> their merit to the community in the NomCom and could hope for some reward >> later on. >> > >> >> >> To a degree yes, too often I felt the NomCom delegate position wasn't >> much of priority to the sending group -- perhaps only welcome when someone >> realized it meant an extra person from their group being funded to attend a >> couple of meetings. On the other hand, there's usually a smattering of >> former board members or people with some equal experience in each >> committee. Though very few have experience in high-level recruitment, >> evaluation etc. >> >> People I've served with took their role seriously, worked hard, were >> honest, and produced overall good results. The process has improved over >> the years. This year's committee had a bit of training in a few relevant >> HR techniques (should have started years ago). NomCom membership needs an >> urgent reworking, other than that, I think it does what it's asked. >> >> Best, >> >> Adam >> >> >> > This breakdown in trust and resignation of stewardship has been toxic. >> There is nothing that can be written in the rules that can cause change >> towards a stewardship and earning-trust model. It has to be the action of >> the community itself that begins thinking less of how to get a larger size >> of the pie and more of how to make the pie better. >> > >> > Therefore I think that this is the worst of times for a major rethink >> of the NomCom and other processes that get Directors to the Board. Change >> may be needed, though what change is needed is a very open discussion. But >> the thing to focus on right now is the substitution of the NTIA's function, >> nothing more. If that implies other changes these must be very convincing. >> > >> > Yours, >> > >> > Alejandro Pisanty >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> wrote: >> > I've been involved in NomCom far too many times :-) And each year the >> community was asked for input on the criteria. >> > >> > ICANN is a large and complex organization: having experience of complex >> organizations, budgets, strategic planning, it part of the job. Doesn't >> mean it has to be a person's only skill, but in a broad aggregate it needs >> to be present. And smart people will learn, but you don't want too many >> learning on the job when they are voting on issues that affect millions and >> $millions. Look at the people NomCom has appointed. There's only one that >> fits the pure "large corporate board" category. >> > >> > Selection of NomCom members does need more thought. I often felt a >> fraud judging people on criteria I myself had little or no experience of. >> > >> > Adam >> > >> > >> > On Apr 4, 2014, at 12:31 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote: >> > >> > > Carlton, >> > > >> > > I completely agree with you, the criteria given to NomCom have to be >> > > thoroughly revised. >> > > >> > > Experience on "large corporate boards" has been an indication given to >> > > NomCom in the past, but I believe that one of the key words in the >> ideal >> > > Director profile is "in aggregate". >> > > >> > > This means that while ideally a Director has to have an incredible >> knowledge >> > > and experience, this is meant in the sense that the Board, as a >> whole, needs >> > > to have this wealth of knowledge and experience, not necessarily each >> and >> > > every Director. So, it might well be that at certain moments there is >> not >> > > enough large corporate boards experience on the Board, and it will be >> > > legitimate to look for reinforcing this aspect, but this does not >> mean that >> > > all candidates that do not have such item in the profile should be >> > > discarded. To make an example, if "large corporate boards" is a need, >> > > "non-profit boards" is well another one. >> > > >> > > So the two big questions are: >> > > >> > > - How to cefine the requirements for NomCom >> > > >> > > - How to select the NomCom members (i.e. is the current >> mechanism >> > > the best one?) >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > >> > > Roberto >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com] >> > > Inviato: mercoledì 2 aprile 2014 02:56 >> > > A: Roberto Gaetano >> > > Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; >> > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of >> lac-discuss; >> > > Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA >> Discuss >> > > Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] >> [At-Large] >> > > VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection >> Process >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Roberto: >> > > >> > > I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but >> strategic and >> > > in the overarching At-Large interest. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot >> accept >> > > that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and >> with >> > > respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to >> 'take >> > > the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This >> is my >> > > position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly >> elected >> > > or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged >> as truly >> > > reflecting the wishes of the constituency. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly >> > > configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the >> At-Large than >> > > the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have >> one >> > > quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that >> set of >> > > criteria utilised for selection of directors. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that >> space >> > > for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria >> between >> > > persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those >> without. >> > > And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of >> > > 'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely >> > > participants from my side of the world will enter the process already >> > > disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at >> that level >> > > for those of us at the edge of empire. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Best, >> > > >> > > -Carlton >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ============================== >> > > Carlton A Samuels >> > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 >> > > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround >> > > ============================= >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano >> > > <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the >> Board >> > > with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. >> > > So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, >> years >> > > later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a >> battle of >> > > the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the >> > > organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. >> > > The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the >> > > stakeholder will get representation based on their relative >> "strength". The >> > > parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, >> where the >> > > constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic >> laws >> > > and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by >> > > constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of >> the >> > > different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the >> elders >> > > that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common >> good. >> > > This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, >> albeit >> > > with only partial, although significant, results. >> > > It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get >> rid as >> > > much as possible of the system by which we have representative of >> "parties" >> > > that often have conflicting interests. >> > > I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed >> Directors, and >> > > have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by >> NomCom. >> > > The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set >> that is >> > > missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names >> > > accordingly. >> > > Cheers, >> > > Roberto >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> > >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: >> euro-discuss- >> > >> bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M >> > >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 >> > >> A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang >> > >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- >> > >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > > afri-discuss@atlarge- >> > >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large >> Worldwide; na- >> > >> discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: >> 2014 >> > > >> > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >> >> > > >> > >> Dear Wolfgang, >> > >> >> > >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to >> > > ensure an >> > >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but >> in the >> > >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared >> > >> responsibility in the selection process. >> > >> >> > >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would >> > > positively >> > >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- >> > >> stakeholder model of Governance. >> > >> >> > >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent >> and >> > >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that >> At-Large has >> > >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As >> you >> > > have >> > >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, >> > >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even >> > > more. >> > >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats >> which >> > > would >> > >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other >> Stakeholders >> > >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the >> > > Board, >> > >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. >> > >> >> > >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed >> by two >> > >> different processes: >> > >> >> > >> 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a >> candidate >> > > and >> > >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which >> could >> > >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist >> within >> > >> this AC at the moment. >> > >> >> > >> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an >> internal >> > >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a >> > >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) >> > >> >> > >> Thank you. >> > >> >> > >> Sivasubramanian M >> > >> India >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < >> > >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Hi, >> > >>> >> > >>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to >> > >>> Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). >> Nothing >> > >>> more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >> > >>> >> > >>> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA >> > >>> transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are >> > >>> remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership >> nine >> > >>> voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November >> 6, >> > >>> 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine >> > >>> (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be >> > >>> established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of >> the >> > >> Initial Board". >> > >>> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- >> > >> en.htm# >> > >>> V >> > >>> >> > >>> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for >> > >>> two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, >> > >> chaired >> > >>> by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large >> Supporting >> > >>> Organisation >> > >>> (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. >> > >>> >> > >>> >> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h >> > >>> tm#_toc523422641 >> > >>> >> > >>> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an >> > >>> At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six >> regional >> > >>> councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large >> Advisory >> > >> Committee" >> > >>> (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the >> > >>> establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the >> > >>> board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of >> ALAC >> > >>> was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar >> to >> > >>> the chair of the GAC). >> > >>> >> > >>> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for >> > >>> two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the >> > >>> horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the >> > >>> multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has >> > >>> to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong >> > >>> civil society role in policy development and decision making. >> > >>> >> > >>> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our >> silos >> > >>> both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and >> > >>> NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination >> and >> > >> collaboration with >> > >>> private sector, technical community and governments. A big >> challenge. >> > >>> >> > >>> Wolfgang >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> wolfgang >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> ________________________________ >> > >>> >> > >>> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von >> > >>> Veronica Cretu >> > >>> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >> > >>> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> > >>> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > >>> euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > >>> afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > >>> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > >>> apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; >> > >>> na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >>> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large >> > >>> Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo >> > >>> and build up on it, I would also like to: >> > >>> >> > >>> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of >> > >>> the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and >> > >>> initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, >> so >> > >>> this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who >> can >> > >>> learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share >> > >>> the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and >> > >>> continue serve the community in the best possible ways. >> > >>> >> > >>> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her >> > >>> much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are >> > >>> important times for ICANN which will require several key >> competences, >> > >>> and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the >> > >>> world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations >> on >> > > the >> > >> community-at-large. >> > >>> >> > >>> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has >> > >>> been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience >> > >>> there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input >> > > from >> > >> members. >> > >>> >> > >>> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return >> home >> > >>> safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >> > >>> >> > >>> With very best, >> > >>> Veronica >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> > >>> <ocl(a)gih.com >> > >>>> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> Dear All, >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in >> what >> > >>>> was a very balanced election that required many rounds to >> > >>>> differentiate the candidates. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >> > >>>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for >> > >>>> ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual >> > >>>> General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take >> > >>>> place in Los Angeles. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It >> is >> > >>>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >> > >>>> options for the future of our community. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation >> > >> Committee. >> > >>>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list >> of >> > >>>> candidates. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >> > >>>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been >> > >>>> challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >> > >>>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >> > >>>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, >> > >>>> the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and >> > >>>> would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the >> > >>>> challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on >> > >>>> the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community >> > >>>> selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to >> > >>>> share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board >> Colleagues >> > >>>> and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of >> > > ICANN. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Kindest regards, >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >> > >>>> ALAC Chair >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >> > >>>>> Dear All, >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process >> > >>>>> Committee >> > >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote >> > >>>> results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the >> > >>>> ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be >> > >> published. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat >> > >>>>> #15) >> > >>>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of >> > >>>>> the >> > >>>> family name) who ran for the position: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >> > >>>>> * Sébastien Bachollet >> > >>>>> * Alan Greenberg >> > >>>>> * Evan Leibovitch >> > >>>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >> > >>>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is >> > >>>> selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for >> > >>>> 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information >> > >>>>> about >> > >>>> the selection procedure, under: >> https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Regards, >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, >> > >>>>> Nathalie >> > >>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >> > >>>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> > >>>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% >> > >>> 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org >> > > <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org> > >> > >>>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> > >>>> >> > >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- >> > >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% >> > >>> >> > >> >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G >> > >>> isella%20Gruber,% >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy >> > >> %20St >> > >>> aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org >> > > <mailto: >> aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff(a)atlarge.icann.o >> > > rg> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ >> > >>>>> At-Large mailing list >> > >>>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < >> > >>> http://atlarge.icann.org/> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >> > >>>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > >>>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > >>>> <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> -- >> > >>> *Veronica Cretu * >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >> > >>> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >> > >>> >> > >>> *Member of the Steering Committee, * >> > >>> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >> > >>> * >> > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> > >> and-cu >> > >>> rrent-membership >> > >>> < >> > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> > >> and-cu >> > >>> rrent-membership >> > >>>> * >> > >>> >> > >>> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet >> > >>> Governance Forum (IGF)* >> > >>> >> > >>> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >> > >>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >> > >>> >> > >>> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation >> > >>> for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >> > >>> >> > >>> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members >> > >>> <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >> > >>> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: >> > >> 373 >> > >>> 067435000* >> > >>> _______________________________________________ >> > >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > >>> >> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > >>> <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> _______________________________________________ >> > >>> APAC-Discuss mailing list >> > >>> APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss >> > >>> >> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy >> > >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > >> >> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > lac-discuss-es mailing list >> > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> > > >> > > http://www.lacralo.org >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > > >> > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > lac-discuss-es mailing list >> > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> > >> > http://www.lacralo.org >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >> > Facultad de Química UNAM >> > Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >> > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >> > +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 >> > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >> > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >> > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >> > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > > > > --------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Qumica UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF México +52-1-5541444475 DESDE EL EXTRANJERO +525541444475 DESDE Mxico SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al Grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Unete a ISOC México, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/27217abc1b.html --]]

1 0

VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process
by ICANN At-Large Staff April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

Dear All, Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process Committee (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the family name) who ran for the position: * Rinalia Abdul Rahim * Sébastien Bachollet * Alan Greenberg * Evan Leibovitch * Jean-Jacques Subrenat After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,%20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

16 24

Project CROPP
by Alberto Soto April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

Dear Dev, Yesterday, I quickly gave my consent to the amendments made into the project in order to comply with the deadline. However, after carefully studying the changes that were made to the project I have the impression that the project would not be appropriate to fulfill the purpose of the trip regarding Haiti. For the above , I propose a modification which involves no change in costs, but it helps to pursue the goal sought . Indeed , I propose that Philippe Boland flies from Colombia (the country where he lives ) to Haiti because Philippe is a French native speaker which would facilitate the exposure of the topics. In turn, Javier Pallero would travel from Argentina to Dominican Republic. These are roundtrip flights and there will not be travel between Port au Prince and Santo Domingo . If it is impracticable to change itineraries , I ask you to replace Jose Arce by Philippe Boland on the trip. In short , we are reducing costs and increasing the level of understanding the presentations. I hope you can consider this request. Best regards Alberto Soto

2 1

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by Kivuva＠transworldafrica.com April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: Kivuva(a)transworldafrica.com Olivier, el usuario individual de Internet es un actor importante y nunca debe sentir poco representados. Como ha observado cristiana, "Los usuarios de Internet de todo tipo son incapaces de hacer oír su voz efectivamente ". Esto exige una mayor representación e incluso un segundo puesto en la junta. Esto debe ser una agenda de ATLAS II en Londres. Saludos Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya. Internet Society Sección de Kenya Secretario El 04/05/2014, Christian de Larrinaga <cdel(a)firsthand.net> escribió: > > As somebody outside this box but keeping half an eye out I am intrigued > by some recent comments from past board, nomcom and others on the issues > as they see them today. There is plenty of space where Internet users > of all sorts are unable to get their voice heard effectively. ICANN is > one place where this needs to be strengthened. > > But I urge those involved to look deeper than technocratic methods such > as Nomcom, HR or systematic processes to explain why problems are coming > up for air again. These process techniques take as read the culture, > interests and remit of an organisation as it is now and tend to enhance > it in some form. That is they reinforce existing structures and are not > effective or desirable levers to reform by themselves. > > ICANN has a structural challenge in that its board is bottom up whilst > its management is top down. This is possibly why Karl proposes to remove > the CEO/President from the board. It is also why there is tension > between ICANN as a manager and ICANN as mainly a community of > responsible organisations that manage Internet resources. > > If you want change in a board you need to drive change from the board > and attract board members who direct rather than manage. Is that what > ICANN as it is today wants? I wonder. > > If intermediaries dominate the landscape at ICANN and many argue this is > now the case then how does ICANN function in the public interest? At > Large is one attempt in that direction. But in face of the NTIA > challenge can it be argued that ICANN is multi stakeholder in the sense > that it represents the broad public interest? In particular if one > focuses on the board in that specific context. > > That seems a far deeper challenge than one you should delegate to HR as > an issue of "skillsets". > > > > Christian > > > Christian > > > Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote: >> Dear Wolfgang, >> >> thank you for this reminder of the history. >> >> I'd like to hear more from our Community on whether they think we should >> be pushing for a second director position now that we've had another >> successful round of selection of a Board Director. >> >> Fadi Chehadé mentioned today the Election in At-Large when speaking >> about the multi-stakeholder model at the Hudson Institute >> http://www.hudson.org/events/1144-the-future-of-internet-governance-a-discu… >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Olivier >> >> On 30/03/2014 11:32, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to Rinalia >>> (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing more to add >>> what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >>> >>> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA transition >>> discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are remembered. One orginal >>> idea was to give the At Large Membership nine voting seats. Article V, >>> Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, 1998) said in para. iv: >>> "Nine (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be >>> established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the >>> Initial Board". >>> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-en.htm#V >>> >>> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for two >>> years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, chaired by >>> Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting >>> Organisation (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the >>> board. >>> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_t… >>> >>> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an At >>> Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional >>> councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory >>> Committee" (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and >>> the establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the >>> board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC was >>> invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to the >>> chair of the GAC). >>> >>> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for two >>> voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the horizon. We >>> need a strong message from ATLAS II that the multistakeholder model - >>> which is now under tough discussion and has to face its "moment of truth" >>> - will work only, if you have a strong civil society role in policy >>> development and decision making. >>> >>> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos >>> both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and NPOC) >>> as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and >>> collaboration with private sector, technical community and governments. >>> A big challenge. >>> >>> Wolfgang >>> >>> >>> >>> wolfgang >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von Veronica >>> Cretu >>> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >>> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >>> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; >>> na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board >>> Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and >>> build up on it, I would also like to: >>> >>> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the >>> Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We >>> all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process >>> should >>> be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, I >>> am >>> sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise >>> gained >>> in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the >>> best >>> possible ways. >>> >>> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her >>> much >>> luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important >>> times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and >>> awareness >>> of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust >>> Rinalia >>> will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. >>> >>> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been >>> for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are >>> always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. >>> >>> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home >>> safe >>> & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >>> >>> With very best, >>> Veronica >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >>> <ocl(a)gih.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what >>>> was >>>> a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the >>>> candidates. >>>> >>>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >>>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN >>>> as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General >>>> Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los >>>> Angeles. >>>> >>>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is >>>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >>>> options for the future of our community. >>>> >>>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. >>>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of >>>> candidates. >>>> >>>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >>>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging >>>> due to the multiple instances of Ties. >>>> >>>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >>>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >>>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >>>> >>>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the >>>> Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and would like >>>> to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months >>>> ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to >>>> "represent >>>> us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our >>>> community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet >>>> End >>>> Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued >>>> involvement in all matters of ICANN. >>>> >>>> Kindest regards, >>>> >>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >>>> ALAC Chair >>>> >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >>>>> Dear All, >>>>> >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process >>>>> Committee >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results >>>> of >>>> the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for >>>> 2015-2017 >>>> (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. >>>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) >>>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >>>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the >>>> family name) who ran for the position: >>>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >>>>> * Sébastien Bachollet >>>>> * Alan Greenberg >>>>> * Evan Leibovitch >>>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >>>>> >>>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >>>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected >>>> as >>>> the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: >>>> Rinalia >>>> Abdul Rahim. >>>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about >>>> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie >>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >>>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >>>>> E-mail: >>>>> <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >>>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >>>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% >>>> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> At-Large mailing list >>>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >>>>> >>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org >>>>> <http://atlarge.icann.org/> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >>>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >>>> >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> *Veronica Cretu * >>> >>> >>> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >>> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >>> >>> *Member of the Steering Committee, * >>> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >>> *http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current-membership >>> <http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current…>* >>> >>> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* >>> *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* >>> >>> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >>> >>> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* >>> *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >>> >>> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members <http://www.icann.org >>> <http://www.icann.org/> >* >>> >>> >>> >>> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >>> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 >>> 067435000* >>> _______________________________________________ >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >>> >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> At-Large mailing list >> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >> >> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________ > AFRI-Discuss mailing list > AFRI-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org > > Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to this > list are more accurate: > http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#… > ______________________ Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya twitter.com / lordmwesh _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/43f5486bc8.html --]]

1 0

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by sana.pryhod＠gmail.com April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: sana.pryhod(a)gmail.com Queridos todos, Me gustaría unirme a la evaluación de la Verónica de toda esta discusión extremadamente valioso! Muchos de los recién llegados necesitan más conocimientos sobre la historia de ICANN / At Large. Me gustaría proponer a prepararse para ATLAS en Londres serie de entrevistas con las personas más prominentes implicados - que sería dispuestos a preparar preguntas para ellos. Y aprecio altamente el artículo de Christopher - podemos traducirlo en Ruso? En cuanto a los miembros del Consejo. Sebastien era el primero de At Large, y él hizo un gran trabajo. En cuanto a mí, Cada miembro del Consejo tiene que tener la misma gran oreja y gran corazón para oír y comprender la voz de cada usuario de internet, ya que Sebastien tiene. No lo hago saber cómo podemos arreglarlo en nuestro ROP, pero estoy seguro de que tengo que encontrar la manera para hacerlo. En cuanto a segundo asiento en el Consejo de At Large. Estoy absolutamente seguro, que lo necesitamos. Miles de gracias a NomCom para Wolfgang - de nuevo con gran oreja y gran corazón))), el conocimiento profundo y gran experiencia! Por lo que yo entiendo, algunos en grandes iniciativas fueron ignoradas por la Junta - Y ahora se considera como errores. No quiero decir, que cada uno en Decisión grande tiene que ser aprobado por la Junta de forma automática. Sin embargo, la Junta tiene para entender nuestra forma de pensar - desde el punto de vista de la ordinaria Usuario de Internet. Realmente necesitamos más voces - que significa que tenemos que crear más amigable interfaz para ellos: desde tecnológica, política, lingüística y otras puntos de vista. Saludos cordiales, Oksana El sábado, 05 de abril 2014 a las 10:45 AM, Christian de Larrinaga <cdel(a)firsthand.net> escribió: > > As somebody outside this box but keeping half an eye out I am intrigued > by some recent comments from past board, nomcom and others on the issues > as they see them today. There is plenty of space where Internet users > of all sorts are unable to get their voice heard effectively. ICANN is > one place where this needs to be strengthened. > > But I urge those involved to look deeper than technocratic methods such > as Nomcom, HR or systematic processes to explain why problems are coming > up for air again. These process techniques take as read the culture, > interests and remit of an organisation as it is now and tend to enhance > it in some form. That is they reinforce existing structures and are not > effective or desirable levers to reform by themselves. > > ICANN has a structural challenge in that its board is bottom up whilst > its management is top down. This is possibly why Karl proposes to remove > the CEO/President from the board. It is also why there is tension > between ICANN as a manager and ICANN as mainly a community of > responsible organisations that manage Internet resources. > > If you want change in a board you need to drive change from the board > and attract board members who direct rather than manage. Is that what > ICANN as it is today wants? I wonder. > > If intermediaries dominate the landscape at ICANN and many argue this is > now the case then how does ICANN function in the public interest? At > Large is one attempt in that direction. But in face of the NTIA > challenge can it be argued that ICANN is multi stakeholder in the sense > that it represents the broad public interest? In particular if one > focuses on the board in that specific context. > > That seems a far deeper challenge than one you should delegate to HR as > an issue of "skillsets". > > > > Christian > > > Christian > > > Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote: > > Dear Wolfgang, > > > > thank you for this reminder of the history. > > > > I'd like to hear more from our Community on whether they think we should > > be pushing for a second director position now that we've had another > > successful round of selection of a Board Director. > > > > Fadi ChehadÃ© mentioned today the Election in At-Large when speaking > > about the multi-stakeholder model at the Hudson Institute > > > http://www.hudson.org/events/1144-the-future-of-internet-governance-a-discu… > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Olivier > > > > On 30/03/2014 11:32, "KleinwÃ€chter, Wolfgang" wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to > Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing more > to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > >> > >> I this context: DonÂŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA > transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are remembered. > One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine voting seats. > Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, 1998) said in para. > iv: "Nine (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be > established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the > Initial Board". > >> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-en.htm#V > >> > >> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for two > years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, chaired by Carl > Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting Organisation > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > >> > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_t… > >> > >> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an At > Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional councils > were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory Committee" > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the board. The > NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC was invited to > serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to the chair of the > GAC). > >> > >> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for > two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the horizon. > We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the multistakeholder model - > which is now under tough discussion and has to face its "moment of truth" - > will work only, if you have a strong civil society role in policy > development and decision making. > >> > >> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and NPOC) as > well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and collaboration > with private sector, technical community and governments. A big > challenge. > >> > >> Wolfgang > >> > >> > >> > >> wolfgang > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> > >> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > Veronica Cretu > >> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > >> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large > Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > >> > >> > >> > >> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and > >> build up on it, I would also like to: > >> > >> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the > >> Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We > >> all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process > should > >> be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, > I am > >> sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise > gained > >> in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the > best > >> possible ways. > >> > >> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her > much > >> luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important > >> times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and > awareness > >> of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust > Rinalia > >> will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. > >> > >> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been > >> for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are > >> always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. > >> > >> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > safe > >> & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > >> > >> With very best, > >> Veronica > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com > >wrote: > >> > >>> Dear All, > >>> > >>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what > was > >>> a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the > >>> candidates. > >>> > >>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > >>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN > >>> as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General > >>> Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los > >>> Angeles. > >>> > >>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > >>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > >>> options for the future of our community. > >>> > >>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. > >>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > >>> candidates. > >>> > >>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > >>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging > >>> due to the multiple instances of Ties. > >>> > >>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > >>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > >>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > >>> > >>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the > >>> Board Member selected by At-Large is SÃ©bastien Bachollet and would like > >>> to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months > >>> ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to > "represent > >>> us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our > >>> community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet > End > >>> Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued > >>> involvement in all matters of ICANN. > >>> > >>> Kindest regards, > >>> > >>> Olivier MJ CrÃ©pin-Leblond > >>> ALAC Chair > >>> > >>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > >>>> Dear All, > >>>> > >>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process > Committee > >>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results > of > >>> the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for > 2015-2017 > >>> (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. > >>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) > >>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > >>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the > >>> family name) who ran for the position: > >>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > >>>> * SÃ©bastien Bachollet > >>>> * Alan Greenberg > >>>> * Evan Leibovitch > >>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > >>>> > >>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > >>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected > as > >>> the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: > Rinalia > >>> Abdul Rahim. > >>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about > >>> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > >>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew > >>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > >>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > >>> > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% > >>> > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> At-Large mailing list > >>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >>>> > >>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > http://atlarge.icann.org/> > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >>> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/ > > > >>> > >> -- > >> *Veronica Cretu * > >> > >> > >> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > >> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > >> > >> *Member of the Steering Committee, * > >> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > >> * > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… > >> < > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… > >* > >> > >> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* > >> *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* > >> > >> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > >> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > >> > >> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* > >> *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > >> > >> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members < > http://www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> >* > >> > >> > >> > >> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > >> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 > >> 067435000* > >> _______________________________________________ > >> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> > >> > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > At-Large mailing list > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/34b4fe0122.html --]]

1 0

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by cdel＠firsthand.net April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: cdel(a)firsthand.net Como alguien fuera de esta caja, pero manteniendo un ojo hacia fuera Estoy intrigado por algunos de los comentarios recientes de la junta anterior, Comité de Nominaciones y otros, sobre los temas como ellos los ven hoy. Hay un montón de espacio en el que los usuarios de Internet de todo tipo son incapaces de hacer oír su voz con eficacia. ICANN es un lugar donde esto debe ser fortalecido. Pero yo insto a los participantes a mirar más allá de los métodos tecnocráticos tales como Nomcom, recursos humanos o procesos sistemáticos para explicar por qué los problemas vienen a tomar aire de nuevo. Estas técnicas de proceso toman como leer la cultura, intereses y competencias de una organización como lo es ahora, y tienden a mejorar en alguna forma. Son ellos los que refuerzan las estructuras existentes y no son palancas eficaces o deseables para reformar por sí mismos. ICANN tiene un desafío estructural en que su consejo es de abajo hacia arriba, mientras que su gestión es de arriba hacia abajo.Esta es posiblemente la razón por Karl propone eliminar el CEO / Presidente de la Junta. También es por eso que hay tensión entre ICANN como gerente y la ICANN como principalmente una comunidad de organizaciones responsables que gestionan los recursos de Internet. Si usted quiere el cambio en una tabla que necesita para impulsar el cambio de la placa y atraer a los miembros de la junta que dirigen más que gestionan. ¿Es eso lo ICANN como lo es hoy quiere? Me pregunto. Si los intermediarios dominan el paisaje en ICANN y muchos sostienen que esto es ahora el caso, entonces ¿Cómo funciona la ICANN en el interés público? En Grande es un intento en esa dirección. Pero ante la NTIA desafío se puede argumentar que la ICANN tiene múltiples partes interesadas en el sentido que representa el interés público general? En particular, si uno se centra en el tablero en ese contexto específico. Eso parece un reto mucho más profundo que uno debe delegar en recursos humanos como una cuestión de "conjuntos de habilidades". Cristiano Cristiano Olivier Crepin-Leblond MJ escribió: > Dear Wolfgang, > > thank you for this reminder of the history. > > I'd like to hear more from our Community on whether they think we should > be pushing for a second director position now that we've had another > successful round of selection of a Board Director. > > Fadi Chehadé mentioned today the Election in At-Large when speaking > about the multi-stakeholder model at the Hudson Institute > http://www.hudson.org/events/1144-the-future-of-internet-governance-a-discu… > > Kind regards, > > Olivier > > On 30/03/2014 11:32, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >> >> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the Initial Board". >> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-en.htm#V >> >> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, chaired by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting Organisation (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. >> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_t… >> >> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory Committee" (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to the chair of the GAC). >> >> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong civil society role in policy development and decision making. >> >> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and collaboration with private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. >> >> Wolfgang >> >> >> >> wolfgang >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von Veronica Cretu >> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> >> >> >> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and >> build up on it, I would also like to: >> >> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the >> Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We >> all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process should >> be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, I am >> sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise gained >> in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the best >> possible ways. >> >> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her much >> luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important >> times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and awareness >> of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust Rinalia >> will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. >> >> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been >> for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are >> always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. >> >> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home safe >> & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >> >> With very best, >> Veronica >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>wrote: >> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what was >>> a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the >>> candidates. >>> >>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN >>> as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General >>> Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los >>> Angeles. >>> >>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is >>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >>> options for the future of our community. >>> >>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. >>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of >>> candidates. >>> >>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging >>> due to the multiple instances of Ties. >>> >>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >>> >>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the >>> Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and would like >>> to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months >>> ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to "represent >>> us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our >>> community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet End >>> Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued >>> involvement in all matters of ICANN. >>> >>> Kindest regards, >>> >>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >>> ALAC Chair >>> >>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process Committee >>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results of >>> the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 >>> (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. >>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) >>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the >>> family name) who ran for the position: >>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >>>> * Sébastien Bachollet >>>> * Alan Greenberg >>>> * Evan Leibovitch >>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >>>> >>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected as >>> the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: Rinalia >>> Abdul Rahim. >>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about >>> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie >>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% >>> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> At-Large mailing list >>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >>>> >>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org <http://atlarge.icann.org/> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >>> >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> >>> >> -- >> *Veronica Cretu * >> >> >> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >> >> *Member of the Steering Committee, * >> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >> *http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current-membership >> <http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current…>* >> >> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* >> *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* >> >> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >> >> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* >> *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >> >> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members <http://www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> >* >> >> >> >> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 >> 067435000* >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d9d103894b.html --]]

1 0

Re: R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by veronicacretu＠gmail.com April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com Estimados colegas, saludos! Me parece que este intercambio de ideas, opiniones y reflexiones de gran valor! Yo Sólo puedo imaginar lo que una maravillosa actividad cara a cara este podría ser con -en general los miembros de intercambio de ideas y 'diseñar' el futuro a través del prisma de la historia y los acontecimientos actuales :)! Pocas reflexiones sobre algunos de los aspectos, a partir de mi experiencia de estar en Comité de nominaciones de este año (y parte de 2013 NomCom): - Cuando se trata de el nivel de competencia de los miembros del Comité de nominaciones (ya que este aspecto ha sido tocado por Adán y Alejandro), creo que podría valer la pena para el Comité de Nominaciones de tener una herramienta de evaluación de la capacidad / competencia que permitiría para un "escaneo" de qué competencias hay dentro del comité sí, y qué competencias son necesarias.Antes de que cualquier "nuevo" Comité de nominaciones es nombrado / seleccionado, esta evaluación tiene que hacerse, y los nombramientos del nuevos miembros estarían en línea con algunos de los desaparecidos elementos / competencias, etc Todos y cada uno de los miembros del Comité de Nominaciones trae ciertos conocimientos, habilidades / conocimientos y experiencias por diferentes sectores (no sólo ICANN / IG relacionado). El grado en que NomCom logra crear o construir sinergia entre estos valiosos 'atributos' de los miembros, determina la calidad del proceso de selección de hecho. - El mismo tipo de evaluación / enfoque debería tener lugar en el nivel de la Junta - y sin una idea clara de las áreas y las competencias clave necesario, es difícil de llevar en el 'más adecuado' para el contexto dado, dada la realidad y el tipo de futuro se pretende construir / crear de / dentro del ecosistema de la ICANN. Por lo tanto, tener una herramienta de Evaluación de la Capacidad Junta y una capacidad NomCom Herramienta de evaluación sería de hecho garantizar la continuidad de las estructuras y continuaría en traer los "ataques correctas" cuando sea necesario. Institucionalización del enfoque podría tardar 2-3 años, después de un piloto resultados de fase estarían disponibles. Un gran fin de semana por delante todo el mundo! Con lo mejor, Verónica El viernes, 04 de abril 2014 a las 4:31 AM, Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> escribió: > Hi Alejandro, > > On Apr 4, 2014, at 2:30 AM, Alejandro Pisanty wrote: > > > Adam, > > > > this reply of mine will only go to some lists (it is too much > cross-posted.) > > > > And there still is. It's quite a collection of addresses. > > > > Your admission in the last sentence is the key to simplifying this > discussion of the ICANN NomCom and giving it some realistic focus. > > > > You say that you often felt inadequate in judging the merits of > candidates who were way above your capacity. You should have resigned at > that very moment but let's skip that part and go into a more general > statement. > > > > > I didn't quite say what you have interpreted me as saying. But it was a > throw-away comment, and you got my meaning below: > > > > The design of the NomCom foresaw an implementation in which every > community that designates members of the NomCom would send a "senior > statesperson", someone who would exert stewardship over the greater good, > without disregarding that communities' own interests and driving > principles. In practice this failed to happen. Instead frequently the > communities designated non-independent, junior people who had to prove > their merit to the community in the NomCom and could hope for some reward > later on. > > > > > To a degree yes, too often I felt the NomCom delegate position wasn't much > of priority to the sending group -- perhaps only welcome when someone > realized it meant an extra person from their group being funded to attend a > couple of meetings. On the other hand, there's usually a smattering of > former board members or people with some equal experience in each > committee. Though very few have experience in high-level recruitment, > evaluation etc. > > People I've served with took their role seriously, worked hard, were > honest, and produced overall good results. The process has improved over > the years. This year's committee had a bit of training in a few relevant > HR techniques (should have started years ago). NomCom membership needs an > urgent reworking, other than that, I think it does what it's asked. > > Best, > > Adam > > > > This breakdown in trust and resignation of stewardship has been toxic. > There is nothing that can be written in the rules that can cause change > towards a stewardship and earning-trust model. It has to be the action of > the community itself that begins thinking less of how to get a larger size > of the pie and more of how to make the pie better. > > > > Therefore I think that this is the worst of times for a major rethink of > the NomCom and other processes that get Directors to the Board. Change may > be needed, though what change is needed is a very open discussion. But the > thing to focus on right now is the substitution of the NTIA's function, > nothing more. If that implies other changes these must be very convincing. > > > > Yours, > > > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> wrote: > > I've been involved in NomCom far too many times :-) And each year the > community was asked for input on the criteria. > > > > ICANN is a large and complex organization: having experience of complex > organizations, budgets, strategic planning, it part of the job. Doesn't > mean it has to be a person's only skill, but in a broad aggregate it needs > to be present. And smart people will learn, but you don't want too many > learning on the job when they are voting on issues that affect millions and > $millions. Look at the people NomCom has appointed. There's only one that > fits the pure "large corporate board" category. > > > > Selection of NomCom members does need more thought. I often felt a > fraud judging people on criteria I myself had little or no experience of. > > > > Adam > > > > > > On Apr 4, 2014, at 12:31 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote: > > > > > Carlton, > > > > > > I completely agree with you, the criteria given to NomCom have to be > > > thoroughly revised. > > > > > > Experience on "large corporate boards" has been an indication given to > > > NomCom in the past, but I believe that one of the key words in the > ideal > > > Director profile is "in aggregate". > > > > > > This means that while ideally a Director has to have an incredible > knowledge > > > and experience, this is meant in the sense that the Board, as a whole, > needs > > > to have this wealth of knowledge and experience, not necessarily each > and > > > every Director. So, it might well be that at certain moments there is > not > > > enough large corporate boards experience on the Board, and it will be > > > legitimate to look for reinforcing this aspect, but this does not mean > that > > > all candidates that do not have such item in the profile should be > > > discarded. To make an example, if "large corporate boards" is a need, > > > "non-profit boards" is well another one. > > > > > > So the two big questions are: > > > > > > - How to cefine the requirements for NomCom > > > > > > - How to select the NomCom members (i.e. is the current > mechanism > > > the best one?) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Roberto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com] > > > Inviato: mercoledì 2 aprile 2014 02:56 > > > A: Roberto Gaetano > > > Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; > > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of > lac-discuss; > > > Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuss > > > Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] > [At-Large] > > > VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > > > > > > > > > Roberto: > > > > > > I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic > and > > > in the overarching At-Large interest. > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot > accept > > > that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and with > > > respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to > 'take > > > the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This > is my > > > position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly > elected > > > or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged as > truly > > > reflecting the wishes of the constituency. > > > > > > > > > > > > Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly > > > configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the > At-Large than > > > the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have one > > > quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that set > of > > > criteria utilised for selection of directors. > > > > > > > > > > > > In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that > space > > > for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria > between > > > persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those > without. > > > And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of > > > 'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely > > > participants from my side of the world will enter the process already > > > disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at that > level > > > for those of us at the edge of empire. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > -Carlton > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============================== > > > Carlton A Samuels > > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround > > > ============================= > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano > > > <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the > Board > > > with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. > > > So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, > years > > > later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle > of > > > the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the > > > organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. > > > The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the > > > stakeholder will get representation based on their relative > "strength". The > > > parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where > the > > > constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic > laws > > > and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by > > > constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of > the > > > different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the > elders > > > that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common > good. > > > This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, > albeit > > > with only partial, although significant, results. > > > It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get > rid as > > > much as possible of the system by which we have representative of > "parties" > > > that often have conflicting interests. > > > I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed > Directors, and > > > have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by > NomCom. > > > The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set that > is > > > missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names > > > accordingly. > > > Cheers, > > > Roberto > > > > > > > > > > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- > > >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: > euro-discuss- > > >> bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M > > >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 > > >> A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang > > >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- > > >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > > afri-discuss@atlarge- > > >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; > na- > > >> discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: > 2014 > > > > > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > >> > > > > > >> Dear Wolfgang, > > >> > > >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to > > > ensure an > > >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in > the > > >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared > > >> responsibility in the selection process. > > >> > > >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would > > > positively > > >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- > > >> stakeholder model of Governance. > > >> > > >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent > and > > >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large > has > > >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you > > > have > > >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, > > >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even > > > more. > > >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats > which > > > would > > >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other > Stakeholders > > >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the > > > Board, > > >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. > > >> > > >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed > by two > > >> different processes: > > >> > > >> 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a > candidate > > > and > > >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which > could > > >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist > within > > >> this AC at the moment. > > >> > > >> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an > internal > > >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a > > >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) > > >> > > >> Thank you. > > >> > > >> Sivasubramanian M > > >> India > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < > > >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to > > >>> Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing > > >>> more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > > >>> > > >>> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA > > >>> transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are > > >>> remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine > > >>> voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, > > >>> 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > > >>> (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be > > >>> established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of > the > > >> Initial Board". > > >>> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- > > >> en.htm# > > >>> V > > >>> > > >>> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for > > >>> two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, > > >> chaired > > >>> by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large > Supporting > > >>> Organisation > > >>> (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > > >>> > > >>> > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h > > >>> tm#_toc523422641 > > >>> > > >>> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an > > >>> At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional > > >>> councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory > > >> Committee" > > >>> (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > > >>> establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the > > >>> board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC > > >>> was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to > > >>> the chair of the GAC). > > >>> > > >>> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for > > >>> two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the > > >>> horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the > > >>> multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has > > >>> to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong > > >>> civil society role in policy development and decision making. > > >>> > > >>> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > > >>> both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and > > >>> NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination > and > > >> collaboration with > > >>> private sector, technical community and governments. A big > challenge. > > >>> > > >>> Wolfgang > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> wolfgang > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ________________________________ > > >>> > > >>> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > > >>> Veronica Cretu > > >>> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > > >>> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > >>> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > >>> euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > >>> afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > >>> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > >>> apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > > >>> na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >>> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large > > >>> Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo > > >>> and build up on it, I would also like to: > > >>> > > >>> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of > > >>> the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and > > >>> initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so > > >>> this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who > can > > >>> learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share > > >>> the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and > > >>> continue serve the community in the best possible ways. > > >>> > > >>> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her > > >>> much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are > > >>> important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, > > >>> and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the > > >>> world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on > > > the > > >> community-at-large. > > >>> > > >>> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has > > >>> been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience > > >>> there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input > > > from > > >> members. > > >>> > > >>> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > > >>> safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > >>> > > >>> With very best, > > >>> Veronica > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > >>> <ocl(a)gih.com > > >>>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Dear All, > > >>>> > > >>>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what > > >>>> was a very balanced election that required many rounds to > > >>>> differentiate the candidates. > > >>>> > > >>>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > > >>>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for > > >>>> ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual > > >>>> General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take > > >>>> place in Los Angeles. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > > >>>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > > >>>> options for the future of our community. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation > > >> Committee. > > >>>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > > >>>> candidates. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > > >>>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been > > >>>> challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. > > >>>> > > >>>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > > >>>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > > >>>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > > >>>> > > >>>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, > > >>>> the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and > > >>>> would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the > > >>>> challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on > > >>>> the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community > > >>>> selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to > > >>>> share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues > > >>>> and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of > > > ICANN. > > >>>> > > >>>> Kindest regards, > > >>>> > > >>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > >>>> ALAC Chair > > >>>> > > >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > >>>>> Dear All, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process > > >>>>> Committee > > >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote > > >>>> results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the > > >>>> ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be > > >> published. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat > > >>>>> #15) > > >>>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of > > >>>>> the > > >>>> family name) who ran for the position: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > > >>>>> * Sébastien Bachollet > > >>>>> * Alan Greenberg > > >>>>> * Evan Leibovitch > > >>>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > > >>>>> > > >>>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > > >>>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is > > >>>> selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for > > >>>> 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information > > >>>>> about > > >>>> the selection procedure, under: > https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Regards, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, > > >>>>> Nathalie > > >>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew > > >>>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > >>>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > > >>> 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org> > > > >>>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > >>>> > > >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- > > >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% > > >>> > > >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G > > >>> isella%20Gruber,% > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy > > >> %20St > > >>> aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > <mailto: > aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff(a)atlarge.icann.o > > > rg> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>>> At-Large mailing list > > >>>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > >>>>> > > >>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > > >>> http://atlarge.icann.org/> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>> EURO-Discuss mailing list > > >>>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > >>>> > > >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > >>>> <http://www.euralo.org/> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> *Veronica Cretu * > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > > >>> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > >>> > > >>> *Member of the Steering Committee, * > > >>> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > > >>> * > > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > > >> and-cu > > >>> rrent-membership > > >>> < > > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > > >> and-cu > > >>> rrent-membership > > >>>> * > > >>> > > >>> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet > > >>> Governance Forum (IGF)* > > >>> > > >>> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > > >>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > >>> > > >>> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation > > >>> for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > >>> > > >>> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members > > >>> <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > > >>> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: > > >> 373 > > >>> 067435000* > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list > > >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > >>> > > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > >>> <http://www.euralo.org/> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> APAC-Discuss mailing list > > >>> APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > >>> > > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > > >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> EURO-Discuss mailing list > > >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > >> > > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > > > -- > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > > Facultad de Química UNAM > > Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > > +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 > > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4f5005932b.html --]]

1 0

Ayuda del EWG Entender Next Generation RDS Riesgo - Completar la Encuesta
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Ayuda del EWG Entender Next Generation RDS Riesgo - Completar la Encuesta De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Gracias Fátima. Es aún más importante para participar en la encuesta. El vínculo de trabajo para la versión en Inglés de la encuesta en línea es aquí: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve… El instrumento de la encuesta imprimible puede accederse en: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve… Nos aseguraremos de hacer circular el enlace a la versión en lengua española como pronto como esté disponible. Sería de gran ayuda si extraemos el vínculo de trabajo, lo envía hacia adelante y pedir a nuestras redes para participar en la encuesta. -Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= > http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-04apr14-en.htm > ------------------------------ > RDS Risk Survey and Webinar: How will a Proposed Next Generation > Registration Directory Services (RDS) to Replace Whois Impact You? > (Available Until 15 May 2014) > > 4 April 2014 > > The *Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services (EWG) > <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175189 > >*invites > you to participate in its recently launched Registration Directory > Service (RDS) Risk Survey. > > If you provide or use gTLD domain name registration data (today known as > Whois), please consider responding to this survey to share your unique > perspective on potential risks and benefits associated with the EWG's > proposed RDS, should ICANN choose to implement such as system to replace > Whois. > > Today, anyone can query Whois to identify the organization or individual > responsible for an Internet domain name, known as a Registrant, along with > their postal address, email address, and telephone number. The EWG was > asked to re-examine the purpose and provision of this information, > envisioning a clean-slate approach to meet global Internet community needs > with greater privacy, accuracy, and accountability. The EWG's proposed next > generation RDS would collect, validate and disclose registration > information for permissible purposes only, with some values remaining > public and others being gated - that is, returned only to authorized users > with legitimate purposes. > > At this point, the RDS is simply a proposal being refined by the EWG for > ICANN Board and community consideration. If you are one of the many > different individuals, businesses, and other organizations that consume > Whois data today, or a domain name Registrant, Registrar, or Registry that > provides Whois data today, please participate in this survey. This survey > is a chance to tell the EWG about the risks and benefits that the > recommended RDS might have for YOU. > > All risks and benefits identified through this survey will be published in > aggregated, anonymized form and used by the EWG to refine its > recommendations and as input to a full risk assessment. > *RDS Risk Survey attributes:* > > - RDS Risk Survey Availability Date: 15 March 2014 > - RDS Risk Survey address: > > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve… > - RDS Risk Survey Close Date: *15 May 2014, 23:59 UTC* > > To read more, you may download a printable > PDF< > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve… > >[PDF, > 1.93 MB] before returning to > > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve…<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve…> > take the on-line survey. Translated versions of this survey will also > > be > > available shortly. > > *To learn more about this survey, please join the EWG for this interactive > > online workshop: How will Next Generation Registration Directory Services > > impact you?* > > *Date:* Wednesday, 16 April 2014 > *Time:* 19:00-20:30 UTC (time converter: > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=EWG+Workshop+Webin… > ) > > *Date:* Thursday, 17 April 2014 > > *Time:* 12:00-13:30 UTC (time converter: > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=EWG+Workshop+Webin… > ) > > Additional details on the interactive online workshop are available > here< > http://www.icann.org/en/about/learning/webinars/rds-workshop-04apr14-en.htm > > > . > > You may also learn more about the proposed next generation RDS at any time > by: > > - WATCHING this short introductory > video<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175189> > - LISTENING to this longer > presentation<http://buenosaires48.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-rds> > - EXPLORING these > FAQs<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/faqs>, > or > - READING the EWG's Initial > Report< > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report… > >[PDF, > 1.70 MB] and Status > Update Report< > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-… > >[PDF, > 2.26 MB] > > *Background* > > In December 2012, ICANN announced the creation of an Expert Working Group > (EWG) on next generation gTLD Registration Directory Services, as a first > step in fulfilling the ICANN Board's directive to help redefine the purpose > and provision of gTLD registration data. The EWG's findings are expected to > serve as a foundation to help the GNSO create a new global policy for the > provision of gTLD registration data. > > A significant milestone was reached on 24 June > 2013< > http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-24jun13-en.htm > >with > the publication > <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-24jun13-en.htm > >of > the Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory > Services<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services > >(EWG)'s > Initial Report and FAQs, opening a consultation period with the > ICANN community. The Initial > Report< > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report… > >[PDF, > 1.70 MB] enumerated the users, purposes, data elements, recommended > principles and features, and proposed model to guide the development of a > next generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace Whois. > > Prior to the ICANN Meeting in Buenos Aires, the EWG published its Status > Update Report< > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-… > >[PDF, > 2.26 MB] to highlight the EWG's thinking on these and many other key > issues. It also provides a great deal more detail on the analysis that lay > behind the Initial > Report< > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report… > >[PDF, > 1.70 MB]. > *What's Next?* > > The EWG is now completing its research and information gathering phase > before delivering its final recommendations to the ICANN Board. The RDS > Risk Survey is one of several research efforts undertaken being the EWG to > ensure that its final recommendations are supported by facts and informed > by current practices and input from all those potentially impacted by any > next generation system to replace Whois. > > The EWG expects to complete its recommendations in 2014, informed by > Community feedback and in-depth analysis of selected areas, including the > responses to this RDS Risk Survey. The EWG plans to deliver its final > report to the ICANN Board in June 2014. > *Questions* > > If questions arise about the RDS Risk Survey, please contact us at > Risk-EWG-Survey(a)icann.org. > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2867ddb857.html --]]

1 0

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by ocl＠gih.com April 4, 2014

April 4, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: ocl(a)gih.com Estimado Wolfgang, gracias por este recordatorio de la historia. Me gustaría saber más de nuestra Comunidad de si creo que deberíamos estar empujando para un segundo puesto de director ahora que hemos tenido otro exitosa ronda de selección de un Director de la Junta. Fadi Chehadmentioned hoy la elección de At-Large al hablar sobre el modelo de múltiples partes interesadas en el Instituto Hudson http://www.hudson.org/events/1144-the-future-of-internet-governance-a-discu… Saludos cordiales, Olivier El 30/03/2014 11:32, "Kleinwchter, Wolfgang" escribió: > Hi, > > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > > I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the Initial Board". > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-en.htm#V > > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, chaired by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting Organisation (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_t… > > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory Committee" (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to the chair of the GAC). > > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong civil society role in policy development and decision making. > > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and collaboration with private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. > > Wolfgang > > > > wolfgang > > > > ________________________________ > > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von Veronica Cretu > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and > build up on it, I would also like to: > > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the > Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We > all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process should > be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, I am > sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise gained > in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the best > possible ways. > > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her much > luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important > times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and awareness > of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust Rinalia > will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. > > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been > for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are > always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. > > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home safe > & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > With very best, > Veronica > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what was >> a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the >> candidates. >> >> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN >> as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General >> Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los >> Angeles. >> >> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is >> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >> options for the future of our community. >> >> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. >> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of >> candidates. >> >> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging >> due to the multiple instances of Ties. >> >> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >> >> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the >> Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and would like >> to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months >> ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to "represent >> us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our >> community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet End >> Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued >> involvement in all matters of ICANN. >> >> Kindest regards, >> >> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >> ALAC Chair >> >> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> >>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process Committee >> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results of >> the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 >> (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. >>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) >> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the >> family name) who ran for the position: >>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >>> * Sébastien Bachollet >>> * Alan Greenberg >>> * Evan Leibovitch >>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >>> >>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected as >> the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: Rinalia >> Abdul Rahim. >>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about >> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >>> Regards, >>> >>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie >> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> At-Large mailing list >>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >>> >>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org <http://atlarge.icann.org/> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > > > -- > *Veronica Cretu * > > > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > *Member of the Steering Committee, * > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > *http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current-membership > <http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current…>* > > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* > *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* > > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* > *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members <http://www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> >* > > > > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 > 067435000* > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/12d9513028.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: ICANN Alerta de Noticias - RDS Encuesta de Riesgo y Webinar: �C�mo va a servicios de directorio de registro de pr�xima generaci�n propuestos (RDS) para reemplazar Impacto Whois usted? (Disponible el 15 de mayo de 2014)
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com April 4, 2014

April 4, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Fwd: ICANN Alerta de Noticias - RDS Encuesta de Riesgo y Webinar: ¿Cómo va a servicios de directorio de registro de próxima generación propuestos (RDS) para reemplazar Impacto Whois usted? (Disponible el 15 de mayo de 2014) De: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com FYI, Para participar en el Webinar: Por favor regístrese a través de correo electrónico a alice.jansen @ icann.org por Martes, 15 de abril 2014 - 23:59 GMT para recibir los detalles de marcación de entrada. ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- De: ICANN Alerta Noticias <communications(a)icann.org> Fecha: 04.04.2014 19:34 GMT-03: 00 Asunto: ICANN Alerta Noticias - RDS Encuesta de Riesgo y Webinar: ¿Cómo una Servicios propuestos Next Generation Directorio registro (RDS) para reemplazar Whois Usted Impacto? (Disponible el 15 de mayo de 2014) A: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com [Image: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> Alerta de noticias http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-04apr14-en.htm ------------------------------ RDS Encuesta de Riesgo y Webinar: ¿Cómo una generación siguiente propuesta Servicios de directorio de registro (RDS) para reemplazar Impacto Whois usted? (Disponible el 15 de mayo de 2014) 04 de abril 2014 El Grupo * Experto de Trabajo sobre Servicios de directorio de gTLD (EWG) < https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175189>*invites a participar en su Directorio de registro recién lanzado Servicio (RDS) Riesgo Encuesta. Si usted proporciona o usa los datos de nombres de dominio de registro de gTLD (hoy conocido como Whois), tenga en cuenta la respuesta a la encuesta de compartir su única perspectiva sobre los posibles riesgos y beneficios asociados con el GTA de RDS propuestos, deben ICANN elegir implementar como sistema para reemplazar Whois. Hoy en día, cualquier persona puede consultar Whois para identificar la organización o individuo responsable de un nombre de dominio de Internet, conocido como un Solicitante de registro, junto con su dirección postal, número de la dirección de correo electrónico y teléfono.El EWG fue pedido que vuelva a examinar el propósito y el suministro de esta información, la aspiración a un enfoque de borrón y cuenta nueva para satisfacer las necesidades de la comunidad de Internet a nivel mundial con una mayor privacidad, la precisión y la rendición de cuentas. El EWG de propuesta siguiente RDS generación recogerían, validar y divulgar el registro la información sólo con fines admisibles, con algunos valores restantes pública y otros que se están urbanización cerrada - es decir, regresó sólo a usuarios autorizados con fines legítimos. En este punto, el RDS es simplemente una propuesta de ser refinado por el EWG para Junta directiva de ICANN y la consideración de la comunidad. Si usted es uno de los muchos diferentes individuos, empresas y otras organizaciones que consumen Hoy los datos Whois, o un nombre de dominio, el Registrador o del Registro que proporciona datos Whois hoy, por favor participar en esta encuesta. Esta encuesta es una oportunidad de decirle al EWG sobre los riesgos y beneficios que el RDS recomendadas podrían tener para usted. Todos los riesgos y beneficios identificados a través de esta encuesta se publicarán en forma agregada, anonimizados y utilizado por el EWG perfeccionando su recomendaciones y, como entrada en una evaluación completa de los riesgos. * RDS Encuesta de Riesgo atributos: * - RDS Encuesta de Riesgo disponibilidad Fecha: 15 de marzo 2014 - RDS Riesgo dirección de Encuesta: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve… - RDS Encuesta de Riesgo Fecha de cierre: * 15 mayo de 2014, 23:59 UTC * Para más información, puede descargar una impresora PDF <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve…> [PDF, 1.93 MB] antes de volver a http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve… participar en la encuesta on-line. Las versiones traducidas de esta encuesta también ser disponible en breve. * Para obtener más información sobre esta encuesta, por favor únase a la EWG para este interactivo taller en línea: ¿Cómo de servicios de directorio de registro de Próxima Generación que afectar? * * Fecha: * Miércoles, 16 de abril 2014 * Hora: * 19:00-20:30 UTC (convertidor de tiempo: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=EWG+Workshop+Webin… ) * Fecha: * Jueves, 17 de abril 2014 * Hora: * 12:00-13:30 UTC (convertidor de tiempo: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=EWG+Workshop+Webin… ) Detalles adicionales sobre el taller interactivo en línea están disponibles aquí <http://www.icann.org/en/about/learning/webinars/rds-workshop-04apr14-en.htm> . También puede obtener más información sobre el RDS próxima generación propuestas en cualquier momento por: - OBSERVACIÓN esta breve introducción video < https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175189> - Escucha esto ya presentación <http://buenosaires48.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-rds> - La exploración de estos FAQs <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/faqs> , o - Lectura inicial del EWG Informe <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB] y Estado Informe de actualización <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-…> [PDF, 2.26 MB] * Antecedentes * En diciembre de 2012, la ICANN anunció la creación de un Grupo de Trabajo de Expertos (GTA) sobre el próximo registro de gTLD generación de servicios de directorio, como un primer paso en el cumplimiento de la directiva de la Junta directiva de ICANN para ayudar a redefinir el propósito y el suministro de datos de registro de gTLD. Las conclusiones del GTE se espera que servir como una fundación para ayudar a la GNSO a crear una nueva política global para la provisión de datos de registro de gTLD. Un importante hito se alcanzó el 24 de junio 2013 <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-24jun13-en.htm> con la publicación <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-24jun13-en.htm> de el Grupo de Trabajo de Expertos en la Guía de gTLD Servicios <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services> (EWG) 's Informe y FAQs inicial, la apertura de un período de consultas con el Comunidad de ICANN. La inicial Informe <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB] enumeró los usuarios, los propósitos, elementos de datos, recomendados principios y características y modelo propuesto para guiar el desarrollo de un Servicio de directorio de registro de próxima generación (RDS) para reemplazar Whois. Antes de la reunión de ICANN en Buenos Aires, el EWG publicó su Estado Informe de actualización <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-…> [PDF, 2.26 MB] para resaltar el pensamiento del EWG sobre estas y muchas otras claves cuestiones. También proporciona mucho más detalle en el análisis que se extendía detrás de la inicial Informe <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB]. * ¿Qué sigue? * El GTA está terminando su fase de investigación y recopilación de información antes de entregar sus recomendaciones finales a la Junta directiva de ICANN. El RDS Encuesta de riesgos es uno de los varios esfuerzos de investigación llevadas a cabo es la EWG que asegurar que sus recomendaciones finales se apoyan en hechos e informados por las prácticas actuales y las aportaciones de todas las personas potencialmente afectadas por cualquier sistema de próxima generación para reemplazar Whois. El EWG espera completar sus recomendaciones en 2014, informado por Retroalimentación de la comunidad y el análisis en profundidad de las áreas seleccionadas, incluyendo el respuestas a esta RDS Encuesta de Riesgos. El EWG tiene previsto entregar su informe final informar a la Junta Directiva de ICANN en junio de 2014. * Preguntas * Si surgen dudas acerca de la Encuesta de Riesgo RDS, por favor contacte con nosotros en Risk-EWG-Survey(a)icann.org. Este mensaje fue enviado a fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com desde: ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094 hasta 2536 Email Marketing by [image: iContact - Try It Gratis!] <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> Administre su Suscripción <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=13227880&l=6333&s=RZZO&m=93…> - * Fatima Cambronero * Abogada-Argentina Teléfono: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @ facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c6b8794f1d.html --]]

1 0

Re: R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by ajp＠glocom.ac.jp April 4, 2014

April 4, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp Hola Alejandro, El 04 de abril 2014, a las 2:30 AM, Alejandro Pisanty escribió: > Adam, > > this reply of mine will only go to some lists (it is too much cross-posted.) > > Your admission in the last sentence is the key to simplifying this discussion of the ICANN NomCom and giving it some realistic focus. > > You say that you often felt inadequate in judging the merits of candidates who were way above your capacity. You should have resigned at that very moment but let's skip that part and go into a more general statement. > > The design of the NomCom foresaw an implementation in which every community that designates members of the NomCom would send a "senior statesperson", someone who would exert stewardship over the greater good, without disregarding that communities' own interests and driving principles. In practice this failed to happen. Instead frequently the communities designated non-independent, junior people who had to prove their merit to the community in the NomCom and could hope for some reward later on. > Personas a las que he servido con tomaron en serio su papel, trabajaron duro, eran honestos, y producidos en general buenos resultados. El proceso ha mejorado con los años. Comité de este año tuvo un poco de entrenamiento en algunas técnicas de recursos humanos pertinentes (debería haber comenzado hace años). Membresía NomCom necesita una remodelación urgente, aparte de eso, creo que hace lo que se le pidió. Best, Adán > This breakdown in trust and resignation of stewardship has been toxic. There is nothing that can be written in the rules that can cause change towards a stewardship and earning-trust model. It has to be the action of the community itself that begins thinking less of how to get a larger size of the pie and more of how to make the pie better. > > Therefore I think that this is the worst of times for a major rethink of the NomCom and other processes that get Directors to the Board. Change may be needed, though what change is needed is a very open discussion. But the thing to focus on right now is the substitution of the NTIA's function, nothing more. If that implies other changes these must be very convincing. > > Yours, > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> wrote: > I've been involved in NomCom far too many times :-) And each year the community was asked for input on the criteria. > > ICANN is a large and complex organization: having experience of complex organizations, budgets, strategic planning, it part of the job. Doesn't mean it has to be a person's only skill, but in a broad aggregate it needs to be present. And smart people will learn, but you don't want too many learning on the job when they are voting on issues that affect millions and $millions. Look at the people NomCom has appointed. There's only one that fits the pure "large corporate board" category. > > Selection of NomCom members does need more thought. I often felt a fraud judging people on criteria I myself had little or no experience of. > > Adam > > > On Apr 4, 2014, at 12:31 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote: > > > Carlton, > > > > I completely agree with you, the criteria given to NomCom have to be > > thoroughly revised. > > > > Experience on large corporate boards has been an indication given to > > NomCom in the past, but I believe that one of the key words in the ideal > > Director profile is in aggregate. > > > > This means that while ideally a Director has to have an incredible knowledge > > and experience, this is meant in the sense that the Board, as a whole, needs > > to have this wealth of knowledge and experience, not necessarily each and > > every Director. So, it might well be that at certain moments there is not > > enough large corporate boards experience on the Board, and it will be > > legitimate to look for reinforcing this aspect, but this does not mean that > > all candidates that do not have such item in the profile should be > > discarded. To make an example, if large corporate boards is a need, > > non-profit boards is well another one. > > > > So the two big questions are: > > > > - How to cefine the requirements for NomCom > > > > - How to select the NomCom members (i.e. is the current mechanism > > the best one?) > > > > Cheers, > > > > Roberto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com] > > Inviato: mercoledì 2 aprile 2014 02:56 > > A: Roberto Gaetano > > Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of lac-discuss; > > Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuss > > Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] > > VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > > > > > Roberto: > > > > I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic and > > in the overarching At-Large interest. > > > > > > > > Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot accept > > that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and with > > respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to 'take > > the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This is my > > position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly elected > > or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged as truly > > reflecting the wishes of the constituency. > > > > > > > > Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly > > configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the At-Large than > > the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have one > > quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that set of > > criteria utilised for selection of directors. > > > > > > > > In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that space > > for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria between > > persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those without. > > And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of > > 'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely > > participants from my side of the world will enter the process already > > disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at that level > > for those of us at the edge of empire. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > -Carlton > > > > > > > > > > > > ============================== > > Carlton A Samuels > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround > > ============================= > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano > > <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the Board > > with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. > > So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, years > > later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle of > > the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the > > organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. > > The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the > > stakeholder will get representation based on their relative "strength". The > > parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where the > > constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic laws > > and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by > > constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of the > > different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the elders > > that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common good. > > This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, albeit > > with only partial, although significant, results. > > It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get rid as > > much as possible of the system by which we have representative of "parties" > > that often have conflicting interests. > > I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed Directors, and > > have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by NomCom. > > The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set that is > > missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names > > accordingly. > > Cheers, > > Roberto > > > > > > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- > >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- > >> bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M > >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 > >> A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang > >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- > >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > afri-discuss@atlarge- > >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na- > >> discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > > > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > >> > > > >> Dear Wolfgang, > >> > >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to > > ensure an > >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in the > >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared > >> responsibility in the selection process. > >> > >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would > > positively > >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- > >> stakeholder model of Governance. > >> > >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and > >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large has > >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you > > have > >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, > >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even > > more. > >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which > > would > >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other Stakeholders > >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the > > Board, > >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. > >> > >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by two > >> different processes: > >> > >> 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate > > and > >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could > >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist within > >> this AC at the moment. > >> > >> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an internal > >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a > >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) > >> > >> Thank you. > >> > >> Sivasubramanian M > >> India > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < > >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to > >>> Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing > >>> more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > >>> > >>> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA > >>> transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are > >>> remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine > >>> voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, > >>> 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > >>> (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be > >>> established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the > >> Initial Board". > >>> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- > >> en.htm# > >>> V > >>> > >>> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for > >>> two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, > >> chaired > >>> by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting > >>> Organisation > >>> (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > >>> > >>> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h > >>> tm#_toc523422641 > >>> > >>> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an > >>> At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional > >>> councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory > >> Committee" > >>> (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > >>> establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the > >>> board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC > >>> was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to > >>> the chair of the GAC). > >>> > >>> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for > >>> two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the > >>> horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the > >>> multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has > >>> to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong > >>> civil society role in policy development and decision making. > >>> > >>> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > >>> both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and > >>> NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and > >> collaboration with > >>> private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. > >>> > >>> Wolfgang > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> wolfgang > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> > >>> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > >>> Veronica Cretu > >>> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > >>> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > >>> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > >>> na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large > >>> Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo > >>> and build up on it, I would also like to: > >>> > >>> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of > >>> the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and > >>> initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so > >>> this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can > >>> learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share > >>> the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and > >>> continue serve the community in the best possible ways. > >>> > >>> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her > >>> much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are > >>> important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, > >>> and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the > >>> world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on > > the > >> community-at-large. > >>> > >>> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has > >>> been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience > >>> there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input > > from > >> members. > >>> > >>> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > >>> safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > >>> > >>> With very best, > >>> Veronica > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > >>> <ocl(a)gih.com > >>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Dear All, > >>>> > >>>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what > >>>> was a very balanced election that required many rounds to > >>>> differentiate the candidates. > >>>> > >>>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > >>>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for > >>>> ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual > >>>> General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take > >>>> place in Los Angeles. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > >>>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > >>>> options for the future of our community. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation > >> Committee. > >>>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > >>>> candidates. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > >>>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been > >>>> challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. > >>>> > >>>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > >>>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > >>>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > >>>> > >>>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, > >>>> the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and > >>>> would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the > >>>> challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on > >>>> the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community > >>>> selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to > >>>> share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues > >>>> and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of > > ICANN. > >>>> > >>>> Kindest regards, > >>>> > >>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > >>>> ALAC Chair > >>>> > >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > >>>>> Dear All, > >>>>> > >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process > >>>>> Committee > >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote > >>>> results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the > >>>> ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be > >> published. > >>>>> > >>>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat > >>>>> #15) > >>>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > >>>>> > >>>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of > >>>>> the > >>>> family name) who ran for the position: > >>>>> > >>>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > >>>>> * Sébastien Bachollet > >>>>> * Alan Greenberg > >>>>> * Evan Leibovitch > >>>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > >>>>> > >>>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > >>>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is > >>>> selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for > >>>> 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. > >>>>> > >>>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information > >>>>> about > >>>> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, > >>>>> Nathalie > >>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew > >>>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >>>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > >>> 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org> > > >>>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > >>>> > >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- > >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% > >>> > >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G > >>> isella%20Gruber,% > >>>> > >>> > >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy > >> %20St > >>> aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > <mailto:aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.o > > rg> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> At-Large mailing list > >>>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >>>>> > >>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > >>> http://atlarge.icann.org/> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >>>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >>>> > >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > >>>> <http://www.euralo.org/> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> *Veronica Cretu * > >>> > >>> > >>> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > >>> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > >>> > >>> *Member of the Steering Committee, * > >>> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > >>> * > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > >> and-cu > >>> rrent-membership > >>> < > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > >> and-cu > >>> rrent-membership > >>>> * > >>> > >>> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet > >>> Governance Forum (IGF)* > >>> > >>> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > >>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > >>> > >>> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation > >>> for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > >>> > >>> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members > >>> <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > >>> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: > >> 373 > >>> 067435000* > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >>> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > >>> <http://www.euralo.org/> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> APAC-Discuss mailing list > >>> APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > >>> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > -- > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > Facultad de Química UNAM > Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/bd6ae301a3.html --]]

1 0

Programa CROPP
by Alberto Soto April 4, 2014

April 4, 2014

Estimados, como ya habrán visto hace tiempo en la lista, estaba coordinando en dos países (HAITI y REPUBLICA DOMINICANA), para realizar reuniones en las respectivas capitales, a fin de tratar de obtener organizaciones que puedan certificar como ALS. También por otro mail solicité si alguien dominaba el francés, y lo conseguimos. Luego de muchas coordinaciones, hemos presentado los dos proyectos y entregados a Dev Anand Teelucksingh el jueves 27 de marzo, y quedamos en espera de respuesta. Hemos realizado un esfuerzo importante, coordinando con representantes de ambos países, y logrado de los sponsors locales un gran entusiasmo por tratar de dejar de ser un país que no tenga una organización que represente a los usuarios finales de Internet. En Haití hay dos organizaciones involucradas y están procurando incorporar a más, y en República Dominicana ya hay tres, dos institutos educativos de nivel superior y uno gubernamental. Todo esto de acuerdo con el modelo de múltiples partes interesadas. A su vez, para los primeros días de mayo (7, 8 y 9) he sido invitado a dictar una conferencia magistral y un taller en el CONGRESO LATINOAMERICANO DE INGENIERIA DE SISTEMAS E INFORMATICA y las JORNADAS NACIONALES DEN CLOUD COMPUTING, en Cochabamba, BOLIVIA. En este caso, pese a que los organizadores no pueden costear lo necesario para mi presencia, y no hay tiempo para hacer una solicitud en el programa CROPP, asumiré los costos involucrados. Allí por la importancia del tema, han incluido una tercera participación mía, y daré un seminario, similar a los que se dictarán en PUERTO PRÍNCIPE , HAITÍ, Y SANTO DOMINGO, REPÚBLICA DOMINICANA. Los seminarios se denominarán: El rol de los usuarios en la Gobernanza de Internet Y el temario a desarrollar será el siguiente: - Gobernanza de Internet - ICANN: Misión, visión, Ecosistema de Internet - Organizaciones At-Large: Su participación en las distintas regiones geográficas de ICANN. Región Latinoamérica y Caribe (LACRALO) - Como involucrase como organización At-Large Solo esperamos la aprobación de los proyectos en el programa CROPP. Saludos cordiales Alberto Soto

4 4

Fwd: Reconociendo Nuestros L�deres Comunitarios - Blog de David Oliva
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com April 4, 2014

April 4, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Fwd: Reconociendo Nuestros Líderes Comunitarios - Blog de David Oliva De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Ver nuestros colegas siendo honrados por su servicio. Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= http://blog.icann.org/2014/04/recognizing-our-community-leaders/ Crecimiento y la evolución de la ICANN como una organización de múltiples partes interesadas depende de el compromiso sostenido de nuestra comunidad. De hecho, nuestro mayor activo es tiempo miembro de la comunidad y compromiso con el trabajo de ICANN. - David A. Oliva * Vicepresidente de Desarrollo de Políticas de Apoyo a Gerente General de ICANN Regional Sede-Estambul * * Corporación de Internet para Nombres y Números Asignados (ICANN) * * Hakki Yeten Cad. Selenio Plaza N º: 10/CK: 5 * * 34349 Fulya, Besiktas, Estambul, Turquía * * Tel: +90.212.381.8727 <% 2B90.212.381.8727> - Fax: +90.212.381.8731 <% 2B90.212.381.8731> - Mobile: 1. 202.341.3611 <% 2B1.% 20202.341.3611> * [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/db40f588ef.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: Correction: LACRALO Election March 2014
by Humberto Carrasco April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

Estimados: Para su conocimiento. Saludos -------- Mensaje original -------- Delivered-To: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com Received: by 10.50.182.227 with SMTP id eh3csp237695igc; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:06:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.102.39 with SMTP id fl7mr9314001pab.43.1396552002208; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 12:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org. [64.78.22.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id se7si3495208pbb.225.2014.04.03.12.06.41 for <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Apr 2014 12:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of ariel.liang(a)icann.org designates 64.78.22.237 as permitted sender) client-ip=64.78.22.237; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of ariel.liang(a)icann.org designates 64.78.22.237 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ariel.liang(a)icann.org Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:06:40 -0700 From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> To: Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org>, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> CC: Silvia Vivanco <silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:07:36 -0700 Subject: Correction: LACRALO Election March 2014 Thread-Topic: Correction: LACRALO Election March 2014 Thread-Index: Ac9Pb9gGfxP7mRiOQp+jlzyDF/TS3Q== Message-ID: <CF63D278.11E70%ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="B_3479425656_13940123" MIME-Version: 1.0 Hello Alberto and Humberto, I hope your day has been going well. My name is Ariel Liang, the At-Large Policy Coordinator. It is nice to virtually meet you. I was informed that there is a country coefficient-related calculation error in the past LACRALO Election. I have checked the vote results several times and confirm that the country coefficients of all ALS representatives are correct expect for that of Carlos Alberto Watson Carazo. The weight of his vote should be 3.13 instead of 6.25. I have created PDF documents (attached) showing where the error occurs, as well as correcting the error. I have also drafted an addendum to the Vote Result (below) that you may consider publicizing via the LACRALO mailing list. Sincerely apologize for the error and the inconvenience may cause you. Thank you, Ariel ** Dear All, In the interests of transparency, the LACRALO Chair and Secretariat are obliged to report an error in calculating the weighted vote for the preferred candidates to serve as LACRALO Chair and Secretariat for the period 2014-2015. Alberto Soto is still the preferred candidate for LACRALO Chair with 43.49 weighted vote instead of 46.61 while Sergio Salinas Porto is unchanged at 28.65 weighted vote. Humberto Carrasco is still the preferred candidate for LACRALO Secretariat with the unchanged 44.80 weighted vote while Juan Manuel Rojas has 32.54 weighted vote instead of 35.66. The reason for the error was due to an incorrect country coefficient assigned to the following ALS: * ISOC-CR Costa Rica Society for Internet Development -- was 6.25 (incorrect) instead of 3.13 (correct) Here is a PDF showing the incorrect calculations: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B10rrZn6kIB0OGhPRjBPQzVEeDg/edit?usp=shari… Here is a PDF showing the corrected results: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B10rrZn6kIB0N1JyUjcyV0FjbmM/edit?usp=shari… Apologies for the error. Kind Regards, Alberto Soto LACRALO Chair Humberto Carrasco LACRALO Secretariat

1 0

Re: R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by apisanty＠gmail.com April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: apisanty(a)gmail.com Adam, esta respuesta mía sólo irá a algunas listas (que es demasiado -publicado cruz.) Su admisión en la última frase es la clave de la simplificación discusión del Comité de nominaciones de ICANN y darle un poco de enfoque realista. Usted dice que a menudo sentía inadecuado para juzgar los méritos de los candidatos que estaban muy por encima de su capacidad. Usted debería haber dimitido en ese mismo momento, pero vamos a saltar esa parte e ir en una declaración más general. El diseño del NomCom preveía una aplicación en la que todas las comunidades que designa los miembros del Comité de Nominaciones enviaría un "estadista senior", alguien que ejercería la administración sobre el bien común, sin sin tener en cuenta que las comunidades 'propios intereses y principios rectores. En practican esta no sucedió.En cambio con frecuencia las comunidades las personas designadas no independientes, junior que tuvieron que demostrar sus méritos a la comunidad en el Comité de Nominaciones y podía esperar alguna recompensa en el futuro. Esta ruptura de la confianza y la renuncia de la administración ha sido tóxica. No hay nada que se puede escribir en las reglas que pueden causar el cambio hacia un modelo de gestión y la ganancia-confianza. Tiene que ser la acción de los la propia comunidad que comienza a pensar menos en cómo conseguir un tamaño más grande del pastel y más de cómo hacer el pastel mejor. Por lo tanto creo que este es el peor de los tiempos para un replanteamiento de el Comité de Nominaciones y otros procesos que se interponen a la Junta de Directores. El cambio puede ser necesario, a pesar de lo que el cambio que se necesita es un debate muy abierto. Pero el cosa para centrarse en estos momentos es la sustitución de la función de la NTIA, nada más. Si eso implica otros cambios estos deben ser muy convincente. Tuya es, Alejandro Pisanty El Jueves, 03 de abril 2014 a las 10:54 AM, Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> escribió: > I've been involved in NomCom far too many times :-) And each year the > community was asked for input on the criteria. > > ICANN is a large and complex organization: having experience of complex > organizations, budgets, strategic planning, it part of the job. Doesn't > mean it has to be a person's only skill, but in a broad aggregate it needs > to be present. And smart people will learn, but you don't want too many > learning on the job when they are voting on issues that affect millions and > $millions. Look at the people NomCom has appointed. There's only one that > fits the pure "large corporate board" category. > > Selection of NomCom members does need more thought. I often felt a fraud > judging people on criteria I myself had little or no experience of. > > Adam > > > On Apr 4, 2014, at 12:31 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote: > > > Carlton, > > > > I completely agree with you, the criteria given to NomCom have to be > > thoroughly revised. > > > > Experience on "large corporate boards" has been an indication given to > > NomCom in the past, but I believe that one of the key words in the ideal > > Director profile is "in aggregate". > > > > This means that while ideally a Director has to have an incredible > knowledge > > and experience, this is meant in the sense that the Board, as a whole, > needs > > to have this wealth of knowledge and experience, not necessarily each and > > every Director. So, it might well be that at certain moments there is not > > enough large corporate boards experience on the Board, and it will be > > legitimate to look for reinforcing this aspect, but this does not mean > that > > all candidates that do not have such item in the profile should be > > discarded. To make an example, if "large corporate boards" is a need, > > "non-profit boards" is well another one. > > > > So the two big questions are: > > > > - How to cefine the requirements for NomCom > > > > - How to select the NomCom members (i.e. is the current > mechanism > > the best one?) > > > > Cheers, > > > > Roberto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com] > > Inviato: mercoledì 2 aprile 2014 02:56 > > A: Roberto Gaetano > > Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of lac-discuss; > > Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuss > > Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] > > VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > > > > > Roberto: > > > > I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic > and > > in the overarching At-Large interest. > > > > > > > > Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot > accept > > that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and with > > respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to 'take > > the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This is > my > > position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly > elected > > or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged as > truly > > reflecting the wishes of the constituency. > > > > > > > > Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly > > configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the At-Large > than > > the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have one > > quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that set of > > criteria utilised for selection of directors. > > > > > > > > In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that > space > > for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria between > > persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those without. > > And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of > > 'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely > > participants from my side of the world will enter the process already > > disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at that > level > > for those of us at the edge of empire. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > -Carlton > > > > > > > > > > > > ============================== > > Carlton A Samuels > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround > > ============================= > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano > > <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the Board > > with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. > > So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, years > > later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle of > > the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the > > organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. > > The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the > > stakeholder will get representation based on their relative "strength". > The > > parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where > the > > constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic laws > > and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by > > constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of the > > different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the > elders > > that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common good. > > This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, > albeit > > with only partial, although significant, results. > > It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get > rid as > > much as possible of the system by which we have representative of > "parties" > > that often have conflicting interests. > > I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed Directors, > and > > have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by > NomCom. > > The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set that is > > missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names > > accordingly. > > Cheers, > > Roberto > > > > > > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- > >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- > >> bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M > >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 > >> A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang > >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- > >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > afri-discuss@atlarge- > >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; > na- > >> discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > > > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > >> > > > >> Dear Wolfgang, > >> > >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to > > ensure an > >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in > the > >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared > >> responsibility in the selection process. > >> > >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would > > positively > >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- > >> stakeholder model of Governance. > >> > >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and > >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large > has > >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you > > have > >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, > >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even > > more. > >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which > > would > >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other > Stakeholders > >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the > > Board, > >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. > >> > >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by > two > >> different processes: > >> > >> 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate > > and > >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could > >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist > within > >> this AC at the moment. > >> > >> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an > internal > >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a > >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) > >> > >> Thank you. > >> > >> Sivasubramanian M > >> India > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < > >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to > >>> Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing > >>> more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > >>> > >>> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA > >>> transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are > >>> remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine > >>> voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, > >>> 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > >>> (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be > >>> established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the > >> Initial Board". > >>> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- > >> en.htm# > >>> V > >>> > >>> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for > >>> two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, > >> chaired > >>> by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting > >>> Organisation > >>> (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > >>> > >>> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h > >>> tm#_toc523422641 > >>> > >>> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an > >>> At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional > >>> councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory > >> Committee" > >>> (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > >>> establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the > >>> board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC > >>> was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to > >>> the chair of the GAC). > >>> > >>> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for > >>> two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the > >>> horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the > >>> multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has > >>> to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong > >>> civil society role in policy development and decision making. > >>> > >>> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > >>> both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and > >>> NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and > >> collaboration with > >>> private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. > >>> > >>> Wolfgang > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> wolfgang > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> > >>> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > >>> Veronica Cretu > >>> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > >>> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > >>> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > >>> apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > >>> na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large > >>> Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo > >>> and build up on it, I would also like to: > >>> > >>> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of > >>> the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and > >>> initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so > >>> this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can > >>> learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share > >>> the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and > >>> continue serve the community in the best possible ways. > >>> > >>> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her > >>> much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are > >>> important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, > >>> and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the > >>> world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on > > the > >> community-at-large. > >>> > >>> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has > >>> been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience > >>> there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input > > from > >> members. > >>> > >>> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > >>> safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > >>> > >>> With very best, > >>> Veronica > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > >>> <ocl(a)gih.com > >>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Dear All, > >>>> > >>>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what > >>>> was a very balanced election that required many rounds to > >>>> differentiate the candidates. > >>>> > >>>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > >>>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for > >>>> ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual > >>>> General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take > >>>> place in Los Angeles. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > >>>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > >>>> options for the future of our community. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation > >> Committee. > >>>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > >>>> candidates. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > >>>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been > >>>> challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. > >>>> > >>>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > >>>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > >>>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > >>>> > >>>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, > >>>> the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and > >>>> would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the > >>>> challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on > >>>> the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community > >>>> selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to > >>>> share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues > >>>> and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of > > ICANN. > >>>> > >>>> Kindest regards, > >>>> > >>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > >>>> ALAC Chair > >>>> > >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > >>>>> Dear All, > >>>>> > >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process > >>>>> Committee > >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote > >>>> results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the > >>>> ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be > >> published. > >>>>> > >>>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat > >>>>> #15) > >>>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > >>>>> > >>>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of > >>>>> the > >>>> family name) who ran for the position: > >>>>> > >>>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > >>>>> * Sébastien Bachollet > >>>>> * Alan Greenberg > >>>>> * Evan Leibovitch > >>>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > >>>>> > >>>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > >>>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is > >>>> selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for > >>>> 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. > >>>>> > >>>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information > >>>>> about > >>>> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, > >>>>> Nathalie > >>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew > >>>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >>>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > >>> 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org> > > >>>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > >>>> > >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- > >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% > >>> > >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G > >>> isella%20Gruber,% > >>>> > >>> > >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy > >> %20St > >>> aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > <mailto: > aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff(a)atlarge.icann.o > > rg> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> At-Large mailing list > >>>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >>>>> > >>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > >>> http://atlarge.icann.org/> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >>>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >>>> > >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > >>>> <http://www.euralo.org/> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> *Veronica Cretu * > >>> > >>> > >>> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > >>> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > >>> > >>> *Member of the Steering Committee, * > >>> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > >>> * > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > >> and-cu > >>> rrent-membership > >>> < > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > >> and-cu > >>> rrent-membership > >>>> * > >>> > >>> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet > >>> Governance Forum (IGF)* > >>> > >>> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > >>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > >>> > >>> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation > >>> for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > >>> > >>> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members > >>> <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > >>> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: > >> 373 > >>> 067435000* > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >>> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > >>> <http://www.euralo.org/> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> APAC-Discuss mailing list > >>> APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > >>> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > --------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Qumica UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF México +52-1-5541444475 DESDE EL EXTRANJERO +525541444475 DESDE Mxico SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al Grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Unete a ISOC México, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6ebcfbd03b.html --]]

1 0

Re: R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by ajp＠glocom.ac.jp April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp He estado involucrado en el Comité de nominaciones demasiadas veces :-) Y cada año la comunidad pidieron para la entrada en los criterios. ICANN es una organización grande y compleja: tener experiencia de las organizaciones complejas, presupuestos, planificación estratégica, es parte del trabajo. Eso no significa que tiene que ser única habilidad de una persona, pero en un agregado amplio que tiene que estar presente. Y las personas inteligentes aprenden, pero no quieren demasiadas aprendizaje en el trabajo cuando están votando en las cuestiones que afectan a millones y millones de dólares. Miren a la gente NomCom ha nombrado. Sólo hay una que se adapte a la categoría de puro "gran tablero de las empresas". Selección de los miembros del NomCom sí necesita más pensamiento. A menudo me sentía un fraude juzgar a la gente sobre los criterios que yo mismo había poca o ninguna experiencia de. Adán El 04 de abril 2014, a las 12:31 de la mañana, Roberto Gaetano escribió: > Carlton, > > I completely agree with you, the criteria given to NomCom have to be > thoroughly revised. > > Experience on large corporate boards has been an indication given to > NomCom in the past, but I believe that one of the key words in the ideal > Director profile is in aggregate. > > This means that while ideally a Director has to have an incredible knowledge > and experience, this is meant in the sense that the Board, as a whole, needs > to have this wealth of knowledge and experience, not necessarily each and > every Director. So, it might well be that at certain moments there is not > enough large corporate boards experience on the Board, and it will be > legitimate to look for reinforcing this aspect, but this does not mean that > all candidates that do not have such item in the profile should be > discarded. To make an example, if large corporate boards is a need, > non-profit boards is well another one. > > So the two big questions are: > > - How to cefine the requirements for NomCom > > - How to select the NomCom members (i.e. is the current mechanism > the best one?) > > Cheers, > > Roberto > > > > > > > > Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com] > Inviato: mercoledì 2 aprile 2014 02:56 > A: Roberto Gaetano > Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of lac-discuss; > Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuss > Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] > VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > Roberto: > > I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic and > in the overarching At-Large interest. > > > > Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot accept > that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and with > respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to 'take > the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This is my > position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly elected > or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged as truly > reflecting the wishes of the constituency. > > > > Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly > configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the At-Large than > the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have one > quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that set of > criteria utilised for selection of directors. > > > > In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that space > for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria between > persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those without. > And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of > 'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely > participants from my side of the world will enter the process already > disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at that level > for those of us at the edge of empire. > > > > Best, > > -Carlton > > > > > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround > ============================= > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano > <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the Board > with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. > So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, years > later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle of > the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the > organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. > The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the > stakeholder will get representation based on their relative "strength". The > parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where the > constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic laws > and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by > constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of the > different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the elders > that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common good. > This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, albeit > with only partial, although significant, results. > It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get rid as > much as possible of the system by which we have representative of "parties" > that often have conflicting interests. > I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed Directors, and > have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by NomCom. > The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set that is > missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names > accordingly. > Cheers, > Roberto > > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- >> bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 >> A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > afri-discuss@atlarge- >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na- >> discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >> Dear Wolfgang, >> >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to > ensure an >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in the >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared >> responsibility in the selection process. >> >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would > positively >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- >> stakeholder model of Governance. >> >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large has >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you > have >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even > more. >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which > would >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other Stakeholders >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the > Board, >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. >> >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by two >> different processes: >> >> 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate > and >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist within >> this AC at the moment. >> >> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an internal >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) >> >> Thank you. >> >> Sivasubramanian M >> India >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to >>> Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing >>> more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >>> >>> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA >>> transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are >>> remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine >>> voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, >>> 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine >>> (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be >>> established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the >> Initial Board". >>> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- >> en.htm# >>> V >>> >>> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for >>> two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, >> chaired >>> by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting >>> Organisation >>> (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. >>> >>> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h >>> tm#_toc523422641 >>> >>> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an >>> At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional >>> councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory >> Committee" >>> (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the >>> establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the >>> board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC >>> was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to >>> the chair of the GAC). >>> >>> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for >>> two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the >>> horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the >>> multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has >>> to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong >>> civil society role in policy development and decision making. >>> >>> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos >>> both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and >>> NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and >> collaboration with >>> private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. >>> >>> Wolfgang >>> >>> >>> >>> wolfgang >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von >>> Veronica Cretu >>> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >>> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >>> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; >>> na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large >>> Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo >>> and build up on it, I would also like to: >>> >>> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of >>> the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and >>> initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so >>> this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can >>> learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share >>> the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and >>> continue serve the community in the best possible ways. >>> >>> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her >>> much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are >>> important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, >>> and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the >>> world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on > the >> community-at-large. >>> >>> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has >>> been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience >>> there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input > from >> members. >>> >>> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home >>> safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >>> >>> With very best, >>> Veronica >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >>> <ocl(a)gih.com >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what >>>> was a very balanced election that required many rounds to >>>> differentiate the candidates. >>>> >>>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >>>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for >>>> ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual >>>> General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take >>>> place in Los Angeles. >>>> >>>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is >>>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >>>> options for the future of our community. >>>> >>>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation >> Committee. >>>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of >>>> candidates. >>>> >>>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >>>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been >>>> challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. >>>> >>>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >>>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >>>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >>>> >>>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, >>>> the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and >>>> would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the >>>> challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on >>>> the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community >>>> selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to >>>> share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues >>>> and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of > ICANN. >>>> >>>> Kindest regards, >>>> >>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >>>> ALAC Chair >>>> >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >>>>> Dear All, >>>>> >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process >>>>> Committee >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote >>>> results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the >>>> ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be >> published. >>>>> >>>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat >>>>> #15) >>>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >>>>> >>>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of >>>>> the >>>> family name) who ran for the position: >>>>> >>>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >>>>> * Sébastien Bachollet >>>>> * Alan Greenberg >>>>> * Evan Leibovitch >>>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >>>>> >>>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >>>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is >>>> selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for >>>> 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. >>>>> >>>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information >>>>> about >>>> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, >>>>> Nathalie >>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >>>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >>>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% >>> 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org> > >>>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >>>> >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% >>> >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G >>> isella%20Gruber,% >>>> >>> >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy >> %20St >>> aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > <mailto:aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.o > rg> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> At-Large mailing list >>>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >>>>> >>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < >>> http://atlarge.icann.org/> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >>>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >>>> >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >>>> <http://www.euralo.org/> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Veronica Cretu * >>> >>> >>> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >>> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >>> >>> *Member of the Steering Committee, * >>> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >>> * >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> and-cu >>> rrent-membership >>> < >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> and-cu >>> rrent-membership >>>> * >>> >>> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet >>> Governance Forum (IGF)* >>> >>> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >>> >>> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation >>> for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >>> >>> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members >>> <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* >>> >>> >>> >>> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >>> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: >> 373 >>> 067435000* >>> _______________________________________________ >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >>> >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >>> <http://www.euralo.org/> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> APAC-Discuss mailing list >>> APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss >>> >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b88bc734e9.html --]]

1 0

Re: R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by vanda＠uol.com.br April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: vanda(a)uol.com.br Hola a todos, Normalmente la comprensión de la NOMCOM es proporcionar el mejor candidato que cumplen con la falta de conocimiento específico de la junta directiva, teniendo en cuenta principalmente todo el perfil del candidato y su capacidad para llevar a cabo en tal junta. Cada año Nomcom tiene una opinión de la Junta sobre qué tipo de conocimiento ahora que falta en el estribo. NOMCOM también considera el perfil de que abandona el tablero de cada año y, si ya se ha definido, el nuevo llegados desde Sos + AC. Por ejemplo, ya sabemos que Rinalia sustituirá por Sebastien 15a del asiento, por lo que su perfil es considerado entre todas las demandas de la Junta. Hoy en día estamos teniendo bastante apoyo profesional para el cazador principal externo organización y capacitación de funcionamiento de la entrevista que se propicie una mucho nuestra capacidad de elegir siempre los mejores candidatos. Reseñas, por otro lado, como se revisa todos los cuerpos dentro de la ICANN, son uno de la mejores mecanismos de gestión de la ICANN tiene que presentar a la comunidad. Siempre hay espacio para mejorar y las revisiones llevar esta oportunidad de cada grupo dentro de ICANN. Todo lo mejor, Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, CJ 1004 01311-200 - Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil Línea del terreno: +55 11 3266.6253 Móvil: + 55 11 98181.1464 El 03/04/14, 12:31, "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> escribió: > Carlton, > > Estoy totalmente de acuerdo con usted, los criterios que figuran a NomCom tienen que ser > Minuciosamente revisado. > > Experiencia en "grandes consejos de administración" ha sido una indicación dada a > Comité de nominaciones en el pasado, pero creo que una de las palabras clave en el ideal > Perfil del director es "en su conjunto". > > Esto significa que, si bien lo ideal sería un director tiene que tener una increíble > Conocimiento > Y la experiencia, esto se entiende en el sentido de que el Consejo, en su conjunto, > necesidades > Tener esta riqueza de conocimientos y experiencia, no necesariamente todos y > Cada director. Por lo tanto, bien podría ser que en ciertos momentos no hay > Suficientemente grande experiencia directorios de las empresas en el Consejo, y será > Legítima para buscar reforzar este aspecto, pero esto no significa > Que > Todos los candidatos que no cuentan con dichos puntos en el perfil deben ser > Desechado. Para dar un ejemplo, si "los grandes consejos de administración" es una necesidad, > "Juntas sin fines de lucro" es bien otra. > > Así que las dos grandes preguntas son: > > - ¿Cómo cefine los requisitos para NomCom > > - ¿Cómo seleccionar los miembros de NomCom (es decir, es el mecanismo actual > El mejor?) > > Saludos, > > Roberto > > > > > > > >Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com] >Inviato: mercoledÃ¬ 2 aprile 2014 02:56 >A: Roberto Gaetano >Cc: Sivasubramanian M; KleinwÃ€chter, Wolfgang; >lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of lac-discuss; >Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuss >Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] >VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > >Roberto: > >I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic and >in the overarching At-Large interest. > > > >Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot accept >that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and with >respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to 'take >the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This is >my >position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly >elected >or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged as >truly >reflecting the wishes of the constituency. > > > >Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly >configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the At-Large >than >the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have one >quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that set of >criteria utilised for selection of directors. > > > >In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that space >for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria between >persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those without. >And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of >'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely >participants from my side of the world will enter the process already >disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at that >level >for those of us at the edge of empire. > > > >Best, > >-Carlton > > > > > >============================== >Carlton A Samuels >Mobile: 876-818-1799 >Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround >============================= > > > >On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano ><roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the Board >with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. >So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, years >later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle of >the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the >organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. >The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the >stakeholder will get representation based on their relative "strength". >The >parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where the >constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic laws >and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by >constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of the >different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the elders >that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common good. >This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, >albeit >with only partial, although significant, results. >It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get rid >as >much as possible of the system by which we have representative of >"parties" >that often have conflicting interests. >I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed Directors, >and >have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by >NomCom. >The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set that is >missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names >accordingly. >Cheers, >Roberto > > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- >> bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 >> A: KleinwÃ€chter, Wolfgang >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >afri-discuss@atlarge- >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na- >> discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >> Dear Wolfgang, >> >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to >ensure an >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in >>the >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared >> responsibility in the selection process. >> >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would >positively >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- >> stakeholder model of Governance. >> >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large >>has >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you >have >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even >more. >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which >would >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other >>Stakeholders >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the >Board, >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. >> >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by >>two >> different processes: >> >> 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate >and >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist >>within >> this AC at the moment. >> >> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an >>internal >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) >> >> Thank you. >> >> Sivasubramanian M >> India >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "KleinwÃ€chter, Wolfgang" < >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to >> > Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing >> > more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >> > >> > I this context: DonÂŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA >> > transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are >> > remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine >> > voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, >> > 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine >> > (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be >> > established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of >>the >> Initial Board". >> > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- >> en.htm# >> > V >> > >> > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for >> > two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, >> chaired >> > by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting >> > Organisation >> > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. >> > >> > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h >> > tm#_toc523422641 >> > >> > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an >> > At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional >> > councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory >> Committee" >> > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the >> > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the >> > board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC >> > was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to >> > the chair of the GAC). >> > >> > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for >> > two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the >> > horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the >> > multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has >> > to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong >> > civil society role in policy development and decision making. >> > >> > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos >> > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and >> > NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and >> collaboration with >> > private sector, technical community and governments. A big >>challenge. >> > >> > Wolfgang >> > >> > >> > >> > wolfgang >> > >> > >> > >> > ________________________________ >> > >> > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von >> > Veronica Cretu >> > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >> > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; >> > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large >> > Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >> > >> > >> > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo >> > and build up on it, I would also like to: >> > >> > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of >> > the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and >> > initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so >> > this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can >> > learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share >> > the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and >> > continue serve the community in the best possible ways. >> > >> > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her >> > much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are >> > important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, >> > and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the >> > world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on >the >> community-at-large. >> > >> > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has >> > been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience >> > there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input >from >> members. >> > >> > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home >> > safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >> > >> > With very best, >> > Veronica >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> > <ocl(a)gih.com >> > >wrote: >> > >> > > Dear All, >> > > >> > > I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what >> > > was a very balanced election that required many rounds to >> > > differentiate the candidates. >> > > >> > > Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >> > > moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for >> > > ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual >> > > General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take >> > > place in Los Angeles. >> > > >> > > Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is >> > > through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >> > > options for the future of our community. >> > > >> > > Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation >> Committee. >> > > Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of >> > > candidates. >> > > >> > > Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >> > > Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been >> > > challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. >> > > >> > > The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >> > > learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >> > > recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >> > > >> > > Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, >> > > the Board Member selected by At-Large is SÃ©bastien Bachollet and >> > > would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the >> > > challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on >> > > the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community >> > > selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to >> > > share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues >> > > and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of >ICANN. >> > > >> > > Kindest regards, >> > > >> > > Olivier MJ CrÃ©pin-Leblond >> > > ALAC Chair >> > > >> > > On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >> > > > Dear All, >> > > > >> > > > Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process >> > > > Committee >> > > (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote >> > > results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the >> > > ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be >> published. >> > > > >> > > > This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat >> > > > #15) >> > > Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >> > > > >> > > > Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of >> > > > the >> > > family name) who ran for the position: >> > > > >> > > > * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >> > > > * SÃ©bastien Bachollet >> > > > * Alan Greenberg >> > > > * Evan Leibovitch >> > > > * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >> > > > >> > > > After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >> > > breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is >> > > selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for >> > > 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. >> > > > >> > > > You may review the results, as well as the detailed information >> > > > about >> > > the selection procedure, under: >>https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > >> > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, >> > > > Nathalie >> > > Peregrine and Terri Agnew >> > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% >> > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org ><mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org> > >> > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> > > >> > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% >> > >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G >> > isella%20Gruber,% >> > > >> > >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy >> %20St >> > aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org ><mailto:aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann >.o >rg> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > At-Large mailing list >> > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >> > > > >> > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < >> > http://atlarge.icann.org/> >> > > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > > >> > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > > <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > *Veronica Cretu * >> > >> > >> > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >> > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >> > >> > *Member of the Steering Committee, * >> > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >> > * >> > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> and-cu >> > rrent-membership >> > < >> > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> and-cu >> > rrent-membership >> > >* >> > >> > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet >> > Governance Forum (IGF)* >> > >> > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >> > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >> > >> > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation >> > for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >> > >> > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members >> > <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* >> > >> > >> > >> > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >> > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: >> 373 >> > 067435000* >> > _______________________________________________ >> > EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > >> > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > APAC-Discuss mailing list >> > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss >> > >> > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > >_______________________________________________ >lac-discuss-es mailing list >lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > >http://www.lacralo.org > > > >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6be709beae.html --]]

1 0

R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2014 Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selecci�n de At-Large
by roberto_gaetano＠hotmail.com April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2014 Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selección de At-Large De: roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com Carlton, Estoy totalmente de acuerdo con usted, los criterios que figuran a NomCom tienen que ser revisado a fondo. La experiencia en los grandes consejos de administración ha sido una indicación dada a Comité de nominaciones en el pasado, pero creo que una de las palabras clave en el ideal Perfil del Director es en conjunto. Esto significa que, si bien lo ideal sería un director tiene que tener un conocimiento increíble y la experiencia, esto se entiende en el sentido de que el Consejo de Administración, en su conjunto, las necesidades tener esta riqueza de conocimientos y experiencia, no necesariamente todos y cada director. Por lo tanto, bien podría ser que en ciertos momentos no hay experiencia suficiente grandes consejos de administración en el Consejo, y será legítimo para buscar reforzar este aspecto, pero esto no significa que todos los candidatos que no cuentan con dichos puntos en el perfil deben ser desechado.Para dar un ejemplo, si los grandes consejos de administración es una necesidad, juntas sin fines de lucro es bien otra. Así que las dos grandes preguntas son: - ¿Cómo cefine los requisitos para NomCom - ¿Cómo seleccionar los miembros de NomCom (es decir, es el mecanismo actual el mejor?) Saludos, Roberto Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto: carlton.samuels @ gmail.com] Inviato: aprile mercoled2 2014 02:56 A: Roberto Gaetano Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwchter, Wolfgang; lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Versión en español de lac-discuss; Discusión de At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Discuta; At-Large Anuncios; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuta Oggetto: Re: R: [lac-discuss-es]: [EURO-Opinar] [APAC-Opinar] [At-Large] Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección Roberto: Yo también creo lo que está proponiendo no es sólo sensata sino estratégico y en el global de At-Large interés. Tal vez sea debido a mi posición de que, por principio, simplemente no puedo aceptar que en materia de gobernabilidad y cuando forma parte de un grupo distante y con respecto a la toma de decisiones, el representante debería estar obligada a "tomar el látigo "- lo que significa seguir las instrucciones - de su grupo /. Este es mi posición sin importar el tamaño del electorado; si popularmente electo o no, no tengo dudas de magníficos que uno puede confinarse y juzgados como verdaderamente que refleja los deseos del electorado. De hecho en el inicio, a algunos de nosotros pensamos que el papel de enlace correctamente configurado probablemente puede tener un interés más sostenible para el At-Large de el director de votación única. Así que, aunque estamos de acuerdo en gran parte, tengo una objetar con su caracterización de la función del Comité de nominaciones; ese conjunto de criterios utilizados para la selección de directores. En su estimación de este nuevo papel de la Junta, espero que el espacio se calcula para una mayor orientación por lo que hay un equilibrio en los criterios entre las personas que tengan experiencia en 'grandes consejos de administración "que los que no. Y lo digo en el contexto de la interpretación probable del significado de "Grande". Para dependiendo de quién la define "grande", todo un conjunto de probabilidades participantes de mi lado del mundo entrarán en el proceso ya desfavorecidos. Y eso no augura nada bueno para la participación en ese nivel para aquellos de nosotros en el borde del imperio. Best, -Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround ============================= El mar, 01 de abril 2014 a las 24:19, Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> escribió: He sido uno de los campeones de la representación de ALAC a la Junta con los directores con derecho a voto, a la par con las otras organizaciones de apoyo. Así que creo que no puedo ser sospechoso de anti-ALAC-ismo si yo ahora, años después, argumentan que para luchar por más Consejeros en el Consejo es una batalla de el pasado, que tiene poco significado mirando a la evolución de la organizazion ya una plena realización del modelo de múltiples partes interesadas. El modelo de múltiples partes interesadas no es un modelo parlamentario en el que el los interesados \u200b\u200bobtendrá representación en función de su "fuerza" relativa. La régimen parlamentario está bien para una organización en su infancia, en el que el constitución tiene que ser redactado. En una organización madura, con las leyes básicas y comportamientos ya definidos, la designación de representantes por circunscripciones trae inevitablemente a la Junta de los mezquinos intereses de la diferentes grupos en lugar de tener una especie de consejo de los ancianos que hace abstracción de los intereses contingentes que buscan el bien común. Esta ha sido la pauta que se intentó con la revisión de la GNSO, aunque con sólo parcial, aunque significativas, resultados. Es el momento de proponer un modelo diferente para la Junta, así, deshacerse como tanto como sea posible del sistema por el cual tenemos representante de "partes" que a menudo tienen intereses en conflicto. Creo que debemos ir hacia la reducción de los Consejeros así nombrados, y tendrá lugar una parte mayor, posiblemente un súper-mayoría, designado por Comité de nominaciones. El Comité de Nominaciones también debe obtener una descripción precisa del conjunto de habilidades que es que falta para ese año en particular, para que puedan elegir los nombres en consecuencia. Saludos, Roberto > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- > bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M > Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 > A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- > lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na- > discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > Dear Wolfgang, > > The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to > independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in the > process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared > responsibility in the selection process. > > A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would > demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- > stakeholder model of Governance. > > In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and > four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large has > matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you > mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, > which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even > In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which > reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other Stakeholders > might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the > because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. > > More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by two > different processes: > > 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate > the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could > sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist within > this AC at the moment. > > 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an internal > NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a > process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) > > Thank you. > > Sivasubramanian M > India > > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < > wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to > > Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing > > more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > > > > I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA > > transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are > > remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine > > voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, > > 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > > (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be > > established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the > Initial Board". > > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- > en.htm# > > V > > > > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for > > two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, > chaired > > by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting > > Organisation > > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > > > > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h > > tm#_toc523422641 > > > > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an > > At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional > > councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory > Committee" > > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the > > board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC > > was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to > > the chair of the GAC). > > > > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for > > two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the > > horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the > > multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has > > to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong > > civil society role in policy development and decision making. > > > > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and > > NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and > collaboration with > > private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. > > > > Wolfgang > > > > > > > > wolfgang > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > > Veronica Cretu > > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large > > Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > > > > > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo > > and build up on it, I would also like to: > > > > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of > > the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and > > initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so > > this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can > > learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share > > the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and > > continue serve the community in the best possible ways. > > > > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her > > much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are > > important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, > > and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the > > world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on > community-at-large. > > > > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has > > been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience > > there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input > members. > > > > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > > safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > > > With very best, > > Veronica > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > <ocl(a)gih.com > > >wrote: > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what > > > was a very balanced election that required many rounds to > > > differentiate the candidates. > > > > > > Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > > > moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for > > > ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual > > > General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take > > > place in Los Angeles. > > > > > > Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > > > through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > > > options for the future of our community. > > > > > > Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation > Committee. > > > Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > > > candidates. > > > > > > Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > > > Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been > > > challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. > > > > > > The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > > > learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > > > recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > > > > > > Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, > > > the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and > > > would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the > > > challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on > > > the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community > > > selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to > > > share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues > > > and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of > > > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > > ALAC Chair > > > > > > On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process > > > > Committee > > > (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote > > > results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the > > > ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be > published. > > > > > > > > This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat > > > > #15) > > > Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > > > > > > > > Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of > > > > the > > > family name) who ran for the position: > > > > > > > > * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > > > > * Sébastien Bachollet > > > > * Alan Greenberg > > > > * Evan Leibovitch > > > > * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > > > > > > > > After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > > > breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is > > > selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for > > > 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. > > > > > > > > You may review the results, as well as the detailed information > > > > about > > > the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, > > > > Nathalie > > > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- > B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% > > > 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G > > isella%20Gruber,% > > > > > > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy > %20St > > aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org rg> > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > At-Large mailing list > > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > > > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > > http://atlarge.icann.org/> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Veronica Cretu * > > > > > > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > > > *Member of the Steering Committee, * > > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > > * > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > and-cu > > rrent-membership > > < > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > and-cu > > rrent-membership > > >* > > > > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet > > Governance Forum (IGF)* > > > > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > > > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation > > for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > > > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members > > <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* > > > > > > > > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: > 373 > > 067435000* > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > APAC-Discuss mailing list > > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org > > > > > > -- > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/698787e3e0.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: �C�mo hacerse socio? | IndividualUsers
by josefranciscoarce＠gmail.com April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Fwd: ¿Cómo hacerse socio? | IndividualUsers De: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com FYI ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- De: "Tracy F. Hackshaw @ Google" <tracyhackshaw(a)gmail.com> Fecha: abr 2, 2014 22:08 Asunto: [becas-alumnos] ¿Cómo hacerse socio? | IndividualUsers Para: "Fellowships-alumni(a)icann.org" <fellowships-alumni(a)icann.org> Cc: En caso de que usted estaba viviendo bajo una roca ... ;) http://individualusers.org/?page_id=8 ------ Rgds, Tracy _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b3a7c97006.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Terremoto en Chile
by geek.iskander＠gmail.com April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Terremoto en Chile De: geek.iskander(a)gmail.com Sergio Gracias a Dios todo bien, El Terremoto FUE en el Norte de Nuestro pas, Pero temamos Por El tsunami, Que afortunadamente no llegcon mucha Fuerza una regin our. Gracias por la preocupacin. Saludos Javier Chanda 02/04/2014 08:23 GMT-04: 00 <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> : > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Earthquake in Chile > From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > Dear Humberto and Javier. Are you and your family well? > _______________________________________________ > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e30ce74f84.html --]]

1 0

Terremoto en Chile
by Sergio Salinas Porto April 2, 2014

April 2, 2014

Estimados Humberto y Javier. Estan bien ustedes y su familia?

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Terremoto en Chile
by dacostabastidas＠dtech.ec April 2, 2014

April 2, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Terremoto en Chile De: dacostabastidas(a)dtech.ec Estimado Humberto Saludo solidario desde Ecuador Con La hermana Nacin de Chile Que es porción NuevaMente asolada el estremecimiento brutal de la tierra. Como en la anterior OPORTUNIDAD, EL DESASTRE dejarvisible el temperamento chileno párr Superar la adversidad. Atte Diego Acosta Bastidas, el Dr. DTECH ECUADOR 02/04/2014 07:42 GMT-05: 00 <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> : > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re: Earthquake in Chile > From: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com > > Sergio, > > > Thank you very much for this email. > > > I do not live in that part of Chile, but I have family who live if > there. They are thankfully uneventful. > > > Regards > The 02/04 / > On 02/04/2014 1:22 pm, Sergio Salinas Porto wrote: > > Estimados Humberto y Javier. Estan bien ustedes y su familia? > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2af9394862.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Transferencia de las Funciones de IANA a la Comunidad Global
by josefranciscoarce＠gmail.com April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Transferencia de las Funciones de IANA a la Comunidad Global De: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com Estimado Rodrigo, Muchas gracias Por tu correo gentil. Como siempre estaremos Apoyando el Proceso Que Lidera ICANN y Dando imput en La Medida Que se nos permita. Saludos José Arce El 19 de marzo 2014 15:05, "Rodrigo de la Parra" <rodrigo.delaparra(a)icann.org> escribi: > Estimados Amigos de LACRALO: > > Espero que este correo los encuentre muy bien. > > Como es de su conocimiento el Gobierno de los Estados Unidos de América > recientemente anunció su intención de transferir su rol técnico respecto > de las funciones de IANA a la comunidad multipartita o multisectorial > global de Internet. > > En 1998, el año en que se forma ICANN, el gobierno de los Estados Unidos > determinó que conforme el Internet se expandiera globalmente, su > responsabilidad se trasladaría a todos los actores de Internet. Actores > que representaran no solo a gobiernos, sino también al sector privado, la > sociedad civil, las comunidades técnicas y académicas, así como los > usuarios independientes de Internet alrededor del mundo. > > Desde su formación, ICANN ha cumplido sus obligaciones contractuales al > ejecutar estas funciones técnicas y ha alcanzado tanto la excelencia > operacional como la madurez organizacional. Ahora, el Gobierno de los > Estados Unidos le ha solicitado a ICANN implementar, bajo un enfoque > multipartita o multisectorial, la transición de su rol de supervisión > iniciando un proceso que permita a la comunidad diseñar un marco > incluyente y "de abajo hacia arriba" para tales efectos. Este proceso > incluirá oportunidades para la incorporación de insumos, incluyendo tanto > aquellos de las organizaciones de soporte y comités asesores activos en > ICANN, como aquellos de otros actores interesados. > > También quisiera aprovechar esta oportunidad para recordarles sobre la > resolución que emitió el Directorio de ICANN el 17 de febrero de 2014 > para acelerar el proceso de globalización de ICANN. Nuestro equipo se > encuentra comprometido para ejecutar este ambicioso plan para implementar > este proceso de globalización tan rápido como sea posible para asegurar la > inclusion de todos los actores relevantes en todo el mundo. > > Esta resolución pueden cosultarla aquí: > > https://www.icann.org/es/groups/board/documents/resolutions-17feb14-es.pdf > > Su participación es muy importante en este proceso. A continuación te > describo una serie de eventos y fechas clave que deben tomar en cuenta: > > EURO 17 de Marzo de 2014: Publicación del anuncio de ICANN describiendo > los > principios de relacionamiento con la comunidad y los objetivos de la > consulta pública en Singapur. > EURO 21 -27 de Marzo de 2014: Durante nuestra reunión 49 en Singapur- > Diálogo > público y consulta con la comunidad sobre cómo deben ocurrir los > mecanismos de la transición. > EURO 7 de abril de 2014: Publicación de los resultados de la discusión > en > Singapur y una propuesta de pasos a seguir y su calendarización. > EURO 22 - 26 de Junio de 2014: Durante nuestra reunión 50 en Londres- > reunión > de la comunidad global multisectorial para avanzar respecto de lo > construido en la reunión previa. > EURO 12-16 de Octubre de 2014: Durante nuestra reunión 51 en Los > Ángeles- > reunión de la comunidad global multisectorial para avanzar respecto de lo > construido en las reuniones previas. > EURO Marzo de 2015: Durante nuestra reunión 52, lugar por definir- > reunión de > la comunidad global multisectorial para avanzar respecto de lo construido > en las reuniones previas. > EURO Junio de 2015: Durante nuestra reunión 53, lugar por definir- > reunión de > la comunidad global multisectorial para avanzar respecto de lo construido > en las reuniones previas. > EURO 30 de Septiembre de 2015: Fecha de Vencimiento del Contrato de > IANA. > > Espero contar con su activa participación y apoyo durante este proceso > histórico en el desarrollo de Internet. Mucho les agradeceré compartir > esta información con sus organizaciones. > > Para referencia estoy adjuntando un documento sobre Preguntas Frecuentes y > otro sobre la Historia y Desarrollo de la Globalización de ICANN. Los > documentos en Inglés, Español, Francés y Portugués se encuentran > disponibles en nuestra página de Internet. > > Reciban un afectuoso saludo. > > > -------------------------- > Rodrigo de la Parra > > rodrigo.delaparra(a)icann.org > @rdelapar > Vicepresidente para América Latina y el Caribe > La Casa de Internet de Latinoamérica y el Caribe > Rambla República de México 6125 > Montevideo, 11400 > Uruguay > ICANN > One World, One Internet > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/18a7afc2b9.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: Sesión Abierta: Agotamiento IPv4 - Open Session on IPv4 Exhaustion
by Andrés Piazza April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

(English Below) Estimados Amigos, El objetivo de esta comunicación es el de invitarlos a participar de una sesión virtual (vía webex) destinada a actualizar las últimas novedades relacionadas con el agotamiento inminente del pool de direcciones IPv4 de LACNIC. Al mismo tiempo, será una opotunidad para conversar abiertamente con nuestra amplia comunidad sobre el estado actual y recomendaciones para una transición a IPv6 de manera estable, segura y definitiva. El evento se realizará el Día Viernes, 4 de Abril a las 19hs UTC, 16hs en Montevideo, Brasilia y BsAs, 14hs en Panamá y 13hs en Ciudad de México. Más información en el siguiente enlace: https://eventos.lacnic.net/ev3/agotamientoipv4sociedadcivil/detail Después de procesado su registro online, el sistema les enviará el enlace para conectarse a la conferencia. Saludos Cordiales, Andrés Piazza Responsable de Relaciones Externas LACNIC ---- Dear Colleagues The purpose of this communication is to invite you to a a virtual session (via WebEx) during which we will provide an update on the latest developments related to the impending exhaustion of LACNIC's IPv4 address pool. These session will also provide an opportunity to openly discuss recommendations for a stable, safe and final transition to IPv6 and the current status of this technology. The event will be held on April 4th at 7pm UTC Time, 4pm in Montevideo and 3pm in Port Spain. More information available here:https://eventos.lacnic.net/ev3/agotamientoipv4sociedadcivil/detail After processing your online registration, you will receive the link to access the conference. Kind Regards, Andrés Piazza Public Affairs Officer LACNIC _______________________________________________ Lacigf mailing list Lacigf(a)lacnic.net https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacigf Cancelar suscripcion: lacigf-unsubscribe(a)lacnic.net -- *Andrés Piazza* @andrespiazza

1 0

DOODLE / Pr�xima llamada
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: DOODLE / Próxima llamada De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Queridos todos, Por favor complete la encuesta adjunta Doodle para programar la próxima convocatoria de la Grupo de Trabajo Nivelacion LACRALO. http://doodle.com/2nxaxixvnzi4qn82 Gracias. ********** Estimados Todos, Por favor completa la Encuesta Adjunta Doodle párr Programar la prxima convocatoria del Grupo de Trabajo Nivelacion LACRALO. http://doodle.com/2nxaxixvnzi4qn82 Gracias. Saludos, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine y Terri Agnew El personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Un mundo, una Internet _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/dae4385d0a.html --]]

1 0

Re: R: Votar Resultados: 2014 Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selecci�n de At-Large
by otieno.barrack＠gmail.com April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: Votar Resultados: 2014 Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selección de At-Large De: otieno.barrack(a)gmail.com Estimados colegas, Sebastián ha hecho un gran trabajo, bien hecho le necesitará en el comunidad, así que esperamos que usted todavía estará disponible para ofrecer su conocimientos. Felicidades Tijani y equipo para liderar este noble esfuerzo. Saludos cordiales El 04/01/14, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribió: > Roberto: > I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic and > in the overarching At-Large interest. > > Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot accept > that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and with > respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to 'take > the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This is > my position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly > elected or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged > as truly reflecting the wishes of the constituency. > > Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly > configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the At-Large > than the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have > one quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that set > of criteria utilised for selection of directors. > > In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that space > for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria between > persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those without. > And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of > 'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely > participants from my side of the world will enter the process already > disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at that > level for those of us at the edge of empire. > > Best, > -Carlton > > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano < > roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the Board >> with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. >> So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, years >> later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle of >> the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the >> organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. >> The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the >> stakeholder will get representation based on their relative "strength". >> The >> parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where >> the >> constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic laws >> and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by >> constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of the >> different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the >> elders >> that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common good. >> This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, >> albeit with only partial, although significant, results. >> It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get rid >> as much as possible of the system by which we have representative of >> "parties" that often have conflicting interests. >> I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed Directors, >> and have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by >> NomCom. The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set >> that is missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the >> names >> accordingly. >> Cheers, >> Roberto >> >> >> >> > -----Messaggio originale----- >> > Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- >> > bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M >> > Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 >> > A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang >> > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- >> > lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> afri-discuss@atlarge- >> > lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; >> > na- >> > discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: >> > 2014 >> > At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >> > Dear Wolfgang, >> > >> > The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to >> ensure an >> > independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in >> > the >> > process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared >> > responsibility in the selection process. >> > >> > A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would >> positively >> > demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- >> > stakeholder model of Governance. >> > >> > In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent >> > and >> > four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large >> > has >> > matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you >> have >> > mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, >> > which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even >> more. >> > In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats >> > which >> would >> > reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other >> > Stakeholders >> > might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the >> Board, >> > because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. >> > >> > More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by >> two >> > different processes: >> > >> > 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate >> and >> > the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could >> > sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist >> > within >> > this AC at the moment. >> > >> > 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an >> internal >> > NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a >> > process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) >> > >> > Thank you. >> > >> > Sivasubramanian M >> > India >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < >> > wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to >> > > Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing >> > > more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >> > > >> > > I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA >> > > transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are >> > > remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine >> > > voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, >> > > 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine >> > > (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be >> > > established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of >> > > the >> > Initial Board". >> > > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- >> > en.htm# >> > > V >> > > >> > > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for >> > > two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, >> > chaired >> > > by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large >> > > Supporting >> > > Organisation >> > > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. >> > > >> > > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h >> > > tm#_toc523422641 >> > > >> > > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an >> > > At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional >> > > councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory >> > Committee" >> > > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the >> > > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the >> > > board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC >> > > was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to >> > > the chair of the GAC). >> > > >> > > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for >> > > two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the >> > > horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the >> > > multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has >> > > to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong >> > > civil society role in policy development and decision making. >> > > >> > > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos >> > > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and >> > > NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination >> > > and >> > collaboration with >> > > private sector, technical community and governments. A big >> challenge. >> > > >> > > Wolfgang >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > wolfgang >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ________________________________ >> > > >> > > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von >> > > Veronica Cretu >> > > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >> > > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> > > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > > afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; >> > > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large >> > > Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo >> > > and build up on it, I would also like to: >> > > >> > > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of >> > > the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and >> > > initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so >> > > this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who >> > > can >> > > learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share >> > > the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and >> > > continue serve the community in the best possible ways. >> > > >> > > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her >> > > much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are >> > > important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, >> > > and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the >> > > world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on >> the >> > community-at-large. >> > > >> > > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has >> > > been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience >> > > there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input >> from >> > members. >> > > >> > > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home >> > > safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >> > > >> > > With very best, >> > > Veronica >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> > > <ocl(a)gih.com >> > > >wrote: >> > > >> > > > Dear All, >> > > > >> > > > I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in >> > > > what >> > > > was a very balanced election that required many rounds to >> > > > differentiate the candidates. >> > > > >> > > > Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >> > > > moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for >> > > > ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual >> > > > General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take >> > > > place in Los Angeles. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It >> > > > is >> > > > through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >> > > > options for the future of our community. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation >> > Committee. >> > > > Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list >> > > > of >> > > > candidates. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >> > > > Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been >> > > > challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. >> > > > >> > > > The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >> > > > learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >> > > > recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >> > > > >> > > > Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, >> > > > the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and >> > > > would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the >> > > > challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on >> > > > the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community >> > > > selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to >> > > > share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board >> > > > Colleagues >> > > > and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of >> ICANN. >> > > > >> > > > Kindest regards, >> > > > >> > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >> > > > ALAC Chair >> > > > >> > > > On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >> > > > > Dear All, >> > > > > >> > > > > Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process >> > > > > Committee >> > > > (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote >> > > > results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the >> > > > ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be >> > published. >> > > > > >> > > > > This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat >> > > > > #15) >> > > > Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >> > > > > >> > > > > Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of >> > > > > the >> > > > family name) who ran for the position: >> > > > > >> > > > > * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >> > > > > * Sébastien Bachollet >> > > > > * Alan Greenberg >> > > > > * Evan Leibovitch >> > > > > * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >> > > > > >> > > > > After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >> > > > breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is >> > > > selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for >> > > > 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. >> > > > > >> > > > > You may review the results, as well as the detailed information >> > > > > about >> > > > the selection procedure, under: >> > > > https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg >> . >> > > > > >> > > > > Regards, >> > > > > >> > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, >> > > > > Nathalie >> > > > Peregrine and Terri Agnew >> > > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> > > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% >> > > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >> > > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> > > > >> > > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- >> > B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% >> > > >> > 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G >> > > isella%20Gruber,% >> > > > >> > > >> > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy >> > %20St >> > > aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > > At-Large mailing list >> > > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >> > > > > >> > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < >> > > http://atlarge.icann.org/> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > > > >> > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > > > <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > *Veronica Cretu * >> > > >> > > >> > > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >> > > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >> > > >> > > *Member of the Steering Committee, * >> > > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >> > > * >> > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> > and-cu >> > > rrent-membership >> > > < >> > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> > and-cu >> > > rrent-membership >> > > >* >> > > >> > > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet >> > > Governance Forum (IGF)* >> > > >> > > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >> > > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >> > > >> > > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation >> > > for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >> > > >> > > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members >> > > <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >> > > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: >> > 373 >> > > 067435000* >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > > >> > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > > <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > APAC-Discuss mailing list >> > > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss >> > > >> > > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy >> > India +91 99524 03099 >> > _______________________________________________ >> > EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > >> > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org >> > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > Barack O. Otieno +254721325277 +254-20-2498789 Skype: barrack.otieno http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/856f0d09fb.html --]]

1 0

Re: R: Votar Resultados: 2014 Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selecci�n de At-Large
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: Votar Resultados: 2014 Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selección de At-Large De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Roberto: Yo también creo lo que está proponiendo no es sólo sensata sino estratégico y en el global de At-Large interés. Tal vez sea debido a mi posición de que, por principio, simplemente no puedo aceptar que en materia de gobernabilidad y cuando forma parte de un grupo distante y con respecto a la toma de decisiones, el representante debería estar obligada a "tomar el látigo "- lo que significa seguir las instrucciones - de su grupo /. Es mi posición sin importar el tamaño del electorado, ya sea popularmente elegido o no, no tengo dudas de magníficos que uno puede confinarse y juzgados como verdaderamente refleja los deseos del electorado. De hecho en el inicio, a algunos de nosotros pensamos que el papel de enlace correctamente configurado probablemente puede tener un interés más sostenible para el At-Large que el director de la votación individual.Así que, aunque estamos de acuerdo en gran parte, no tengo Un problemilla con su caracterización de la función del Comité de nominaciones; ese conjunto de los criterios utilizados para la selección de directores. En su estimación de este nuevo papel de la Junta, espero que el espacio se calcula para una mayor orientación por lo que hay un equilibrio en los criterios entre las personas que tengan experiencia en 'grandes consejos de administración "que los que no. Y lo digo en el contexto de la interpretación probable del significado de "Grande". Para dependiendo de quién la define "grande", todo un conjunto de probabilidades participantes de mi lado del mundo entrarán en el proceso ya desfavorecidos. Y eso no augura nada bueno para la participación en ese nivel para aquellos de nosotros en el borde del imperio. Best, -Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= El mar, 01 de abril 2014 a las 24:19, Roberto Gaetano < roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> escribió: > I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the Board > with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. > So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, years > later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle of > the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the > organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. > The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the > stakeholder will get representation based on their relative "strength". The > parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where the > constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic laws > and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by > constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of the > different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the elders > that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common good. > This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, > albeit with only partial, although significant, results. > It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get rid > as much as possible of the system by which we have representative of > "parties" that often have conflicting interests. > I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed Directors, > and have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by > NomCom. The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set > that is missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names > accordingly. > Cheers, > Roberto > > > > > -----Messaggio originale----- > > Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- > > bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M > > Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 > > A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang > > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- > > lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > afri-discuss@atlarge- > > lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na- > > discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > > At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > Dear Wolfgang, > > > > The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to > ensure an > > independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in the > > process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared > > responsibility in the selection process. > > > > A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would > positively > > demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- > > stakeholder model of Governance. > > > > In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and > > four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large has > > matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you > have > > mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, > > which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even > more. > > In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which > would > > reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other Stakeholders > > might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the > Board, > > because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. > > > > More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by > two > > different processes: > > > > 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate > and > > the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could > > sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist within > > this AC at the moment. > > > > 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an > internal > > NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a > > process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) > > > > Thank you. > > > > Sivasubramanian M > > India > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < > > wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to > > > Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing > > > more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > > > > > > I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA > > > transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are > > > remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine > > > voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, > > > 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > > > (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be > > > established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the > > Initial Board". > > > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- > > en.htm# > > > V > > > > > > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for > > > two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, > > chaired > > > by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting > > > Organisation > > > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > > > > > > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h > > > tm#_toc523422641 > > > > > > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an > > > At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional > > > councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory > > Committee" > > > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > > > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the > > > board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC > > > was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to > > > the chair of the GAC). > > > > > > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for > > > two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the > > > horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the > > > multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has > > > to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong > > > civil society role in policy development and decision making. > > > > > > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > > > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and > > > NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and > > collaboration with > > > private sector, technical community and governments. A big > challenge. > > > > > > Wolfgang > > > > > > > > > > > > wolfgang > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > > > Veronica Cretu > > > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > > > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > > afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > > > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large > > > Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo > > > and build up on it, I would also like to: > > > > > > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of > > > the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and > > > initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so > > > this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can > > > learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share > > > the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and > > > continue serve the community in the best possible ways. > > > > > > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her > > > much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are > > > important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, > > > and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the > > > world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on > the > > community-at-large. > > > > > > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has > > > been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience > > > there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input > from > > members. > > > > > > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > > > safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > > > > > With very best, > > > Veronica > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > > <ocl(a)gih.com > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what > > > > was a very balanced election that required many rounds to > > > > differentiate the candidates. > > > > > > > > Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > > > > moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for > > > > ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual > > > > General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take > > > > place in Los Angeles. > > > > > > > > Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > > > > through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > > > > options for the future of our community. > > > > > > > > Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation > > Committee. > > > > Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > > > > candidates. > > > > > > > > Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > > > > Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been > > > > challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. > > > > > > > > The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > > > > learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > > > > recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > > > > > > > > Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, > > > > the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and > > > > would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the > > > > challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on > > > > the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community > > > > selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to > > > > share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues > > > > and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of > ICANN. > > > > > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > > > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > > > ALAC Chair > > > > > > > > On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > > Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process > > > > > Committee > > > > (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote > > > > results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the > > > > ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be > > published. > > > > > > > > > > This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat > > > > > #15) > > > > Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > > > > > > > > > > Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of > > > > > the > > > > family name) who ran for the position: > > > > > > > > > > * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > > > > > * Sébastien Bachollet > > > > > * Alan Greenberg > > > > > * Evan Leibovitch > > > > > * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > > > > > > > > > > After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > > > > breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is > > > > selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for > > > > 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. > > > > > > > > > > You may review the results, as well as the detailed information > > > > > about > > > > the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg > . > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, > > > > > Nathalie > > > > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > > > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > > > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > > > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- > > B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% > > > > > 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G > > > isella%20Gruber,% > > > > > > > > > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy > > %20St > > > aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > At-Large mailing list > > > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > > > > > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > > > http://atlarge.icann.org/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > > <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Veronica Cretu * > > > > > > > > > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > > > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > > > > > *Member of the Steering Committee, * > > > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > > > * > > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > > and-cu > > > rrent-membership > > > < > > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > > and-cu > > > rrent-membership > > > >* > > > > > > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet > > > Governance Forum (IGF)* > > > > > > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > > > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > > > > > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation > > > for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > > > > > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members > > > <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* > > > > > > > > > > > > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > > > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: > > 373 > > > 067435000* > > > _______________________________________________ > > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > APAC-Discuss mailing list > > > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > > India +91 99524 03099 > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4f98a1efb1.html --]]

1 0

Re: R: Votar Resultados: 2014 Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selecci�n de At-Large
by vanda＠uol.com.br April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: Votar Resultados: 2014 Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selección de At-Large De: vanda(a)uol.com.br Roberto, Estoy totalmente de acuerdo con usted, después de haber sido también ALAC de enlace en la Junta. Lo es hora de repensar realmente todo el modelo. He siendo intercambiar algunos ideas con otros miembros de la junta anterior y le encantaría ejercer algún ideas con usted también. Creo que en general tiene una gran oportunidad en el ATLAS para presentar algunas buenas alternativas para el modelo de ICANN en el futuro cercano. Esperamos contar con las ideas Wolfgang también, siempre trayendo sugerencias pertinentes. Todo lo mejor para todos Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, CJ 1004 01311-200 - Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil Línea del terreno: +55 11 3266.6253 Móvil: + 55 11 98181.1464 El 04/01/14, 14:19, "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> escribió: > He sido uno de los campeones de la representación de ALAC a la Junta > Con los directores con derecho a voto, a la par con las otras organizaciones de apoyo. > Así que creo que no puedo ser sospechoso de anti-ALAC-ismo si yo ahora, años > Después, argumentan que para luchar por más Consejeros en el Consejo es una batalla de > El pasado, que tiene poco significado mirando a la evolución de la > Organizazion ya una plena realización del modelo de múltiples partes interesadas. > El modelo de múltiples partes interesadas no es un modelo parlamentario en el que el > Los interesados \u200b\u200bobtendrá representación en función de su "fuerza" relativa. > El sistema parlamentario está bien para una organización en su infancia, > Donde la constitución tiene que ser redactado. En una organización madura, con > leyes y comportamientos básicos ya definidos, el nombramiento de > Representantes de circunscripciones trae inevitablemente a la Junta la > mezquinos intereses de los diferentes grupos en lugar de tener una especie > Del consejo de los ancianos que en los resúmenes de los intereses contingentes > Buscar el bien común. > Esta ha sido la pauta que se intentó con la revisión de la GNSO, > Aunque con sólo parcial, aunque significativas, resultados. > Es el momento de proponer un modelo diferente para la Junta, así, para deshacerse > Tanto como sea posible del sistema por el cual tenemos representante de > "partes" que a menudo tienen intereses en conflicto. > Creo que debemos ir hacia la reducción de los Consejeros así nombrados, > Y tiene lugar una mayor proporción, posiblemente, una súper mayoría, designado por > Comité de nominaciones. El Comité de Nominaciones también debe obtener una descripción precisa del conjunto de habilidades > Lo que falta para ese año en particular, para que puedan elegir el > nombres consecuencia. > Saludos, > Roberto > > > >> ----- Originale Messaggio ----- >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: euro-discuss- >> Bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 >> A: Kleinwchter, Wolfgang >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es @ atlarge- >> Lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> Afri-discuss @ atlarge- >> Lists.icann.org; At-Large Anuncios; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na- >> Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Comenta] [APAC-Comenta] [At-Large] Resultados de la votación: 2014 >> Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de selección de At-Large >> >> Estimado Wolfgang, >> >> La idea original de los nueve directores de la votación fue posiblemente concebido para >> Garantizar una >> Organización independiente, impulsada por los usuarios. Comité de nominaciones fue una buena idea, pero en >> El >> Proceso de At-Large perdió los escaños en el Consejo, a cambio de compartir >> Responsabilidad en el proceso de selección. >> >> Una mejor representación de At-Large, según lo previsto originalmente, lo haría >> Positivamente >> Demuestran que ICANN Gobierno se basa enfáticamente sobre la multi- >> Modelo de las partes interesadas de la Gobernabilidad. >> >> En las recientes elecciones de At-Large, hemos tenido un titular efectivo y >> Otros cuatro candidatos calificados, lo que va a demostrar que At-Large >> Tiene >> Madurado, tiene personas suficientemente cualificadas para los puestos de la Junta. Como >> Tener >> Mencionado, tenemos las comunidades de usuarios de la GNSO con personas cualificadas, >> Lo que aumenta el número de candidatos calificados disponibles incluso >> Más. >> En este contexto, si vamos a retomar las conversaciones sobre más puestos en el Directorio >> Que haría >> Reafirmar la fe de la ICANN en el modelo de múltiples partes interesadas. Otro >> Las partes interesadas >> Pudieran acoger dicha discusión para mejorar la participación de los usuarios en el >> Junta, >> Porque sería esencialmente mejorar la confianza en el proceso de ICANN. >> >> Más candidatos de At-Large para cargos en la Junta podrían ser nombrados por >> Dos >> diferentes procesos: >> >> 1) Por el proceso existente mediante el cual el AC selecciona / elige a un candidato >> Y >> La persona elegida es nombrado. Esto introduce una elección que podría >> A veces crean diferencias, aunque no existen tales diferencias >> Dentro >> Esta CA en el momento. >> >> 2) Mediante un proceso totalmente libre de las elecciones internas, por una >> Interno >> NomCom. (Pensamientos iniciales, hay varias maneras de diseñar tal >> Proceso, hay ventajas y desventajas a tener en cuenta) >> >> Gracias. >> >> Sivasubramanian M India >> >> >> >> El Sol, 30 de marzo 2014 a las 17:32, "Kleinwchter, Wolfgang" < >> Wolfgang.kleinwaechter @ medienkomm.uni-halle.de> escribió: >> >>> Hola, >>> >>> Yo también quiero unirme a las muchas gracias a Sebastian (buen trabajo), a >>> Rinalia (gran reto) y Roberto y Tijani (bien hecho).Nada >>> Más que añadir lo que Veronica lo ha dicho muy bien y bien estructurado. >>> >>> I este contexto: no se olvide la historia. En el presente NTIA >>> Discusión transición muchas "ideas orginal" de 1998 son >>> Recordado. Una idea original era dar a la Membresía En Large nueve >>> asientos voto. Artículo V, Sección 4 de los Estatutos Sociales Orginal (06 de noviembre, >>> 1998) dijo en el párr. iv: "Nueve >>> (9) Al Directores grandes, seleccionadas con arreglo a un proceso de ser >>> Establecida por mayoría de votos de todos los miembros de la Junta en su conjunto de >> El >> Junta Inicial ". >>> Http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- >> En.htm # >>> V >>> >>> Conocemos la historia. Cinco directores de votación fueron elegidos en 2000 para >>> Dos años. En noviembre de 2001 el Comité de Membresía En Large, >> Presidido >>> Carl Bildt, recomendó el establecimiento de un At Large Apoyo >>> Organización >>> (También) con el derecho de enviar seis directores con derecho a voto a la junta. >>> >>> Http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h >>> Tm # _toc523422641 >>> >>> En 2002, como parte del proceso general de reforma de la ICANN las ideas de un >>> At Large elecciones y el establecimiento de un TAMBIÉN con seis regional >>> Consejos fueron abolidos y se sustituyeron por un "At Large Advisory >> Comité " >>> (ALAC) con cinco RALOs, un proceso de certificación de las ALS y la >>> Establecimiento de un NomCon que ahora envía ocho directores de la >>> Bordo. El Comité de Nominaciones tiene cinco votantes en Grandes Usuarios. El presidente del ALAC >>> Fue invitado a servir de enlace no votong en la Junta (similar a >>> El presidente del GAC). >>> >>> En la preparación para ATLAS I en México en 2008 pedíamos >>> Dos miembros de la Junta con derecho a voto del ALAC. Nos dieron una. Ahora ATLAS II es en la >>> Horizonte.Necesitamos un fuerte mensaje de ATLAS II que la >>> Modelo de múltiples partes - que ahora es objeto de debate resistente y tiene >>> Hacer frente a su "momento de la verdad" - sólo funcionará, si usted tiene un fuerte >>> Papel de la sociedad civil en la formulación de políticas y toma de decisiones. >>> >>> Aquí tenemos que invertir más cómo hacer esto y salir de nuestros silos >>> Tanto dentro de la comunidad más amplia CS (en particular con NCUC y >>> CONP), así como en la comunicación circunscripción cruz, coordinación y >> Colaboración con >>> Sector privado, comunidad técnica y de los gobiernos. Una gran >> Reto [ERROR: Sentencia demasiado tiempo para traducir (1916> 1800 bytes)]. Todos seguimos construyendo sobre nuestras experiencias previas, por lo que >>> Este proceso debe ser un ejercicio continuo e incluir a aquellos que pueden >>> Aprender de nosotros - es así, estoy seguro de Sebastian encontrará buenas maneras de compartir >>> La riqueza de la experiencia adquirida en su papel como miembro de la Junta y >>> Continuar servir a la comunidad en la mejor manera posible. >>> >>> - Felicite * Rinalia * por haber sido elegido miembro de la Junta y le deseamos >>> Mucha suerte en esta interesante, sin embargo, un reto nuevo papel. Estos son >>> Momentos importantes para ICANN que requerirán varias competencias clave, >>> Y el conocimiento de las realidades geopolíticas en diferentes partes del >>> Mundo. Confío Rinalia será capaz de cumplir con las expectativas de >> El >> Comunidad At-Large. >>> >>> - Tarjetas * Roberto * por la maravillosa dirección de la BCEC - tiene >>> Sido para mí, personalmente, una gran experiencia. Al igual que en cualquier experiencia >>> Siempre hay cosas que aprender y mejorar en base a la entrada >> De >> Miembros. >>> >>> En esta nota, espero que todos los asistentes a la ICANN 49 logró regresar a casa >>> Seguro y sonido, de lo contrario, deseando a salvo viaja de vuelta a casa! >>> >>> Con lo mejor, >>> Veronica >>> >>> >>> >>> El jue, 27 de marzo 2014 a las 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >>> <ocl(a)gih.com >>>> Escribió: >>> >>>> Queridos todos, >>>> >>>> Quería extender mis felicitaciones a Rinalia Abdul Rahim en lo >>>> Fue una elección muy equilibrada que requiere de muchas rondas de >>>> Diferenciar los candidatos. >>>> >>>> Rinalia ha sido seleccionada por nuestra comunidad a participar en el Consejo a un >>>> Momento que no sólo es crucial para At-Large, sino también crucial para >>>> ICANN como un todo. Ella tomará su asiento en el 2014 ICANN anual >>>> Junta General - la última reunión del año - que se llevará a >>>> Lugar en Los Ángeles. >>>> >>>> Gracias a todos los candidatos que han corrido para el puesto. Es >>>> Través de una amplia lista de candidatos que podemos asegurar una mayor oferta de >>>> Opciones para el futuro de nuestra comunidad. >>>> >>>> Gracias a Roberto Gaetano y la Evaluación del Candidato Junta >> Comité. >>>> Su trabajo ha sido crucial en la provisión de una primera clase de corta lista de >>>> Candidatos. >>>> >>>> Gracias a Tijani Ben Jemaa y el Proceso de Selección de miembro de la Junta >>>> Comité para su gestión de un proceso que ha sido >>>> Desafiante debido a las múltiples instancias de Ties. >>>> >>>> El trabajo de estos comités no ha terminado. Analizarán las lecciones >>>> Aprendido y trabajar juntos para proporcionar la ALAC con un conjunto actualizado de >>>> Recomendaciones para mejorar el proceso de selección la próxima vez. >>>> >>>> Por último, me gustaría recordarles que hasta el 2014 la ICANN AGM, >>>> El Consejero elegido por At-Large es Sbastien Bachollet y >>>> Quisiera reafirmar el pleno apoyo de nuestra comunidad en el >>>> Desafiando meses por delante de nosotros.Somos muy conscientes de que no está en >>>> La Junta que "nos representan", sino como un candidato de nuestra comunidad >>>> Seleccionado a la Junta por nuestra comunidad, que él mismo ha demostrado >>>> Compartir su experiencia de los usuarios finales de Internet con sus colegas de la Junta >>>> Y estamos agradecidos de su continua participación en todos los asuntos de >> ICANN. >>>> >>>> Saludos cordiales, >>>> >>>> Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >>>> Presidente del ALAC >>>> >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large escribió: >>>>> Queridos todos, >>>>> >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Presidente del Proceso de Selección Miembro de la Junta Comité >>>>> >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, ha pedido que un anuncio en la votación final >>>> Resultados del Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) seleccionados por el >>>> ALAC / At-Large para 2015-2017 (para tomar su asiento en el 2014 AGM) sea >> Publicada. >>>>> >>>>> Esto es para informarle de que el 2014 director (Asiento At-Large Junta >>>>> # 15) >>>> Proceso de selección se completó el 25-marzo-2014. >>>>> >>>>> A continuación se muestra la lista de candidatos (por orden alfabético de >>>>> La >>>> Apellido) que se postuló para el puesto: >>>>> >>>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >>>>> * Sbastien Bachollet >>>>> * Alan Greenberg >>>>> * Evan Leibovitch >>>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >>>>> >>>>> Después de la votación primera vuelta y primera votación del segundo ROUND, empate >>>> Voto arrolladores y segunda votación (final), el candidato que es >>>> Seleccionado como el Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) por ALAC / At-Large para >>>> 2015-2017 es: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. >>>>> >>>>> Usted puede revisar los resultados, así como la información detallada >>>>> Acerca >>>> El procedimiento de selección, en: >> https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >>>>> >>>>> Saludos, >>>>> >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, >>>>> Nathalie >>>> Peregrine y Terri Agnew >>>>> El personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC >>>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% >>> 3cmailto: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> >>>> Staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >>>> >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,% 20Heidi% >>> >> 20Ullrich,% 20Silvia% 20Vivanco,% 20Matt% 20Ashtiani,% 20Ariel% 20Liang,% 20G >>> Isella% 20Gruber,% >>>> >>> >> 20Nathalie% 20Peregrine% 20y% 20Julia% 20Charvolen% 20ICANN% 20Policy >>% 20St >>> Aff% 20en% 20Support% 20de% 20ALACmailto: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> At-Large lista de correo >>>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >>>>> >>>>> At-Large Sitio Oficial: http://atlarge.icann.org < >>> Http://atlarge.icann.org/> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> EURO-Comenta lista de correo >>>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss [ERROR: Sentencia demasiado tiempo para traducir (2686> 1800 bytes)] >>> >>> Página de inicio de la región: http://www.euralo.org >>> <http://www.euralo.org/> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> APAC-Comenta lista de correo >>> APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss >>> >>> Página de inicio de la región: http://www.apralo.org >>> >> >> >> >> - >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy >> India +91 99524 03099 >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Comenta lista de correo >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Página principal de la región: http://www.euralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large lista de correo > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Sitio Oficial: http://atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/90fc16eb39.html --]]

1 0

R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by roberto_gaetano＠hotmail.com April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com He sido uno de los campeones de la representación de ALAC a la Junta Directiva con derecho a voto, a la par con las otras organizaciones de apoyo. Así que creo que no puedo ser sospechoso de anti-ALAC-ismo si yo ahora, años después, sostengo que para luchar por más Consejeros en el Consejo es una batalla del pasado, que no tiene mucho sentido mirar la evolución de la organizazion y a una plena realización del modelo de múltiples partes interesadas. El modelo de múltiples partes interesadas no es un modelo parlamentario donde el interesado obtendrá representación en función de su "fuerza" relativa. El régimen parlamentario está bien para una organización en su infancia, donde la constitución tiene que ser redactado. En una organización madura, con las leyes y comportamientos básicos ya definidos, la designación de representantes por circunscripciones trae inevitablemente a la Junta de los mezquinos intereses de los diferentes grupos en lugar de tener una especie de consejo de los ancianos que hace abstracción de los intereses contingentes que buscan el bien común. Esta ha sido la pauta que se intentó con la revisión de la GNSO, aunque con sólo parcial, aunque significativas, resultados. Es el momento de proponer un modelo diferente para la Junta, así, deshacerse lo más posible del sistema por el cual tenemos representante de "partes" que a menudo tienen intereses en conflicto. Creo que debemos ir hacia la reducción de los Directores SO equipadas, y tienen lugar una parte mayor, posiblemente un súper-mayoría, designado por Comité de nominaciones. El Comité de Nominaciones también debe obtener una descripción precisa del conjunto de habilidades que falta para ese año en particular, para que puedan elegir los nombres en consecuencia. Saludos, Roberto > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- > bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M > Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 > A: KleinwÃ€chter, Wolfgang > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- > lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; afri-discuss@atlarge- > lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na- > discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > Dear Wolfgang, > > The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to ensure an > independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in the > process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared > responsibility in the selection process. > > A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would positively > demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- > stakeholder model of Governance. > > In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and > four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large has > matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you have > mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, > which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even more. > In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which would > reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other Stakeholders > might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the Board, > because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. > > More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by two > different processes: > > 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate and > the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could > sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist within > this AC at the moment. > > 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an internal > NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a > process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) > > Thank you. > > Sivasubramanian M > India > > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "KleinwÃ€chter, Wolfgang" < > wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to > > Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing > > more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > > > > I this context: DonÂŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA > > transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are > > remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine > > voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, > > 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > > (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be > > established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the > Initial Board". > > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- > en.htm# > > V > > > > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for > > two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, > chaired > > by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting > > Organisation > > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > > > > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h > > tm#_toc523422641 > > > > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an > > At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional > > councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory > Committee" > > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the > > board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC > > was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to > > the chair of the GAC). > > > > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for > > two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the > > horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the > > multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has > > to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong > > civil society role in policy development and decision making. > > > > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and > > NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and > collaboration with > > private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. > > > > Wolfgang > > > > > > > > wolfgang > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > > Veronica Cretu > > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large > > Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > > > > > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo > > and build up on it, I would also like to: > > > > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of > > the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and > > initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so > > this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can > > learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share > > the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and > > continue serve the community in the best possible ways. > > > > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her > > much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are > > important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, > > and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the > > world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on the > community-at-large. > > > > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has > > been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience > > there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input from > members. > > > > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > > safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > > > With very best, > > Veronica > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > <ocl(a)gih.com > > >wrote: > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what > > > was a very balanced election that required many rounds to > > > differentiate the candidates. > > > > > > Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > > > moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for > > > ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual > > > General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take > > > place in Los Angeles. > > > > > > Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > > > through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > > > options for the future of our community. > > > > > > Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation > Committee. > > > Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > > > candidates. > > > > > > Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > > > Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been > > > challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. > > > > > > The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > > > learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > > > recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > > > > > > Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, > > > the Board Member selected by At-Large is SÃ©bastien Bachollet and > > > would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the > > > challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on > > > the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community > > > selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to > > > share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues > > > and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of ICANN. > > > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > > > Olivier MJ CrÃ©pin-Leblond > > > ALAC Chair > > > > > > On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process > > > > Committee > > > (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote > > > results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the > > > ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be > published. > > > > > > > > This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat > > > > #15) > > > Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > > > > > > > > Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of > > > > the > > > family name) who ran for the position: > > > > > > > > * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > > > > * SÃ©bastien Bachollet > > > > * Alan Greenberg > > > > * Evan Leibovitch > > > > * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > > > > > > > > After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > > > breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is > > > selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for > > > 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. > > > > > > > > You may review the results, as well as the detailed information > > > > about > > > the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, > > > > Nathalie > > > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- > B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% > > > 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G > > isella%20Gruber,% > > > > > > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy > %20St > > aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > At-Large mailing list > > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > > > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > > http://atlarge.icann.org/> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Veronica Cretu * > > > > > > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > > > *Member of the Steering Committee, * > > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > > * > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > and-cu > > rrent-membership > > < > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > and-cu > > rrent-membership > > >* > > > > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet > > Governance Forum (IGF)* > > > > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > > > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation > > for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > > > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members > > <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* > > > > > > > > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: > 373 > > 067435000* > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > APAC-Discuss mailing list > > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org > > > > > > -- > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > India +91 99524 03099 > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ebf6389eea.html --]]

1 0

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2014 Director de At-Large Board (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2014 Director de At-Large Board (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com Felicitaciones a Rinalia, deseando ver y oír en la mesa del Consejo. Gracias Sebastien para su servicio pasado y continuó el trabajo en el sector público interés. Saludos Cintra El mar, 01 de abril 2014 a las 11:29 AM, <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re: VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) > Selection Process > From: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > > Dear Rinalia: > Heartiest congratulations! I'm sure you'll make the best job of this > appointment. > > > Warm regards, > -Carlton > > > > > ============================== > A Carlton Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > * Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround * > ============================= > > > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Abdul Rahim Rinalia < > rinalia.abdulrahim @ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > > I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to all members of the > At-Large > > community, the Electorate, the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee, the > > Board Member Selection Process Committee, the ICANN community and staff. > > > > I am honored to have been selected as an ICANN Board Director by the > > At-Large Community of individual Internet users around the world. The > > support and encouragement given to me across all regions have been > > overwhelming and I am deeply touched by the trust and confidence that the > > community has bestowed upon me. > > > > Your trust will guide me during my term as an ICANN Board director and I > am > > very much looking forward to continue engaging with you in the years to > > come. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Rinalia Abdul Rahim > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1ca942e774.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) Selection Process
by Cintra Sooknanan April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

Congratulations to Rinalia, looking forward to seeing and hearing you on the Board table. Thank you Sebastien for your past service and continued work in the public interest. Regards Cintra On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:29 AM, <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re: VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) > Selection Process > From: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > > Dear Rinalia: > Heartiest congratulations! I'm sure you'll make the best job of this > appointment. > > > Warm regards, > -Carlton > > > > > ============================== > A Carlton Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > * Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround * > ============================= > > > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Abdul Rahim Rinalia < > rinalia.abdulrahim @ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear Colleagues, > > > > I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to all members of the > At-Large > > community, the Electorate, the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee, the > > Board Member Selection Process Committee, the ICANN community and staff. > > > > I am honored to have been selected as an ICANN Board Director by the > > At-Large Community of individual Internet users around the world. The > > support and encouragement given to me across all regions have been > > overwhelming and I am deeply touched by the trust and confidence that the > > community has bestowed upon me. > > > > Your trust will guide me during my term as an ICANN Board director and I > am > > very much looking forward to continue engaging with you in the years to > > come. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Rinalia Abdul Rahim > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/767898b350.html > --]] > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en >

1 0

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Querido Rinalia: Sinceras felicitaciones! Estoy seguro de que va a hacer el mejor trabajo de este cita. Un cordial saludo, -Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= El sábado, 29 de marzo 2014 a las 9:27 AM, Rinalia Abdul Rahim < rinalia.abdulrahim @ gmail.com> escribió: > Dear Colleagues, > > I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to all members of the At-Large > community, the Electorate, the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee, the > Board Member Selection Process Committee, the ICANN community and staff. > > I am honored to have been selected as an ICANN Board Director by the > At-Large Community of individual Internet users around the world. The > support and encouragement given to me across all regions have been > overwhelming and I am deeply touched by the trust and confidence that the > community has bestowed upon me. > > Your trust will guide me during my term as an ICANN Board director and I am > very much looking forward to continue engaging with you in the years to > come. > > Best regards, > > Rinalia Abdul Rahim > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f3d50683bf.html --]]

1 0

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com + 1 -Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= El sábado, 29 de marzo 2014 a las 9:55 AM, Veronica Cretu <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> escribió: > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and > build up on it, I would also like to: > > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the > Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We > all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process should > be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, I am > sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise gained > in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the best > possible ways. > > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her much > luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important > times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and awareness > of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust Rinalia > will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. > > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been > for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are > always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. > > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home safe > & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > With very best, > Veronica > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com > >wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what was > > a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the > > candidates. > > > > Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > > moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN > > as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General > > Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los > > Angeles. > > > > Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > > through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > > options for the future of our community. > > > > Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. > > Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > > candidates. > > > > Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > > Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging > > due to the multiple instances of Ties. > > > > The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > > learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > > recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > > > > Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the > > Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and would like > > to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months > > ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to "represent > > us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our > > community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet End > > Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued > > involvement in all matters of ICANN. > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > ALAC Chair > > > > On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > > > Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process Committee > > (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results of > > the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 > > (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. > > > > > > This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) > > Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > > > > > > Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the > > family name) who ran for the position: > > > > > > * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > > > * Sébastien Bachollet > > > * Alan Greenberg > > > * Evan Leibovitch > > > * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > > > > > > After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > > breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected as > > the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: Rinalia > > Abdul Rahim. > > > > > > You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about > > the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% > > > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > At-Large mailing list > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > > > > -- > *Veronica Cretu * > > > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > *Member of the Steering Committee, * > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > * > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… > < > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… > >* > > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* > *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* > > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* > *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members <http://www.icann.org > >* > > > > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 > 067435000* > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4560f069ea.html --]]

1 0

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by isolatedn＠gmail.com April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: isolatedn(a)gmail.com Estimado Wolfgang, La idea original de los nueve directores de la votación fue posiblemente concebido para asegurar una organización independiente, impulsada por los usuarios. Comité de nominaciones fue una buena idea, pero en el proceso de At-Large perdió los escaños en el Consejo, a cambio de compartir responsabilidad en el proceso de selección. Una mejor representación de At-Large, según lo previsto originalmente, lo haría demostrar positivamente que la ICANN Gobierno se basa enfáticamente sobre la modelo multilateral de gobernanza. En las recientes elecciones de At-Large, hemos tenido un titular efectivo y otros cuatro candidatos calificados, lo que va a demostrar que At-Large tiene madurado, tiene personas suficientemente cualificadas para los puestos de la Junta. Como usted tiene mencionado, tenemos las comunidades de usuarios de la GNSO con personal calificado, que aumenta el número de candidatos calificados disponibles aún más.En este contexto, si vamos a retomar las discusiones sobre más puestos de la Junta que lo haría reafirmar la fe de la ICANN en el modelo de múltiples partes interesadas. Otros Grupos de Interés podría acoger ese debate para mejorar la participación de los usuarios en la Junta, porque sería esencialmente mejorar la confianza en el proceso de ICANN. Más candidatos de At-Large para cargos en la Junta podrían ser nombrados por dos diferentes procesos: 1) Por el proceso existente mediante el cual el AC selecciona / elige a un candidato y la persona elegida es nombrado. Esto introduce una elección que podría a veces crean diferencias, aunque no existen tales diferencias dentro esta CA en el momento. 2) Mediante un proceso totalmente libre de las elecciones internas, por una interna Comité de nominaciones. (Pensamientos iniciales, hay varias maneras de diseñar tal proceso, hay ventajas y desventajas a tener en cuenta) Gracias. Sivasubramanian M India El Domingo, 30 de marzo 2014 a las 17:32, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < wolfgang.kleinwaechter @ medienkomm.uni-halle.de> escribió: > Hi, > > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to Rinalia > (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing more to add > what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > > I this context: DonÂŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA transition > discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are remembered. One orginal > idea was to give the At Large Membership nine voting seats. Article V, > Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be established by > a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the Initial Board". > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-en.htm#V > > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for two > years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, chaired by Carl > Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting Organisation > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_t… > > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an At > Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional councils > were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory Committee" > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the board. The > NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC was invited to > serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to the chair of the > GAC). > > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for two > voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the horizon. We > need a strong message from ATLAS II that the multistakeholder model - which > is now under tough discussion and has to face its "moment of truth" - will > work only, if you have a strong civil society role in policy development > and decision making. > > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos both > within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and NPOC) as well > as in cross constituency communication, coordination and collaboration with > private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. > > Wolfgang > > > > wolfgang > > > > ________________________________ > > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von Veronica > Cretu > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board > Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and > build up on it, I would also like to: > > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the > Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We > all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process should > be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, I am > sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise gained > in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the best > possible ways. > > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her much > luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important > times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and awareness > of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust Rinalia > will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. > > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been > for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are > always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. > > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home safe > & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > With very best, > Veronica > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com > >wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what was > > a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the > > candidates. > > > > Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > > moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN > > as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General > > Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los > > Angeles. > > > > Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > > through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > > options for the future of our community. > > > > Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. > > Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > > candidates. > > > > Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > > Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging > > due to the multiple instances of Ties. > > > > The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > > learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > > recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > > > > Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the > > Board Member selected by At-Large is SÃ©bastien Bachollet and would like > > to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months > > ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to "represent > > us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our > > community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet End > > Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued > > involvement in all matters of ICANN. > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > Olivier MJ CrÃ©pin-Leblond > > ALAC Chair > > > > On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > > > Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process Committee > > (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results of > > the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 > > (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. > > > > > > This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) > > Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > > > > > > Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the > > family name) who ran for the position: > > > > > > * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > > > * SÃ©bastien Bachollet > > > * Alan Greenberg > > > * Evan Leibovitch > > > * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > > > > > > After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > > breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected as > > the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: Rinalia > > Abdul Rahim. > > > > > > You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about > > the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% > > > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > At-Large mailing list > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > http://atlarge.icann.org/> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > -- > *Veronica Cretu * > > > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > *Member of the Steering Committee, * > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > * > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… > < > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… > >* > > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* > *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* > > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* > *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members <http://www.icann.org< > http://www.icann.org/> >* > > > > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 > 067435000* > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > _______________________________________________ > APAC-Discuss mailing list > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy India +91 99524 03099 _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/05708e2751.html --]]

1 0

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by veronicacretu＠gmail.com April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com Estimados colegas, querido Olivier - Gracias por este mensaje y hacer eco y acumulan en él, me gustaría también: - Gracias * Sebastian * por el trabajo realizado en su calidad de miembro de la Junta y le deseamos éxito en las próximas nuevas funciones e iniciativas. Nosotros todo seguir construyendo sobre nuestras experiencias previas, por lo que este proceso debe ser un ejercicio continuo e incluyen aquellos que pueden aprender de nosotros - así, estoy Seguro Sebastian encontrará buenas maneras de compartir la riqueza de la experiencia adquirida en su calidad de miembro de la Junta y continuar sirviendo a la comunidad de la mejor posibles maneras. - Felicitar * Rinalia * por haber sido elegido miembro de la Junta y le deseamos mucho suerte en esta interesante, sin embargo, un reto nuevo papel. Estos son importantes veces para ICANN que requerirán varias competencias clave y la conciencia de las realidades geopolíticas en diferentes partes del mundo.Confío Rinalia será capaz de cumplir con las expectativas de la comunidad en general. - Gracias * Roberto * por la maravillosa dirección de la BCEC - ha sido para mí, personalmente, una gran experiencia. Al igual que en cualquier experiencia que hay siempre cosas que aprender y mejorar en base a la opinión de los miembros. En esta nota, espero que todos los asistentes a la ICANN 49 logró regresar a casa sanos Y sonido, de lo contrario, deseando a salvo viaja de vuelta a casa! Con lo mejor, Verónica El Jueves, 27 de marzo 2014 a las 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> escribió: > Dear All, > > I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what was > a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the > candidates. > > Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN > as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General > Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los > Angeles. > > Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > options for the future of our community. > > Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. > Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > candidates. > > Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging > due to the multiple instances of Ties. > > The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > > Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the > Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and would like > to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months > ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to "represent > us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our > community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet End > Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued > involvement in all matters of ICANN. > > Kindest regards, > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > ALAC Chair > > On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process Committee > (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results of > the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 > (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. > > > > This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) > Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > > > > Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the > family name) who ran for the position: > > > > * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > > * Sébastien Bachollet > > * Alan Greenberg > > * Evan Leibovitch > > * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > > > > After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected as > the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: Rinalia > Abdul Rahim. > > > > You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about > the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > > > > Regards, > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > At-Large mailing list > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > * Veronica Cretu * * Presidente del Instituto de Gobierno Abierto ** República de Moldova - Http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/> * * Miembro del Comité de Dirección, * * Abrir Government Partnership (OGP); * * Http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… <http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current…> * * Miembro del Grupo Asesor Multisectorial * * Para el Foro de Gobernanza de Internet (IGF) * * Http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/> * * Miembro del Comité de Nominaciones de ICANN * * (Corporación de Internet para la Asignación de Nombres y Numeración) * * Http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members <http://www.icann.org> * * Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> y / o veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md> Skype: veronicacretu Teléfono: 373 067435000 * _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a0e222267d.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] último mensaje de la secretaria Sylvia
by DIEGO ALFONSO ACOSTA BASTIDAS April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

Estimada Sylvia Un gracias enorme por la pródiga y sincera vocación por la ayuda y entrega; tu huella sin duda es una impronta indeleble y tu presencia un requisito inevitable de la memoria grata. Diego Acosta Bastidas El 27 de marzo de 2014, 11:42, Gilberto Lara <galara(a)conexion.sv> escribió: > Gracias a ustedes queridos Sylvia y José por su dedicación, esfuerzo y > sacrificio, sin duda que han hecho un excelente trabajo. > > Un fuerte abrazo para ambos. > > > ------------------------------------ > GL > > > > El 27/03/2014, a las 02:14, José Francisco Arce < > josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > > Mi muy querida Sylvia, > > > > Cuanto uno más te conoce más de enamora de ese ser maravillo que supe > > descubrir en vos. Que más decirte que un eterno gracias y un infinito > > abrazo de corazón. > > > > Lo mejor para vos, siempre !!! > > > > José.- > > > > > > El 27 de marzo de 2014, 3:15, <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> escribió: > > > >> Estimados Miembros de LACRALO, este será mi último mensaje como > Secretaria > >> de LACRALO, cargo que me ha dado mucho orgullo! > >> > >> Fue un periodo desafiador y de gran crecimiento personal por el cual > estoy > >> muy agradecida a toda la región por la oportunidad de haber sido la > >> secretaria de la misma y por la confianza que han depositado en mi. > >> > >> El resumen de mi trabajo está en los informes mensuales de la wiki por > lo > >> que no necesito mencionárselos aquí: > >> > >> > https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/LACRALO+Secretariat+Monthly+Repo > >> rts > >> > >> > >> > >> Tengo que agradecer todo el apoyo y colaboración por parte de la > mayoría de > >> los representantes de las ALS, aunque también lamentar la falta de > >> comunicación con algunos de ellos a pesar de la insistencia de mi parte > por > >> medio del envío de varios e-mail e intentos de contacto por Skype con > >> algunos de ellos. > >> > >> Quiero agradecer especialmente a mi compañero de tareas Jose Arce por su > >> compañerismo, ayuda y consulta continua, a los miembros de ALAC con los > que > >> me tocó trabajar ( Sergio Salinas, Natalia Enciso, Dev Anand > Teeluckseeng, > >> Fatima Cambronero y Carlton Samuels) por su colaboración, disposición y > >> trabajo en equipo; así como también a todo el staff y principalmente a > los > >> miembros con los que tuve más contacto: Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani y > >> Gisella Gruber por estar siempre atentos a mis solicitaciones. Y no > puedo > >> dejar de mencionar a los secretarios y lideres de las otras RALOS por > estar > >> siempre dispuestos a compartir los intereses e inquietudes de sus > regiones > >> con LACRALO. > >> > >> Muchísimas gracias a todos los que me dieron la oportunidad de ser la > >> secretaria de la región y ser parte de la comunidad mundial de ICANN. > >> > >> Pido disculpas por algún inconveniente o falta de interpretación, pero > les > >> puedo asegurar que brindé lo mejor de mi a la región por lo cual les > >> agradezco infinitamente la oportunidad y les aseguro que seguiré > >> participando en la región y en la organización del ATLAS II tan vital > para > >> todas las ALSes de todas las regiones. > >> > >> Un gran abrazo, > >> > >> Sylvia > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ___________________________________________________ > >> > >> Sylvia Herlein > >> > >> <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org > >> > >> Secretaria LACRALO-ICANN/ 2012-2014 - <http://atlarge.icann.org/> > >> http://atlarge.icann.org > >> > >> Secretaria FLUI 2009-2015 > >> > >> sylvia_leite=Skype > >> > >> Descrição: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> lac-discuss-es mailing list > >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > >> > >> http://www.lacralo.org > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Arce, José F. > > http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org >

1 0