March 2012 - lac-discuss-es

Asamblea General - Agenda !!!
by José Francisco Arce March 8, 2012

March 8, 2012

*Estimados, Adjunto encontraran la version en Español y en Ingles de la agenda para la asamblea general de Costa Rica. Saludos Coordiales * Jose Arce Presidente de LACRALO Dev Anand Teelucksingh Secretario de LACRALO

2 1

consulta
by carlos watson March 8, 2012

March 8, 2012

Buenas todos, me gustaria saber si tengo que enviar la lista de las personas que me acompa;aran en el evento del lacralo el dia lunes en la noche.? saludos cw

2 1

Por favor registre su asistencia en el sitio web de ICANN
by devtee＠gmail.com March 8, 2012

March 8, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Por favor registre su asistencia en el sitio web de ICANN De: devtee(a)gmail.com Queridos todos, Sólo un recordatorio a todos los representantes que asistieron a la ICANN LACRALO reunión en Costa Rica, por favor regístrese en la página web de la ICANN en http://www.registration123.com/ICANN/CR43/~~V El registro permitiría tarjetas con los nombres que estar listo cuando se registra en persona en la conferencia de la ICANN. Saludos cordiales, Dev Anand Teelucksingh LACRALO Secretaría _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/336b650ed1.html --]]

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-es] El papel de la ICANN en los Estados Unidos / Verisign incautaciones de dominios com.
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com March 7, 2012

March 7, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: El papel de la ICANN en los Estados Unidos / Verisign incautaciones de dominios com. De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Estamos en el expediente: extra-jurisdiccional alcance de la ley nacional es EE.UU. muy preocupante para nosotros en el Caribe. Sobre todo cuando una y otra vez, el gobierno de Estados Unidos demuestra que no es "obligado a respeto "a los de nuestro lado! Con respecto a los juegos de azar en línea y pese a las numerosas resoluciones de la OMC en contra, el gobierno de Estados Unidos sigue castigando nuestra Antigua y Barbuda miembro de la familia para atreverse a tratar de aumentar la misma con sus propios medios. La hipocresía es el pasado rancio. Pero seguro que la noche sigue al día, lo que pasa , vuelve, "secar la pieza 'es una perra. También creo que con el Internet declarada de seguridad nacional de interés "de los Estados Unidos, estoy seguro de que vendrá el tiempo cuando algunos todavía personas sensatas pondrá 'dos \u200b\u200bmás dos "junto a los veintidós años, y comenzar a el viaje de entender esto es contrario a sus intereses globales. Mensaje: nunca darse por vencido a Estados Unidos, a pesar de la profunda "ludita" y nativista racha que supera la superficie de vez en cuando. Alguien finalmente se 'Explicar el sentido "correcto! - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos * ============================= On Wed, 07 de marzo 2012 a las 4:52 am, Prakash Pranesh <pranesh(a)cis-india.org> escribiÃ³: > From the easyDNS blog: http://goo.gl/jt3oq > > ## Verisign seizes .com domain registered via foreign Registrar on > behalf of US Authorities. > > Written by Mark Jeftovic on February 29, 2012 > > Yesterday Forbes broke [the news that Canadian Calvin Ayre and partners > who operate the Bodog online gambling empire have been indicted in the > U.S.][], and in a blog post [Calvin Ayre confirmed that their bodog.com > domain had been seized by homeland security][]. As reported in Forbes > ([hat tip to The Domains][] for the cite), > > > According to the six-page indictment filed by Rosenstein, Ayre worked > with Philip, Ferguson and Maloney to supervise an illegal gambling > business from June 2005 to January 2012 in violation of Maryland law. > The indictment focuses on the movement of funds from accounts outside > the U.S., in Switzerland, England, Malta, and Canada, and the hiring of > media resellers and advertisers to promote Internet gambling. > > > > Sports betting is illegal in Maryland, and federal law prohibits > bookmakers from flouting that law simply because they are located > outside the country, Rosenstein said in a statement. Many of the harms > that underlie gambling prohibitions are exacerbated when the enterprises > operate over the Internet without regulation. > > That is a truly scary quote but we'll emphasize that: "The indictment > focuses on the movement of funds **outside the U.S.**" and that you > can't just "flout US law" by *not being in the US*. What also needs to > be understood is that the domain bodog.com was registered to via a > non-US Registrar, namely [Vancouver's domainclip][]. > > ## So Here's Where It Get's Scary > > We all know that with some US-based Registrars (\*cough\* Godaddy > \*cough\*), all it takes is a badge out of a box of crackerjacks and you > have the authority to [fax in a takedown request which has a good shot > at being honoured][]. We also know that some non-US registrars, i[t > takes a lot more "due process-iness" to get a domain taken down.][] > > But now, none of that matters, because in this case the State of > Maryland simply issued [a federal warrant was issued in the State of > Maryland][][1] to .com operator Verisign, (who is headquartered in > California) who then duly updated the rootzone for .com with two new NS > records for bodog.com which now redirect the domain to the takedown page. > > This is exactly the scenario we were worried about [when Verisign > originally tabled their very troubling takedown proposal][]. Said > proposal was quickly retracted, but here we have the same situation > playing out anyway. Granted, this was an actual court order, to Verisign > not a "request" from a governmental or "quasi-governmental" agency as > originally proposed. > > But at the end of the day what has happened is that US law (in fact, > Maryland state law) as been imposed on a .com domain operating outside > the USA, which is the subtext we were very worried about [when we > commented on SOPA][]. Even though SOPA is currently in limbo, the > reality that US law can now be asserted over all domains registered > under .com, .net, org, .biz and maybe .info (Afilias is headquartered in > Ireland by operates out of the US). > > This is no longer a doom-and-gloom theory by some guy in a tin foil hat. > It just happened. > > The ramifications of this are no less than chilling and every single > organization branded or operating under .com, .net, .org, .biz etc needs > to ask themselves about their vulnerability to the whims of US federal > and state lawmakers (not exactly known their cluefulness nor > even-handedness, especially with regard to matters of the internet). > > ## The larger picture: root monopolies and the need to replace ICANN > > The .com root will never be opened to a truly competitive bidding > process. Verisign has pretty well ensconced themselves into the .com and > .net roots indefinitely with [built-in price hikes baked into the > cake][]. I recall a conversation I once had with Tucows CEO Elliot Noss, > back when they still owned Liberty RMS (which ran the .info registry and > later sold to Afilias) he lamented that if the .com registry bidding > process were *truly* competitive, you would see a registry operator in > there doing it for about $2 per domain. At the time the wholesale cost > of a .com domain was $6 and is now $7.85 after their latest *annual > increase* which is hard-coded into their contract. > > I mention this because a truly competitive bidding process for the > registry operator job would bring out both cost competition and > stewardship competition: players who would table proposals on just how > they would respect the rights of all their stakeholders, not to mention > operators who may operate outside the United States. > > **Where the fsck is ICANN in all of this?** > > ****They are nowhere. They are collecting their fees, pushing their > agenda of as many possible new-top-level domains and despite the fact > that SOPA, ACTA, PIPA et aim directly at the interests of their core > stakeholders, for whom they are supposed to be advocates and stewards. > ICANN is conspicuous in their absence from the debate, save for a smug > and trite abdication of involvement (i.e. "[ICANN Doesn't Take Down > Websites][]") translation: "This isn't our problem". > > And therein lies the issue. ***ICANN needs to make this their problem, > because it very much is.*** If ICANN isn't going to stand up, and > vigorously campaign for **global** stakeholder representation in these > matters, than they are not only abdicating any responsibility in the > ongoing and escalating crackdown on internet freedom, they are *also* > abdicating their right to govern and oversee it. > > They need to be visible, they need to be loud and they need to come down > on the right side of these issues or they need to be replaced. > > **Of course, the replacement of ICANN will never happen.** At least not > by a non-US entity, which means we are once again headed to the > unthinkable place that only crackpots and conspiracy theorists think > possible: a fractured internet with competing roots. On the bright side, > life will go on, and companies like mine will probably become > exceedingly wealthy charging every internet user in the world fees to > gain and project visibility across all the myriad internet roots that > will someday exist because governments will refuse to approach it > co-operatively. The only thing that will remain to be seen is whether > we'll be deemed "criminals" for doing so. > > ## Further Reading: > > - [First They Came For The Filesharing Domains][] > - [Verisign Takedown Proposal Very Worrisome][when Verisign originally > tabled their very troubling takedown proposal] > - [How SOPA Will Destroy The Internet][when we commented on SOPA] > - [The Price of Freedom and The Cost of a Domain Name][fax in a > takedown request which has a good shot at being honoured] > - [The Official easyDNS Takedown Policy][t takes a lot more "due > process-iness" to get a domain taken down.] > - [Further Ramifications of US Government Domain Takedowns][] > > ## Footnote > > [1] I originally was under the impression that the State of Maryland > issued the warrant, it has been pointed out to me that this is not the > case, the warrant is a federal warrant issued in the State of Maryland. > > > ## Links > > [the news that Canadian Calvin Ayre and partners who operate the Bodog > online gambling empire have been indicted in the U.S.]: > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2012/02/28/feds-indict-former-onlin… > [Calvin Ayre confirmed that their bodog.com domain had been seized by > homeland security]: > > http://calvinayre.com/2012/02/28/legal/calvin-ayre-indicted-by-feds-calvin-… > [hat tip to The Domains]: > > http://www.thedomains.com/2012/02/28/feds-not-only-seize-the-domain-name-bo… > [Vancouver's domainclip]: http://www.domainclip.com > [fax in a takedown request which has a good shot at being honoured]: > > http://blog.easydns.org/2012/02/17/the-price-of-freedom-and-the-cost-of-a-d… > "The price of freedom and the cost of a domain name" > [t takes a lot more "due process-iness" to get a domain taken down.]: > > http://blog.easydns.org/2012/02/21/the-official-easydns-domain-takedown-pol… > "The Official easyDNS Domain Takedown Policy" > [a federal warrant was issued in the State of Maryland]: > > http://cdn3.bit2host.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/BodogWebsiteSeizureWarr… > [when Verisign originally tabled their very troubling takedown > proposal]: > > http://blog.easydns.org/2011/10/11/verisign-domain-takedown-proposal-very-w… > "Verisign domain takedown proposal very worrisome." > [when we commented on SOPA]: > http://blog.easydns.org/2011/12/22/how-sopa-will-destroy-the-internet/ > "How SOPA Will Destroy The Internet" > [built-in price hikes baked into the cake]: > > http://blog.easydns.org/2007/04/16/verisign-raises-fees-on-com-and-net-easy… > "Verisign raises fees on .COM and .NET, easyDNSdoesn't" > [ICANN Doesn't Take Down Websites]: > http://blog.icann.org/2010/12/icann-doesnt-take-down-websites/ > [First They Came For The Filesharing Domains]: > > http://blog.easydns.org/2010/11/27/first-they-came-for-the-file-sharing-dom… > "First they came for the file-sharing domains" > [Further Ramifications of US Government Domain Takedowns]: > > http://blog2.easydns.org/2012/03/05/the-ramifications-of-us-government-doma… > > -- > Pranesh Prakash · Programme Manager · Centre for Internet and Society > PGP: 0x1D5C5F07 · @pranesh_prakash · http://cis-india.org > > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/00de30e910.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Sugerencias De Temas, El Cambio Apra estatutos de - Sugerencias de nuestros cambios de los estatutos
by omar＠kaminski.adv.br March 7, 2012

March 7, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Sugerencias De Temas, El Cambio Apra estatutos de - Sugerencias de nuestros cambios de los estatutos De: omar(a)kaminski.adv.br Querida Vanda, 03/06/2012 Vanda UOL <vanda(a)uol.com.br> : > > 1) La cuestión de diversidad que Yo he levantado cuando contesté los > puntos de la propuesta de Fatima, pode ser mejor traducida si hablamos de > regiones: LACRALO debía definir su diversidad con base en sus regiones > geopolíticas : América Central (adonde debemos incluir el México) Caribe, > Mercosur y Pacto Andino. Si así definirnos, siempre que hablamos de > diversidad , significa que los representantes no pueden ser de una misma > región. > > 1) I have raised a question related to the diversity over the bylaws > changes, proposed by Fatima. However I believe that diversity will become > clearer if we talk about LACRALOŽs geopolitical regions: Central America ( > and here we need to add Mexico) Caribbean, the Andean Pact and Mercosul . > once we define these regions anytime we talk about diversity will mean that > representatives cannot belong to the same region. Tengo dudas sobre si la mejor distribución regional es por el comercio o bloques económicos. > 2) Proxy > > Esta es una de las cuestiones mas relevante, na cual debemos tener un > acuerdo, porque generó toda una disputa con consecuente pérdida de imagen > de LACRALO, cuando de las elecciones de Andrés y Sergio (en 2009 creo Yo). > > Mi propuesta es terminar definitivamente con la votación con proxy hasta que > tengamos herramientas de certificación digital, por ejemplo. Se una ALS no > está presente físicamente o por teléfono, bueno, no tendrá su voto > contabilizado, igual como en una elecciones en nuestros países. Para que su > voto sea valido es necesario que la ALS sea identificada físicamente o por > teléfono pro uno de sus miembros registrados. > This is one of the most relevant issues we need to have an agreement due > the dispute it had generated in the past election of Andrés & Sergio (2009 I > guess), with consequent loss of LACRALOŽs image. > > My proposal is not to have proxy vote anymore, till we have some tools like > digital signature , for instance. > If one ALS cannot be physically present or > by telephone , then its vote will be not considered, like any election in our countries. > Its vote only will be valid if the ALS can be identified physically or by telephone, by > one formally registered as one of its member. De acuerdo en que debemos tener un mayor nivel de compromiso. _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/bad085426e.html --]]

1 0

Sugerencias de temas apra el cambio de bylaws - Suggestion for our bylaws changes
by Vanda UOL March 7, 2012

March 7, 2012

Tengo dos sugerencias a incorporar em nuestras discusiones sobre cambios em nuestros estatutos (bylaws) I have two suggestion to add to our discussions related to changes in our bylaws 1) La cuestión de diversidad que Yo he levantado cuando contesté los puntos de la propuesta de Fatima, pode ser mejor traducida si hablamos de regiones: LACRALO debía definir su diversidad con base en sus regiones geopolíticas : América Central (adonde debemos incluir el México) Caribe, Mercosur y Pacto Andino. Si así definirnos, siempre que hablamos de diversidad , significa que los representantes no pueden ser de una misma región. 1) I have raised a question related to the diversity over the bylaws changes, proposed by Fatima. However I believe that diversity will become clearer if we talk about LACRALO´s geopolitical regions: Central America ( and here we need to add Mexico) Caribbean, the Andean Pact and Mercosul . once we define these regions anytime we talk about diversity will mean that representatives cannot belong to the same region. 2) Proxy Esta es una de las cuestiones mas relevante, na cual debemos tener un acuerdo, porque generó toda una disputa con consecuente pérdida de imagen de LACRALO, cuando de las elecciones de Andrés y Sergio (en 2009 creo Yo). Mi propuesta es terminar definitivamente con la votación con proxy hasta que tengamos herramientas de certificación digital, por ejemplo. Se una ALS no está presente físicamente o por teléfono, bueno, no tendrá su voto contabilizado, igual como en una elecciones en nuestros países. Para que su voto sea valido es necesario que la ALS sea identificada físicamente o por teléfono pro uno de sus miembros registrados. 2) Proxy This is one of the most relevant issues we need to have an agreement due the dispute it had generated in the past election of Andrés & Sergio (2009 I guess), with consequent loss of LACRALO´s image. My proposal is not to have proxy vote anymore, till we have some tools like digital signature , for instance. If one ALS cannot be physically present or by telephone , then its vote will be not considered, like any election in our countries. Its vote only will be valid if the ALS can be identified physically or by telephone, by one formally registered as one of its member. Vanda Scartezini Acesse: http://nomcom.icann.org e candidate-se! Access: http://nomcom.icann.org and apply! Polo Consultores Associados IT Trend Alameda Santos 1470 conj. 1407 01418-903 São Paulo,SP, Brasil Tel + 5511 3266.6253 Mob + 55118181.1464 Dissemine esta idéia: Digite o dominio ao inves do telefone. Domain dialing Descrição: Descrição: Siter-16-square.png <http://www.siter.com> www.siter.com

2 1

RES: mis comentarios relacionados con la Enmienda
by vanda＠uol.com.br March 6, 2012

March 6, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: RES: mis comentarios relacionados con la Enmienda De: vanda(a)uol.com.br Omar Envié a algunos otros puntos a la lista de hoy, gracias por tus comentarios. Mejor espero verte en CR. ----- Mensagem original ----- De: Omar Kaminski [mailto: omar(a)kaminski.adv.br] Enviada em: tera-feira, 6 de maro de 2012 11:43 Para: Vanda UOL Cc: ALC DISCUTEN Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] mis comentarios relacionados con la Enmienda Aunque la mayor parte del tiempo que he estado al acecho aquí, porque el RT Whois, estoy después de algunas discusiones importantes y aquí va mi dos centavos de Vanda comentarios y teniendo también en cuenta el último correo electrónico de Jacqueline de Brasil está "excluido" de las definiciones. Omar 03/03/2012 Vanda UOL <vanda(a)uol.com.br> : > 1) the right of ALSes to vote in LACRALO affairs determined by a > minimum level of participation > > This is positive > 2) working languages expanded to French and Portuguese > > I donŽt see need and may be too expensive. But this is not a main > ( but I donŽt see APRALO working in the more than 20 languages they > have there les recomiendo que la barrera - quiero decir, sólo Brasil (y quizás Portugal, Cabo Verde) se beneficiarán de portugués y la Guayana Francesa, Surinam y Haití (Directa) del francés. Si tenemos en cuenta el Brasil debería tener más de ALS que significa debemos tener estructuras más allá de brasileños inglés / español los que se hablan a un representante de participationtion real. (...) > 7) LACRALO would elect 2 persons to serve on ALAC and 2 others as > their > > respective alternates (diversity requirements shall not apply to > elected ALAC member and their alternate). > > I disagree - diversity shall apply. The principles of ICANN states > on diversity. The concentration of persons from just one country for > instance, is not democratic neither safe for the organization. ( > imagine if the two big countries Mexico and Brazil decide to make a > strong movement to take over this group, can be control all the > positions) really not safe. Must have diversity. ejemplo) tiene el mismo peso que los países (y no importa la población tasa), que es lo mismo si Haití (o Brasil, o Uruguai) tiene 3 o 13 de ALS los delegados. Deben llegar a un consenso de todos modos. _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/dd5bb91668.html --]]

1 0

invitaci�n a la reuni�n / LACRALO Costa Rica Eventos rueda de prensa Grupo de Trabajo el martes 06 de marzo 2012 a las 20:00 UTC
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org March 6, 2012

March 6, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: invitación a la reunión / LACRALO Costa Rica Eventos rueda de prensa Grupo de Trabajo el martes 06 de marzo 2012 a las 20:00 UTC De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Queridos todos, En relación con la encuesta de Doodle, el próximo LACRALO Costa Rica Eventos GT conferencia convocatoria está prevista para el Martes 06 marzo de 2012 a las 20:00 UTC. Para otros horarios: http://tinyurl.com/6ol5syd El proyecto de programa (por actualizar) para esta convocatoria está disponible en: https://community.icann.org/x/G6PbAQ Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/lacralo * Por favor confirme su acceso telefónico de salida y número de contacto a staff(a)atlarge.icann.org~~V. Tenga en cuenta que tendremos AUDIO ESPAÑOL (tanto escuchar y hablar función) en la sala de Adobe Connect. Gracias. Un cordial saludo, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisela Gruber y Nathalie Halcón peregrino ICANN At-Large Personal E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/cef6d89ab9.html --]]

12 11

Re: e-mail que yo no pod�a entender en absoluto.
by jam＠jacquelinemorris.com March 6, 2012

March 6, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: e-mail que yo no podía entender en absoluto. De: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com Hola Alberto Lo sentimos - esta traducción es tan mala que no tienen idea de lo que es el sentido. También vi algunas citas de la mina fuera de contexto, pero no pudo averiguar cuál es el sentido de la observación fue. El incumplimiento de las normas a que se refiere fue, de nuevo, incomprensible para la razón. Así pues, si usted desea hacer esos comentarios una vez más por separado, que intentará responder en mi habitual considerar, lógico e impersonal manera. Jacqueline A. Morris La tecnología debe ser como el oxígeno: Ubicua, necesaria, invisible y Gratis. (AfterChris Lehmann) El mar, 06 de marzo 2012 a las 12:03 AM, <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Events Costa Rica > From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org > > I understand that Fátima really must be busy, I know personally and > unattested seek to avoid this responsibility. > But keep in mind that when you work a lot (and not just > Fátima), and the job gets comments like "I might Have Been > naive to expect Differently. "or" This is patently ridiculous. The > creation of a member THIRTEEN .. ", or many other similar, remove the desire > to participate. And in addition contribute to not meeting the objectives of > ICANN 'Meeting planned for Costa Rica, and both have been cited > up here. I make a aquen mocin for that later, only discharged > opinions, no adjectives, no offense, only the basis, we know that > when there is injury, there is no basis. > Sessions to know better? I think I read emails with this content > offensive and a breach of the rules, enough to meet > number. > Again, I'd like to see a bright LACRALO as requested by some, really > of excellence, where there is a discrepancy, but with respect, with > educacin without personal offenses, which would peritan a themed discussion. > And considering that everything is discussed, should terminate a vote. > > > Best Regards > > > Alberto Soto > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5f403b1b40.html --]]

1 0

Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Invitaci�n = F3n_a_la_reuni = F3n_/_LAC? == Iso-8859-1? Q? RALO_Costa_Rica_Eventos_rueda_de_prensa_Grupo_de_Tr? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Abajo_el_martes_06_de_marzo_2012_a_las_20 = 3A00_UTC? =
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com March 6, 2012

March 6, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Invitación = F3n_a_la_reuni = F3n_/_LAC? == Iso-8859-1? Q? RALO_Costa_Rica_Eventos_rueda_de_prensa_Grupo_de_Tr? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Abajo_el_martes_06_de_marzo_2012_a_las_20 = 3A00_UTC? = De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com Querida Fátima, Sé que debes estar ocupado, pero por favor, no consideramos que usted no tiene nada más que añadir. Incluso si no estamos de acuerdo, vamos a mantener la esperanza de que la razón de buena voluntad prevalecer. Por favor, no deje que su voz sea silenciada o siente que debe no contribuyen. Espero que reconsidere su decisión y asistir a la llamada, que realmente Necesitamos que todos manos a la obra para asegurar que nuestras actividades tienen éxito. Un cordial saludo Cintra 03/05/2012 <fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com> > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Invitation = F3n_a_la_reuni = F3n_/_LAC? > == Iso-8859-1? Q? RALO_Costa_Rica_Eventos_rueda_de_prensa_Grupo_de_Tr? == > Iso-8859-1? Q? Abajo_el_martes_06_de_marzo_2012_a_las_20 = 3A00_UTC? = > From: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com > > Dear, > > > I apologize for the teleconference tomorrow but I will not participate. > Having spent many hours working for the events of Costa > Rica, both Capacitacin Program, as proposed in Agenda > or Order of Da in the Proposed Amendments of our Principles > Operating, in the explanation for each of these points of the proposal > amendment, having delivered all within the specified periods, and > having contributed to our RALO what was within my powers, > provide knowledge and reach the truth by the time I have nothing more > to add. We will continue dialogue in the General Assembly. > > > Good luck and see you in Costa Rica. > > > Fatima Cambronero > > > > > > > On March 5, 2012 20:22, JosOvidio Salgueiro A.< > salgueiro.jo @ gmail.com> escribitbNL> > > > Me disculpo, mañana estare de viaje fuera de la ciudad > > > > Sorry, tomorrow I`ll be out of town al day > > > > > > José Ovidio Salgueiro A. > > salgueiro.jo(a)gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de > > Natalia > > Enciso > > Enviado el: lunes, 05 de marzo de 2012 12:53 p.m. > > Para: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] invitación a la reunión / LACRALO Costa Rica > > Eventos rueda de prensa Grupo de Trabajo el martes 06 de marzo 2012 a las > > 20:00 UTC > > > > No podre asistir tengo otra reunión con clientes previo al viaje a Costa > > Rica. > > > > Enviado desde mi dispositivo BlackBerry® proveído por Tigo. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > Sender: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 17:03:27 > > To: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > Reply-To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Cc: Elad Levinson<elad.levinson(a)icann.org>; Rodrigo de la > > Parra<rodrigo.delaparra(a)icann.org>; SÃ©bastien > > Bachollet<sebastien(a)bachollet.com> > > subject:invitación a la reunión / LACRALO Costa Rica Eventos rueda de > > prensa > > Grupo de Trabajo el martes 06 de marzo 2012 a las 20:00 UTC > > > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > > > Asunto: invitación a la reunión / LACRALO Costa Rica Eventos rueda de > > prensa Grupo de Trabajo el martes 06 de marzo 2012 a las 20:00 UTC > > De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > Queridos todos, > > > > > > En relación con la encuesta de Doodle, el próximo LACRALO Costa Rica > > Eventos GT conferencia convocatoria está prevista para el Martes 06 > marzo > > de 2012 a las 20:00 UTC. > > > > > > Para otros horarios: > > http://tinyurl.com/6ol5syd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El proyecto de programa (por actualizar) para esta convocatoria está > > disponible en: > > https://community.icann.org/x/G6PbAQ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adobe Connect: > > http://icann.adobeconnect.com/lacralo > > > > > > > > > > * Por favor confirme su acceso telefónico de salida y número de > contacto a > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org~~V. > > Tenga en cuenta que tendremos AUDIO ESPAÑOL (tanto escuchar y hablar > > función) en la sala de Adobe Connect. > > > > > > Gracias. > > Un cordial saludo, > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisela Gruber y Nathalie > > Halcón peregrino > > ICANN At-Large Personal > > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/42d4a4317c.html --]]

2 1