Re: [UA-discuss] [Ext] Re: Document Review: UASG006 - Relevant RFCs
Hi Don, The title could be "Relevant RFCs and Unicode reports to Universal Acceptance" And a separate table for Unicode reports within the same document. Best regards Nabil Benamar ------------------- نبيل بنعمرو On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 8:16 PM Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org> wrote:
Thanks Nabil.
Good point with regard to the title. Any suggestions?
And with regard to the table – within the same document, yes? Not another document?
D
*From:* Nabil Benamar <benamar73@gmail.com> *Sent:* Wednesday, 8 May 2019 11:09 PM *To:* Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org> *Cc:* ua-discuss@icann.org *Subject:* [Ext] Re: [UA-discuss] Document Review: UASG006 - Relevant RFCs
Hi Don, All
I think it would be better to decouple the unicode reports from the RFCs since the title focus on "Relevant RFCs...". You can make a seperate table or adjust the title of the document.
Best regards
Nabil Benamar
-------------------
نبيل بنعمرو
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 8:20 AM Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org> wrote:
Here’s a link to a proposed revision of UASG006. https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aq2WU6G5jDZ5grJBCjX89ELF978tKA [1drv.ms] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__1drv.ms_w_s-21Aq2WU6G5j...>
We’ve added a few references to Unicode standards and some W3C documents.
Your comments are welcome by the 13th of May.
Don
Don Hollander
Secretary General – UASG
Skype: Don_Hollander
On 5/8/2019 3:23 PM, Nabil Benamar wrote:
Hi Don,
The title could be "Relevant RFCs and Unicode reports to Universal Acceptance"
And a separate table for Unicode reports within the same document.
The Unicode "technical reports" series includes both reports and standards. The ones related to securities should all be "Unicode Technical Standards" or "UTS", as in UTS#36, if not annexes to the main Unicode standard (or "UAX", as in UAX15). None of them are "UTR" which would be the designator for "technical reports". Just like RFCs are not longer really "request for comments", as may have been the case originally. Now, the SSAC statement, as well as the W3C documents on text layout requirements fit neither of the categories. "Standards and other documents related to Universal Acceptance" would cover it. A./
Best regards Nabil Benamar ------------------- نبيل بنعمرو
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 8:16 PM Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org <mailto:don.hollander@icann.org>> wrote:
Thanks Nabil.
Good point with regard to the title. Any suggestions?
And with regard to the table – within the same document, yes? Not another document?
D
*From:*Nabil Benamar <benamar73@gmail.com <mailto:benamar73@gmail.com>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 8 May 2019 11:09 PM *To:* Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org <mailto:don.hollander@icann.org>> *Cc:* ua-discuss@icann.org <mailto:ua-discuss@icann.org> *Subject:* [Ext] Re: [UA-discuss] Document Review: UASG006 - Relevant RFCs
Hi Don, All
I think it would be better to decouple the unicode reports from the RFCs since the title focus on "Relevant RFCs...". You can make a seperate table or adjust the title of the document.
Best regards
Nabil Benamar
-------------------
نبيل بنعمرو
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 8:20 AM Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org <mailto:don.hollander@icann.org>> wrote:
Here’s a link to a proposed revision of UASG006. https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aq2WU6G5jDZ5grJBCjX89ELF978tKA [1drv.ms] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__1drv.ms_w_s-21Aq2WU6G5j...>
We’ve added a few references to Unicode standards and some W3C documents.
Your comments are welcome by the 13^th of May.
Don
Don Hollander
Secretary General – UASG
Skype: Don_Hollander
Hi Asmus, Makes sens to me! Best regards Nabil Benamar ------------------- نبيل بنعمرو On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:04 PM Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On 5/8/2019 3:23 PM, Nabil Benamar wrote:
Hi Don,
The title could be "Relevant RFCs and Unicode reports to Universal Acceptance"
And a separate table for Unicode reports within the same document.
The Unicode "technical reports" series includes both reports and standards. The ones related to securities should all be "Unicode Technical Standards" or "UTS", as in UTS#36, if not annexes to the main Unicode standard (or "UAX", as in UAX15). None of them are "UTR" which would be the designator for "technical reports".
Just like RFCs are not longer really "request for comments", as may have been the case originally.
Now, the SSAC statement, as well as the W3C documents on text layout requirements fit neither of the categories.
"Standards and other documents related to Universal Acceptance"
would cover it.
A./
Best regards Nabil Benamar ------------------- نبيل بنعمرو
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 8:16 PM Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org> wrote:
Thanks Nabil.
Good point with regard to the title. Any suggestions?
And with regard to the table – within the same document, yes? Not another document?
D
*From:* Nabil Benamar <benamar73@gmail.com> *Sent:* Wednesday, 8 May 2019 11:09 PM *To:* Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org> *Cc:* ua-discuss@icann.org *Subject:* [Ext] Re: [UA-discuss] Document Review: UASG006 - Relevant RFCs
Hi Don, All
I think it would be better to decouple the unicode reports from the RFCs since the title focus on "Relevant RFCs...". You can make a seperate table or adjust the title of the document.
Best regards
Nabil Benamar
-------------------
نبيل بنعمرو
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 8:20 AM Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org> wrote:
Here’s a link to a proposed revision of UASG006. https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aq2WU6G5jDZ5grJBCjX89ELF978tKA [1drv.ms] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__1drv.ms_w_s-21Aq2WU6G5j...>
We’ve added a few references to Unicode standards and some W3C documents.
Your comments are welcome by the 13th of May.
Don
Don Hollander
Secretary General – UASG
Skype: Don_Hollander
participants (2)
-
Asmus Freytag -
Nabil Benamar