Thanks Nabil.  

 

Good point with regard to the title.  Any suggestions?

 

And with regard to the table – within the same document, yes?   Not another document?

 

D

 

From: Nabil Benamar <benamar73@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 8 May 2019 11:09 PM
To: Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org>
Cc: ua-discuss@icann.org
Subject: [Ext] Re: [UA-discuss] Document Review: UASG006 - Relevant RFCs

 

Hi Don, All

 

I think it would be better to decouple the unicode reports from the RFCs since the title focus on "Relevant RFCs...". You can make a seperate table or adjust the title of the document.

 

 

Best regards

Nabil Benamar

-------------------

نبيل بنعمرو

 

 

 

 

 

 

On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 8:20 AM Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org> wrote:

Here’s a link to a proposed revision of UASG006.  https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aq2WU6G5jDZ5grJBCjX89ELF978tKA [1drv.ms]

 

We’ve added a few references to Unicode standards and some W3C documents.

 

Your comments are welcome by the 13^th of May.

 

Don

 

 

 

 

Don Hollander

Secretary General – UASG

Skype: Don_Hollander