Hello Mike Awkwardly no, I am not naming myself for UAA ? Universal Acceptance Ambassador I be ascertain of do present charter of UASG allow us to designated names for UAA? As in past also all people who were appointed was a sole decision of UASG administrative group and no proposals or endorsements were taken from UASG community. I agree that it’s commendable about Aj who progressed toward becoming Chair. It would be decent for us to see update each month from his leadership team however as mentioned in formerly that past appointments of UAA Universal Acceptance Ambassador term is already pass away so without being prejudiced about few individuals, UASG administrative group must appoint new UAA who have already shown their interest in past, if they want community to contribute and help is choosing right UAA they must amend their present charter and seek support community members. Yes Aj has noteworthy remarks about his enthusiasm for UA and working with groups so I look forward for his similar approach in taking quick decisions which will be transparent and in interest of UASG. Patrick On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 8:43 PM Mike Hemp <mikehamp1971@mail.com> wrote:
Patrick
Are you naming yourself for UAA ? Universal Acceptance Ambassador
Do you have names to be designated as UAA ?
Incredible that Aj has progressed toward becoming Chair. It would be decent for us to see update each month from leadership and from ambassadors.
Aj, I heard noteworthy remarks about your enthusiasm for UA and working with groups. It would be pleasant chance that you could include a few of us into this , its locale which will make it successful.
Anticipating to get notification from you.
*Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2019 at 3:25 PM *From:* "Patrick Patrick Davison" <patrickdavisons@gmail.com> *To:* "Mark Svancarek (CELA)" <marksv@microsoft.com> *Cc:* "ua-discuss@icann.org" <ua-discuss@icann.org> *Subject:* Re: [UA-discuss] ICANN64
Hello Mark
Virtuous to see your response, well I am no one to submit any suggestions for ambassadors. UA ambassador’s appointment was sole decision of administrative group and no one asked from community members who should be considered. There was just one email to us about selected ambassadors who were appointed for one year.
I strappingly have faith that candidates willing for the position must have applied in last one year and UASG secretariat must be having the details of them which they can share with administrative group. Once you all have the information your administrative group can set some selection standards and ask secretariat to filter out the new candidates from it. As a community members and believer is UASG mission I would only suggest that candidates who can really contribute in the mission must be given chance.
Since the terms of earlier appointed UA Ambassadors is already over even before ICANN64 and we still have names on website of old ambassadors whose terms has already expired and who at present do not hold that position. So pronouncement for new UA ambassadors should not be deferred.
Cheers!!!!
Patrick
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:23 PM Mark Svancarek (CELA) < marksv@microsoft.com> wrote:
Feel free to submit your suggestions for ambassadors. No need to wait.
*From:* UA-discuss <ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Patrick Patrick Davison *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2019 12:26 *To:* ua-discuss@icann.org; don.hollander <don.hollander@icann.org> *Subject:* Re: [UA-discuss] ICANN64
Hello
Last week I shared below piece of information with newly appointed Administrative Group but look like I am just overhear. So sharing again with all in community. Also beside all other points startlingly inspite knowing the fact that the terms of earlier appointed UA Ambassadors is already over even before ICANN64 still no pronouncement were been made for new UA ambassadors during ICANN64 or later. I am surprised don’t we have nominations or interest submitted by peoples around the world during last one year who can be considered.
Cheers !!!!
Patrick
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:23 AM Patrick Patrick Davison < patrickdavisons@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello
Prodigious meeting all again during ICANN and enthusiastic to see the focus of universal acceptance universally in all groups in Kobe and also in ICANN.
Further down are my observations on UASG in ICANN64 which i giving you all as food for thoughts.
· Universal acceptance group exertions are now building shape.
· Ram with administrative group members have put a strong foundation and given strong beliefs for UASG among all already.
· Community have lots of expectations from newly elected Chair and vice chairs.
· Issues raised for Universal acceptance program during public forums were disastrous yet new administrative group must seriously address it.
· It’s fortunate that term for earlier elected UA Ambassadors is already over few month back so they must be quickly dropped to preserve civic credence.
· We already have few newly elected UA Ambassadors now in team to take over and if we have pending applications they must be given chance quickly.
· As per UASG community update counties to be precise China, UAE, India and Russia should we key focus areas so we should have new faces as UA Ambassadors in this region who can deliver UASG mission.
· Persons vetoed by community should be kept away from any auxiliary selections. Earlier we heard a lot for Mr. Modi as Indian Prime minister and now in ICANN for a UA Ambassadors, terrible and sad for UASG. We should not show any nepotism towards anyone.
· UASG available documents must be reviewed and updated to help community members
· Short training modules and crash courses material must be soon updated on UASG.tech so that same can be used by institutions to educate for Universal acceptance program.
· UA ready certifications for applications and website must be quickly planned and implemented.
· Community have lots of expectations from Universal acceptance group so we should move with a structured plan to deliver speedily.
Cheers !!!!
Patrick