Looks good to me also, but I would change only one thing - Readiness status, first paragraph, “and then do something with them” – it looks to me like a magic J We can use something more precise like “and then do processing them” or something similar. Also, I think this report can be published as a blog… Dusan From: UA-discuss [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mark Svancarek (CELA) via UA-discuss Sent: 23. април 2019. 20:26 To: don.hollander <don.hollander@icann.org>; ua-discuss@icann.org Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] First Draft: UASG024 - UA Readiness of Command Line Tools Looks good to me. From: UA-discuss <ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org> > On Behalf Of Don Hollander Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 21:30 To: ua-discuss@icann.org <mailto:ua-discuss@icann.org> Subject: [UA-discuss] First Draft: UASG024 - UA Readiness of Command Line Tools One of the requests that came out of the Barcelona meeting was to do a review of the UA Readiness of Command Line Tools. Here’s a draft of the report https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aq2WU6G5jDZ5grIaNq1p5JhSusI26A <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ap/w-59584e83/?url=https%3A%2...> Can I please have comments before the end of the month? Thanks. Don Don Hollander Secretary General – UASG Skype: Don_Hollander --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus