Massachusetts time zone report
Massachusetts has approved a 47 page report on its time zone http://www.eileendonoghue.org/special-commission-approves-time-zone-report/ it cautiously recommends moving to permanent Atlantic standard time. -- Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB 260 Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m
The report also states it isn’t feasible unless surrounding states also do the same.
On Nov 4, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org> wrote:
Massachusetts has approved a 47 page report on its time zone http://www.eileendonoghue.org/special-commission-approves-time-zone-report/ it cautiously recommends moving to permanent Atlantic standard time.
-- Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB 260 Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m
On Sat 2017-11-04T10:25:47-0700 D. Nathan Cookson hath writ:
The report also states it isn’t feasible unless surrounding states also do the same.
http://www.eileendonoghue.org/media/The-Report-of-the-Special-Commission-on-... It also includes the notion of "reasonable" times for sunset and sunrise, and plots of how "reasonable" various points in the US are on that measure. Ah, if only the earth and sun were reasonable. -- Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB 260 Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m
As a Massachusetts resident, I feel a little guilty for not paying closer attention to this process. (Curiously I was in the Mass. State House during their most recent meeting this week...) Having read the report, I'm a little surprised there isn't a nydiscussion of the ramifications of increasing the time-zone-width of the [lower 48] United States from 3 hours to 4 hours. It seems to me that would have a significant effect on business -- not an overwhelming one, but a measurable one. Right now people in Boston working with people in California know that at worst they have to deal with meetings 3 hours later in the evening than they might otherwise, or wait until 3 hours after the business day starts to coordinate with business-day operations on the west coast. (Of course, globalism counters this to some extent: people who have to deal with meetings in Europe and Asia too won't see that much of a change). --jhawk@mit.edu John Hawkinson
participants (3)
-
D. Nathan Cookson
-
John Hawkinson
-
Steve Allen