Kevin Kenny said:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 8:30 AM Clive D.W. Feather via tz <[1]tz@iana.org> wrote:
Therefore any argument that they should be two or three zones instead needs to be based on some *other* objective requirement. Which, I suspect, needs to be *added* to the present policies rather than just handwaved. Such requirements could be: * Never abolish a zone once it's got into the default setup.
I could live with this. [...]
Just to be clear, I'm not arguing for or against any of the possible requirements I listed. I was just making the point that they're *new* requirements and need to have group consensus, or at least solid group discussion, before being adopted. -- Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler, Email: clive@davros.org | it will get its revenge. Web: http://www.davros.org | - Henry Spencer Mobile: +44 7973 377646