Re: [tz] [PROPOSED] Use more up-to-date citation for leap seconds

Matthew Donadio wrote:

Wouldhttp://www.ursi.org/content/RSB/RSB_359_2016_12.pdf be a better reference? I know the article is open access on IEEE Xplore, but wouldn't the URSI one be canonical and always available?

The URSI URL is for the entire issue, which is a bit off-putting. I doubt whether the IEEE Xplore version will go away any time soon; if it does, we can redirect. Ironically, the canonical URL does not work: https://doi.org/10.23919/URSIRSB.2016.7909995 I filed a bug report for that.