Robert Elz via tz said:
| For example, despite recent events | in Kosovo we haven't had to worry about creating a name like | Europe/Pristina, and this is a win.
I don't recall seeing anyone request one, which is one reason for not creating it - but if they did, I believe you should. I certainly don't see failing to create it as any kind of win.
I understand the argument - the guidelines say there is no need for a new zone as the time has been the same as ... since at least 1970. And you can claim that you're not making a political decision because of that - though people in Kosovo might (one day) start complain that you're a Russian/Serbian puppet, and are trying to pretend Kosovo doesn't exist.
So why doesn't that argument apply to Europe/Glasgow and Europe/Cardiff? Followed in quick succession by Europe/Redruth. -- Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler, Email: clive@davros.org | it will get its revenge. Web: http://www.davros.org | - Henry Spencer Mobile: +44 7973 377646