Nov. 22, 2006
10:23 p.m.
Small comment - I understand this reasoning: On 11/22/06, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
This patch migrates the WA DST idiosyncracies into Rule lines, where they probably belonged anyway. I realize the official legislation specifies dates rather than "Mar lastSun", but we commonly reverse-engineer the underlying rules in other situations and might as well do so consistently here.
but then there's this proposed rule:
+Rule AW 2006 only - Dec 3 2:00s 1:00 -
With reverse engineering of rules like lastSun, why not "Dec Sun>=1"? Best regards, markus