Sept. 3, 2013
3:52 p.m.
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Shanks information has at least some degree of thought behind it,
As a longtime reader of the Shanks data, I have a good feeling for when it's reliable and when it isn't. This is definitely a place where isn't.
the consumers of the tzdb see the data as fact
That's a problem, since much of the data are wrong. And it's all the more reason to omit dubious data when we can, which is the case here.