Paul Eggert <eggert@twinsun.com> writes:
Ideally the automated procedure, whatever it is, would generate XHTML 1.1, which is the latest version of HTML. (Hmm, I see that tz-link.htm and tz-art.htm specify XHTML 1.0; time to upgrade.)
I would be a bit careful about moving to XHTML 1.1 without analyzing all of the issues. XHTML 1.1 is not really the same thing as HTML; for example, it's not supposed to be served out as text/html. Many browsers don't really support XHTML 1.1 yet. XHTML 1.0 or HTML 4.01 Strict are still the best choices for portable HTML. Future versions of XHTML are not intended to be backward compatible upgrades to HTML, but instead are moving the standard intentionally in a completely different direction towards a purer XML-based markup world that not all browsers are prepared for. -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>