Aug. 6, 2014
6:32 p.m.
Lester Caine wrote:
If it is proven wrong because there is a proven correct version then OK, but switching one unproven fact with another ...
Those changes mostly remove dubious data, rather than replacing one dubious datum with another. In a few places dubious data were replaced with less-dubious data, but these exceptions were individually justified with sources. In the long run it'd be better to remove dubious data, or at least move it to a "dubious" area optionally available to users who prefer it; but one step at a time.