July 3, 2014
3:21 p.m.
No issue with Ürümqi zone. Questioning whether the other three Chinese zones should be removed or instead updated to the 1949 transition date. Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 3 juil. 2014 à 01:02, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> a écrit :
On 07/01/2014 03:56 PM, J Andrew Lipscomb wrote: Isn't this in conflict with what was decided last cycle re: pre-1970 differences (e. g. the Toronto/Montreal mess)? I don't see the conflict. Asia/Beijing and Asia/Urumqi differ in behavior since 1970, whereas America/Toronto and America/Montreal did not differ.