On 2020-12-29 22:45, Brian Park wrote:
Then I wish you had said exactly that, instead of having me go off on a tangent.
So do I. I am sorry to have lead you astray.
Maybe I am misinterpreting something, but I don't understand why you are being confrontational about this. I am presenting results from 2 different TZ parsers, using algorithms developed independently. I thought this would be interesting and relevant to this topic.
I do not want to sound confrontational but I do want to be short. My comment on your original post concerned only one sentence, and I did in no way comment on the rest of that post.
I don't understand the point that you are trying to make.
The complete sentence I commented about is: The core of why it "just works" seems be in the interpretation of the "2:00 transition to US Rule", and the fact that "2:00" is Wall-time, not S-time or U-time: I understand this to imply that a time of day value with a postfix "s" or "u" in the UNTIL column would preclude that it "just works". Now there are cases where two transitions (an increase in SAVE value after a decrease in STDOFF) are colaesced, and where the corresponding UNTIL column has a time of day value with a postfixed "s"; one example is for Kaliningrad. My comment asks how your code deals with such cases, given that it would not "just work". I hope this makes my point clear(er). Michael Deckers.