Dec. 8, 2016
11:17 p.m.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Brian Inglis <Brian.Inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca> wrote:
That paper is *not* a summary of the results of the same research: it is adapted from the 10 year old Canon partly based on some of the same authors' results from 2 years earlier, as the year in the URI indicates!
You are right! I stand corrected. I saw the same authors on whose research this reference that I knew is based, and assumed it was the same work without checking the new paper. Cheers