John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU> wrote on Fri, 7 Oct 2011 at 03:15:23 +0000 in <20111007031523.GB25751@homeworld.netbsd.org>:
The suit, if you wish to read it is, Astrolabe, Inc. v. Olson et al, docket number 1:11-cv-11725-GAO. The other plaintiff is Paul Eggert. ... http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.mad.139342/
The last activity the Court's docket reports is the summons to Eggert and Olson was issued on September 30th, and the summons has not been returned (i.e. they have not been served). As I understand it, according to rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Astrolabe had 120 days to serve Eggert and Olson with the complaint. Assuming calendar days, which I think are correct here, that 120 days would be up as of January 28, about 2 weeks ago. I am rather uncertain what to think. --jhawk@mit.edu John Hawkinson 09/30/2011 #3 Summons Issued as to Paul Eggert, Arthur David Olson. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (York, Steve) (Entered: 09/30/2011)