Tobias, The Database Coordinator has a pretty free hand. That having been said, I would suggest that this is a rather evolutionary process, and we can always have follow-up work that further codifies Theory, should that be what people want to do. Eliot On 9/25/11 3:32 PM, Tobias Conradi wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
On 09/24/11 09:30, Tobias Conradi wrote:
Does anyone know why the rules of tz names are changed in the IANA tz text? This was part of the IANA drafting and editing process, which is pretty longwinded. Although the wording changed, the intent remained pretty much the same, as far as I can tell.
The word "accurate" only occurs once in the document. Therefore ----------- "3. Making Updates to the TZ Database New TZ names (e.g. locations) are only to be created when the scope of the region a name was envisioned to cover is no longer accurate." ------------ leaves open to guessing what means "accurate".
In the Theory file it says "Include at least one location per time zone rule set per country."
The word "country" is not even mentioned once in the IANA text.
Although the wording changed, the intent remained pretty much the same, as far as I can tell. Any intent that is included in the text can be obtained from the text. Any other cannot.