"Philip Paeps" <philip@trouble.is> writes:
Unfortunately, I don't think it's practical to retroactively apply a CC0 tag. Formally, you'd need each individual contributor to agree. Given the age of the tz project, this may be impossible.
Yeah, that. FWIW, we've had roughly comparable discussions in the Postgres project. The existing PG copyright is a mess: it's sloppily worded and it protects nobody except the University of California. But we've concluded that changing it is effectively impossible, because there's no way to get the concurrence of every past contributor. And that conclusion was arrived at in 2000 ... so it'd be that much worse now. In practice, the amount of interest in changing the license wording has dropped to about nothing since 2000, too. People are far more used to the concept of community-owned open source code than they were then, and the fact that the governing document is loosely phrased bothers nobody now other than perhaps some bean-counters. In short, I think politely ignoring SPDX is the right thing to do. It's trying to solve a problem that was real enough twenty years ago, but people have gotten over it. regards, tom lane