Re: [tz] [PROPOSED] Rename asctime symbols if required in private.h

On 10/15/19 4:24 AM, Roland Young wrote:

Note: if my assumption about "other cases" is wrong, the preprocessor guards in this patch should be omitted.

Thanks, I installed the patch without the preprocessor guards (see attached) since I don't see why asctime/asctime_r should be different from ctime/ctime_r etc. RESERVE_STD_EXT_IDS is not the only reason that the symbols might be renaming; it could be that the symbols are not reserved but you want to rename them anyway. If I am missing something and a fix is needed here, it can be the subject of a separate patch.