Feb. 15, 2016
9:05 a.m.
Russ Allbery wrote:
my sense is that it's much less common to use the two-digit form in day-to-day use of ISO 8601,
Yes, I have the same sense. This is the main argument for having 4 digits in the offset. I also have the sense that 4 digits have been quite a bit more popular in this thread (though I'm not sure how we'd handle Liberia before 1972 -- maybe give up and leave that one alphabetic...).
and it's intended to indicate lower precision.
I don't have this sense for 2-digit zones. I would not expect (and have never seen) India's time zone being listed as "+06" because someone felt like rounding +0530 up.