Gentlemen: Could we please drop the discussion of the minutia of version control systems, please? In the first part, this is a bikeshed -- many have opinions and they mostly do not matter, any color would do. Secondly, it's really a question of the discretion of the maintainer. Let us as assume that is kre, and let him deal with it as he wishes. It doesn't really have much effect on the data. Several of you have published repositories and collections, and that is great. They'll work well for people. But I know many of us depend on this list (and its predecessor) for useful communication about timezine information, and from that perspective its signal-to-noise ratio has worsened dramatically. So, can we please try to drastically reduce the volume of traffic here that pertains to the details of version control options, and just like kre do as he wishes? Thank you. --jhawk@mit.edu John Hawkinson +1 617 797 0250 p.s.: As I noted on apps-discuss, RECAP is now working properly, (a bug handling an archive.org error condition was fixed by Dhruv Kapadia), and all of http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.mad.139342/gov.uscourts.mad.139... http://archive.recapthelaw.org/mad/139342/ http://www.archive.org/details/gov.uscourts.mad.139342/ should work now. I like the first one, but others might prefer the other presentations. I also said there, "I will commit to keeping it up to date within a day, and probably more like within the hour, of any court filings." I'll also make sure this list is aware of filings in the case, at least as long as doing so doesn't seem to generate an annoying level of traffic.