Paul Eggert said:
I can set up a new list tomorrow. What would be a good name? time.h? c-time? c9x-time? c200x-time? :-)
Any API changes are too late for draft C9x, which (despite its name) is carved in stone. I believe the C standards committee informally calls the next version C0x, so c0x-time might be a good name. Clive Feather would be a good person to ask, since he's on the ISO C committee and knows their naming scheme; I'll CC this to him.
Make it c-time. This work doesn't have to wait for C0X - it can go in as a Normative Addendum to C9X. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive@demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 Internet Expert | Home: <clive@davros.org> | Fax: +44 20 8371 1037 Demon Internet Ltd. | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 973 377646