Aug. 5, 2014
3:10 p.m.
Eliot Lear wrote:
On 8/4/14, 1:32 AM, Robert Elz wrote:
Yes, it does, and if you really wanted to get rid of all unverified data, you'd remove all of it (from all zones) - the format requires that something be there, not any particular transitions.
What I like about Paul's approach is that he can make changes in perhaps small batches so that people can review them in bite-sized pieces.
Yes, and the recent contretemps started mainly because of a batch that was too large for some in the audience. The latest proposal is a small fraction of the original proposal. I would like to continue to remove data lacking a reliable source -- a process that's been going on for some time -- but I guess it'll be one step at a time.