Steve Allen via tz <tz@iana.org> writes:
On Sun 2021-05-23T10:54:16+0800 Philip Paeps via tz hath writ:
This is a good point. Particularly since LMT is only "correct" for very narrow regions within any given timezone.
In general LMT is not even correct for the city at the given location.
Yeah, this. The entire premise of tzdb's zones is that the same time is/was observed over the whole area of the zone. Even granting that the time in New York City back in 1883 was exactly GMT-4:56:02, surely that's complete fiction for most of the zone? We're not helping anybody by specifying many digits of fictional precision. Having said that, I do buy John Hawkinson's point that fooling around with tzdb's data for past timestamps is a bad idea. But that should apply equally to Paul's proposal to drop the existing data for times later than the LMT era. regards, tom lane