On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:29:16AM +0100, Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne@joda.org> wrote:
I oppose this direction for the tzdb on principle.
TL;DR: The tzdb isn't broken. Don't fix it.
I agree, this new direction of removing data without need is too drastic.
I also doubt that you have or will get consensus to push through such a change.
Indeed, I have yet to see somebody on this list backing these changes, so this doesn't even seem to be controversial.
to add a +1 to this email.
+1 On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:51:35AM +0200, gunther vermeir <gunther.vermeir@oracle.com> wrote:
I might have missed a really good reason why this all has been done ,
I think it hasn't been given. The only explanation so far was that the Theory file requires it, which has been shown not to be so. -- The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG -----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net ----==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schmorp@schmorp.de -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\