Hi Simon, Thanks for the feed back. On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> wrote:
Tobias,
A draft's name is irrelevant. It will be gone once it gets published as an RFC. Other than in the two drafts' names, "timezone" is absent from the proposed milestone text so I don't see any terminology issue.
All,
My comments on the proposed milestones:
- I don't see the need for 2-3 months between WGLC and submission to IESG. If issues are tracked tightly during the whole process [RFC7282], WGLC becomes a formality and you can send to IESG right away. In any case, I suggest removing the WGLC milestones: the "send to IESG" milestones are sufficient.
I got your point. The time between WGLC and IESG submission has been provisioned in case some issues/comments are lately reported on the mailing list. However we hope this should not happen and encourage people to comment as soon as possible.
- "September 2016 re-charter the WG": This should not be a milestone. Rechartering is something that is done out of necessity in the present moment, not something that a WG aims to do in the future. Not having the milestone does not impact in any way the possibility of a rechartering.
I am also fine with that.
Simon
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Tobias Conradi <tc@tobiasconradi.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: ...
These are the milestones we propose. If you have any comments, please feel free to post them before Tuesday August 19 so we can consider them.
2014-08-13 today 2014-08-19 the mentioned Tuesday = 6 days
This seems rather short, see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tzdist/current/msg00004.html 2014-07-03 proposal to Mr. Daboo to change "timezone" to "time zone"
2014-08-08 this change has been done for the WG name
= 1 month, 5 days
But simple renaming not yet done for the drafts mentioned in the charter -------------- The working group will use the following drafts as initial input for its work: draft-douglass-timezone-service-11 draft-daboo-caldav-timezone-ref-01 --------------
So, shall people use drafts with outdated terminology as basis for discussion?
I prefer to fix the drafts ASAP so that their contents can be discussed using consistent terminology.
-- Tobias Conradi Rheinsberger Str. 18 10115 Berlin Germany
_______________________________________________ Tzdist mailing list Tzdist@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist
-- Daniel Migault Orange Labs -- Security +33 6 70 72 69 58