Robert Elz via tz said:
One zone (at least) per authority (nb: not country) should be the goal, as I recall it, that's what we used to have.
Do we know who the authorities are? Three examples: (1) I don't know who the authorities in the USA are. I know that the Secretary of Transport has some kind of authority, but I was under the impression that state governments are also involved in changing what zone a state is in. I know that Arizona seems to have at least three separate authorities. And as for the mess in Indiana ... (2) The EU is the authority for the transition rules throughout the EU, but doesn't select what zone a country is in. That's a national matter. (3) Does Eucla have an authority? Or was it just a few people in the pub that decided to change the clocks and everyone else went along with it? (Does Eucla have a pub? Surely it does - it's in Oz.)
And to answer Clive's question about whether Wales should have its own timezone, the answer entirely depends upon whether the Welsh parliament (such as it is) has the authority to alter the time in Wales,
So far it doesn't. And you've missed my point, which is that people (e.g. the Welsh) don't accept 3166 as the authoritative list of countries for domain names, so why would they for time zones. Which is why "at least one zone per 3166 'country'" isn't automatically going to prevent political arguments. -- Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler, Email: clive@davros.org | it will get its revenge. Web: http://www.davros.org | - Henry Spencer Mobile: +44 7973 377646