May 23, 2013
1:20 p.m.
On Thu, May 23, 2013, at 8:35, John Hawkinson wrote:
This paragraph from Random832 was just quoted: | We already don't handle (to make up an arbitrary example) people | who moved from New York to Phoenix in 1992, but spent a month-long | vacation in Florida in 2004.
And I realize I don't understand what this is getting at. (Maybe this is unimportant?)
We don't have zones that track people movements, and I don't see why we would.
Why do we have zones that track _cities'_ movements from one timezone to another? It's arbitrary to demand one (to the point of objecting to putting it behind an 'advanced' option) but not the other.